Rest of 2008 Will Bring Dynamic Changes,
If terrorist countries and groups want Time,
Preparing Ingredients for Israel’s Destruction!
The Next Five months will reveal Their Decision,
The Iranian’s Yes Or No On Ur anium Enrichment,
Will supply
an Answer to this important Question!
July 21, 2008
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
I believe the world scene is beginning to s
lip into the final mold of the end of the Age of the Gentiles. Obama has a great campaign slogan of one word – CHANGE! Well, unless some unforeseeable change occurs in the American mindset, he will be elected and, my friend, we will see unprecedented changes in the basic character of the American society I have enjoyed for 76 years.
But, in all honesty, I don’t really mind seeing him elected President, because it let’s me know my years of waiting for the final war of the Gentile Age is almost over. I can go home in peace know
ing I will see the rest of my friends very shortly. The America I have loved from my youth is about to CHANGE at an accelerated rate after his election, but I have the biblical comfort it will be changed into a better world than man has ever known at the Second Advent, which closes the Age of the Gentiles.
After digesting all the worldwide events having transpired since Obama began his fast ascendancy to power, including the reports of statements made to world leaders on his current overseas trip, it appears the U.S. troops will be out of Iraq
by 2010. This would leave an open door for a conventional war attack on Israel without interference from the United States or any other western power at some point in time between 2010 and 2015.
If we do see Iran agree to stop uranium enrichment, it will be to buy time for Iranians, and all its affiliated terrorist nations and groups, to prepare for a well coordinated, fully equipped, attack on Israel. But it is a certainty they will continue the process in secret in underground facilities.
Begin Excerpt 1 from Jerusalem Post
‘Teheran cracking under int’l pressure’
July 21, 2008
JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
A leading analyst on Iran says there is a growing feeling among various Iranian politicians that the Islamic Republic would be best served by yielding to international pressure and halting its nuclear program.
Menashe Amir, who for many years served as manager of Israel Radio’s Farsi broadcasts, said that while Iran appears on the surface to be united in its nuclear drive, “there is a debate in Iran. [Some] say: We are being offered a fantastic, generous incentives package. Let’s accept it…we cannot withstand the international pressure. The sanctions are widening, and the danger of a US or Israeli attack is growing. Let’s not miss this chance…We’ll accept it, we’ll fold for now, we’ll wait until the storm passes and until international conditions change. Under the current conditions we cannot continue with the nuclear plans.'”
Among Iranian politicians who hold this opinion, Amir said, are former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, parliament speaker and former nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani, and former nuclear negotiator Hassan Rouhani.
Amir added that during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s, there was a period when Arab nations offered Iran $50 billion in exchange for the country’s agreement to a cease-fire with Iraq. Iran refused, continued the war and “ended up losing both the war and the $50 billion.” According to Amir, there are voices in Iran today saying “Let’s not repeat this mistake.”
“This is the message I am getting from Iran,” Amir said, “and I have a feeling that the atmosphere in Iran today is [similar to] the atmosphere before the cease-fire in the Iran-Iraq war.”
Begin Two Excerpts from Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs – Daily Alert
July 21, 2008
Begin Excerpt 1 from UK Times
U.S. Gives Iran Two Weeks to Think Again on Enrichment
Caroline Lees
Iranian and American officials
were deadlocked Saturday after their highly publicized meeting failed to produce a breakthrough.
After six unproductive hours the Iranians were given two weeks to respond.
“Iran has a choice to make: negotiation or further isolation,” said U.S. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack. The negotiations, in Geneva, allowed the U.S. to press its demand for the immediate suspension of Iran’s uranium enrichment program. However, Iran refused to agree to any such proposal. Diplomats described the talks as a final attempt to persuade Iran that it must freeze its nuclear program. “They can take this message away with them to Iran,” said a British official. “If they don’t agree to our proposals, we will have to start imposing sanctions.” (Times-UK)
Begin Excerpt 2 from Wall Street Journal
Heat Rises Under Iran
Jay Solomon
The U.S. is fine-tuning new financial penalties against Iran that would target everything from gasoline imports to the insurance sector, and the prospect of such sanctions grew after talks over its nuclear-fuel program this weekend made no progress. The sanctions could include measures to impede Iran’s shipping operations in the Persian Gulf and its banking activities in Asia and the Middle East, officials said.
“We have not gotten all the answers to the questions,” said EU foreign-policy coordinator Javier Solana after Saturday’s meeting. He said the two-week timeframe was meant to give Iran the space to come up with “the answers that will allow us to continue.” (Wall Street Journal)
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are mak ing such material available
in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site.
However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner
from which we extracted it.