Arab Spring Effects Spread Across Interior And Exterior Israel
West Bank PA Uprisings Inside Israel Across PA-Jordan Border
All the West Bank was Once a Functional Part of Trans-Jordan
February 24, 2013
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Begin Excerpt 1 from YNet News
Palestinians riot in WB; prisoners stage ‘breakfast strike’
Some 4,500 security prisoners refuse breakfasts as hundreds of Palestinians riot across West Bank, clash with security forces
Elior Levy
February 24, 2013
Some 4,500 Palestinian security prisoners held in Israel began what may propel into a hunger strike Sunday, by refusing their breakfasts in unison.
The measure was taken in protest of the Saturday death of Palestinian prisoner Arafat Jardat, 39, apparently of cardiac arrest, at the Megiddo Prison.
Related stories
Palestinian MP: New intifada if prisoners harmed
Tensions run high in West Bank
Palestinian prisoner dies in Megiddo Prison
News of the “breakfast strike” came as Palestinian sources reported that hundreds of Palestinians were rioting in various villages across the West Bank over Jardat’s death.
Rioters stoned IDF forces trying to maintain order. Security forces used crowd-control measures in an effort to stop the protestors from blocking nearby Highway 60.
Israel has reportedly relayed a communiqué to the Palestinian Authority, via Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s confidant Attorney Yitzhak Molcho, demanding it take all necessary measure to calm the situation on the ground.
Netanyahu also ordered the Treasury to release January tax revenue held by Israel to the PA.
Palestinian sources, however, said that the Palestinian prisoners intend to refuse all their meals throughout the day.
The Israel Prison Service noted that prisoners are allowed to keep food in their cells, which they usually purchase in the prison canteen.
According to IPS regulations, the prisoners would have to refuse all meals for 48 hours for the measure to be recognized as a full-fledged hunger strike
Meanwhile, the Doctors for Human Rights group requested the Shin Bet’s permission to examine the four Palestinian security prisoners who have been hospitalized over their extended hunger strike.
The organization said that the Shin Bet has yet to respond to the request.
Itamar Fleishman and Raanan Ben-Zur contributed to this report
You can contact Elior Levy, Ynet’s Palestinian Affairs Correspondent, att;
paldesk@gmail.com
Begin Excerpt 2 from YNet News
Preparing for the fall of Jordan Op-ed: Instead of trying to impose two-state solution, world should help establish stable Palestinian state east of Jordan River
Yoel Meltzer
February 24, 2013
As the bloodshed in Syria continues with no end in sight, more and more eyes are beginning to focus on Syria’s formerly stable southern neighbor, Jordan. After nearly two years of low level protests, the last few months have witnessed not only an upsurge in the amount of protests but also a significant change in the makeup of the protesters themselves.
For starters, Jordan’s large Palestinian population, a group which comprises roughly 70% of Jordan’s total population, has finally entered the fray with many in this somewhat disenfranchised community openly calling for the king to be ousted. Equally significant, the Muslim Brotherhood, a group that traditionally has been treated well by the king, has also begun to take part in the escalating protest movement. However, unlike the Palestinians, the Muslim Brotherhood is not calling for the king to be toppled but rather for the regime to be reformed. Although they clearly understand that the king is slowly losing his grip on power, tactically it’s in their interest to gradually gain control via reforms instead of taking a chance with the all-out chaos that is likely to prevail should the king suddenly fall.
With the post-Mubarak Egypt already in the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood, coupled with the Hamas regime in Gaza and the Hezbollah domination of Lebanon, western and Israeli leaders are understandably concerned about the future in Jordan. The question is, what should they do?
While some will suggest that the king needs to be supported at all costs in order to maintain the relatively peaceful border with Israel, this approach seems short-sighted since it’s only a matter of time before the unstoppable events which have been sweeping the region for the last two years will finally bring down the king and end the Hashemite rule in Jordan.
Another option is to simply stand aside and do nothing. However, since the Muslim Brotherhood, thanks to its close association with the king, already has the inside track for gaining power in the post-Hashemite Jordan, and due to the fact that a similar course of action in Egypt backfired and brought Morsi to power, this approach also does not seem to be the most prudent.
Thus, the only logical option is to strengthen the large Palestinian population and to facilitate their rise to power in such a way as to prevent yet another needless civil war and bloodbath in the region. Moreover, by already forging contacts with various Palestinian leaders in Jordan, the seeds can be set for the development of the Arab world’s first true democracy. Finally, regarding the king, it’s a near certainty that if done peacefully he and his family will be granted asylum in a European capital, a fate infinitely better than that of either Mubarak or Gaddafi.
The question is, will the world sit idly by and allow yet another Arab country, one that is bordered by a warring Syria to the north and an unstable Iraq to the east, to either be taken over by Muslim fundamentalists or to deteriorate into civil war and bloodshed? Or will they spend a tiny fraction of the time and money that is invested in endlessly trying to force Israel to accept the ill-advised and impractical two-state solution to help develop a stable Palestinian state east of the Jordan River, one that can be developed to satisfy the national aspirations of the Palestinians and in doing so finally lay the groundwork for solving the supposedly unsolvable Arab-Israeli conflict?
Yoel Meltzer is a freelance writer living in Jerusalem.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.