blog.Tribulationperiod.com

OPPS! THERE GOES ANOTHER RUBBER TREE PLANT!

July 16, 2011

http://www.tribulatinperiod.com/

Foreign policy of any country

is directed by what is best for its National Interest, particularly if its basic goal is to continue to exist as a country. Pakistan does not have a border with two oceans on its east and west, nor does it have Mexico and Canada on its southern and northern borders. Pakistan has Afghanistan Taliban to its north and west, Iran to its southwest, India to its east and southeast, China to its northeast, former Soviet Union Satellites to its north, and multiple imbedded terrorist groups across its countryside. So what would its first National Interest priority be labeled? How about SURVIVAL! I don’t care how many generals and diplomats Pakistan sends to the US to mend our badly wounded relations, it must presently maintain a good buddy relationship with those around and in it, because when the US pulls out of Afghanistan, SURVIVAL is their National Interest.

When American troops leave Afghanistan, both Iraq and Afghanistan will quickly hate the US and Israel as much as they did in the past.

Pakistan, along with both Islamic countries, will eventually become a part of a massive caliphate.

The Pakistani President is like any other king, as are the other leaders in charge, when they consider how the current situation will finish. They will be surrounded by the aforementioned countries, and both their immediate

and long range National Interest will be SURVIVAL. Pakistan can see the end of the future scenario, which is a great way off, and their present actions are governed by what will happen when the US pulls out of Afghanistan. Their immediate enemies have long memories.

Luke 14:31,32 – Or what king, going to make war against another king, sitteth not down first, and consulteth whether he be able with ten thousand to meet him that cometh against him with twenty thousand? [32] Or else, while the other is yet a great way off, he sendeth an ambassage, and desireth conditions of peace.

Begin Excerpt from MEMRI

Middle East Media Review

July 11, 2011

http://www.tribulationperiod.com/

Sabotaging American, British Military and Intelligence Efforts

The Pakistani military campaign to control Afghanistan has been accompanied by the expulsion of U.S. and British military

and intelligence officials from Pakistan. According to an April 21 report in the Pakistani media, some 500 CIA personnel were told to leave Pakistan in the beginning of this year. In late June, Pakistani Defense Minister Chaudhry Ahmed Mukhtar revealed that Pakistan has asked the CIA to leave the Shamsi airbase in Pakistan’s Baluchistan province, from which drones are dispatched to monitor and attack the Taliban safe havens in the Pakistani tribal region. In addition, 18 British military trainers have been told to leave.

The Political/Diplomatic Campaign

Pakistan has also stepped up its diplomatic and political efforts to influence Afghanistan and undercut Western influence there.

Sabotaging U.S.-Taliban Negotiations

In June 2011, Pakistan informed the U.S. that the U.S.-Taliban peace talks could not succeed without involving Pakistan. To reinforce this message of Pakistan, the Pakistan-backed Taliban have been carrying out suicide bombings in Kabul, Kandahar, Jalalabad and o

ther Afghan cities. Afghan NDS spokesman Lotfullah Mashal said: “Unfortunately, neighboring countries, in particular the Pakistani Army has continued to intervene in different ways ranging from suicide attacks, roadside bombings to commando-style attacks on hotels, mosques and hospitals.”

Pakistan Presents Written Demands to Karzai, Aimed at Subjugating Afghanistan

On April 16, 2011, the entire top Pakistani leadership (except for President Asif Zardari) descended on Kabul for bilateral talks with the Afghan leaders.[16] According to reports in the Afghan media, Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani presented Karzai with a set of written demands: Afghanistan must sever its relationship with the U.S. and forge ties with China; keep Pakistan informed on the training and number of the Afghan security forces; appoint Pakistani officials to Afghan government institutions; and clarify Pakistan’s share in Afghan mining and development projects; in addition, future Afghan governments must implement Pakistani strategies, and Pakistan must be made aware of any agreement between Afghanistan and its Western allies, including the U.S. and NATO. The claim that Pakistan has demanded to incorporate Pakistani officials into the Afghan government institutions may appear far-fetched.

However, this would not be an unprecedented move.

In the 1990s, when Afghanistan was under the Taliban, Pakistani nationals indeed served in the Afghan government.

Pakistani Army Seeks to Formally Influence the Future of Afghanistan

During the talks, it was also decided to set up a two-tier Afghan-Pakistani joint commission, composed of both military and government officials, which is to include Pakistani Army Chief General Kayani and ISI Chief Lt.-Gen. Shuja Pasha. The sole purpose of the creation of a two-tier commission was to create a formal role for Pakistani military and its Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in Afghanistan, as the two countries previously did have an Afghan-Pakistan joint commission. Thus, for the first time, the Pakistani military has officially embedded itself in an institution that will shape Afghanistan’s future. Speaking after the Kabul talks, President Karzai said: “The Pakistani prime minister, the chief of Army staff, and the intelligence agency chief would now represent the country on the peace commission, charged with finding a way of reaching a peace deal with the Taliban.”

Karzai Instructed to Forge Relations with China

During the April 16 talks, in a bid to weaken the Western influence in the region, Prime Minister Gilani also asked President Karzai to forge relations with China. According to a report in the Pashtu-language Khedmatgar Wrazpanra, the Pakistanis asked the Afghan leaders to establish strategic relations with China instead of the U.S., telling them that the U.S. has been defeated in Afghanistan, and that Ch

ina was therefore a better ally for both Pakistan and Afghanistan. Gilani also advised the Afghanis not to allow the long-term presence of the U.S. forces in their country.

Pakistani Defense Minister Confirms Plan to Involve the Pakistani Taliban in the Afghan Settlement

Pakistan and Afghanistan have conducted a series of bilateral talks with the aim of brokering peace with the Pakistani-backed Taliban in Afghanistan.

Obviously, any settlement will involve give-and-take with the Afghan Taliban.

However, it seems that Pakistan also aims to involve the Pakistani Taliban, backed by the Pakistani army and intelligence, in the negotiations.

This is evident from a June 28 statement by Pakistani Defense Minister Chaudhry Ahmed Mukhtar, who said that both the Afghan and Pakistani Taliban would be involved in the peace process: “The government [of Pakistan] knows where the (Pakistani) Taliban are and where their groups are based, and contacting them is no problem. We will have talks to all Taliban,” Mukhtar said.

Afghan Political Commentator:

“The Pakistani Government regards Afghanistan as a Pakistani Colony”

Afghans saw the Pakistani demands as a case of unabashed interference in Afghanistan’s domestic affairs. Political analyst Noor Ul-Haq Ulomi blamed the Karzai government for accepting the Pakistani hegemony and collaborating with Pakistan’s plan through the bilateral talks.

In an interview with the Afghan television channel TOLO News, he noted that the “close friendship” between Karzai and Pakistani leadership was “hidden” earlier, and added: “Pakistan has never been honest with us.” Other political commentators accused the Pakistani government of violating diplomatic norms by demanding major concessions from Afghanistan. Former Afghan politician Sulaiman Layaq said: “The Pakistani government regards Afghanistan as a

Pakistani colony. If Pakistan really offers the conditions to Afghan government, it is disrespectful to the independence of Afghanistan.”

* Tufail Ahmad is Director of MEMRI’s South Asia Studies Project

(www.memri.org/sasp);

Y. Carmon is President of MEMRI.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.

A PREDICTION OF AN OUTCOME OF CURRENT SYRIAN EVENTS

BY FORMER SYRIAN VICE-PRESIDENT ABD AL-HALIM KHADDAM

HE BEGINS EXCERPT: “I EXPECT THE ARMY TO DISINTEGRATE.”

ENDS: “I EXPECT THE HEAD OF THE REGIME TO BE IN PRISON”

July 15, 2011

http://www.tribulationperiod.com/

The history of Syrian governments is filled with coups, assassinations, and jailing of presidents, so the forecast of Khaddam may turn out to be valid.

The following three paragraphs were extracted from Wikipedia.

From 1961 to 1963 he (Bashar Assad’s Father) worked at the Ministry of Sea Transportation while focusing on Ba’ath Party political activities. Assad and others planned the 1963 coup d’état, which took the Ba’ath Party to power. Following the coup, Assad returned to

the Air Force in the rank of major. Syria was officially ruled by Amin Hafiz, a Sunni Muslim, but was in practice dominated by young Alawite Ba’athists.

The following year, 1964, Assad jumped several ranks to become a general and was appointed to the Ba’ath Party’s regional command.

The following year, he became Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force. This military power allowed Assad, operating in conjunction with Salah Jadid, to overthrow the government of Amin Hafiz in 1966.

In 1966, the Ba’ath launched a coup d’état within the government and cleared the other parties from the government. Assad became Minister of Defence and wielded considerable influence over government policy.

However, there was tension between the dominant radical wing of the Ba’ath Party, which promoted an aggressive foreign policy and rapid social reform, and Assad’s more pragmatic, military-based faction. After being discredited by the failure of the Syrian military in the Six-Day War in 1967, and enraged by the aborted Syrian intervention in the Jordanian-Palestinian Black September war, the government faced conflict within its ranks.

By the time President Nureddin al-Atassi and the de facto leader, deputy secretary general of the Ba’ath Party Salah Jadid, realized the threat and ordered Assad and Tlass be stripped of all party and government power, it was too late. Assad swiftly launched a bloodless intra-party coup, the Corrective Revolution of 1970.

The party was purged, Atassi and Jadid jailed, and Assad loyalists installed in key posts throughout the government.

Begin Excerpt from MEMRI

Middle East Media Research Institute

Former Syrian Vice-President Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: In Three Months, I Expect the Heads of the Syrian Regime to Be in Prison

Special Dispatch No.

3986

July 11, 2011

Following are excerpts from an interview with former Syrian vice president Abd Al-Halim Khaddam, which aired on Al-Arabiya TV on July 4, 2011.

“I Expect the Army to Disintegrate”

Interviewer: “As observers say, the decisive factor in the Tunisian and Egyptian revolution was the army, even though the people played a major role. In Tunisia, the army was neutral, and in Egypt, it sided with the people. In Syria, as you’ve said more than once, the army seems to be siding with the regime. This means that as long as this is the case, the revolution will not succeed.”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “This army will not remain in its current situation. It will not continue to be an implement of oppression and murder. The spirit of patriotism will be rekindled among many of the army officers.

This army will not persist in its current position.

The day will soon come when the army finds itself at a dead-end, with no choice but to return to the people.”

Interviewer: “Is this analysis wishful thinking, or is it based on information?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: ” This is not an analysis.

It is based on my own knowledge of the army’s structure, and of the circumstances in which the officers find themselves.”

Interviewer: “Are your hopes based on a rift within the army’s ranks?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “I expect not only rifts.

I expect the army to disintegrate.”

Interviewer: “Do you mean a rift along sectarian lines?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “No.”

Interviewer: “Along what lines, then?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “Patriotic lines.” […]

There is no Military Solution for Syria Vis-a-Vis Israel

Interviewer: “Are you saying the region – Israel, for example – would tolerate such anarchy in Syria, on its border?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “Israel cannot do anything beyond its efforts to preserve the regime.”

Interviewer: “Who is behind Israel?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “Its interests, because it thinks…”
Interviewer: “No, some international forces adopt Israel’s view and defend its security.”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “Will a change of regime lead to war in the region

? Absolutely not.”

Interviewer: “I held an interview with one of the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood, who kept saying that the Syrian regime had not fired a single bullet at Israel since 1973. I asked him what they would do if they replaced the regime, and he said: ‘We will ignite the Golan Heights.’ What would you do? You are a different kind of opposition, consisting of ex-Ba’thists, and even present-day Ba’thists. Would you ignite the Golan Heights or make peace or make peace with Israel?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “Let me tell you something from the past.

After the 1973 war, when President Sadat moved towards making peace with Israel, we discussed the situation, and we became convinced that it would not be easy for us to wage war [again]. The USSR did not approve of this. Egypt was out of the picture. We were in the midst of a bitter conflict with Iraq. A civil war was raging in Lebanon. We could not s ay th

at we would wage a war in many years to come. Therefore, President Hafez Al-Assad decided to accept the Disengagement Agreement, leading to a status quo in the region.”

Interviewer: “Let me be brief, before we take another break. You are suggesting that in the Syria of the future, after the current regime, the situation will remain the same, without any military confrontation. Is that what you are saying?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “Look, when it comes to a military confrontation, there are many factors that must be taken into consideration: domestic, regional, and international factors.”

Interviewer: “In your view, do all these factors lead to maintaining the current situation?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “The current factors indicate that a military solution is not an option now.” […]

“The Fall of the [Syrian] Regime would Lead to the Liberation of Lebanon and to the Isolation of Hizbullah”

Interviewer: “In the event of a military intervention, do you think Iran would not intervene?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “Iran would undoubtedly be affected by the fall of the regime, because the Syrian regime allowed Iran to control a region stretching from the Mediterranean Sea to Afghanistan. The fall of the regime would lead to the liberation of Lebanon and to the isolation of Hizbullah. Iran would lose the Palestinian bargaining chip, as well as its influence in Iraq.”

Interviewer: “And therefore?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “Iran would be affected, but it would not do anything beyond what it is already doing.

It has already sent IRGC detachments, experts, advisors, and equipment.”

Interviewer: “Do you have any proof of that? Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Mu’alem was asked this recently, and he categorically denied it, saying that Iran gives Syria political support. Do you believe this? They say one thing, and you say another.”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “First of all, do you believe what this regime says? There are events witnessed by everyone, yet you say: ‘They say one thing, and you say another.’ Yes. People have seen Iranian buses, full of armed men, heading to Hauran. In Jisr Al-Shughour, they arrested six Iranians from the IRGC…”

Interviewer: “Were these six Iranians about to tip the balance in Syria?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “They were there. They were experts on military equipment.”

Interviewer: “Do you think that the Syrian regime is in need of [Iranian] military capabilities? After all, it has a huge army.”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “Yes, it needs combat experience and experience in oppression…”

Interviewer: “Doesn’t it have experience of its own when it comes to oppression?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “Not in this way, with the army entering cities, shelling them with tanks and cannons, violating all that is sacred, and humiliating people. Such a thing has never happened…”

Interviewer: “Didn’t it happen in Hama in 1982?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “It happened in Hama, but at that time there was a problem between the regime and the Muslim Brotherhood party…”
Interviewer: “So it is okay to attack Hama if Muslim Brotherhood members are there?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “The problem now is between the regime and the entire Syrian people.”

Interviewer: “I’d like to return to this point. When the Muslim Brotherhood was barricading itself in Hama, it was okay for the Syrian army to shell the city, in your view?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “That’s not what I said. I said that it is what the regime did. Nevertheless, it will be only fair, after the fall of the regime, to establish an inquiry commission that will investigate the issue of Hama, as well as the issue of the Tadmor [prison massacre in 1980], and will hold accountable the people who made this decision and carried it out.” […]

Interviewer: “In his latest press conference, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Mu’alem was asked what he thought would happen in three months’ time, and he said that he expected Syria to become a model of democracy. What do you expect will happen in Syria in three months?”

Abd Al-Halim Khaddam: “I expect the head of the regime to be in prison.”

[…]

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.

President Obama still ignoring a huge danger US faces in its Southwest

The “Partly” in the Hamas, Hizbullah & Mexican Drug Cartel Connection

Has Now Become 100 percent Believable Over Lengthy Period of Time

Just AS Paul’s Estimation OF “Partly” Eventually Became 100 Percent

Believable by the time when he wrote the second epistle to Corinth

It Is Certainly Past Time For The US To Close its Mexican Back Door

Before A FINAL Middle East War Begins In The Turbulent Mid-East!

July 15, 2011

http://www.tribulationperiod.com/

I Corinthians 1:11 – For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.

I Corinthians 11:18 – For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it.

II Corinthians 13:1,2 – This is the third time I am coming to you.

In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established.

[2] I told you before, and foretell you, as if I were present, the second time; and being absent now I write to them which heretofore have sinned, and to all other, that, if I come again, I will not spare:

I am persuaded it would be more in America’s immediate National Interest to have the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan policing our own borders rather than distant Islamic lands since Islamic terrorists have moved in “Next Door.” The immediate National Interest has now become our most pressing future National Interest.

The Following Excerpt by Katie Pavlich was extracted from Fox News

July 14, 2011

A Growing Terror Threat: Hezbollah in Latin America

by Katie Pavlich

Hezboll ah is

a very sophisticated terrorist group, with activity beyond criminal. Intelligence shows the group started pushing its terrorism initiative into South America a decade ago but upped its efforts in 2005, a new approach that is a threat to the United States. Testimony showed Hezbollah is strategically positioning itself in order to possibly launch a response to an Iranian attack either from the U.S. or Isreal on their nuclear program. Intelligence cited during the hearing also shows the group is interested in obtaining weapons of mass destruction, which should be taken seriously since the group has published entire books about how to build and use WMDs and terrorist operations are justified by Hezbollah’s belief in Islam’s ongoing struggle with the West through violent jihad.

Hezbollah has also been supplying explosives training to Mexican drug cartels operating along the U.S.-Mexico border, and tunnels used in the area are near replicas of weapons-smuggling tunnels built by Hezbollah and used in Lebanon. Since 2006, violence in Mexico has rapidly escaladed and cartels have become more ruthless.

In addition, Mexican cartels are serving as source of financing and easy entrance for the organization into the United States.

“Hezbollah members have used the porous U.S.-Mexico border as an entrance to the United States,” Vice President of the American Foreign Policy Council Ilan Berman said.

Farah agreed, saying that some gang members, who entered the U.S. through the southern border with Mexico, have been arrested in the U.S. proudly displaying Farsi tattoos. He also said these groups together have access to hundreds of millions of dollars and that money funneled back to the Middle East is used to purchase weapons for attacks on Israel.

GOP NewYork Rep. Pete King has called for Mexican drug cartels to be classified by the Department of Homeland Security as terrorist groups in order to better track finances and operations, and, knowing Mexican cartels are being trained to build tunnels and to use explosives by Hezbollah, a new classification for Mexican drug cartels would be appropriate. Hezbollah and drug cartels are actively exchanging technology and training.

It was also revealed during the hearing that unstable political atmospheres in the Middle East could make Hezbollah an even larger threat to U.S. national security. Hezbollah also has the potential to gain even more power through the rise of Iran’s nuclear program.

“As the events in the Middle East and with the Arab spring continue to unfold, we must keep a close eye on Hezbollah,” Democrat Rep. Jackie Speier of California said.

Begin Excerpts from a multitude of past headings from articles on this subject:

Hamas and Hezbollah Training Paying-Off: 29 Beheaded by Mexican …

Hamas and Hezbollah Training Paying-Off: 29 Beheaded by Mexican Drug Cartel. Posted by Maggie On May – 16

– 2011. MOISES CASTILLO @ (AP)/CNS News: …

http://www.chandlerswatch.com/2011/05/16/hamas-and-hezbollah-training-paying-off-29-beheaded-by-mexican-drug-cartel/

Mexico – Hezbollah and Hamas is partnered with drug cartels – ties …

May 7, 2011 … Mexico – Hezbollah and Hamas is partnered with drug cartels – ties … Was Al Qaeda a much more elaborate and more trained organization back …

Mexico – Hezbollah and Hamas is partnered with drug cartels – ties to Lebanon – tunnels in San Diego

YouTube – ALEX JONES CLAIMS HEZBOLLAH IS TRAINING MEXICAN DRUG …

Nov 25, 2010 … ALEX JONES CLAIMS HEZBOLLAH IS TRAINING MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS. … ://www. infowars.com/ us-government-hamas-hezbollah-collaborating-with-mexi.

YouTube – Muslim Hezbollah Terrorists Training Mexican Drug Cartels‏

Nov 22, 2010 … Muslim Hezbollah Terrorists Training Mexican Drug Cartels …

Congresswoman: Hizballah jihadists colluding with drug cartels on …

Jun 25, 2010 … Iran-tied terror group Hezbollah may be colluding with drug cartels along … believes Hezbollah could be training Mexican drug cartels to make bombs.

… they think of Hezbollah (and Hamas) in the border region where …

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/06/congresswoman-hizballah-jihadists-colluding-with-drug-cartels-on-mexican-border.html

Hezbollah, Hamas Raise Money for ‘Terrorist Activities’ From Drug

Jun 9, 2010 … As evidence that Hezbollah and Hamas are doing business with South American into very close contact with Colombian and Mexican drug trafficking cartels….. Terror training camps and arsenals have been established, …

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2531271/posts

Hamas is next door | Facebook

Hezbollah has also been supplying explosives training to Mexican drug cartels operating along the U.S.-Mexico border, and tunnels used in the area are near …

http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=15704546335&topic=68807

How Many Nefarious Groups are Included in the Worldwide Drug Cartels

?

Feb 16, 2011 … It identifies the groups Hezbollah, Hamas, the Palestine Liberation ….. IRAN SURROGATES, HEZBOLLAH TRAINING MEXICAN CARTELS Terror News …

Destroy Worship Places, But Save Holy Hothouses!

Congresswoman Raises Red Flag on Hezbollah-Cartel Nexus on U.S.

Jun 25, 2010 … Iran-tied terror group Hezbollah may be colluding with drug cartels along … Hezbollah could be training Mexican drug cartels to make bombs. … coffers of Islamic Radical Groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas,” he said, …

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/25/congresswoman-raises-red-flag-hezbollah-cartel-nexus-border/

Hezbollah uses Mexican drug routes into U.S. « Ark-La-Tex 9-12 Project

Jun 3, 2011 … Drug Money Funding Chavez, Islamic Terror Groups • Hamas and Hezbollah Training Paying-Off: 29 Beheaded by Mexican Drug Cartel →

Hezbollah uses Mexican drug routes into U.S.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by

the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.

If Iran’s current Nuclear development Rate isn’t shut Down,

Get ready for an underground nuclear test in Iran in 2012,

A Small Launch-Capable arsenal of Nuke Missiles in 2013,

And Conventional war starting between 2013 and 2015,

When Israel Is Counterattacked By TEN Islamic HORNS,

Led In A Jihad By Islamic Antichrist KING Of The North,

WHO IS The ‘Another’ Eleventh HORN Of Daniel 7:24!

July 14, 2011

http://www.tribulationperiod.com/

Revelation 17:12,13 – And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. [13] These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.

Daniel 7:24-27 – And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings. [25] And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. [26] But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end.

[27] And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him.

The following 5 Scriptures refer to the 2nd Advent of Christ, NOT what is called the Rapture which occurs when he comes FOR the saved, BUT when he comes WITH the saved afterwards at his 2nd Advent.

Luke 21:27 – And then shall

they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.

Revelation 1:7 – Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.

Zechariah 14:5 – And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the Lord my God shall come, and all the saints with thee.

Daniel 7:13,14 – I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds

of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. [14] And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.

Zechariah 14:9 – And the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and his name one.

Begin Excerpt 1 from Arutz Sheva

2012: Iran’s Atomic Daydreams

By Gavriel Queenann

July 12, 2011

Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Khameni has ordered the revolutionary guards to “immediately” proceed with the completion of an atomic bomb with hopes of a test in 2012, Iran Press News reports.

The order includes testing and arming of missiles capable of delivering a nuclear payload, according to sources inside the Revolutionary Guards, the report says.

According to the report Khameini’s order stems from the belief that Israel and the United States lack the courage to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities and that they are “frozen in place and confused as to what action to take.”

Iran has said US-backed sanctions have had ‘no effect.’

Khameini and his advisors have – according to the report – concluded from Western inaction that the time is ripe for the Iranian regime to become a nuclear-armed state without any interference from the outside.

Reports of an Iranian nuke in 2012 have been increasingly common in the past several months.

Bomb Fantasies

An article, entitled “The Day After after the Iranian Nuclear Test Will be a Normal Day,” recently appeared on an Iranian website, Gerdab.ir, which is run by the Revolutionary Guards.

Presenting numerous would-be fantasy headlines for the day after an Iranian nuclear test, the site sets up the day-dreamt scenario: “In the deserts of central Iran, where the Americans and some western countries wanted to bury their nuclear waste, an underground nuclear explosion has occured.”

Among the many faux headlines that follow one reads, “Washington Post: ‘Iran’s nuclear explosion, consternation in Tel Aviv.'”

The article then says the day after an Iranian bomb test, “Everyone will be able to go about their business as usual, but in the eyes of many we will have new power. It will be a day for Iranians to be filled with pride.”

Perhaps more disturbing is the Quaranic verse the article ends with (Al Enfal 60):

“And prepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may terrify the enemy of Allah.”

Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said Monday Iran was fulfilling “all its duties” towards the IAEA, the UN’s atomic energy watchdog.

Bomb Realities
Iran, which for years only enriched uranium

to the 3.5 percent level out of fear of retaliation by the international community, recently moved its enrichment efforts to an underground facility and raised

its enrichment levels to 20 percent.

Twenty percent enrichment is a significant step towards what is needed for weaponization and far more than is needed to generate electrical power.

Iran reportedly has over 3600 kilograms of enriched uranium at 3.5 percent, enough for three nuclear bombs if enriched further. It also has an announced inventory of 40 kilograms of 20 percent enriched uranium. If true, it would take Iran 2-3 months to further enrich their stockpile into 20 kilograms of enriched uranium over 90 percent, sufficient for one nuclear warhead.

The IAEA revealed in a recent report that Iran has sought and experimented with certain technologies that could make a type of atom bomb known as an implosion device, considered more advanced than the bomb America used on Hiroshima.

(IsraelNationalNews.com)

Begin Excerpt 2 from DEBKAfile

Iran has already built a nuclear warhead pilot

DEBKAfile DEBKA-Net-Weekly

July 5, 2011, 11:44 AM (GMT+02:00)

The latest DEBKA-Net-Weekly out Friday uncovered Iran’s surreptitious leaps and bounds toward a home-made nuclear weapon. Tehran has not only executed four nuclear-capable missile tests, but actually constructed a nuclear warhead prototype.

This issue showed how Tehran had crossed every red line set by the West against Iran acquiring nuclear arms by furtively exploiting the months of furious Arab unrest for high speed, undisturbed progress.

Western and Israeli intelligence are now waking up to some unpleasant surprises.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.

Egyptians will end up governed by a Muslim Brotherhood Caliph

The Main Goal Of A Muslim Brotherhood Was Always A Caliphate

Under a Muslim Brotherhood Caliph who Would Establish Sharia

Law Islamic Government Under Which Its Citizens Worship Allah

Laying their tribute in the Capital before the Caliph’s seat Steps

Future Caliph Of A Caliphate Has Napoleon Conquest Character!

July 13, 2011

http://www.tribulationperiod.com/

Daniel 11:42,43 – He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape. [43] But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps. (As bordering parts of his caliphate paying tribute)

Begin Excerpt from MEMRI

Middle East Media Research Institute

US-Based Egyptian Scholar Mamoun Fandy Blames US Aid for “the Ruin of Egypt” and Says: The US May Be Handing Egypt Over to the Muslim Brotherhood Just Like It Handed Post-Saddam Iraq over to Iran

Clip No. 3021

July 4, 2011

Following are excerpts from an interview with US-based Egyptian scholar Mamoun Fandy, which aired on ANB TV on July 4, 2011:

Mamoun Fandy: This revolution was not made in Tahrir Square, or in Cairo in general, as is commonly believed. The first martyrs of the revolution – in fact, most of the martyrs – were from the cities of Suez and Alexandria. If not for the steadfastness of the people of Suez, the people at Tahrir Square would not have persevered. The Central Security Forces and Mubarak’s regime were defeated in Suez. They were first defeated in Suez and Alexandria.

Interviewer: The same happened in Tunisia.

Mamoun Fandy: Yes. Bouazizi was not from the capital Tunis, but in Sidi Bouzid. It is the periphery that is generating such spectacles, not the capitals. With all due respect, Cairo is a failing city, by any standard. Its architecture is not fit to be called “the architecture of freedom.” And its streets cannot be labeled “the streets of freedom.” This is the architecture of oppression, which will only generate a new kind of dictatorship. We must open up our horizons, and see the entire country, from north to south. Reducing the country to a single city reflects the notion of a “hydraulic society,” which is controlled by dams. Wherever there is a dam, you control the water, and Cairo has become the center of political and cultural dams.

This is the basic notion of Eastern tyranny, as critiqued by Marx and as existed in Asian regimes – the “Asiatic mode of production.” Present-day Cairo remains, to a great extent, the Cairo of Mameluke times.

Mubarak’s era was the era of

the neo-Mamelukes. It was not an era of enlightenment. It was an era of the neo-Mamelukes.

[…]

When the Egyptians cried: “The people want to change the regime,” they did not mean the specific regime, but the system as a whole – to change the system of values ruling Egyptian society, transforming it into a society that rewards capabilities, from a traditional to a modern society, from what happened on February 2 – the so-called “Battle of the Camel,” when [Mubarak supporters] stormed Tahrir Square on camels and donkeys, and a battle ensued between the camel and Facebook…

The Egyptian must choose which path they want to take – whether to take the path of the camel, and return to the world

of the camels, or whether to embark on the train of global modernism, and to become part of the world of Facebook. This is not a symbolic thing. It was the reality in Tahrir Square – a confrontation between the Facebook youth, and people who ride camels and try to establish a bullying state once again.

If you take a look at the political map in Egypt today, you will see that many of those camel riders try to present themselves as having access to the Internet, and as being Facebook users. The Muslim Bro therhood,

the Islamists, and the Salafis belong to the world of camels.

I have no doubt whatsoever about this.

Interviewer: You are convinced of this?

Mamoun Fandy: Let me tell you something.

Some things are indisputable. When you enter the modern Western world as an immigrant, you must ask yourself whether you will practice polygamy. If the answer is “yes,” you cannot be an immigrant in this modern world. In my view, anyone who practices polygamy – I’m not talking about polygamy as a notion, but about those who actually practice it… As a notion, polygamy had its proper time, place, and circumstances. But anybody who practices polygamy in the 21st century cannot be considered democratic, under any guise.

[…]

Anyone who believes in a religious state and in the existence of a “super-Muslim,” or in other words, believes that his Islam is better than your Islam, and that therefore, he alone has the fax number of God, and God asks him to approve whether you are a good Muslim or not… Such a person feels that he is superior to others.

[..]

The Americans are the most stupid to have dealt with the Middle East issue.

Interviewer: That is an important statement.

Mamoun Fandy: There are two reasons for this.

They are the ones who are leading it all.

Interviewer: They are the ones who are leading it all.

Mamoun Fandy: Right. For example, they disposed of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Then, they handed it over to Iran, instead of to their friends. So if they ended up handing the Egyptian revolution over to the Muslim Brotherhood, it would not be something unheard of. They always give the prize to their enemies, rather than to their friends. This is due to deep ignorance of the nature of this region. I believe that the main reason…

As someone who has lived for many years in the US, I think that the US aid constituted one of the main reasons for the ruin of Egypt. US aid to Egypt since the days of Sadat has reached 50 billion dollars. If you consider it in dollar value, it is equivalent to the 20 billion dollars allocated by the Marshall Plan for the recovery of Europe after World War II.

How come the same amount of money that was used to rebuild Europe, and to built several modern countries – not just one – has gone into a black hole in Egypt, down deep wells – or rather, deep pockets – and has not made any impact on Egyptian society, and has not transformed it from a backward, ignorant society to a modern one

?

Where did this money go

? It was given as a kind of bribery to the “yes men” who followed Washington’s policies without hesitation. The US aid did not contribute in any meaningful way to Egyptian society. It helped to create a dictatorial regime, which led Egyptian society to accept the policies of the US government. This is abhorrent to the average Egyptian, and is equally abhorrent to the average American, who believes that his money should go to help the poor and the needy, to improve education and so on. I hope that the Americans stop giving any aid to Egypt.

[…]

Begin Excerpt 2 from MEMRI

Middle East Media Research institute

Clip No. 3031

July 10, 2011

Egyptian Sociologist Saadudin Ibrahim: The Egyptian Revolution Might Give Rise to a New Napoleon

Following are excerpts from an interview with Egyptian sociologist Saadudin Ibrahim, which aired on CBC TV on July 10, 2011:

Interviewer: Do you believe that the military council might hijack the revolution?

Saadudin Ibrahim: Of course.

Interviewer: How exactly?

Saadudin Ibrahim: If there is a state of chaos, and the various parties are incapable of reaching an agreement, they will tell you that for the sake of the country’s security and stability, and in order to defend the national soil and protect the country from danger, the [military] council has resolved to remain in power until the matter is decided.

Interviewer: What you are saying is very serious, because all the statements by the military council emphasize that they would like to step down tomorrow, if not today.

Saadudin Ibrahim: Right.

Interviewer: They say that they would like to transfer powers today, that they do not want to postpone the elections, that they were asked to prolong the interim period, but refused… How could you possibly say that they want to remain in power?

[…]

Saadudin Ibrahim: This does not have to be their declared intention.

Still, the military council can hijack the revolution.

[…]

Interviewer: The truth is that the public is divided between the liberal forces and the religious forces.

Saadudin Ibrahim: True, and this leaves room for the role played by Napoleon.

Interviewer: So Egypt is waiting for another Napoleon

?

Saadudin Ibrahim: it is possible.

Interviewer: And this Napoleon will emerge from the military council or from the elections?

Saadudin Ibrahim: He could emerge from either.

[…]

Begin Excerpt from Wikipedia

Canal of the Pharaohs

With Egypt quiet again and under his control, Bonaparte used this time of rest to visit Suez and see with his own eyes the possibility of a canal (known as the Canal of the Pharaohs) said to have been cut in antiquity between the Red Sea and the Mediterranean by order of the pharaohs. Before setting out on the expedition, he gave Cairo back its self-government as a token of its pardon — a new ‘divan’ made up of 60 members replaced the military commission.

Then, accompanied by his colleagues from the Institut, Berthollet, Monge, Le Père, Dutertre, Costaz, Caffarelli, and followed by a 300-man escort, Bonaparte set out for the Red Sea and after three days’ marching across the desert he and his caravan arrived at Suez. After giving orders to complete the fortifications at Suez, Bonaparte crossed the Red Sea and on 28 December 1798 moved into Arabia to look for the celebrated fountains of Moses 17 kilometres from Suez. On his return, surprised by the rising tide, he ran the risk of drowning. Arriving back at Suez, after much exploration the expedition fulfilled its aim, finding the remains of the ancient canal built by Senusret III and Necho II.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.