It Will Take an Act of God to Put 10 Disjointed Islamic Clans Together
To Launch A United Islamist Force Against the Israel Apple of His Eye
God will Put Hooks in Gog’s Jaws to pull him down into Land of Israel
Gog Is A Chief Prince of Meshech & Tubal Which Is Now Greater Syria
And Gog is the Beast King of the 10 Horns in Revelation 17:12,13,17!
February 18, 2013
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Ezekiel 38:3-6 – And say, Thus saith the Lord God; Behold I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal: [4] And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws, and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords: [5] Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet: [6] Gomer, and all his bands; the house of Togarmah of the north quarters, and all his bands: and many people with thee.
Revelation 17:12,13,17 – And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. [13] These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast. [17] For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.
Begin Excerpt from MEMRI
Middle East Media Research Institute
Special Dispatch No. 5188
February 15, 2013
The Libyan National Amazigh Congress notes the following:
“1. The rampant racist and discriminatory actions undertaken by the tyrant Mu’ammar Al-Qadhafi against the Libyan Amazigh people continue to be instigated deliberately, methodically and institutionally by the two Libyan interim prime ministers [Al-Keib and Ali Zaidan]…
“2. This is a clear violation, both morally and legally, of Libya’s obligations following the 17 February revolution regarding the assertion of human rights and the implementation of its international obligations in conformity with the international human rights norms. These are the obligations which the highest authorities of the country pledged to honor at the relevant international gatherings.
“3. The prime ministers of the two interim governments and the speaker of the former NTC bear the full legal, moral and religious responsibility for the alarming consequences which will result from this racist and institutionalized practices against the Libyan Amazigh people.
“4. [Committed] to Libya’s national unity and its territorial integrity and eager to spare the lives of innocent Libyan citizens who suffered terribly during the era of the tyrant and the revolution, the Libyan Amazigh have resorted to every peaceful and civilized means [in] demanding their just and legitimate rights. By now, however, they have exhausted all such means and are no longer capable of suffering further humiliation, particularly [considering] their key role in eliminating the dictator and freeing Libyans from injustice and tyranny.
“5. [We] forcefully stress that the Libyan Amazigh people, who played a decisive role in the battle to liberate Libya from the tyrant, are capable of resorting to the use of force to respond to these racist and odious practices, and that they see all other options as legitimate in defend[ing] their human dignity and their natural rights which are being denied them.
“6. The aforementioned Libyan officials, and other officials who are in charge of sovereign ministries and administrative institutions, are fully responsible for the consequences of their racist and discriminatory practices against the Libyan Amazigh people.
“7. Libyan civil society organizations, particularly those concerned with asserting human rights, bear part of the national responsibility for failing to show solidarity with their Libyan Amazigh brothers and practically for failing to express such solidarity. Their negative stances can only be seen as openly condoning such racist practices.”
Begin Excerpts from Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs/Daily Alert
February 15, 2013
Excerpt 1 – AP
Tunisians Head Abroad to Perform Jihad
Bouazza ben Bouazza and Paul Schemm
(AP)
Tunisia, the cradle of the Arab Spring, is increasingly looking like the birthplace of jihadists. Evidence suggests it remains one of the top exporters of jihadists per capita.
Long before Tunisia ousted its dictator, the relatively prosperous country had the dubious distinction of exporting Islamic militants. Now, experts say the flow of fighters is getting worse.
Furthermore, the much more relaxed security approach of the country’s new leaders is allowing extremist groups and their networks to flourish like never before, experts say.
Tunisians have turned up on the battlefields of Iraq, Syria, Libya and now Mali. The militants who seized a gas plant in Algeria and took dozens of foreign workers hostage were more than one-third Tunisian.
Excerpt 2 – Israel Hayom
Israel’s Challenging Diplomatic Predicament
Dore Gold
(Israel Hayom)
In light of developments over the last few years, there has been a growing realization in Israel that the chances of reaching a complete final status agreement with the Palestinians are presently extremely small. This is not just an ideological position coming out of certain quarters in Israel, but it is also the professional view of practitioners who have been involved in the political process itself.
Yet there is a push underway to move forward with new negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians with the hope of concluding an agreement between them. British Foreign Secretary William Hague was just in Washington meeting with Secretary of State John Kerry where he called on the Obama administration “to inject the necessary momentum on this issue.” There was a diplomatic rumor in January that the Europeans wanted Kerry to put down on the table the parameters of a final settlement before Israel and the Palestinians, including a withdrawal to the 1967 lines.
Thus Israel finds itself in a paradoxical situation: just as international pressures are increasing for it to make new concessions in order to restart and advance the political process, there is growing realization in Israel that the kind of final status agreement that the international community is hoping will be concluded is not about to happen. The Palestinian side knows this as well.
Some try to make the argument that the conventional military threat to Israel is undergoing a transformation, allowing Israel to make the very sort of new concessions that the Europeans are demanding. With neighboring armies, like that of Syria, involved in domestic upheavals, their conventional forces have been badly degraded. Would that mean that Israel can withdraw from territories that in the past were regarded as vital but whose importance may have changed?
This would be an irresponsible conclusion. First of all, the Arab states are likely to build up their conventional armies again in the future once their internal political situation becomes more stable; already Egypt has no problem seeking 200 additional Abrams tanks from the U.S., which will bolster the strength of its armored forces. After all, decisiveness in wars is still a function of the movement of ground armies and their maneuver units, and not through the employment of airpower alone. America’s two wars against Iraq proved that point conclusively in 1991 and 2003.
The result of all this talk coming out of Europe about getting the U.S. to impose a solution will be completely self-defeating as it hardens the Palestinian readiness to come to the negotiating table – since Israel will be delivered on a silver platter anyway – and makes any real diplomatic progress more difficult than ever.
The writer, a former Israeli ambassador to the UN, is president of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.