Egyptians will end up governed by a Muslim Brotherhood Caliph
The Main Goal Of A Muslim Brotherhood Was Always A Caliphate
Under a Muslim Brotherhood Caliph who Would Establish Sharia
Law Islamic Government Under Which Its Citizens Worship Allah
Laying their tribute in the Capital before the Caliph’s seat Steps
Future Caliph Of A Caliphate Has Napoleon Conquest Character!
July 13, 2011
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Daniel 11:42,43 – He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape. [43] But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps. (As bordering parts of his caliphate paying tribute)
Begin Excerpt from MEMRI
Middle East Media Research Institute
US-Based Egyptian Scholar Mamoun Fandy Blames US Aid for “the Ruin of Egypt” and Says: The US May Be Handing Egypt Over to the Muslim Brotherhood Just Like It Handed Post-Saddam Iraq over to Iran
Clip No. 3021
July 4, 2011
Following are excerpts from an interview with US-based Egyptian scholar Mamoun Fandy, which aired on ANB TV on July 4, 2011:
Mamoun Fandy: This revolution was not made in Tahrir Square, or in Cairo in general, as is commonly believed. The first martyrs of the revolution – in fact, most of the martyrs – were from the cities of Suez and Alexandria. If not for the steadfastness of the people of Suez, the people at Tahrir Square would not have persevered. The Central Security Forces and Mubarak’s regime were defeated in Suez. They were first defeated in Suez and Alexandria.
Interviewer: The same happened in Tunisia.
Mamoun Fandy: Yes. Bouazizi was not from the capital Tunis, but in Sidi Bouzid. It is the periphery that is generating such spectacles, not the capitals. With all due respect, Cairo is a failing city, by any standard. Its architecture is not fit to be called “the architecture of freedom.” And its streets cannot be labeled “the streets of freedom.” This is the architecture of oppression, which will only generate a new kind of dictatorship. We must open up our horizons, and see the entire country, from north to south. Reducing the country to a single city reflects the notion of a “hydraulic society,” which is controlled by dams. Wherever there is a dam, you control the water, and Cairo has become the center of political and cultural dams.
This is the basic notion of Eastern tyranny, as critiqued by Marx and as existed in Asian regimes – the “Asiatic mode of production.” Present-day Cairo remains, to a great extent, the Cairo of Mameluke times.
Mubarak’s era was the era of
the neo-Mamelukes. It was not an era of enlightenment. It was an era of the neo-Mamelukes.
[…]
When the Egyptians cried: “The people want to change the regime,” they did not mean the specific regime, but the system as a whole – to change the system of values ruling Egyptian society, transforming it into a society that rewards capabilities, from a traditional to a modern society, from what happened on February 2 – the so-called “Battle of the Camel,” when [Mubarak supporters] stormed Tahrir Square on camels and donkeys, and a battle ensued between the camel and Facebook…
The Egyptian must choose which path they want to take – whether to take the path of the camel, and return to the world
of the camels, or whether to embark on the train of global modernism, and to become part of the world of Facebook. This is not a symbolic thing. It was the reality in Tahrir Square – a confrontation between the Facebook youth, and people who ride camels and try to establish a bullying state once again.
If you take a look at the political map in Egypt today, you will see that many of those camel riders try to present themselves as having access to the Internet, and as being Facebook users. The Muslim Bro therhood,
the Islamists, and the Salafis belong to the world of camels.
I have no doubt whatsoever about this.
Interviewer: You are convinced of this?
Mamoun Fandy: Let me tell you something.
Some things are indisputable. When you enter the modern Western world as an immigrant, you must ask yourself whether you will practice polygamy. If the answer is “yes,” you cannot be an immigrant in this modern world. In my view, anyone who practices polygamy – I’m not talking about polygamy as a notion, but about those who actually practice it… As a notion, polygamy had its proper time, place, and circumstances. But anybody who practices polygamy in the 21st century cannot be considered democratic, under any guise.
[…]
Anyone who believes in a religious state and in the existence of a “super-Muslim,” or in other words, believes that his Islam is better than your Islam, and that therefore, he alone has the fax number of God, and God asks him to approve whether you are a good Muslim or not… Such a person feels that he is superior to others.
[..]
The Americans are the most stupid to have dealt with the Middle East issue.
Interviewer: That is an important statement.
Mamoun Fandy: There are two reasons for this.
They are the ones who are leading it all.
Interviewer: They are the ones who are leading it all.
Mamoun Fandy: Right. For example, they disposed of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Then, they handed it over to Iran, instead of to their friends. So if they ended up handing the Egyptian revolution over to the Muslim Brotherhood, it would not be something unheard of. They always give the prize to their enemies, rather than to their friends. This is due to deep ignorance of the nature of this region. I believe that the main reason…
As someone who has lived for many years in the US, I think that the US aid constituted one of the main reasons for the ruin of Egypt. US aid to Egypt since the days of Sadat has reached 50 billion dollars. If you consider it in dollar value, it is equivalent to the 20 billion dollars allocated by the Marshall Plan for the recovery of Europe after World War II.
How come the same amount of money that was used to rebuild Europe, and to built several modern countries – not just one – has gone into a black hole in Egypt, down deep wells – or rather, deep pockets – and has not made any impact on Egyptian society, and has not transformed it from a backward, ignorant society to a modern one
?
Where did this money go
? It was given as a kind of bribery to the “yes men” who followed Washington’s policies without hesitation. The US aid did not contribute in any meaningful way to Egyptian society. It helped to create a dictatorial regime, which led Egyptian society to accept the policies of the US government. This is abhorrent to the average Egyptian, and is equally abhorrent to the average American, who believes that his money should go to help the poor and the needy, to improve education and so on. I hope that the Americans stop giving any aid to Egypt.
[…]
Begin Excerpt 2 from MEMRI
Middle East Media Research institute
Clip No. 3031
July 10, 2011
Egyptian Sociologist Saadudin Ibrahim: The Egyptian Revolution Might Give Rise to a New Napoleon
Following are excerpts from an interview with Egyptian sociologist Saadudin Ibrahim, which aired on CBC TV on July 10, 2011:
Interviewer: Do you believe that the military council might hijack the revolution?
Saadudin Ibrahim: Of course.
Interviewer: How exactly?
Saadudin Ibrahim: If there is a state of chaos, and the various parties are incapable of reaching an agreement, they will tell you that for the sake of the country’s security and stability, and in order to defend the national soil and protect the country from danger, the [military] council has resolved to remain in power until the matter is decided.
Interviewer: What you are saying is very serious, because all the statements by the military council emphasize that they would like to step down tomorrow, if not today.
Saadudin Ibrahim: Right.
Interviewer: They say that they would like to transfer powers today, that they do not want to postpone the elections, that they were asked to prolong the interim period, but refused… How could you possibly say that they want to remain in power?
[…]
Saadudin Ibrahim: This does not have to be their declared intention.
Still, the military council can hijack the revolution.
[…]
Interviewer: The truth is that the public is divided between the liberal forces and the religious forces.
Saadudin Ibrahim: True, and this leaves room for the role played by Napoleon.
Interviewer: So Egypt is waiting for another Napoleon
?
Saadudin Ibrahim: it is possible.
Interviewer: And this Napoleon will emerge from the military council or from the elections?
Saadudin Ibrahim: He could emerge from either.
[…]
Begin Excerpt from Wikipedia
Canal of the Pharaohs
With Egypt quiet again and under his control, Bonaparte used this time of rest to visit Suez and see with his own eyes the possibility of a canal (known as the Canal of the Pharaohs) said to have been cut in antiquity between the Red Sea and the Mediterranean by order of the pharaohs. Before setting out on the expedition, he gave Cairo back its self-government as a token of its pardon — a new ‘divan’ made up of 60 members replaced the military commission.
Then, accompanied by his colleagues from the Institut, Berthollet, Monge, Le Père, Dutertre, Costaz, Caffarelli, and followed by a 300-man escort, Bonaparte set out for the Red Sea and after three days’ marching across the desert he and his caravan arrived at Suez. After giving orders to complete the fortifications at Suez, Bonaparte crossed the Red Sea and on 28 December 1798 moved into Arabia to look for the celebrated fountains of Moses 17 kilometres from Suez. On his return, surprised by the rising tide, he ran the risk of drowning. Arriving back at Suez, after much exploration the expedition fulfilled its aim, finding the remains of the ancient canal built by Senusret III and Necho II.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.