Great Conspiracy Theory – The New World Order (NWO)
Emergence of a bureaucratic collectivist one-world Government
Its history and multiple group different ideas about it are on Web Site:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory)
In the past 30 years I’ve had many e-mails about the New World Order, some telling me about it, and o
thers asking me about it but, for the most part, I have remained in silence about it all these years. As a former part of the National Security Agency, I could hardly have been unaware of many of the groups associated with it, but I was never a part of it. Many of the things written about these organizations within our government are true, some are not, and some are greatly exaggerated. There is no question in my mind that an attempt is being made to form a world government run by far left wing intellectual liberals who believe it is the best thing for the masses. In their mindset their intellectual superiority gives them the right to decide what is best for mankind. While I have long known a massive far left liberal conspiracy existed in political parties in Europe and America, I am afraid conservative political parties are just now recognizing it for the danger it poses.
So why have I remained silent on something I have kept up with for 40 years? It is because I do not believe it will have time to develop into the one world government which is portrayed by many prophetic buffs of today. It does exist and is growing, but the Islamic invasion of Israel
will cut it short of maturing to complete control.
I have long believed the massive forces of Islam would one day attack Israel, led by the Antichrist, and
would be successful in driving her into the Negev at Beersheba, where a truce, a hudna, would be declared, leaving Israel there for three and one-half years, at the end of which time the battle of Armageddon would occur and the Messiah would return to end it, and thereafter restore Israel.
Once this hudna is declared, nations south of a line from the Rock of Gibraltar to Kazakhstan to New Guinea, with populations greater than 50 percent Muslim, will almost immediately join the Islamic Antichrist’s Caliphate, and that will be the One World government which represents the biblical last days Kingdom of Antichrist.
I am convinced the initial attack which drives Israel into the Negev Wilderness is most likely to occur between 2010 and 2015. I have never believed the one-world government conspiracy would have the time to gain full control of the world before the Islamic assault on Israel. Hence, in the past I have said nothing about it in order to avoid adding the complex and varying opinions within its scattered components to the already confused maize of prophetical interpretations of Scriptures. If you want to see those complex and varying opinions, then take a look at the following Web Site:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory)
I am afraid the believing world thinks they have plenty of time before the tribulation period begins because it will take time for the Antichrist of this great one-world government to take over. I am convinced the one thing we don’t have is a lot of time left in the Age of the Gentiles.
Begin Short Excerpt from Wikipedia
In conspiracy theory, the term “New World Order” or “NWO” refers to the emergence of a bureaucratic collectivist one-world government.
The common theme in conspiracy theories about a New World Order is that a powerful and secretive elite of globalists is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an autonomous world government, which would replace sovereign nation-states and other checks and balances in international power struggles. Significant occurrences in politics and finance are speculated to be caused by an extremely influential cabal operating through many front organizations.
Numerous historical and current events are seen as steps in an on-going plot to achieve world domination through secret political gatherings and decision-making processes.
Prior to the early 1990s, New World Order conspiracism was limited to two subcultures, primarily the militantly anti-government right, and secondarily Christian fundamentalists concerned with end-time emergence of the Antichrist. Skeptics, such as political scientist Michael Barkun, have expressed concern that right-wing conspiracy theories about a New World Order have now not only been embraced by many left-wing conspiracy theorists but have seeped into popular culture, thereby inaugurating an unrivaled period of people actively preparing for apocalyptic millenarian scenarios in the United States of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. They warn that this development may not only fuel lone wolf terrorism but have devastating effects on American political life, such as the rise of an insurrectionary national-anarchist movement capable of subverting the established political powers.
End Excerpt from Wikipedia
October 31, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
10 Jihad Kings among the Kings of Revelation 19:19!
The 10 Jihad Toes of Daniel 2
Daniel 2:44 – And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it
shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
At the battle of Armageddon most of the kings of the earth
will come to join the antichrist in a final attempt to eradicate the nation of Israel. Among them will be 10 nations representing the 10 Jihad toes of Daniel 2 that drove Israel into the Negev three and one-half years earlier.
Revelation 19:19 – And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army.
Some three and on-half years before the final battle of Armageddon, which closes the tribulation period, ten kings of nations out of the territory once occupied by the ancient Roman Empire will attack Israel from the north.
Daniel 2:42 – And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and
part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.
II Thessalonians 2:3 – Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
The last evil kingdom of antichrist on this earth was to initially be comprised of 10 nations with 10 kings led by the man of sin himself. It was to arise out of the ashes of the old Roman Empire. I have always believed it would rise out of the southern half of the Empire and be made up of 10 Arab nations. I believe the elements for its formation are in place today, and I suspect that the most likely Arab nations of which it will be comprised are Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Sudan, Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Iran. Some of these nations are strong like iron, and some are as soft and pliable as clay.
I do not question that in the final battle of Armageddon the descendants of Ham, Shem, and Japheth will be combatants against the nation of Israel. But I have always contended, along with the Bible expositors of the 18th and 19th centuries, that the antichrist’s initial attack would be led by Arab descendants of Abraham.
They are the mingled seed of his oldest son Ishmael with the seed of the six sons he sired by Keturah, as well as some of the other offspring of his own father Terah. The empire of the antichrist will be an Islamic empire that eventually takes into it other old world nations. And, in the final great battle of Armageddon, all those nations that made up the world as it was known in A.D. 95 will come against Israel, such that Japheth, Ham, and Shem’s descendants will also be involved.
Daniel 2:41-43 – And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters’ clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.
[42] And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken. [43] And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.
The 10 toes will consist primarily of Terah’s descendants. Abraham came out of Terah. Out of Abraham came the leaders of the three great monotheistic faiths associated with Moses, Jesus, and Mohammad. And they have always been in conflict. (See Archive Update 78 Diagram)
The inspired word in Daniel 2:43, from which the word “mingled” comes, is ARAB, which means “ to interlace,
to mix. The “seed of men” refers to non-descendants of the man Abraham, from which both Jews and Arabs descended. “They” refers to the 10 toes of Daniel’s statue in Daniel 2:42, which have 10 kings over them.
Isaac, the father of Israel, had seven half brothers – Ishmael from Hagar and the six sons of Keturah. It was from these seven half brothers that the Arab world has been primarily created. The descendants of Israel have been more likely to marry within the blood line of the man Israel than have the Arabs to marry within their separate bloodlines of Hagar and Keturah, and the Arabs have also intermingled with non-descendants of Abraham more than have the Jews.
Daniel 2:43 – And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.
Just as iron and clay do not hold together very long, the 10 Arab nations will only hold together long enough to fulfill God’s end time tribulation period prophecies. The saved will be caught up on the sounding of the seventh trump to be judged in heaven, and the kingdom of God will all be united in heaven, waiting to return to earth with Christ at his Second Advent.
Revelation 11:15 – And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and
ever.
Daniel 2:44 – And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
The God of heaven will call all the saved of all the ages together in heaven during the “days of these kings,” and will initially “set up” his kingdom, from whence he will return to earth with it as its head, after the saved have been judged in heaven. Christ’s coming kingdom will “break in pieces and consume all the kingdoms” of the present world, and his kingdom alone will rule.
Revelation 11:15-18 – And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.
[16] And the four and twenty elders, which sat before God on their seats, fell upon their faces, and worshipped God, [17] Saying, We give thee thanks, O Lord God Almighty, which art, and wast, and art to come; because thou hast taken to thee thy great power, and hast reigned.
[18] And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.
Christ, the stone, came from the mountain representing God, without any human instrumentation, but by God’s Spirit forming his body in a virgin’s womb. Christ will return to destroy those morally destroying the earth. All of the evil that came out of the Babylonian, Medo- Persian, Macedonian, and Roman Empires will be laid waste by his Second Advent.
Daniel 2:45 – Forasmuch as thou sawest that the stone was cut out of the mountain without hands, and that it brake in pieces the iron, the brass, the clay, the silver, and the gold; the great God hath made known to the king what shall come to pass hereafter: and the dream is certain, and the interpretation thereof sure.
Begin Excerpt from CNN
Are ‘too big to fail’ powers just too big?
As lawmakers reshape financial rules to stop firms from getting too big to fail, one thing is clear: The White House gets more power. That scares some people.
By Jennifer Liberto, CNNMoney.com senior writer
Last Updated: October 31, 2009: 8:14 AM ET
WASHINGTON (CNNMoney.com) — As Congress starts debating how to deal with financial firms deemed “too big too fail,” some lawmakers and advocates are worried about giving the executive branch expansive new powers over the financial sector.
“Mr. Secretary, I’m not a man that fears this administration or you,” Rep. Paul Kanjorksi, D-Pa., told Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner this week. “But I do fear the accumulation of power exercised by someone in the future that can be extraordinary.”
Indeed, draft legislation that was released this week by the House Financial Services committee would give the Treasury a lot of new clout.
For example, the bill would create an oversight council to watch over big financial firms and require some to shore up their capital reserves. The Federal Reserve would have a big role in determining those levels, but the Treasury secretary would serve as chairman of the council. And that troubles some lawmakers and experts.
“The idea that the Treasury should assume such a large role is, in my view, a problem, ” said Jane D’Arista, for Americans for Financial Reform, a coalition of consumer advocate groups and labor unions. “The council should have more responsibility, and I don’t think it should be under the thumb of the Treasury.”
Also, under the bill being debated, the Treasury secretary’s approval would be needed to pull the trigger before the government takes over a giant failed financial company. (Two-thirds of the members of the Fed and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. boards would also have to agree.)
Even more controversial: The Treasury’s approval would be needed before the government made loans to and bought assets of troubled and, in some cases, healthy firms.
Geithner has maintained in public comments that he needs such power to unwind the kind of multi-billion dollar companies that pose broad threats to the economy.
He denied that his office would use such power to simply dole out bailouts, saying he would oppose any bill that gave such carte blanche.
“I would not support it — would not want to have to live under it and administer it. And it’s just not the proposal we are describing,” Geithner said.
Indeed, in response to criticism of the bailouts, House leaders have made at least one big change in the proposed legislation: Regulators would be able to recoup money used in the unwinding of big firms by assessing fees on firms with more than $10 billion in assets.
But some on the political left and right still worry that the power Congress is contemplating giving Treasury could lead to more bailouts, even if bailouts were simply fronted with taxpayer dollars.
“Passing good regulation is not an excuse for passing permanent, unlimited bailout authority,” said Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who believes regulators should ask Congress for any money used to wind down firms.
House Republicans say they’d prefer that Congress establishes a special bankruptcy court with the power to unwind big financial firms.
Administration officials and House Financial Services Committee Chairman Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., have argued that a new bankruptcy court is not good enough to deal with the kinds of systemwide failure these institutions can trigger. They point to the repercussions of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy in September 2008.
“If they lose the capacity to fund, then they can cause enormous damage to the system as a whole, so you need a slightly different regime for banks, because banks are different from a regular company,” Geithner said.
Under the legislation, regulators could “wipe out” entire classes of creditors, Frank said. They could force different stakeholders to take haircuts.
“You say you don’t like what we’re doing, because it’s too creditor unfriendly. Yeah, that’s what we want to be,” Frank told a banking industry official this week.
But some experts say they worry about empowering regulators, who can be susceptible to lobbying and politics, to favor some creditors over others.
“Enhanced resolution authority would allow the government to put money into a private firm and to change contracts,” said Phillip Swagel, an economist and former assistant Treasury secretary in the Bush administration who teaches at Georgetown University.
Giving such broad new power to the executive branch is not unprecedented but is usually limited to wartime situations, said law professor Stephen Vladeck of American University.
“It’s understandable that members of Congress for both partisan and institutional prerogative reasons would be a little bit nervous,” said Vladeck. “Republicans are opposed because of who is in the White House. And even Democrats would balk at least a little bit.”
First Published: October 31, 2009: 8:12 AM ET
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.