Archive for June, 2010

Supplement to Thursday “Bluff” or “Hit” Blogs!

Friday, June 25th, 2010

A lot of the bad guys in the Middle East are Nervous!

Consolidation of Several Reports over Last 12 Days

Concerning Supposed Strike On Iranian Facilities

Which May be a Well planned bluff by the West

And only time will reveal if it is phony or Real!

34clomid and nolvadex

erythromycin

I Can’t tell Which of the 2 choices Will Occur

But if I had to choose I would Call it a Bluff,

Because ploys used were easy to Detect,

Israeli Military Intelligence would not Be

So outwardly visible in Staging a Strike

That was truly going to be Conducted

But Maybe Israel is Pulling a Double

Reverse in old T Formation Football

Using 2 Halfbacks & A Blocking F.B.!

Making Iran one big nervous Ninny!

June 25, 2010

http://www.tribulationperiod.com/

Begin Excerpt from Arutz Sheva (Israel National News)

Reports: IAF Landed at Saudi Base, US Troops near Iran Border

by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

June 25, 2010

The Israeli Air Force recently unloaded military equipment at a Saudi Arabia base, a semi-official Iranian news agency

female viagra

claimed Wednesday, while a large American force has massed in Azerbaijan, which is on the northwest border of Iran.

body bro good levitra stuff up whats yea yea

how do antibiotics affect birth control pills

Both reports follow by less than a week the Pentagon’s confirmation that an unusually large American fleet sailed through the Suez Canal Saturday.

0 cialis comment currently reply

Several reports stated that an Israeli ship joined the armada.

doxycycline cat

The Pentagon played down the news, saying the American maneuvers were routine. However, a report by Iran on Wednesday that it has enriched dozens of pounds of 17 per cent enriched uranium serves as a reminder that time is running out to stop Iran from being able to produce a nuclear weapon.

add comment effects levitra side

blinklist com levitrai

Iran’s Fars News Agency said the Israeli military aircraft landed 10 days ago at the Saudi base near the city of Tabuk, located in northwest

diflucan cost

Saudi Arabia, one of the closest areas in the oil kingdom to Iran.

Fars said that the Tabuk base will be

after clomid

the central station for an Israeli attack on Iran. It quoted an Islamic news site that a commercial airline passenger said the airport in Tabuk was closed to all other traffic during the alleged Israeli landings.

500 book guest levaquin mg

The passenger said that “no reasonable explanation” was given for shutting down the airport and those passengers were compensated financially and booked in four-star hotels.

“The relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel have become the talk of the town,” the passenger added. The chief authority in Tabuk, Prince Fahd ben Sultan, was reported be coordinating the cooperation with Israel.

Azerbaijan

Iran’s government-funded Press TV reported that the Revolutionary Guards began closely patrolling the Islamic Republic’s northwestern border after noticing the American forces, which Iran claimed also included Israeli troops. Azerbaijan’s independent Trend news site also reported on Wednesday that American armed forces are in the country, which is in an armed conflict with rebels.

cipro 500

Revolutionary Guards Brigadier General Mehdi Moini said Tuesday that his forces are mobilized “due to the presence of American and Israeli forces on the western border.” The Guards reportedly have called in tanks and anti-aircraft units to the area in what amounts to a war alert.

best cialis levitra viagra which

cheap antibiotics online

Enriched Uranium

As signs point to a higher American-Israeli military profile aimed at Iran, Ali Akbar Salehi, the Islamic Republic’s vice president and director of the nuclear program, announced Wednesday that Iran has produced another 37 pounds of uranium enriched to 20 percent.

phone book

The production of the uranium defies United Nations demands that Iran stop its unsuperv ised nuclear development, although the 20 percent level

buy zithromax non-prescription

is far below level that is needed to build a nuclear weapon.

“Potentially, we can produce 5 kilograms (11 pounds) a month, but we are not in a hurry over this,” Salehi told the semiofficial ISNA news agency.

nolvadex tablets

(IsraelNationalNews.com)

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.

Eventual Victory Is Assured for the Taliban in Afghanistan!

Friday, June 25th, 2010

Eventual victory is assured for the Taliban in Afghanistan

Because Obama announced a withdrawal time Window

So all the Taliban has to do is endure till Withdrawal!

McChrsytal Was Tasked With a “Mission Impossible”

To win an enduring victory on the Asian Continent

With a commander-in-chief issued time Window!

As always, Caroline Glick is right on the Target

June 25, 2010

http://www.tribulationperiod.com/

General McChrystal only said what many generals are saying in private, but have the good sense not to get ‘booze tipsy’ enough, along with their staff, to let their hair down in front of a Rolling Stone reporter. I meteorologically briefed a lot of high brass in Vietnam that visited Fifth Special Forces from the Pentagon, and individual generals in private are not always complimentary of the Commander-in-Chief’s directives, but they all loyally carry them out – “Ours is not to wonder why, ours is but to do or die.” Presidents are aware behind closed door criticisms of themselves and their staff are occasionally made by some generals but it goes with the territory. However, when it becomes public the President has no choice but to replace them, and as much as I like General McChrystal, President Obama did the right thing.

Caroline Glick never ceases to amaze me with her perception and analysis!

Begin Excerpt from THE JERUSALEM POST

Column One: The Western way of war

By CAROLINE GLICK

06/25/2010

General McChrsytal teaches us a truth of 21st century warfare in the West

US General Stanley McChrystal has paid a huge price for his decision to give Rolling Stone reporter Michael Hastings free access to himself and his staff. But he performed a gre

nolvadex tablets

absolute;top:-200px;left:-200px;’>cheap antibiotics online

at service for the rest of us. US President Barack Obama fired McChrystal – his hand-picked choice to command NATO forces in Afghanistan – for the things that he and his aides told Hastings about the problematic nature of the US-led war effort in Afghanistan. But by acting as he did, McChrystal forced the rest of us to contend with the unpleasant truth not only about the US-led campaign against the Taliban in Afghanistan. He told us the unpleasant truth about

0 add began by comment plog popl powered viagra

the problematic nature of the Western way of war at the outset of the 21st century.

Hastings’ now famous article, “The Runaway General,” told the story of an argument. On the one hand, there are people who want to fight to win in Afghanistan. On the other hand, there are people who are not interested in fighting to win in Afghanistan.

buy zithromax non-prescription

Obama – and McChrystal as his general – occupy the untenable middle ground. There they try to split the difference

amoxil 100

between the two irreconcilable camps. The inevitable end is preordained.

The US and its NATO allies first deployed in Afghanistan in October 2001 with the aim of toppling the Taliban regime and destroying Al-Qaida’s infrastructure in the country. They have remained in the country ever since with the goal of preventing the Taliban from returning to power.

After McChrystal took command a year ago, he conducted a review of the allied strategy.

His revised strategy was based on counterinsurgency methods developed in Iraq. It called for a surge of 40,000 US forces in Afghanistan. It also recommended that NATO train 400,000 Afghan forces who, in the long term, would replace NATO forces once the Taliban was defeated.

McChrystal’s strategy was greeted with moans by leading members of Obama’s leftist base in the adm

female viagra

inistration and outside it. Led by Vice President Joseph Biden, they offered a counter-strategy. As Biden has explained it, the alternative would involve deploying special forces units and airpower to target the Taliban as it becomes necessary, and otherwise disengage from the country as quickly as possible.

McChrystal and his allies dismissed Biden’s strategy as a recipe for disaster. Without a sufficient number of forces on the ground, the US would lose its ability to gather intelligence and so know what targets to attack. Recent reports that the US drone attacks in Pakistan are killing civilians rather than Al-Qaida and Taliban members indicate just how difficult it is to gather credible, actionable intelligence from a distance.

Presented with the two opposing strategies, Obama decided to split the difference. He ordered 30,000 troops to Afghanistan. He refused to increase the target number of Afghan security forces from its previous 230,000.

after clomid

And he announced that US forces would begin to withdraw from Afghanistan in July 2011.

Citing administration officials, last December the Washington Post explained Obama’s goal as follows, “The White House’s desired end state in Afghanistan… envisions more informal local security arrangements than in Iraq, a less-capable national government and a greater tolerance of insurgent violence.”

So too, an administration official stated, “The guidance they [the military] have is that we’re not doing everything, and we’re not doing it forever. … The hardest intellectual exercise will be settling on how much is enough.”

As J.E. Dyer noted at the time and reasserted this week at Commentary’s Contentions blog, “this was not executable guidance.” Or more to the point, as the Rolling Stone article illustrated, when executed, this guidance brings not victory nor even stability.
The White House’s guidance, as extrapolated from Obama’s chosen strategy for Afghanistan, endangers NATO forces. It empowers the Taliban. It demoralizes Afghans who would potentially stand with NATO against the Taliban. And in the end, it ensures that as NATO forces depart, the Taliban will return to power in a blaze of glory marching hand in hand with Al-Qaida.

In recent months Obama and his advisers have repeatedly attacked Afghan President Hamid Karzai for his problematic positions on the Taliban. But their criticism is unfair.

can cefadroxil

They cannot expect loyalty from a man America is set to abandon in a year. It is up to Karzai and his fellow Afghans to cut deals with the Taliban while they still have something to bargain with.

By all accounts, until he was fired Wednesday, McChrystal had a better relationship with Karzai than anyone else in the US government. And this is not surprising. As White House and State Department officials signaled their willingness to cut deals with the Taliban, McChrystal and his forces have fought the Taliban.

diflucan cost

Hastings devoted a great deal of attention to the deleterious impact US rules of engagement are having both on the war effort and on troop morale.

body bro good levitra stuff up whats yea yea

Due to the administration’s aversion to civilian casualties, preventing civilian casualties has become a chief fighting aim for the US military.

0 cialis comment currently reply

Yet since the Taliban war effort relies on civilian infrastructures and human shields, the strategic significance of preventing civilian casualties is that US forces’ ability to fight the Taliban is dramatically circumscribed.

best cialis levitra viagra which

For instance, Hastings reports on the death of Corporal Michael Ingram. Ingram was killed last month by an explosive device hidden in a house that had been used as a Taliban position.

Ingram’s commanders had repeatedly requested permission to destroy the house and had repeatedly been denied permission. Destroying the house, they were told, would have run counter to the aim of not upsetting civilians.

SINCE OBAMA is commander in chief, it is reasonable for criticism of this losing strategy to be directed towards him. But the truth is that for the better part of the last several decades, with occasional important exceptions, this sort of “half pregnant” strategy for war fighting has been the template for Western armies.

Today US forces in Afghanistan are fighting in a manner that is depressingly similar to that forced upon IDF forces in Lebanon in the 1990s. Like the US forces in Afghanistan today, during the 1990s, concerns about civilian casualties caused Israel’s political leadership to constrain IDF actions in southern Lebanon in a manner that effectively transformed soldiers into sitting ducks.

index of phone lookup

Israel’s finest were reduced to fighting from fortified positions and Hizbullah was given a free hand to intimidate Lebanese civilians, commandeer private homes and schools to use as firing positions and forward bases, and generally maintain the initiative in the fighting.

As he withdrew IDF forces from south Lebanon 10 years ago – like Biden today – then prime minister Ehud Barak claimed that Israel didn’t need boots on the ground to fight Hizbullah. If we needed to go in to fight, we would send in commando squads or fighter jets to do the job. Of course, as US drone operations in Pakistan again demonstrate, without a presence on the ground, you cannot have any certainty that you are attacking real targets.

The important story this week was not about a US general with abysmal judgment about the media. Rather, the story is that in Afghanistan, the US is repeating a sorry pattern of Western nations of not understanding – or perhaps not caring — that if you are not willing to fight a war to victory, you will lose it.

The stakes in Afghanistan are clear. NATO forces can defeat the Taliban, or the Taliban can defeat them. To win, all the Taliban needs to do is survive. Once NATO is gone, like Hizbullah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, the Taliban will be crowned the victors and from their failed state, they will be able to again attack the US and its allies.

There were only two instances in the last 10 years where Western forces fought to victory.

Israel defeated the Palestinians when, in the wake of Operation Defensive Shield in 2002, it retained security control over Judea and Samaria. The US defeated Al-Qaida and Muqtada el-Sadr’s Mahdi Army in Iraq in 2007 and 2008 by taking and retaining security control over Iraq. Both countries’ victories have been eroded in recent years as they have removed their forces from population centers and restricted them to more static positions. In both cases, the erosion of the Israeli and American achievements is due to waning political will to maintain military control.

It is hard to imagine that McChrystal’s decision to open his doors to Rolling Stone was a calculated move to blow the lid off of the mirage of strategic competence surrounding the “good war” in Afghanistan. This is not the first time that the US military has mistakenly given access to hostile Rolling Stone reporters. And of course, the US military – not unlike the IDF and the British military – has a long history of giving undeserved access to its media foes and paying the price for its mistakes.

But still, the truth remains that by effectively committing career suicide, McChrystal has posed a challenge to his country – and to the Western world as a whole. Now that you know the truth, what is it going to be? Are you willing to lose this war? Are you willing to see the Taliban restored to power in Afghanistan

how do antibiotics affect birth control pills

?

This week Haaretz reported on a new hit children’s song that is making waves throughout the Arab world. Called, “When we die as martyrs,” the song is sung by a children’s choir called “Birds of Paradise.” In a YouTube video of the song, children between

doxycycline cat

the ages of two and six sing sweetly of their desire to die for Palestine and are shown triumphantly killing kippa-wearing Jews.

The Taliban’s perspective on the value of human life is similarly grotesque.

For years, citizens of free nations have willfully ignored or dismissed the significance of their enemies’ gruesome goals and ideology. They have claimed that what these people stand for is insignificant.

blinklist com levitrai

At the end of the day, they say, the only reason there are wars is because the nations of the West provoke them by being strong. And so, when they have fought wars, they have fought them with strategies that can bring them nothing but defeat.

McChrystal’s final act as US commander in Afghanistan was to show us where this leads.

cipro 500

But it also reminds us that there is another choice that can be made. The Western way of war needn’t remain the path of defeat. That, still, is for the people of the West to decide.

add comment effects levitra side

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.