Yasser Arafat – The Dead Godfather of the Global Terror Infant Fatah
A Bloody Lying Terrorist Thug – Nobel Peace Laureate Yasser Arafat – The Betrayer of his own People – The Head Thief among Thieves – A Chief Deceiver of the International Community via the United Nations!
January 2, 2007
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
During my time in intelligence work I became well versed in the infant stages of the ever growing Islamic menace, and warned of it in the first book I finished five years after I retired, advising that the prophetic 10 horns and 10 toes found in Daniel and Revelation were not European, as 98 percent of the prophetic buffs taught, but Islamic nations in the Middle East. I have firmly believed that to be the case since 1967. It has been a long uphill battle among the brethren for me, and I am not without scars, but some of them have changed their minds. I believe my case for this belief is both Scriptural and currently visible in the Middle East. I have, since the early sixties, watched in amazement as nations and politicians have walked down a garden path with whoever they got to negotiate with them. It has been like the farmer negotiating with a weasel not to bother his chickens, because he trusts him more than the fox and thinks it can control the fox. I confess that if I had never been involved in intelligence work, I might have thought President Clinton had scored a major breakthrough when he brought Yassar Arafat to Camp David. Bill put his patting hand on the shoulder of Israel to negotiate with this good old Islamic farm boy from Booger Holler, but I knew the character of this raging wolf in sheep’s clothing, who would make Judas Iscariot look like Captain Do-Good!
I was on assignment in Europe when Godfather Yasser Arafat became the patron saint of baby Fatah, the infant manger child of global terror. By the time I retired from the USAF-NSA Branch in Fort George G. Meade in 1971, Fatah had grown into a terror organization headed by Arafat, who was determined to end the existence of Israel in the Holy Land. I am even more amazed today that this roving leopard, that gave birth to Fatah, is believed to have produced a leopard with no spots. A leopard cannot change its spots and it does pass them on to its offspring. Arafat’s death has produced the same kind of negotiating partner for Israel.
Since my retirement, I have followed the fruitless attempts of some U.S. Presidents, acting in good conscience, try to lead and influence Israel to negotiate with Arafat and his band of renegade murderers, with little to no success. It was possible for Israel to negotiate a peace with Jordan and Egypt, but it will never be possible to negotiate anything but a very temporary false peace or hudna with Fatah, or its splinter terrorist group, al-Aksa Martyr’s Brigades. And the impossibility of anything other than the same with Hamas and Islamic Jihad is a certainty, since they are even more bloodthirsty than Fatah.
Please allow me to advise you of a certainty which, quite frankly, is the only certainty that can occur in the Middle East – There cannot be any form of lasting peace in the Middle East until Jesus arrives on the scene at his Second Advent.
For 36 years I have believed the U.S. Policy toward Israel should be a very simple one – Supply them with whatever military weaponry they request, let them decide what to do with, and about, the Palestinians, then get out of their hair and let them do it! For those who say, Oh No!, Israel will get us involved in a war! Friend, we are already involved in a war!
Caroline Glick is a very attractive woman. A lady who tells it like it is! A hawk among hawks! I appreciate the article she has written in the Jerusalem Post, which follows. It is the straight skinny! Please take the time to read it.
Begin Jerusalem Post Article
Our World: The longest-running big lie
Caroline Glick, THE JERUSALEM POST
January 1, 2007
Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Yasser Arafat was a master of the big lie. Since he invented global terrorism with the founding of the Fatah terror organization in 1959, Arafat successfully portrayed himself as a freedom fighter while introducing the world to passenger jet hijackings, schoolhouse massacres and embassy takeovers.
To cultivate the myth of his innocence Arafat ordered his Fatah terror cells to operate under pseudonyms. In the early 1970’s he renamed several Fatah murder squads the Black September Organization while publicly claiming that they were “breakaway” units completely unrelated to Fatah or to himself.
In 2000, as he launched the current Palestinian jihad, he repeated the process by renaming Fatah terror cells the Aksa Martyr Brigades and then claiming that they were completely unrelated to Fatah or to himself.
This fiction too, has been successful in spite of the fact that all Aksa Martyr Brigades terrorists are members of Fatah
and most are members of Palestinian Authority official militias who receive their salaries, guns and marching orders from Fatah.
Last week, with the quiet release of a 33-year-old US State Department cable, a good chunk of the edifice of his great lie was destroyed.
ON MARCH 1, 1973, eight Fatah terrorists, operating under the Black September banner stormed the Saudi Arabian Embassy in Khartoum, Sudan during a farewell party for the US Embassy’s Charges d’Affaires George Curtis Moore.
The terrorists took Moore, US ambassador Cleo Noel, Belgian Charges d’ Affairs Guy Eid and two Arab diplomats hostage.
They dem anded that the US, Israel, Jordan
and Germany release PLO and Baader-Meinhof Gang terrorists, including Robert F. Kennedy’s Palestinian assassin Sirhan Sirhan and Black September commander Muhammed Awadh (Abu Daud), from prison in exchange for the hostages’ release.
The next evening, the Palestinians brutally murdered Noel, Moore, and Eid. They released their other hostages on March 4.
Arafat denied any involvement in the attack. The US officially accepted his denial. Yet, as he later publicly revealed, James Welsh, who served at the time of the attack as an analyst at the National Security Agency, intercepted a communication from Arafat, then headquartered in Beirut to his terror agents in Khartoum ordering the attack.
In 1986, as evidence of Arafat’s involvement in the operation became more widely known, more and more voices began calling for Arafat to be investigated for murder. As the New York Sun’s online blog recalled last week, during that period, Britain’s Sunday Times reported that 44 US senators sent a letter to then US attorney-general Edwin Meese, “urging the American government to charge the PLO chief with plotting the murders of two American diplomats in 1973.”
The article went on to note that the Justice Department’s interest in pursuing the matter was making senior State Department officials uneasy: “State Department diplomats, worried that murder charges against Arafat would anger the United States’ friends in the Arab world, are urging the Justice Department to drop the investigation.”
As late as 2002, in spite of President George W.
Bush’s pointed refusal to meet with Arafat, the State Department continued to protest his innocence. At the time, Scott Johnson, a Minneapolis attorney and one of the authors of the popular Powerlineblog weblog, inquired into the matter with the State Department’s Near Eastern Affairs Bureau.
In an emailed response from the bureau’s deputy director of press affairs Gregory Sullivan, Johnson was told, “Evidence clearly points to the terrorist group Black September as having committed the assassinations of Amb. Noel and George Moore, and though Black September was a part of the Fatah movement, the linkage between Arafat and this group has never been established.”
So it was that for 33 years, under seven consecutive presidential administrations, the State Department denied any knowledge of involvement by Arafat or Fatah in the execution of its own people.
Until last week.
THE CABLE released by the State Department’s historian states, “The Khartoum operation was planned and carried out with the full knowledge and personal approval of Yasir Arafat, Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization, (PLO), and the head of Fatah. Fatah representatives based in Khartoum participated in the attack, using a Fatah vehicle to transport the terrorists to the Saudi Arabian Embassy.”
Although clearly skilled in the art of deception, Arafat could never have succeeded in creating and prolonging his fictions and with them, his crimes, without the cooperation of the US government and the media.
In this vein, the release of the State Department cable raises two daunting questions. First, how is it possible that the belated admission of a massive 33 year cover-up of the murder of senior American diplomats spanning the course of seven consecutive presidential administrations has been ignored by the US media? A Google news search for Cleo Noel brought up but a handful of stories – none of which were reported by the major news networks or national newspapers.
On the face of it, the released cable, which calls into question the very foundation of US Middle East policy for the past generation is simply stunning. The cable concludes, “The Khartoum operation again demonstrated the ability of the BSO to strike where least expected. The open participation of Fatah representatives in Khartoum in the attack provides further evidence of the Fatah/BSO relationship. The emergence of the United States as a primary fedayeen target indicates a serious threat of further incidents similar to that which occurred in Khartoum.”
The media’s silence on the issue does not merely raise red flags abut their objectivity. By not availing the American public to the knowledge that Fatah and the PLO have been specifically targeting Americans for 33 years, the media has denied the American people basic knowledge of the world in which they live.
The media’ s abject refu
sal to cover the story raises an even more egregious aspect of the episode. Specifically, what does the fact that under seven consecutive administrations, the US government has covered up Arafat’s direct responsibility for the murder of American diplomats while placing both Arafat and Fatah at the center of its Middle East policy, say about the basic rationale of US policy towards Israel and the Palestinians? What would US Middle East policy looked like, and what would have been the results for US, and international security as a whole, if rather than advancing a policy that made Arafat the most frequent foreign visitor to the White House during the Clinton administration, the US had demanded his extradition and tried him for murder?
How many lives would have been saved if the US had not been intent on upholding Arafat’s big lie? How would such a US policy have impacted the subsequent development of sister terror organizations like Hizbullah, al-Qaida and Hamas, all of which were founded by members of Arafat’s terror industry?
Sadly, the release of the cable did not in any way signal a change in the US policy of whitewashing Fatah. In contravention of US law, for the past 13 years, the State Department has been denying that Fatah, the PLO and the Palestinian Authority are terrorist organizations, and has been actively funding them with US taxpayer dollars.
This policy went on, unchanged even after Fatah gunmen murdered three US embassy employees in Gaza in October 2003.
This policy continues, unchanged still today, as Fatah’s current leader, Arafat’s deputy of 40 years Mahmoud Abbas works to form a unity government with Hamas. Indeed, the central component of the US’s policy towards the Palestinians today is the goal of strengthening Fatah by arming, training and funding its Force 17 terror militia.
In a November 14, 2006 interview on Palestinian television, Ahmed Hales Abu Maher who serves as Secretary of Fatah in Gaza, bragged of Fatah’s role in the development of international terrorism. In his words, reported by Palestinian Media Watch, “Oh warrior brothers, this is a nation that will never be broken, it is a revolution that will never be defeated. This is a nation that gives an example every day that is imitated across the world. We gave the world the children of the RPG [Rocket Propelled Grenades], we gave the world the children stone [-throwers], and we gave the world the male and female Martyrdom-Seekers [suicide bombers].”
Imagine what the world would have looked like if, rather than clinging to Arafat’s big lie that he and his Fatah terror organization were central components of Middle East peace, the US had captured and tried Arafat for murdering its diplomats and worked steadily to destroy Fatah.
Imagine how our future would look if rather than stealthily admitting the truth, while trusting the media not to take notice, the US government were to base its current policies on the truth, and the media were to reveal this truth to the world.
End Jerusalem Post Article
Our worldwide society has reached the status of the Jewish society just before it was taken into Babylonian captivity, as described by the great Prophet Jeremiah.
Jeremiah 5:30,31 – A wonderful (shocking) and horrible thing is committed in the land; [31] The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site
contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.