Obana and Quartet Plan shall Deliver Israel to a Holocaust Slaughter!
Children of This World are in Their Day Wiser than Children
of Light.
Obama’s a neophyte novice who is a cunningly political Deceiver,
Who considers all his political moves with intellectual Precision.
He Knew Exactly What a 1967 Borders Policy Would Produce,
Namely – Guaranteed Argument With Binyamin Netanyahu.
Obama’s oft great Love Professed for Israel from his Lips
Isn’t Manifested by his Political Moves He PUTS on Her!
I Now find myself Guessing Whose side Obama is On.
DEBKAfile will tell us their analysts are Speculative!
ALL Analysts Are Speculative As I Am Speculative.
I agree with most speculation in DEBKA Excerpt.
Having all open borders along Jordan’s Length
PLUS 8 Mile Israeli Mediterranean LAND Strip,
Is a sentence for Secong Holocaust for Jews
This is the Day of the Children of the World!
May 22, 2011
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Luke 16:8b – For the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.
Ephesians 5:11-13 – And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them. [12] For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret. [13] But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light: for whatsoever doth make manifest is light.
Ephesians 6:12 – For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
BEGIN ARCHIVE SPECIAL PROPHECY UPDATE NUMBER 73B
The Final Addition – The Jordan Valley Buffer Zone
June 24, 2002
Yesterday, the cabinet of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon approved the final nail in the buffer zone and the buffer zone that I diagramed in Prophecy Update Number 65C.
The buffer zone includes a 10-mile section around the city of Jerusalem. The buffer zone section between the foothills of the Samarian Mountains and the Jordan River will consist of a series of obstacles, rather than the high fence in the northern, western, and southern zones of the West Bank.
The only member of the cabinet voting against it was Foreign Minister Shimon Peres in a 25 to 1 vote. He objected because he said it amounted to carving up the West Bank into enclaves and incorporating more than 20 percent of it into Israel, which he said would cause Israel to have diplomatic difficulties. You may remember that I told you Israel might take up to 30 percent of the West Bank by putting the Buffer Zone inside the territory the Palestinians want for their new state.
The building of th is buffer zone, whether it
is, or is not, ever completed, is definitely having a real effect on the Palestinians, the terrorist groups, and the Arab countries that sponsor them. It is forcing them to made a decision: Do we want an autonomous Palestinian State inside the State of Israel, or do we want a Palestinian population inside the West Bank governed by the State of Israel? It is up to them! They have long demanded that Israel completely withdraw from ALL the West Bank and ALL of the Old City of Jerusalem, and then they would grant them peace. Well, they are not going to get that wish! When Ehud Barak offered them most of the Old City and 95 percent of the West Bank they should have taken it without reservations, but they did not!
Last week our forever shifty friend, Yassar Arafat, said he was now, in the interest of peace, willing to accept what Ehud Barak and President Clinton offered him before the peace talks broke down in Egypt. IT IS TOO LATE, YASSAR!
If the Palestinians, the terrorists, and the Islamic nations that sponsor them, want a truly autonomous Palestinian State inside Israel, then they are going to have to work together to do these four things:
(1) Announce that all terrorist activity will cease.
(2) Get the terrorist groups to hold off for a while.
(3) Come to the negotiating table and get as much as they can of what lies inside the Green Line of the West Bank.
(4) Drop the demand that all Palestinian refugees be allowed to return to their homeland, and settle for a percentage.
This could being in the “forced” false peace that the Bible indicates will come before Israel is suddenly attacked from the north to begin the last 3 and ½ years before the battle of Armageddon. In order to successfully launch such an attack from the north they must have an autonomous partner inside Israel to launch outward in all directions against the IDF.
End 2002 ARCHIVE SPECIAL PROPHCY UPDATE NUMBER 73B
Begin Excerpt from DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis
Netanyahu is one of 12 Mid East leaders saying no to Obama
DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis
May 20, 2011, 7:38 PM (GMT+02:00)
By rejecting US President Barack Obama’s proposal for Israel and its troops to pull back from the West Bank to behind the indefensible 1967 lines, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu lands in the company of eleven Middle East and North African rulers who spurned Washington’s Middle East policy in the six months of the unfolding Arab uprising. Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak was the only one to keep faith with Obama and he was pushed out for his pains.
Barack Obama’s presentation of his Middle East vision Thursday, May 19 had three immediate results:
1. Every surviving regional leader was confirmed in his determination to keep his distance from US administration policies;
2. Another nail was driven in the coffin of the stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace process;
3. The fuel that was poured on regional tensions increased the prospects of an Israel-Palestinian or an Israeli-Arab war this year.
No Israeli politician can afford to back away from the demand that Israel retain a security presence and defensible borders along its eastern boundary and, even more so, on the West Bank in any future peace accord. This fundamental principle was not denied by opposition leaders Tzipi Livni and Shaul Mofaz even as they poured boiling oil on the prime minister’s head for getting into an argument with the US president.
But this repudiation is exactly what Obama wants.
The notion that Israel can achieve security through peace talks is a pipe dream because no Palestinian negotiator will think of seeking fewer concessions from Israel than the ones laid down by the US president. He will simply use the speech as a starting-point for the biggest squeeze Israel has ever faced.
Obama saw this maxim played out in his first two years in office: First, he said Netanyahu must freeze West Bank settlement construction.
The Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, when he first heard about it, found the demand absurd – it had never been put to any former prime minister either by Washington or the Palestinians. But after Obama led the way, Abbas could demand no less.
So he shrugged and turned this demand into a useful pretext in his maneuvers for wriggling out of talking to Israel.
The Israeli Prime Minister after practically begging the Palestinians to sit down and talk for two years has now put his foot down against the new Obama proposals.
If he stands by this refusal, he leaves the vast region stretching across the Middle East, the Persian Gulf and North Africa without a single political, military or royal ruler willing to accept Obama’s new policy principles. The only possible exception may be Turkish Prime Minster Tayyip Erdogan.
The regional anti-Obama opposition falls into two camps:
The largest consists of eight former American allies, some of them ex-strategic partners, which is headed by the Saudi royal family.
A leading Saudi spokesman Nawaf Obaid brought the Riyadh-Washington rupture out in the open for the first time on May 16 in the form of a Washington Post op-ed.
“In some issues, such as counterterrorism and efforts to fight money laundering, the Saudis will continue to be a strong US partner,” he wrote. “In areas in which Saudi national security or strategic interests are at stake, the kingdom will pursue its own agenda. The oil for security formula is history… The special relationship may never be the same…”
Saudi King Abdullah has already swept the half a dozen GCC (Cooperation Council of the Arab States of the Gulf) behind the separate security and strategic policies he is pursuing independently of the US and often diametrically opposed to Obama’s course. He has invited Jordan, Morocco and Yemen to join the group.
The suggestion put by Jordanian monarch Abdullah II to Obama this week that the US transfer its sponsorship of the Israel-Palestinian issue to the GCC underscored the rising power of the new Gulf grouping and was firmly rejected.
The second camp consists of four anti-US Arab rulers, Syria’s Bashar Assad, the Libyan Muammar Qaddaf, President Ali Abdullah Saleh of Yemen and King Hamad bin Isa al Khalifa of Bahrain, who have resorted to armed violence to suppress the pro-democracy movements sponsored by President Obama.
Saudi Arabia is propping the Bahraini and Yemen regimes up with cash, arms, military assistance and intelligence.
All four are determined to do whatever it takes to avoid the fate that befell Hosni Mubarak.
The only leaders who until Thursday, May 19, stood out against joining both those camps were the military council ruling Egypt and the Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas.
The generals in Cairo nod obediently when faced with demands from Washington and do nothing.
The Palestinian leader called the Obama speech “disappointing” in that no timeline or diplomatic mechanisms were offered.
The US President poured scorn on Abbas’ plan to seek unilateral UN recognition of Palestinian statehood in September, hoping to shut the door on yet another ploy for avoiding peace talks with Israel. The Palestinian leader may well defy him.
Abbas, even after losing his key patron Mubarak, is still juggling several balls in the hope of pushing Israel into a corner. Netanyahu, for his part, having stayed passive in the face of the new currents blowing in from Washington and the Arab revolt, has reached crunch time with the US president without strong cards.
A falling-out between the White House and the Israeli prime minister will also box Abbas into a choice of which anti-Obama Arab camp to jump into – the group led by Saudi Arabia or the Syrian group which also includes Hamas with whom he has just signed a unity pact.
In the long run, that pact may have saddled him with undesirable options.
Begin Excerpt from THE JERUSALEM POST
Erekat: If Netanyahu accepts ’67 lines, we’ll resume talks
By JPOST.COM STAFF
05/22/2011 14:25
Abbas talking to Jordan’s Abdullah, Arab leaders on Obama speech; PLO official: PA will give up UN statehood push if ’67 lines accepted.
Palestinian Authority chief negotiator Saeb Erekat on Sunday said that he agreed with US President Barack Obama’s assertion that the 1967 borders should be the basis for negotiations with Israel, but that it was more important that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu accept this premise.
“Once Netanyahu says that the negotiations will lead to a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders, then everything will be set,” Palestinian news agency WAFA quoted Erekat as saying. He added that until that happened, negotiations with Israel would not resume.
RELATED:
For the Arab world, Obama didn’t go far enough
PA to Obama: Put a stop to PM’s blatant peace refusal
Following Obama’s Middle East speech on Thursday, in which he said that a future Palestinian State should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed upon land swaps, PA President Mahmoud Abbas called an emergency meeting of the PA leadership to discuss the new developments. Erekat said that the meeting could take place on Tuesday or Wednesday after Abbas, who is currently in Jordan meeting with King Abdullah, completes consultations with Arab leaders and the Arab League.
PLO Executive Committee member Hana Amira was quoted by Israel Radio on Sunday as saying that the Palestinians would cancel plans to go to the UN with a unilateral declaration of statehood in September if Israel would agree to negotiations based on the 1967 lines and freeze all building in West Bank settlements and east Jerusalem for a period of three months.
Following Obama’s speech on Thursday, Erekat said that Abbas appreciated Obama’s efforts to resume the peace talks between the Palestinians and Israel, and maintained hopes of reaching a solution on the core issues, according to an agreed timetable.
“President Abbas affirms his appreciation for President Obama’s declaration regarding people’s right to self-determination, freedom and dignity, as well as ensuring freedom of worship,” Erekat added.
Khaled Abu Toameh contributed to this report.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.