Come Into My Parlor,
Said the Spider to the Fly!
Rest assured I am no Brawler,
So if someone eats you it is not I!
It’s finally happened in Middle East,
Terrorists have finally come to Realize
The importance of lulling U.S. and Israel
To a time of temporary Peace and Safety!
All are currently involved in doing just That,
Cunning with words as Spock’s Cat in a Hat!
July 22, 2008
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
More than seven years ago I believed the many terrorist groups, and their sponsoring terrorist nations, would eventually get together behind closed doors, where they would reach the logical conclusion that Israel and the United States would need to be lulled into a false sense of peace and safety, before a untied Jihad attack against Israel would succeed.
I am now convinced those closed door meetings have been conducted, and the terrorist nations and organizations are holding terrorist activities to a minimum, while they militarily build up their forces in preparation for a major coordinated attack against Israel. I am of the opinion
the war will begin at some point between 2010 and 2015. While they keep America, Israel, and the free world talking, they will become militarily stronger month by month.
If Iran does officially stop uranium enrichment in response to any negotiations, it will be for the purpose of more time to make complete preparation for an eventual assault on Israel, and I assure you they will still continue to enrich it secretly.
Begin Quote from Archive Prophecy Update 3
ARCHVE PROPHECY UPDATE NUMBER 3
JANUARY 2001
I retired from the USAF/National Security Agency as a synoptic analyst. When one analyzes anything, it is imperative to advance from what controls the conclusion of the problem being examined.
Some problems do not have a definite controlling factor, and all the factors, both incidental and insignificant, must be given the appropriate weight in making a forecast of the outcome. However, this is not the case in making a determination of when peace will come between Israel and the Palestinians. The controlling factor, which determines when a false peace will come to Israel, rests solely with the terrorist groups that plague her. There can never be a period of peace, even false peace, without the approval of all
the terrorist groups. Yassar Arafat cannot control the terrorist groups, nor can any other single Arab leader.
The terrorist complex of Osama Bin Laden, the Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Hisbullah, and Fatah are really controlled by leaders in Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Afghanistan, and Iraq. Until these leaders finally come to the conclusion that the only way Israel can be driven into the Negev is by being lulled into a false sense of security, the terrorist groups will continue to operate, and the killing will continue. I believe these terrorist groups will soon realize that if they really want to slaughter Jews by the hundreds of thousands, and drive the rest into the Negev, they will have to lull Israel into a brief period of false peace. When this happens, an agreement will finally be reached between Israel and the Palestinians.
So my advice to those who want to get a feel of when the false peace will come is this: WATCH the terrorist groups. When their actions drop to zero, and stay there for a while, you may rest assured it has been as a result of meetings behind closed doors between the leaders of the aforementioned nations, and the leaders of the terrorist groups they sponsor.
I don’t pay much attention to any leader of Israel or the Palestinians.
The terrorist groups are the key to a false peace in
the Mid-East. When they grasp that by appearing to cease their activities they will be able, at a later time, to kill many Jews, and drive the rest into the Negev, they will settle down and wait for the surprise attack against Israel from the north. Ariel Sharon may try to put a “forced peace” on the Palestinians before the terrorist groups shut down. This was one of the options considered by his party in the past. But it will not work. Watch for a cessation of terrorism. Then, after a brief period of false peace, look for a vicious surprise attack from the north out of Syria.
End January 2001 Archive Prophecy Update
They are determined to keep us talking until they get a nuclear bomb. After two weeks expire, Iran will want to continue a dialog on the European plan, and give indications they like some parts of it, which will lead to more new negotiations, more yak, yak, yak, to lead to more yatta, ta, yatta, ta yatta, followed by more bla, bla,bla, with a long chorus of etc, etc, etc.!
The three excerpts from the Jerusalem Post, the Associated Press, and Arutz Sheva give the account of negotiations over the last three days.
Begin Jerusalem Post Excerpt
Iran, EU to resume talks in 2 weeks
July 19, 2008
Associated Press, THE JERUSALEM POST
A US decision to bend policy and sit down with Iran at nuclear talks fizzled Saturday, with Teheran stonewalling Washington and five other world powers on their call for Iran to freeze uranium enrichment.
In response, the six gave Iran two weeks to respond to their demand, setting the stage for a new round of UN sanctions.
Iran’s refusal to consider suspending enrichment was an indirect slap at the United States, which had sent US Undersecretary of State William Burns to the talks in hopes the first-time American presence would encourage Teheran into making concessions.
Diplomats at the negotiating table refused to characterize the two-week time frame as an ultimatum – but it was clear the offer was a de-facto deadline for Teher
an to show flexibility.
EU envoy Javier Solana said Iran still has to answer a request made on behalf of the five permanent UN Security Council members plus Germany to “refrain from any new nuclear activity.”
“We have not gotten all the answers to the questions,” Solana told reporters after apparently unsuccessful daylong talks, adding that the two weeks should allow Iran to come up with “answers that will allow us to continue.”
Chief Iranian negotiator Saeed Jalili evaded the issue of suspension, demanded as part of the six-power “freeze-for-freeze” proposal that carries a commitment of no new UN sanctions in exchange for an Iranian pledge to stop expanding its enrichment program.
Instead he spoke in generalities about the need for cooperation and constructive exchanges of ideas that reflected Teheran’s reluctance to focus on the six-power offer.
“Iran is calling on the Western powers to resume the dialogue,” he said.
Iran already is under three sets of UN sanctions for its refusal to suspend enrichment, which can generate both nuclear fuel and the fissile material at the core of nuclear warheads. While Teheran says it has a right to enrich for peaceful purposes, the sanctions reflect international concern that it might use its program to make weapons.
The “freeze-for-freeze” offer delivered to Iranian officials last month by Solana envisions a six-week commitment from Iran to stop expanding enrichment in exchange for a six-week moratorium on new sanctions.
That aims to lead to formal negotiations in which the six nations hope they can persuade Teheran to indefinitely ban enrichment.
Burns’ decision to attend the Geneva talks showed that Washington was willing to temporarily accept the “freeze-for-freeze” plan – something less than fully mothballing the program as it had always demanded.
Recent Iranian statements had suggested Teheran was looking to improve ties with the United States, with officials speaking positively of deliberations by the US administration to open an informal diplomatic presence in Teheran after closing its embassy decades ago.
Iran and the United States broke off diplomatic relations after the 1979 Islamic Revolution and the hostage crisis at the US Embassy in Teheran. US interests in Iran are now represented by the Swiss Embassy in Teheran.
Imani said Teheran had not yet received a proposal from the US on a representation bureau but would “study it positively” if it did.
US officials had earlier said Burns was at the table to listen only, describing his presence as a one-time occasion. But McCormack said he did speak.
Burns delivered “a clear simple message” when it was his turn to speak, McCormack told reporters in Washington. He quoted Burns as telling his Teheran counterpart: “Iran must suspend uranium enrichment to have negotiations involving the United States.”
The US said the Geneva talks would focus only on the nuclear issue, but Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said earlier this week the two nations also were considering the issue of direct flights between the two countries.
Begin Associated Press Excerpt
Iran praises latest nuclear talks
July 20, 2008
Iranian state radio is quoting President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (ah-muh-DEE’-neh-zhahd) as saying the latest round of talks between Iran and world powers are “a step ahead.”
The Sunday report also quotes the Iranian leader as saying his country’s official assessment of the talks will soon be announced. He did not give a precise date.
Ahmadineajd’s remarks are the first after the meeting Saturday in Geneva between Iran’s top nuclear negotiator and envoys from Washington and five other world powers.
The six have called on Iran to freeze uranium enrichment, arguing that it is designed to make nuclear weapons.
Iran has rejected the demand, as it has repeatedly done in the past. It says its uranium enrichment program is for peaceful purposes.
Begin Arutz Sheva Excerpt
Rice to Iran; Cooperate or Face Sanctions in Two Weeks
19 Tammuz 5768, 22 July 08 04:52
(IsraelNN.com) American Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice warned Iran Monday that it will face stricter sanctions in two weeks unless it responds positively to an incentives program in return for its suspending nuclear development. “We are in the strongest possible position to demonstrate that if Iran doesn’t act, then it is time to go back” to sanctions, she told reporters.
The threat came days after Undersecretary of State William Burns met with European Union (EU) policy advisor Javier Solana and Iran’s top nuclear negotiator. Secretary Rice said Iran used “small talk” instead of providing a definitive answer.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site.
However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.