The mid-term election Concerns,
Secret flight part of Obama Plan,
To Regain Pre-election Popularity!
A New Middle East Modus Operandi,
For Temporary Victory in Afghamistan!
BHO made a left in His mode of Operation,
Obami Modus Operandi for Israeli & Palestini,
BHO Betrayal OF Israel is an Act of Anti-Semitism,
And an unveiling of BHO’s true colors of Islamic Favor!
BHO will never commit U.S. ground troops to defend Israel
In a future final war of this age I believe will begin before 2015!
March 29, 2010
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Ephesians 6:10-13 – Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. [11] Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against
the wiles of the devil. [12] For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. [13] Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, THAT YE MAY BE ABLE TO WITHSTAND IN THE EVIL DAY, AND HAVING DONE ALL, TO STAND.
Matthew 6:33,34 – But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
[34] Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. SUFFICIENT UNTO THE DAY IS THE EVIL THEREOF.
Mark 6:50 – For they all saw him, and were troubled. And immediately he talked with them, and saith unto them, Be of good cheer: it is I; be not afraid.
WHAT FOLLOWS ARE A LONG SERIES OF EXCERPTS FROM MANY SOURCES THAT MAY BE HELPFUL IN UNDERSTANDING MASSIVE POLICY CHANGES SINCE OBAMA WAS ELECTED, AS WELL AS THE SUDDEN ACCELERATION NOW OCCURRING IN FOREIGN POLICY.
Began Excerpt from Columbus Dispatch Politics
Secret flight
Obama presses Afghan leader during surprise trip
Overseas visit emphasizes war, corruption fight
Monday, March 29, 2010 2:49 AM
By Dion Nissenbaum and Steven Thomma
KABUL, Afghanistan – President Barack Obama made a surprise trip to Afghanistan yesterday as he sought to steel American forces for a tough summer and deliver a political jolt to Hamid Karzai as the Afghan president weighs potential peace talks with the Taliban.
In his first visit to Afghanistan since taking office, Obama firmly prodded Karzai to take more-decisive steps to reform his corruption-tainted government so that both leaders can capitalize on the surge of 30,000 more American troops into the war zone.
Speaking to nearly 2,000 military-service members, Obama warned that they face “difficult days” in the escalating fight against Taliban insurgents.
“There are going to be setbacks,” Obama said in the 20-minute speech at Bagram Airfield near Kabul. “We face a determined enemy. But we also know this: The United States of America does not quit once it starts on something.”
The six-hour trip capped a week in which Obama won congressional approval of a health-care overhaul plan that was the centerpiece of his domestic agenda, signed it into law and announced a treaty with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to reduce the nuclear arsenals of both countries.
His visit came at a pivotal moment for both the U.S.-led military coalition and the Karzai government.
After a successful military campaign in opium-saturated Helmand province, American forces are preparing for a bigger showdown in Kandahar, the spiritual birthplace of the Taliban in southern Afghanistan.
The recent military offensive in Marjah helped shore up flagging public support in America. A new Washington Post poll found that Afghanistan is the only issue tested on which Obama’s handling merits majority approval (53percent) and more strong approval than disapproval.
But support at home could waver as the fighting intensifies this summer.
At least 77 American servicemen have been killed in Afghanistan this year, according to an Associated Press survey. That’s more than twice the number killed in
the first three months of 2009.
At the same time, Karzai is preparing to hold a nationwide conference – a peace jirga – in April to discuss ways to end the eight-year war by holding talks with pragmatic Taliban leaders.
Obama made no public mention of the potential peace talks, a contentious step that has not won broad support in Afghanistan or the United States.
Some Obama administration officials believe the U.S.-led military coalition needs to deliver a more-decisive blow to the Taliban insurgency before entering any serious peace talks with its leaders.
In his speech, Obama told the American troops that their job is to “reverse the Taliban’s momentum” and disrupt, dismantle, defeat and “destroy al-Qaida and its extremist allies.”
After meeting Karzai for about half an hour, Obama told reporters that Americans are encouraged by the progress in Afghanistan, but that more work lies ahead.
The Obama administration has struggled to find the right mix of pressure and praise to persuade Karzai to crack down on rampant government corruption that has severely undermined the Afghan president’s political stature.
Karzai “needs to be seized with how important that is,” Jim Jones, Obama’s national security adviser, told the small pool of reporters brought along on the trip under tight secrecy.
Jones also said that Obama wanted to impress on Karzai the need to step up the fight against Afghanistan’s dominant opium trade, which helps finance Taliban fighters.
Aides to Karzai and Obama described the meeting as friendly and businesslike.
The Obama administration said Karzai is to visit Washington on May 12, about a week after he is scheduled to wrap up the peace jirga.
“Relations now are stronger than they’ve been in the last eight years,” Karzai spokesman Waheed Omar said after the talks.
In his late-night speech at Bagram, Obama also praised neighboring Pakistan for acceding to persistent American pressure to clamp down on al-Qaida and Taliban sanctuaries.
“We can’t uproot extremism and advance security and opportunity unless we succeed on both sides of the border,” Obama said.
As was the case for Obama’s surprise visit to Iraq in April, the trip to Afghanistan was shrouded in intense secrecy. Air Force One arrived in Kabul early yesterday evening after a nonstop, 13-hour flight from the United States.
The Obama administration informed Karzai of the trip Thursday, giving the Afghan administration little time to prepare for the visit.
After dinner at the presidential palace with Karzai and members of his cabinet, Obama flew to Bagram, where he changed into a leather Air Force One bomber jacket and took off his tie before speaking to troops.
Although the visit was short, Jones said it was critical. “We have to have the strategic rapport with President Karzai and his cabinet to understand how we are going to succeed this year in reversing the momentum the Taliban and the opposition forces have been able to establish since 2006.”
Begin Series of Excerpts from Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs/Daily alert
Excerpt 1 – Miami Herald
In Confrontation with Israel, Obama May Double His Bets
Warren P. Strobel
After nearly three weeks of open confrontation with Israel, President Obama may be about to double his bets. Obama, fresh from his legislative victory on health care, is planning an attempt to turn the current disaster into a diplomatic opportunity, according to U.S. officials, former officials and diplomats. The administration is said to be preparing a major peace initiative that would be Obama’s most direct involvement in the conflict to date, and would go far beyond indirect Israeli-Palestinian talks. “It is crystallizing that we have to do something now. That this can’t go on this way,” said one official. (McClatchy-Miami Herald)
Excerpt 2 – Ha’artz
Israel Fears Obama Heading for Imposed Mideast Settlement
Ari Shavit
President Obama’s demands during his meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu
last Tuesday point to an intention to impose a permanent settlement on Israel and the Palestinians in less than two years, political sources in Jerusalem say. Israeli officials view the demands that Obama made at the White House as the tip of the iceberg under which lies a dramatic change in U.S. policy toward Israel. Of ten demands posed by Obama, four deal with Jerusalem: opening a Palestinian commercial interests office in east Jerusalem, an end to the razing of structures in Palestinian neighborhoods in the capital, stopping construction in Jewish neighborhoods in east Jerusalem, and not building in the neighborhood of Ramat Shlomo. The fact that the White House and State Department have been in contact with Israel’s European allies, first and foremost Germany, is seen as part of an effort to isolate Israel and put enormous political pressure on it.
(Ha’aretz)
Excerpt 3 – Politico
President Obama’s Mideast Gamble
Ben Smith
The question facing Obama is whether he will be able to turn a perception of increased “evenhandedness” into an Arab engagement in the peace process that the administration sought, but did not get, last year. Obama’s new focus, and the intense pressure his administration has placed on Netanyahu, have stirred deep concern among Israel’s allies on Capitol Hill, they say, because it represents an acceptance of the Arab narrative that Israeli intransigence lies at the heart of the Middle East conflict. David Rothkopf, a former Clinton administration trade official, said the new model drawing attention from Democratic foreign policy hands is to build support among Arab leaders for a U.S. plan and then present that to Israel – to serve as the Arabs’ lawyer, rather than as Israel’s. (Politico)
Excerpt 4 – Polititico
Fierce Debate on Israel Underway Inside Obama Administration
Laura Rozen
Since Netanyahu’s tense visit to the White House last week, an intense debate inside the Obama administration about how to proceed has grown more heated. Sources say within the inter-agency process, White House Middle East strategist Dennis Ross is staking out a position that Washington needs to be sensitive to Netanyahu’s domestic political constraints including over the issue of building in east Jerusalem in order to not raise new Arab demands, while other officials including some aligned with Middle East peace envoy George Mitchell are arguing Washington needs to hold firm in pressing Netanyahu for written commitments. (Politico)
Begin Collection of Excerpts from the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA)
ZOA: Obama Shows He’s No Friend Of Israel By Disgraceful Action Toward PM Of The Jewish State
March 26, 2010
Morton A. Klein
Obama actions are an insult and affront to all Jews
Reports and editorials from around the world state that President Obama treated Prime Minister Netanyahu of the Jewish state of Israel in a disgraceful and unwarranted manner.
The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) strongly condemns President Obama for his behavior toward the Jewish state. We consider Obama’s actions an affront and an insult to all Jews in America and throughout all the world. Obama apparently also made new and substantial demands of Israel while making no demands of the anti-peace regime of Mahmoud Abbas’ Palestinian Authority.
The ZOA concurs with the words of Commentary Magazine’s Jennifer Rubin who wrote, “… the Obami are sticking with their modus operandi – preconditions and ultimatums for the Israelis, and water-carrying for the Palestinians;
Netanyahu reportedly wanted to know where the “reciprocity” was and why he was the one making all the concessions. (“Netanyahu, according to senior officials, said that while the US held him responsible for the timing of the announcement to build 1,600 units in Ramat Shlomo, rather than holding Interior Minister Eli Yishai responsible, Abbas was not held responsible when it came to the PA – which recently presided over the naming of a square in Ramallah for the terrorist responsible for the Coastal Road massacre.”)…
It is not that the Obami fear daylight between the U.S. and Israel; it is that they flaunt it. It is not credibility as an honest broker that the Obami are establishing but rather fidelity to the Palestinian negotiating stance. And after all this, and the revelation that the proposed sanctions will be pinpricks at best, would any reasonable Israeli leader believe this administration will do everything (or even anything too strenuous) to remove the existential threat to the Jewish state?
The low point in the history of U.S.-Israel relations has come about not because of a housing permit but because we have a president fundamentally uninterested in retaining the robust, close relationship between the two countries that other administrations of both parties have cultivated. The Obami set out to separate the U.S. from Israel, to pressure and cajole the Jewish state, and to remake the U.S. into an eager suitor to the Muslim World. In the process, anti-Israel delegitimizing efforts have been unleashed as Israel’s enemies (and our own allies) sense that we have downgraded the relationship with the Jewish state, the Israeli public has come to distrust the administration, the American Jewish electorate is somewhere between stunned and horrified, and Israel is less secure and more isolated than ever before.
If mainstream Jewish organizations are serious about their stated mission, it is incumbent upon them to protest this state of affairs clearly and loudly and make their support for this president and his congressional enablers conditional, based on a change of policy in regard to Israel. Otherwise, they are enabling a potentially fatal assault on the security of the Jewish state. Silence is acquiescence, meekness is shameful. A generation from now, Jews will be asking those who led key American Jewish organizations, what did you do to protect Israel
? What did you do to protest the creep toward a “containment” policy for a nuclear-armed Iran? They better have a good answer.”
Following is a selected sample of articles discussing the Netanyahu-Obama White House meeting —
Washington Post – Jackson Diehl – March 24, 2010
“…for the second time in a year, the Middle East peace process has been stalled by a U.S.-engineered deadlock….
…Obama has added more poison to a U.S.-Israeli relationship that already was at its lowest point in two decades. Tuesday night the White House refused to allow non-official photographers record the president’s meeting with Netanyahu; no statement was issued afterward. Netanyahu is being treated as if he were an unsavory Third World dictator, needed for strategic reasons but conspicuously held at arms length. That is something the rest of the world will be quick to notice and respond to.
Just like the Palestinians, European governments cannot be more friendly to an Israeli leader than the United States. Would Britain have expelled a senior Israeli diplomat Tuesday because of a flap over forged passports if there were no daylight between Obama and Netanyahu? Maybe not…
…Obama chose to challenge Netanyahu on a point that is not material to the creation of a Palestinian state. As the Israeli leader has pointed out, previous U.S. administrations and the Palestinians themselves have already accepted that Jewish Neighborhoods in and around Jerusalem will be annexed to Israel in exchange for territory elsewhere…
…A new administration can be excused for making such a mistake in the treacherous and complex theater of Middle East diplomacy.
That’s why Obama was given a pass by many when he made exactly the same mistake last year. The second time around, the president doesn’t look naïve. He appears ideological – and vindictive.
Jerusalem Post blog – Mayor Ed Koch – March 23, 2010
I consider the Obama administration’s recent actions against the Israeli government to be outrageous and a breach of trust.
What is most disturbing about the truly harsh and inflammatory rhetoric of both Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton directed at the government of Israel, is that it is speculated President Obama himself may have ordered Biden and Clinton to make the statements they made. The Times of March 16 reported, “…Mr. Obama was deeply involved in the strategy and planning for Mr. Biden’s visit and orchestrated the response from Mr. Biden and Mrs. Clinton after it went awry, these officials said.” President Obama and his administration’s overly harsh public reaction to the construction in east Jerusalem appears to have emboldened Israel’s enemies and provided a cover for their extremist views. It has also created a serious crisis of confidence among the Israeli public that it can depend on this administration for its security.
…the relations will never be the same again. Humpty Dumpty has been broken and the absolute trust needed between allies is no longer there. How sad it is for the supporters of Israel who put their trust in President Obama.
New York Times – Ethan Bronner – March 26, 2010
…news coverage of his Washington trip, describing his treatment at the White House as deeply humiliating because neither photographs or ceremony mark his visit.
There is little doubt that Obama administration officials thought it was appropriate to reciprocate the embarrassment felt by Mr.
Biden here and to send a tough message….
Commentary Magazine – Jonathan S. Tobin – blogs – 03.25.2010
No Denying White House Animus Toward Israel
…But the cold reception of the Dalai Lama now seems like a wild party compared to the way Obama received Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House this week….it was an excuse for the administration to renew its war on Netanyahu…
…But never has the leader of America’s ally Israel been treated with such open contempt as shown by Obama to Netanyahu. The Israeli’s visit to the White House was closed to the press – with not even one photo released of their encounter. The fact is that Obama didn’t even want his picture taken with Netanyahu. That’s particularly strange since the president has never any qualms about getting snapped next to a wide variety of international leaders on his travels….Coming from a president that has spent his time in office making non-stop efforts to reach out to and engage America’s enemies around the world, this open hostility to Israel is breathtaking in its brazenness.
…Something that not even the elder Bush and James Baker ever tried to shove down Shamir’s throat. There was no joint statement released after the talks ended but the White House let it be known that they expected the Israelis to make further concessions as in indication of their willingness to build confidence….the Palestinians, who have refused to even negotiate directly with Israel and who refused only a year and a half ago to accept an Israeli offer of an independent state that would have included part of Jerusalem, have not been asked by Obama to make any gestures of their own to enhance the non-existent chances of peace.
This White House’s cold shoulder to Netanyahu…even the most shameless Obama apologist can pretend that it was anything but an indication of the president’s hostility…The question for Jewish Democrats and other liberal friends of Israel is whether they are prepared to hold Barack Obama accountable in the same fashion.
Jerusalem Post – Caroline Glick – 03/22/2010
…This is the behavior of an adversary.
…U.S. President treating Israel like an enemy…
Obama has made clear that he is not Israel’s ally….he will do everything he can to downgrade US relations with Israel while maintaining his constant genuflection to the likes of Iran, Syria, the Palestinians and Turkey.
The Times of the United Kingdom – March 26, 2010
Binyamin Netanyahu humiliated after Barack Obama ‘dumped him for dinner’
For a head of government to visit the White House and not pose for photographers is rare. For a key ally to be left to his own devices while the President withdraws to have dinner in private was, until this week, unheard of.
Yet that is how Binyamin Netanyahu was treated by President Obama on Tuesday night, according to Israeli reports on a trip viewed in Jerusalem as a humiliation.
…”It was awful,” the congressman said. One Israeli newspaper called the meeting “a hazing in stages”,…Another said that the Prime Minister had received “the treatment reserved for the President of Equatorial Guinea.”…
…He [Netanyahu] returned to Israel yesterday isolated after what Israeli media have called a White House ambush…
“The Prime Minister leaves America disgraced, isolated and altogether weaker than when he came,” the Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz said….
…Newspaper reports recounted how Mr. Netanyahu looked “excessively concerned and upset”…
Commentary Magazine – Jennifer Rubin – 03/26/2010
As Jonathan has noted, we don’t know exactly how shabby the Obami’s behavior toward Bibi Netanyahu was. It is cause for alarm if it was remotely like this:
…the projected air of chilliness and the ensuing deadlines that we have learned have been imposed on the Israeli government are enough to confirm that the relationship between the two countries is anything but “rock solid”…
Victor Davis Hanson on Israel
Some strong supporters of both Obama and Israel are disappointed in the latest hysterical Biden-Clinton-Obama smack-down over the settlement issue. But why, I don’t know – this is a logical, not an aberrant, development from President Obama.
Once it was thought to be unprincipled guilt-by-association for pro-Israeli, anti-Obama groups to question candidate Obama’s dubious associations; after all, Reverend Wright, Rashid Khalidi, Samantha Power, et al.
were all on record as hostile to the Jewish state. Few likewise seemed to take note when a key Obama campaign foreign policy advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, in September 2009 suggested that the U.S. might, and perhaps should, shoot down Israeli planes over Iraq on their way to Iran; e.g., “If they fly over, you go up and confront them.
They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a Liberty in reverse.” Then there was the nomination of Charles Freeman. And of course the present outreach to the two most terrorist-friendly regimes in the Middle East, theocratic Iran and authoritarian Syria. Someone from Mars might conclude that the United States has spent far more effort in courting Ahmadinejad and Assad than Netanyahu.
…in aggregate they paint a pretty clear picture that for this administration the benefits of supporting Israel are far outweighed by the downside.
…Israel’s multiple enemies now are almost giddy in sensing that America is not all that into protecting the Jewish state, intellectually or morally….
Associated Press – Tom Raum – 03/25/10
Analysis: Obama risks alienating Jewish voters
…And in a break from tradition that many U.S. lawmakers saw as a snub, the White House accorded Netanyahu’s visit none of the trappings usually extended to an important ally.
The news media were not allowed into any part of the initial 90-minute Tuesday evening meeting between the two leaders, or a follow-up 35-minute session. There was no joint news conference afterward, no statements about what transpired, not even a White House-produced photograph….
…Since Obama took office, his relations with Israel have been tense. He has visited the Middle East twice as president but has yet to schedule an Israeli visit….
…Netanyahu’s reception at the White House was frosty….
The Jerusalem Post – Herb Keinon & Khaled Abu Toameh – 01/25/2010
…Nevertheless, the administration’s treatment of Netanyahu during his meeting with Obama created the impression of a deep crisis in relations….
Politico – Laura Rozen & Ben Smith – March 23, 2010
After meeting, deafening silence
The Obama administration shifted this week from red hot anger at Benjamin Netanyahu to an icier suspicion toward the Israeli Prime Minister…
…made sure to reward Netanyahu with a series of small snubs: There were no photographs released from the meeting, and no briefing for the press.
And as of late Tuesday evening, neither side had released the usual “readout” of the meetings’ content – a likely indicator of the distance between the sides.
Haaretz – Aluf Benn – 03/26/10
Netanyahu Leaves US in Disgrace
…The visit – …only highlighted the deep rift between the American and Israeli administrations.
The Prime Minister leaves America disgraced, isolated, and altogether weaker than when he came.
…But then calamity struck. At their White House meeting, Obama made clear to his guest that the letter Netanyahu had sent was insufficient and returned it for further corrections. Instead of a reception as a guest of honor, Netanyahu was treated as a problem child, an army private ordered to do laps around the base for slipping up at roll call.
The revolution in the Americans’ behavior is clear to all…
The moment the bill was passed, however, a victorious Obama was free to deal with his unruly guest.
The Americans made every effort to downplay the visit. As during this last visit in November, Netanyahu was invited to the White House at a late hour, without media coverage or a press conference. If that were not enough, the White House spokesman challenged Netanyahu’s observation at AIPAC that “Jerusalem is not a settlement.”
…It was not the behavior Washington shows an ally,, but the kind it shows an annoyance.
Haaretz – Yossi Verter – 03/26/2010
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu returned from the United States Thursday with egg all over his face but also with a painfully sharp insight – gone are the days when the White House was considerate about the intricacies of Israeli domestic politics.
…Obama is not making any effort to show sensitivity to Netanyahu’s distress and worse – he’s ignoring it as though he intends to wreck some political chaos here.
“Obama isn’t only sticking the knife in,” a minister said, “he’s twisting it and enjoying it.”
Shock treatment, a senior Likud figure said Thursday about Netanyahu’s experience in Washington.
The New Republic blog – Marty Peretz – March, 2010
…Hillary Clinton, addressed AIPAC with the emptiest reassurances that Israel’s real security will be assured in any American design for a peace agreement….
…And the president didn’t allow even a formal goodbye today. I don’t think there was even a photo op….
An American source close to the administration said that Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have decided to ‘test’ Netanyahu and see whether he will carry out his promised gestures of good will toward the Palestinians.
So am I crazy
?
Obama and Clinton are going to test Bibi’s bona fides? What about the bona fides of Abu Mazen? What about his capacity to make an agreement, let alone his will?
Obama and Clinton seem to trust the Palestinians more than they trust the government of Israel. And they trust them without the Palestinian Authority uttering anything other than demands.
The administration’s capitulation to proximity talks as a formula for the negotiations is a very bad sign that it will accept anything from the Palestinians, including their and their Arab cousins’ nearly hundred years design for failed talks….
Arutz – 7 – Gil Ronen – March 24, 2010
Obama Dresses Down Netanyahu: No photo Ops or Statements
President Barack Obama appeared to carry on a policy of intentionally humiliating Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu this week by ignoring custom and abstaining from any public appearance with him during Netanyahu’s visit to the White House.
In a particularly unusual step, no press coverage or photographs of Netanyahu’s meeting Tuesday with Obama at the White House were permitted.
,,,Mark Toner, the deputy State Department spokesman, said that “the US made clear it is looking for steps to increase confidence and show commitment to the process.”
A White House spokesman, Tommy Vietor, said the White House continues to believe that Israel building in eastern Jerusalem is ‘destructive’ to the Middle East peace process….
Haaretz – Bradley Burston – 03/18/2010
Israel’s Titanic moment: Does Obama want Bibi’s head?
To the delight of Mahmoud Zabar and Mahmoud Ahmdinejad, Israel’s homemade weapons of mass destruction – pro-settlement bureaucrats with conflicts of financial and ideological interest – have done in one meeting what Israel’s foes have sought for generations: driving a stake through the heart of Israel’s relationship with the White House…
End of the Long Collection of Excerpts from the Zionist Organization of America
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.