Obama’s Hollywood PING PONG DIALOG Diplomacy,
Is now on department store special in Iran-like-Macys!
DIALOG with comic book THUGS didn’t work for Dick Tracy,
And it will only generate a scenario of false peace with Laces,
Until the Islamic hoard roars south in Israel to break all Traces!
Our new far left liberal government is fooling all of its many Races,
Into believing a smiling face and friendly dialog can change Radicals,
And reality has now left the United States to go on a LONG Sabbatical!
February 28, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Please take the time to read
the two excerpts from DEBKAfile.
I wholeheartedly agree with them. The first outlines the diplomatic dialog administrative program being launched by Obama’s talking heads, and the second lays out the way Iran will take advantage of it.
WELCOME TO THE NEW LIBERAL WORLD OF “LET’S PRETEND!”
IT IS THE WAY THE AMERICAN WORLD IN GENTILE AGE WILL END!
Begin Excerpt 1 from DEBKAfile
Obama’s “Hollywood diplomacy” launches dialogue with Tehran
February 28, 2009, 10:05 AM (GMT+02:00)
Thirty-eight years ago, a ping pong team sent by US President Richard Nixon to Beijing opened the door to Communist China. February 27, 2009, president Barack Obama launched his bid for dialogue with Iran with an Academy of Motion Pictures, Arts and Sciences delegation from Hollywood. It is led by the actress Annette Bening, AMPAS president Sid Ganis and his predecessor Frank Pierson who flew in just after the Oscar award ceremony. Visiting in the framework of “US-Iranian culture exchanges,” they will hold talks in Tehran Saturday and Sunday.
DEBKAfile’s Washington sources note that this visit coincides with three relevant events:
1. Friday, Obama announce that the bulk of US forces will be out of Iraq by Aug. 2010 leaving only 50,000 in place.
This meets Tehran’s objections to the presence of large-scale US forces in Iraq.
2. He calmed Iran’s fears on another score when he stated in a PBS interview: “One of the things that I think we have to communicate in Afghanistan is that we have no interest or aspiration to be there over the long term.”
3. The US president had his reply from Tehran in the former Iranian president Akbar Hashemi Rasanjani’s Friday sermon, when he extended his government’s first overt invitation for talks on the nuclear issue: “…we don’t make false promises,” said the Iranian strongman. “Therefore I declare that Iran’s nuclear plan is not to build weapons …and we are ready to prove it in negotiations.”
End Excerpt 1 from DEBKAfile
ALL OF THIS DIPLOMATIC DIALOG WILL LULL THE FREE WORLD INTO A FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY, JUST AS WORLD DIPLOMACY WITH THE NAZI’S LULLED IT INTO A FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY PRIOR TO THE INVASION OF POLAND IN 1939. THIS CURRENT ATTEMPT OF AMERICA AND ITS ALLIES TO DIALOG PEACE WITH ISLAMIC FANATICISM WILL END IN THE FINAL WAR OF THE AGE OF THE GENTILES.
Begin Excerpt 2 from DEBKAfile
Iran offers Obama nuclear negotiations –
With a catchDEBKAfile ExclusiveAnalysis
February 27, 2009, 10:04 AM (GMT+02:00)
The Friday sermon delivered by former Iranian president Akbar Hashemi Rasanjani in Tehran on Feb.
27 embodied an incentive and a catch for US president Barack Obama, condemned Israel and threatened Russia.
He said: “…we don’t make false promises. Therefore I declare that Iran’s nuclear plan is not to build weapons… and we are ready to prove it in negotiations.” Indicating Israel, he said: “‘You are planting a false notion in public minds.” Addressing the Russians, he said bluntly that “…even if they don’t’ deal with the [Bushehr] project, we can finish it on our own.”
The Iranian leader closest to supreme ruler Ayatollah Ali Khameni had in fact issued Tehran’s first explicit invitation to Obama to open direct negotiations which promised an Iranian pledge not to build a nuclear weapon.
That was the incentive.
But the catch implicit in his message was picked up by DEBKAfile’s Iranian experts: He was saying in typical Rafsanjani shorthand that Tehran was willing to kick off the bargaining with a pledge not
to develop on nuclear weapons, provided Washington agreed to the Islamic Republic retaining the capability to do so.
This formula would reduce the Tehran-Washington talks to haggling over where to place the cutoff point in the Iranian program.
The Iranians would demand to be allowed leeway for completing a bomb within four to six months; the Americans would likely insist on halting
the program two to-three years short of a military capability, and the negotiations would end in a compromise.
Rafsanjani employed this verbal tactic on the strength of the information about the Obama administration’s position gained from informal preliminary Iranian-US contacts in the last two months. Tehran believes the US president needs Iran’s help in the Afghan War and would therefore be flexible in his dialogue with Iran.
They calculate that he would go an extra mile for the sake of showing he had managed to arrest the Islamic Republic’s march toward a nuclear weapon.
Israel is adamantly opposed to this formula, certain Tehran will use it as a blind to forge ahead secretly until its clandestine bomb and warhead projects are close to assembly at short notice.
Thursday, Feb. 25, outgoing Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert commented on the launch of Iran’s first nuclear reactor at Bushehr: “We have deployed enormous efforts to reinforce our deterrence capacity.
Israel will be able to defend itself … against all threats,
against all enemies. I cannot say more but believe me, I know what I’m talking about.”
Without referring to Israel by name, Rafsanjani responded by saying: “You are planting a false notion in public minds,” in reference to the “unthinking words of the main enemies of the Islamic revolution.”
But Russia, which had delayed completing the Bushehr reactor for 10 years on one pretext or another, was warned specifically: “The Russians and others should know that …even if they don’t deal with the project, we can complete it on our own. But they must fulfill their promise.”
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.