Hooray For The Israeli Prime Minister And All The Rest Of H is
Ministers!
Israel Is Now Taking Action I Believe Pleases Her Soon Coming Messiah!
She’s showing backbone to Gentile pressure to give up God’s Land Grant!
She’s saying NO to U.S. and International Pressure For the Two State Plan!
The West Bank was given to Israel and she should not give it to Canaanites!
God took the land from Canaanites and gave it to his chosen people of Israel!
There Will be No Canaanite in the House of the Lord of Hosts in the Millennium!
April 17, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Joshua 1:1-4 – Now after the death of Moses the servant of the Lord it came to pass, that the Lord spake unto Joshua the son of Nun, Moses’ minister, saying, [2] Moses my servant is dead; now therefore arise, go over this Jordan, thou, and all this people, unto the land which I do give to them, even to the children of Israel. [3] Every place that the sole of your foot shall tread upon, that have I given unto you, as I said unto Moses. [4] From the wilderness and this Lebanon even unto the great river, the river Euphrates, all the land of the Hittites, and unto the great sea
toward the going down of the sun, shall be your coast.
“The wilderness” in Joshua 1:4 is where “Kadesh” was located in the western Negev in Ezekiel 47:19
“Lebanon” in Joshua 1:4 is pretty much where Lebanon is today
“Hamath” in Joshua 1:4 is Hama in northern Syria where ancient Hittites dwelt
“The great sea” is the Mediterranean
“The great river” is the Euphrates
Genesis 15:18 – In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:
Ezekiel 47:17 – And the border from the sea shall be Hazar-enan, the border of Damascus, and the north northward, and the border of Hamath. And this is the north side.
Ezekiel 47:19 – And the south side southward, from Tamar even to the waters of strife in Kadesh, the river to the great sea. And this is the south side southward.
Zechariah 14:8,9,20,21 – And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem; half of them toward the former sea, and half of them toward the hinder sea: in summer and in winter shall it be. [9] And the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and his name one. [20] In that day shall there be upon the bells of the horses, HOLINESS UNTO THE LORD; and the pots in the Lord’s house shall be like the bowls
before the altar.
[21] Yea, every pot in Jerusalem and in Judah shall be holiness unto the Lord of hosts: and all they that sacrifice shall come and take of them, and seethe therein: and in that day there shall BE NO MORE THE CANAANITE IN THE HOUSE OF THE LORD OF HOSTS.
Genesis 9:25 – And he said, Cursed be CANAAN; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.
Joshua 5:13-15 – And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, there stood a man over against him with his sword drawn in his hand: and Joshua went unto him, and said unto him, Art thou for us, or for our adversaries? [14] And he said, Nay; but AS CAPTAIN OF THE HOST OF THE LORD am I now come.
And Joshua fell on his face to the earth, and did worship, and said unto him, What saith my lord unto his servant? [15] And THE CAPTAIN OF THE LORD’S HOST said unto Joshua, Loose thy shoe from off thy foot; for the place whereon thou standest is holy. And Joshua did so.
Begin Excerpt from YNet News
Netanyahu: We won’t accept another Hamastan
Prime minister meets with visiting US special envoy George Mitchell, says Israel has no desire to rule the Palestinians but must ensure that political process does not result in another Hamas-controlled entity that could threaten Jerusalem
Roni Sofer
April 16, 2009
It appears the coveted assurance from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the United States that the Israeli government will back the two state solution has failed to materialize.
The prime minister met on Thursday evening with US President Barack Obama’s special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell.
Netanyahu told Mitchell that while Israel has no desire to rule over the Palestinians, it must maintain its security interests.
Prior to the meeting a senior official in Netanyahu’s office said that the prime minister would stress to Mitchell that Israel “expects the Palestinians to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of the Jewish people.”
He also emphasized the importance of furthering the West’s cooperation with other countries in the region, especially Saudi Arabia, as these nations have a better understanding of the Iranian threat.
“Israel must make sure that the political process does not result in the creation of a second Hamastan (in the West Bank) that would threaten Jerusalem and the coastline,” Netanyahu said, according to the official.
But despite the apparently tough line from Israel, the meeting was positive in atmosphere, the Prime Minister’s Office said.
The PMO refused to comment on any controversial topics of conversation that may have come up in the meeting, namely the creation of a Palestinian state based on Annapolis guidelines, settlement expansion and eviction and renewed negotiations with the Palestinians.
Instead, they reported that Mitchell rejected recent publications the US President Barack Obama refused to meet with Netanyahu and, on the contrary, had suggested May 11, 2009 as a possible meeting date at the White House. For internal reasons, including the Pope’s visit, this date was not acceptable for the Israeli side.
The office also said that Mitchell had not referred to IDF aerial attacks in Gaza.
Begin Excerpt 2 from Jerusalem Post
Netanyahu: Palestinians must recognize State of Israel
April 16, 2009
herb keinon, jpost.com staff and ap , THE JERUSALEM POST
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu met Thursday evening with US envoy George Mitchell and said Israel would not risk the creation of another Hamas-controlled entity on its border.
Also, Netanyahu told Mitchell that the Palestinians would have to recognize Israel as a Jewish state as a precondition for talks on a two-state solution, a step they have refused to take so far.
Earlier on Thursday, Mitchell reiterated that the US remained committed to Palestinian statehood, countering comments by Israeli ministers to the effect that the new government was not bound to a two-state solution.
“The US policy favors a two-state solution, which would have a Palestinian state living in peace alongside the Jewish state of Israel,” Mitchell said after meeting with Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman in Jerusalem.
Mitchell said that the two had a “good, full and candid discussion covering both the history of the peace process, going back to the 1990s, and continuing to the present, and also looking into the future on what can be done to achieve our common objectives.”
“We agreed to meet again, and we look forward to exchanging ideas on future visits when we can compare the progress we are making as we seek to move forward,” continued the US envoy.
Lieberman, who caused waves earlier this month when he said that Israel was not bound by the Annapolis process – although he reiterated the country’s commitment to the road map – said after the meeting that he and Mitchell spoke about “close cooperation.”
“We are looking forward to the next meeting and some really deep dialogue,” he said. It was Mitchell’s first meeting with Lieberman as foreign minister.
A statement released by the Foreign Ministry said that Lieberman had told Mitchell that, “thus far, the traditional approach has not brought any results or solutions.”
Lieberman emphasized that previous prime ministers had already shown readiness to make “far-reaching concessions” and cited the previous government’s legacies of “the Second Lebanon War and the operation in Gaza, as well as the severing of ties with Qatar and Mauritania; Gilad Schalit is still in captivity and the diplomatic process is at [a] dead end.”
Lieberman said that he expected the international community to not only rally behind Israel’s security concerns but also to affirm its commitment to Israel’s Jewish character.
Mitchell’s statement echoed remarks he had made earlier in the day
in a meeting with President Shimon Peres. Mitchell assured the president that the US was wholly committed to Israel’s security and reiterated Washington’s commitment to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
“The opening point of American foreign policy is an absolute and strong commitment to the security of the state of Israel and its people,” said the US envoy. “Both President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton have said this. We are committed to two states for two peoples living alongside each other in security and peace and we shall act accordingly.”
Peres urged Mitchell not to let the pessimism and the negative voices being heard in the region affect him.
“There is an opening point for promoting the political process,” said the president. “No door to peace has been closed and I believe that this year is a decisive year in the Middle East. We do not have time to waste.”
The president went on to say that Obama’s policy to attain peace in the region matched Israel’s position, stressing that while Israel wanted peace, it would not compromise on security.
Referring to the upcoming Durban II Conference, Peres told Mitchell it was “a conference of self-righteous people who boast at having invited [Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad as the guest of honor.”
He questioned whether the conference could contribute to the cessation of the arms smuggling to Gaza, a phenomenon he said Israel would not put up with.
“We will not sit with folded arms and wait for rockets to fall on Tel Aviv,” he said.
Greer Fay Cashman contributed to this report
Begin Excerpt 3 from Jerusalem Post
Ministers renounce two-state solution
April 16, 2009
JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
As US emissary George Mitchell was making the rounds in Jerusalem Thursday and reaffirming President Barack Obama’s commitment to Palestinian statehood, Israeli ministers were distancing themselves from a two-state solution.
“The preferable course of diplomatic action at this time is two economies for two peoples and not two states for two peoples,” Interior Minister Eli Yishai said.
“The American emissary also knows that forcing the region into virtual diplomatic discourse will only breed the opposite results.”
Speaking to Army Radio, Yishai expounded on the “economic peace” propounded by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, saying, “It would be more correct to create trust through economic discourse which is essentially a Palestinian interest.”
By “enlisting” to aid the recovery of the Palestinian economy, he said, the international community would also be helping the Palestinian public “relinquish terror.”
Earlier, Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz rejected the Annapolis process and said that Israel would not accept a two-state solution as the basis for talks.
“The Annapolis outline has failed and is no longer binding,” Katz said in an interview with Israel Radio, emphasizing that Netanyahu would “formulate a diplomatic approach that takes into account all of the different elements, and first and foremost Israel’s security.”
Commenting on a statement by Egypt’s Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit, who said on Wednesday that Cairo would not work with Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, Katz stated that the government would do “everything it takes” in order to safeguard Israel’s “strategic relationship” with Egypt.
He admitted that certain remarks made by Lieberman in the past, including a comment that Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak could “go to hell” if he did not agree to make an official visit to Jerusalem, were “unfortunate,” but said he would not recommend an apology on the part of the foreign minister.
Responding to Katz’s comments, MK Yuli Tamir (Labor) said that “it is rapidly emerging that the government has no understanding of our international context and is putting us on a collision course with Europe and the US. The entire world supports Annapolis while Israel alone singles itself out as a dissenter.”
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site.
However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.