Prophecy Teaching Errors Began in 1730 Evangelical Movements!
Part A
O European Antichrist – Where are you after 64 years of Waiting?
Many continue to wait for the European Antichrist who never Was
Many still wait for the mighty Euro to replace the American Dollar
But Antichrist Will Not come out of Europe, But from the Mid-East,
And both the Euro and American dollar are tied to Middle East Oil!
I’ve Diligently Attempted To Teach And Preach BOTH Since 1976!
I’ve Taught the Rapture Will Occur On the Sounding of Trumpet 7
And that the “Three He’s” in Daniel 9:27 are Jesus, not Antichrist
Lord willing, I will continue to do so until my last Breath in Flesh!
January 4, 2011
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
DARDANELLE MBC IS NOW OFFERING AN EXPOSITION OF ‘DANIEL’S 70 PROPHETIC WEEKS’ ON 2 DVD DISKS IN AN ATTRACTIVE PLASTIC CASE
THE COST IS $29.93 – WE PAY ALL SHIPPING AND HANDLING
DARDANELLE MBC IS ALSO NOW OFFERING A DVD ON AN EXPOSITION OF TRIBULATION PERIOD EFFECTS OF THE NEW MADRID FAULT IN A PLASTIC CASE.
THE COST IS $24.93 – WE PAY ALL SHIPPING AND HANDLING
DARDANELLE MBC IS ALSO NOW OFFERING IN A PLASTIC CASE A DVD ON COMMUNION.
THE COST IS $19.93 – WE PAY ALL SHIPPING AND HANDLING
DARDANELLE MBC IS OFFERING FOR PURCHASE 10 DVD DISKS ON “A GEOLOGICAL EXPOSITION OF THE SECOND COMING OF CHRIST.” IT IS ENCLOSED IN AN ATTRACTIVE PLASTIC CASE WHICH OPENS LIKE A BOOK – INSIDE THERE ARE 5 PLASTIC PAGES EACH HOLDING 2 DVD’s IN BACK TO BACK POSITIONS. THE COVER AND DISKS ARE IN COLOR AND HAVE DESCRIPTIVE COVERS OF THE SERIES.
THE COST OF THE SERIES IS $59.93
WE PAY ALL POSTAGE AND HANDLING
TO ORDER, WRITE A CHECK MADE OUT TO DARDANELLE MBC
WITH YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS ON IT OR A PIECE OF PAPER
STATING THE ITEM OR ITEMS YOU DESIRE.
AND SEND IT TO:
DARDANELE MBC
P.O. BOX 157
204 HICKORY ST.
DARDANELLE, AR 72834
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
BEGIN 1976 QUOTE FROM PAGE 78 OF “TECTONIC CHAOS”
Revelation 13:1 – And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having SEVEN HEADS and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
The seven heads of the Beast in Revelation 13:1 represent six great world governments that of the past in which Satan has been actively involved. The seventh world government is now rising again at the present time around Israel and will soon produce the Antichrist. Prior to God separating from His wife, the nation of Israel, six great world Kingdoms that existed before, and at, the time of the cross are, in chronological order, as follows:
The Egyptian
The Assyrian
The Babylonian
The Medo-Persian
The Grecian
The Roman
The rising seventh Kingdom will incorporate all the cunning and skill in the arts and sciences that have been handed down from the previous six kingdoms. Man has come a long way since the days of the cruel Pharaoh of the Exodus, but all that modern man has learned is based on the root contributions of these six kingdoms – and soon all the knowledge and expertise of sinful mankind will be centered in the final kingdom.
The ten horns of Revelation 13:1 are ten Arab nations who will form the nucleus of the final kingdom, and the ten crowns are the power of the kings that will rile them. For years we have pictured the typical Arab as a scrawny little fellow on a camel in the desert with a comic expression on his face. This viewpoint is quickly changing. Oil is replacing the U.S. dollar in international importance – and soon ten Arab nations will have gained economic control of much of the earth’s wealth. We will not try to stop them because of the Soviet Union – and the Soviet Union will not try to stop them because of us and Red China. The world power block will block itself as the Arab nations prosper in our midst.
END 1976 QUOTE FROM PAGE 78 OF “TECTONIC CHAOS”
BEGIN 2002 ARCHIVE PROPHECY UPDATE NUMBER 54
February 8, 2002
Daniel 7:23-25 – Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces. [24] And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he
shall subdue three kings. [25] And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.
When a best selling book was written in the fifties about six emerging European Common Market nations, it began to cause many theologians to rapidly change their minds as to where the antichrist would eventually arise. Prior to that time most had believed he would arise out of the old Seleucid dynasty, which was formed by one of the generals who divided Alexander’s Grecian Empire into four sections. Many believed the Assyrian, in the fifth chapter of Micah, would be the antichrist, and that he would arise in, and come out of, modern day Syria.
Before the European Common Market theory arose, a majority believed antichrist would come out of the southern half of the old Roman Empire, rather than out of the European northern half. But the great popularity of the aforementioned book ascended to the highest levels of acceptability, and previous beliefs were dwarfed to obscurity. The book indicated that the six original members of the Common Market would soon be joined by four other nations to reach ten, and then be joined by the eleventh horn, who would be the antichrist of Daniel’s fourth beast in chapter seven. However, soon there were ten horns, then there were eleven, then more, then fifteen, and soon more will come to be added. But the astounding popularity of this book, and the thousands of preachers and other teachers who have taught it, have left a legacy that is difficult to convince they might not be correct in what they have taught, and are still teaching.
I have been concerned, since the book was first published, about the possibility it might cause many to be deceived when he does not arise in Europe, but in Syria. Quite frankly, I watch both Europe and Syria just like a hawk, and, if I do see him rising in Europe, I most assuredly will accept it. I am prepared for both. But many are so convinced he must come out of Europe, I doubt if anything would change their minds. In any case, in future updates I will show my reasons for believing he will come out of the Syria area.
The beast of Daniel 7:23 does indeed represent the old Roman Empire, and it certainly did tread down “the whole world,” that is, the “known” world of Daniel’s day. Have you ever thought that perhaps we were meant to take the expressions of Daniel’s day concerning the world, and believe that is the only part of the present world the antichrist will dominate completely? The ten horns will arise out of “the whole world” of Daniel’s day. But why do they have to be European nations? Were not Syria, Lebanon, Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, northern Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, and northern Sudan part of the old Roman Empire under the Emperor Trajan? And are not these countries the descendants of Ishmael, the first son of Abraham, and Keturah’s six sons by Abraham, and the two sons of Abraham’s nephew Lot, Moab and Ammon by his two daughters? Are not these descendants of Abraham the ones who have hated and battled the sons of Abraham through Israel for many centuries?
I do not question that Europe will come down as part of the mass of many nations that join antichrist in Jerusalem for the final battle of Armageddon, but I am confident that the initial attack of the tribulation period will be by the antichrist leading Islamic nations against Israel.
Begin Excerpt from the UK Guardian via World News
An Unhappy anniversary for the Euro
John Grahl
If the monetary union does survive, in the form now planned by EU leaders, the case could turn out to be worse than the ddisease.
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 1 January 2012 07.00 EST
The start of 2012 marks the second time
the euro has reached its 10th birthday. From a technical and financial point of view, the single currency was launched on 1 January 1999, when all
financial claims in the currencies of the first eleven member states were converted into euros. Three years later this unification became “visible” to European citizens as euro notes and coin replaced those of the member states.
In the runup to the first 10-year anniversary, Jean-Claude Trichet, then president of the European Central Bank (ECB) claimed that the euro had “helped to protect the euro area economy from the many global shocks and considerable turbulence of the last few years“. The mood at the second anniversary could hardly be more different.
Unresolved crises in the eurozone, and its very problematic future, have become the most serious source of shocks and turbulence in the global economy.
Trichet claimed at the same time that monetary union had been good for employment: “Between the launch of the euro and the end of 2007, the euro area created more than 15 million new jobs and the unemployment rate was at its lowest level since the early 1980s.” In fact the European commission’s Ameco database now gives the growth of employment in the original eurozone (the first eleven countries plus Greece) between 1999 and 2007 as 13.7 million. But, of this total, two thirds, or 8.9 million, took place in the “periphery” – in Ireland, Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal.
In other words, the growth of employment was not due to the good functioning of the monetary union but to its malfunctions. It depended on widening trade imbalances – huge surpluses in Germany and some of its neighbours against widening deficits in the periphery, covered by unsustainable capital flows from the former to the latter. Even so the employment performance of the eurozone was not such an impressive achievement. What Trichet called the lowest level of unemployment “since the early 1980s” was still, in 2007, before the global crisis pushed it back up, 7.6%. In the three countries which chose not to adopt the euro, Denmark, Sweden and the UK it stood at 3.8%, 6.1% and 6.6% respectively.
In fact the first decade of the euro followed two decades of restrictive macroeconomic policies – aimed, in the 80s, at bringing down inflation via high interest rates and, in the 90s, to prepare for monetary union by increasing taxes and cutting public expenditure.
Candidate members for monetary union sacrificed development and employment to come into compliance with the Maastricht conditions, later perpetuated as the stability and growth pact.
Whether the eurozone can survive the crisis will not be discussed in detail here. However, if the monetary union does survive, in the form now planned by EU leaders, then the cure could turn out to be worse than the disease.
What is now termed “fiscal union” is nothing of the kind; it does not involve a genuine co-ordination of macroeconomic policies or significant transfers of tax revenues. Rather it is an authoritarian structure that would subject the weaker states to permanent and extremely intrusive surveillance, formally by the commission and the ECB, in reality by Germany and the stronger northern European states.
The “surveillance union” is likely to be as dysfunctional in economic terms as it is politically undemocratic. One alarming aspect of German views of the current “reforms” is a fascination with numerical limits – on public spending,
on public borrowing and so on. In many ways these are analogous to the Friedmanite notion of numerical limits on the money stock and, just like money supply rules, they will prove to be either ineffective or dysfunctional. Public debt is not a control variable available to policymakers; it represents a relationship between the public sector and the unstable, unpredictable, private sector which does not admit of mechanical arithmetic constraints.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.