Proposal TO MOVE Toward Banning Doomsday Arms,
Will Never Come to Fru iti
on Prior to the Second Advent!
There WILL Be NO Doomsday Weapons after Armageddon,
Just a lot of Meshech, Tubal & Magog Bones across All Israel!
May 30, 2010
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Ezekiel 39:1-29 – Therefore, thou son of man, prophesy against Gog, and say, Thus saith the Lord God;
Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal: [2] And I will turn thee back, and leave but the sixth part of thee, and will cause thee to come up from the north parts, and will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel: [3] And I will smite thy bow out of thy left hand, and will cause thine arrows to fall out of thy right hand. [4] Thou shalt fall upon the mountains of Israel, thou, and all thy bands, and the people that is with thee: I will give thee unto
the ravenous birds of every sort, and to the beasts of the field to be devoured.
[5] Thou shalt fall upon the open field: for I have spoken it, saith the Lord God. [6] And I will send a fire on Magog, and among them that dwell carelessly in the isles: and they shall know that I am the Lord. [7] So will I make my holy name known in the midst of my people Israel; and I will not let them pollute my holy name any more: and the heathen shall know that I am the Lord, the Holy One in Israel.
[8] Behold, it is come, and it is done, saith the Lord God; this is the day whereof I have spoken. [9] And they that dwell in the cities of Israel shall go forth, and shall set on fire and burn the weapons, both the shields and the bucklers, the bows and the arrows, and the handstaves, and the spears, and they shall burn them with fire seven years: [10] So that they shall take no wood out of the field, neither cut down any out of the forests; for they shall burn the weapons with fire: and they shall spoil those that spoiled them, and rob those that robbed them, saith the Lord God. [11] And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will give unto Gog a place there of graves in Israel, the valley of the passengers on the east of the sea: and it shall stop the noses of the passengers: and there shall they bury Gog and all his multitude: and they shall call it The valley of Hamon-gog. [12] And seven months shall the house of Israel be burying of them, that they may cleanse the land. [13] Yea, all the people of the land shall bury them; and it shall be to them a renown the day that I shall be glorified, saith the Lord God. [14] And they shall sever out men of continual employment, passing through the land to bury with the passengers those that remain upon the face of the earth, to cleanse it: after the end of seven months shall they search. [15] And the passengers that pass through the land, when any seeth a man’s bone, then shall he set up a sign by it, till the buriers have buried it in the valley of Hamon-gog. [16] And also the name of the city shall be Hamonah.
Thus shall they cleanse the land. [17] And, thou son of man, thus saith the Lord God; Speak unto every feathered fowl, and to every beast of the field, Assemble yourselves, and come; gather yourselves on every side to my sacrifice that I do sacrifice for you, even a great sacrifice upon the mountains of Israel, that ye may eat flesh, and drink blood. [18] Ye shall eat the flesh of the mighty, and drink the blood
of the princes of the earth, of rams, of lambs, and of goats, of bullocks, all of them fatlings of Bashan. [19] And ye shall eat fat till ye be full, and drink blood till ye be drunken, of my sacrifice which I have sacrificed for you. [20] Thus ye shall be filled at my table with horses and chariots, with mighty men, and with all men of war, saith the Lord God. [21] And I will set my glory among the heathen, and all the heathen shall see my judgment that I have executed, and my hand that I have laid upon them. [22] So the house of Israel shall know that I am the Lord their God from that day and forward. [23] And the heathen shall know that the house of Israel went into captivity for their iniquity: because they trespassed against me, therefore hid I my face from them, and gave them into the hand of their enemies: so fell they all by the sword.
[24] According to their uncleanness and according to their transgressions have I done unto them, and hid my face from them. [25] Therefore thus saith the Lord God; Now will I bring again the captivity of Jacob, and have mercy upon the whole house of Israel, and will be jealous for my holy name; [26] After that they have borne their shame, and all their trespasses whereby they have trespassed against me, when they dwelt safely in their land, and none made them afraid. [27] When I have brought them again from the people, and gathered them out of their enemies’ lands, and am sanctified in them in the sight of many nations; [28] Then shall they know that I am the Lord their God, which caused them to be led into captivity among the heathen: but I have gathered them unto their own land, and have left none of them any more there. [29] Neither will I hide my face any more from them: for I have poured out my spirit upon the house of Israel, saith the Lord God.
Magogite Bear Sticking its Paw in Middle East Honey Tree!
December 26, 2007
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
If I learned nothing else during my years in the NSA, I learned the one thing which motivates the chess moves of all nations, both short and long term, is their individual national interest. There are many national interests of Russia causing her to be involved in the Middle East. One of them, of course, is her own national security. Six of the former break away states from the old Soviet Union are to the south and southwest of Russia, namely, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. The majority population of these states are of the Islamic faith, and as such do not look favorably on the infidels of Russia. This is one of the reasons Russia has tried to get on the buddy train with the worshippers of Allah, and one of the reasons she will be delighted to come down at the final battle of Armageddon to help the forces of Islam make a final attempt to eradicate the Jews.
Russia will, of course, be joined by the armies of the six aforementioned nations, but in the end the land of Magog will pay a terrible price for her actions. God will turn back the massive army of many nations that come against Israel at the final battle of Armageddon, and will send fire and brimstone on the land of Magog, as well as the volcanic islands and tectonic plate boundaries of the earth.
Ezekiel 38:22,23 – And I will plead against him with pestilence and with blood; and I will rain upon him, and upon his bands, and upon the many people that are with him, an overflowing rain, and GREAT HAILSTONES, FIRE, AND BRIMSTONE. [23] Thus will I magnify myself, and sanctify myself; and I will be known in the eyes of many nations, and they shall know that I am the Lord.
Ezekiel 39:2-7 – And I will turn thee back, and leave but the sixth part of thee, and will cause thee to come up from the north parts, and will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel: [3] And I will smite thy bow out of thy left hand, and will cause thine arrows to fall out of thy right hand. [4] Thou shalt fall upon the mountains of Israel, thou, and all thy bands, and the people that is with thee: I will give thee unto the ravenous birds of every sort, and to the beasts of the field to be devoured. [5] Thou shalt fall upon the open field: for I have spoken it, saith the Lord God. [6] AND I WILL SEND A FIRE ON MAGOG, AND AMONG THEM THAT DWELL CARELESSLY IN THE ISLES; and they shall know that I am the Lord. [7] So will I make my holy name known in the midst of my people Israel; and I will not let them pollute my holy name any more: and the heathen shall know that I am the Lord, the Holy One in Israel.
Begin Excerpt from Arutz Sheva
Obama Government Backs Down on No-Nukes Draft; Israel Objects
by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu
May 29, 2010
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu denounced as “hypocritical” a United Nations resolution calling for a nuclear-free Middle East and said Israel will not participate in a planned conference by members of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The resolution did not mention Iran.
“This resolution is deeply flawed and hypocritical. It ignores the realities of the Middle East and the real threats facing the region and the entire world,” government spokesmen stated in Toronto, where Prime Minister Netanyahu is visiting. “It singles out Israel, the Middle East’s only true democracy and the only country threatened with annihilation. Given the distorted nature of this resolution, Israel will not be able to take part in its implementation.”
NPT members agreed to a draft resolution on Friday after the United States withdrew its objections to the draft that points out “the importance of Israel’s accession to the treaty and the placement of all its nuclear facilities under comprehensive IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) safeguards.”
The resolution calls for a conference in 2012 but did not mention Iran, which Israel and the United States are sure is trying to use its nuclear program to develop and manufacture a nuclear warhead to be aimed at Israel.
The draft also does not mention India and Pakistan, which have nuclear weapons but, like Israel, have not signed the NPT. Israel continues its policy of “ambiguity,” which neither confirms nor denies that it possesses nuclear weapons.
Most analysts assume that the Jewish State has at least 200 atomic bombs or warheads.
U.S. President Barack Obama criticized the draft agreement even though American delegates gave up trying to block the wording in order to prevent a collapse in the negotiations to propose a resolution. The president stated, “We strongly oppose efforts to single out Israel, and will oppose actions that jeopardize Israel’s national security” even though the resolution itself represents another victory for the anti-Israel movement aimed at weakening Israel’s existence.
Pro-Israel leaders warned last month that President Obama was making a mistake in agreeing to an Egyptian demand to discuss the idea of a nuclear-free in the Middle East. (IsraelNationalNews.com)
Begin Excerpt from THE TIMES OF INDIA VIA WORLD NEWS
NPT members agree to take early steps on nuclear-free Mideast
AP, May 29, 2010, 03.47am IST
UNITED NATIONS: The 189 member nations of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty on Friday adopted a detailed plan of small steps down a long road toward nuclear disarmament, including a sharply debated proposal to move toward banning doomsday arms from the Middle East.
The 28-page Final Declaration was approved by consensus on the last day of the monthlong conference, convened every five years to review and advance the objectives of the 40-year-old NPT.
Under its action plan, the five recognized nuclear-weapon states – the United States, Russia, Britain, France and China – commit to speed up arms reductions, take other steps to diminish the importance of atomic weapons, and report back on progress by 2014.
The final document also calls for convening a conference in 2012 “on the establishment of a Middle East zone free of nuclear weapons and all other weapons of mass destruction.”
This Arab idea of a WMD-free zone is designed to pressure Israel to give up its undeclared nuclear arsenal. Despite the decision here, U.S. officials questioned whether Israel could be persuaded to attend the conference.
Iran and Syria had dissented loudly on various points in the final hours, but no objections were raised in the concluding session. After the declaration’s approval, Iran’s chief delegate Ali Asghar Soltanieh joined with the others in hearty applause beneath the U.N. General Assembly hall’s soaring dome.
“All eyes the world over are watching us,” the conference president, Libran Cabactulan of the Philippines, said before gaveling the final document into the record.
The decision was “an important step forward towards the realization of the goals and objectives of the treaty,” Egypt’s Maged Abedelaziz said afterward, speaking for the 118-nation Nonaligned Movement of mainly developing countries.
“The final document this conference adopted today advances President Obama’s vision” of a world without nuclear weapons, Undersecretary of State Ellen Tauscher told the assembled delegates.
The conference is convened twice a decade to review and advance the objectives of the 40-year-old NPT, under which nations without nuclear weapons committed not to acquire them; those with them committed to move toward their elimination; and all endorsed everyone’ s right to develop peaceful nuclear energy.
The last NPT conference, in 2005, failed to adopt a consensus declaration, in part because U.S. President George W. Bush had withdrawn U.S. backing for such nonproliferation steps as ratifying the treaty banning all nuclear tests. President Barack Obama’s support for an array of arms-control measures improved the cooperative atmosphere at the 2010 conference.
For the first time at an NPT review, the final declaration laid out complex action plans for all three of the treaty’s “pillars” – nonproliferation, disarmament and peaceful nuclear energy.
The five recognized weapons states did manage to strip earlier drafts of specific timelines for disarmament negotiations, such as a proposal that they consult among themselves on how to disarm and report back to the 2015 conference, after which a high-level meeting would convene to negotiate a “roadmap” for abolishing nuclear weapons.
But in the final draft the five weapons states committed to “accelerate concrete progress” toward reducing their atomic weaponry, and to report on progress in 2014 in preparation for the 2015 NPT review session.
The document calls on them also to reduce the role of nuclear arms in their military doctrines and consider downgrading the alert status of weapons systems, and it held out the possibility of negotiations on a global treaty abolishing nuclear arms.
Cuba expressed the disappointment of many non-nuclear-weapon states here that the nuclear powers did not accept a firmer timetable, saying it had done “all we could to set a timetable with 2025 as the deadline for the total elimination of nuclear weapons.”
The disarmament action plan also inevitably leaves a major gap, since it doesn’t obligate four nations that are not members of the treaty – India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea, all of which have or are suspected of having nuclear arsenals.
On the Middle East, Arab states and Israel’s allies h
ad been at odds over wording in the plan to convene a conference in 2012 to begin a process to turn the region into a zone free of nuclear and other mass-destruction weapons.
This Arab proposal for a WMD-free zone, to pressure Israel to give up its undeclared arsenal of perhaps 80 nuclear warheads, was endorsed by the 1995 NPT conference but never acted on.
Israel has long said a full Arab-Israeli peace must precede such weapons bans. But at this conference the U.S., Israel’s chief supporter, said it welcomed “practical measures” leading toward the goal of a nuke-free zone, and U.S. diplomats discussed possibilities with Israel.
A sticking point had been a passage naming Israel, reaffirming “the importance of Israel’s accession to the NPT,” a move that would require it to destroy its arsenal.
Iran demanded that this NPT session insist Israel join the treaty before a 2012 conference. Egypt’s Abdelaziz told reporters the Arab position was softer – that Israel’s accession to the treaty would come as “part of the process” begun in 2012.
Although the Israelis apparently had acquiesced to U.S. urging that they take part in such a 2012 discussion, they objected to participating under terms in which they were the only nation mentioned in this way, diplomats said.
In the end, the singling out of Israel remained in the text, and Tauscher said that would “seriously jeopardize” U.S. efforts to persuade the Israelis to attend 2012 talks.
Establishment of a verifiable Mideast nuclear weapons-free zone should help allay international concerns about whether Iran’s ambitious nuclear program is aimed at building bombs, something Tehran denies. The Iranians have long expressed support for a nuke-free Mideast.
Besides Israel’s attendance, other important details of a 2012 Mideast conference remain to be worked out, such as whether the talks are meant as the start of formal negotiations on a treaty.
Iran had loomed as a potential spoiler, blocking consensus, at this conference. Facing possible new U.N. sanctions because of its nuclear program, the Iranians had sought to turn the spotlight instead on the big nuclear powers, demanding the final document call for speedier disarmament moves.
On the other hand, the final document did not single Iran out by name as a member nation that has been found to be in noncompliance with U.N. nuclear safeguards agreements.
Although the Iranians did not block final agreement, Tauscher complained, “We note that Iran has done nothing to enhance the international community’s confidence in it by its performance in this review conference.”
For his part, Iran’s Soltanieh said after it was adopted that much was lacking in the final outcome, but its “limited measures” represent “a step forward” toward global disarmament.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.