Islamization Of Egypt By Muslim Brotherhood Is Occurring
Out of the Ashes of Umayyad will Rise Antichrist’s Caliphate.
It will be the last Empire to afflict Israel since Exodus Pharaoh
And the Prophesied Mahdi Antichrist Shall Be its Caliphate Caliph
This Caliphate Is A Stated Muslim Brotherhood Mission Since 1928.
May 22, 2012
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
THE GOAL OF MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IS TO SEE A CALIPHATE CREATED THAT SPREADS FROM SPAIN TO INDONESIA UNDER ISLAMIC SHAR’IA LAW.
The Muslim Brotherhood will join the Islamic Antichrist by attacking their own army from within when the Mahdi charges west across the northern Sinai to the Suez Canal, after he has driven Israel into the Negev Wilderness.
The “Arab Spring” has been an “Allah-Send” for the Muslim Brotherhood, in that it has freed the Brotherhood, which had been kept under the thumbs of Arab leaders across the Middle East. The thumbs have, are, and will, continue to be lifted off many Brotherhoods in Arab countries as a result of “Arab Spring.” The goal of the Muslim Brotherhood has always been to create an Islamic Caliphate with Shar’ia law.
The first 10 nations under the Antichrist are likely to be French Morocco, Algeria, Iran, Tunisia, Libya, Sudan, Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq, and Syria.
Excerpts from Wikipedia
The Muslim Brotherhood was founded in Ismailia, Egypt by Hassan al-Banna in March 1928 as an Islamist religious, political, and social movement. The group spread to other Muslim countries but has its largest, or one of its largest, organizations in Egypt, where for many years it has been the largest, best-organized, and most disciplined political opposition force, despite a succession of government crackdowns in 1948, 1954, 1965 after plots, or alleged plots, of assassination and overthrow were uncovered. Following the 2011 Revolution the group was legalized, and in April 2011 it launched a civic political party called the Freedom and Justice Party (Egypt) to contest elections.
Its founder, Hassan Al-Banna, was influenced by Islamic reformers Muhammad Abduh and Rashid Rida. In the group’s belief, the Quran and Sunnah constitute a perfect way of life and social and political organization that God has set out for man. Islamic governments must be based on this system and eventually unified in a Caliphate. The Muslim Brotherhood’s goal, as stated by Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna was to reclaim Islam’s manifest destiny, an empire, stretching from Spain to Indonesia.
Begin Excerpt from our Article Blog 7
AN EXPOSITION OF CHAPTER 11 OF THE BOOK OF DANIEL – BLOG 7
July 22, 2011
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
(ARCHIVE BLOG 6 WAS ISSUED JULY 10, 2011)
God’s prophecies He has fulfilled in the past are assurance to each new generation He will perform those yet to be fulfilled.
Isaiah 41:18-23 – I will open rivers in high places, and fountains in the midst of the valleys: I will make the wilderness a pool of water, and the dry land springs of water. [19] I will plant in the wilderness the cedar, the shittah tree, and the myrtle, and the oil tree; I will set in the desert the fir tree, and the pine, and the box tree together: [20] That they may see, and know, and consider, and understand together, that the hand of the Lord hath done this, and the Holy One of Israel hath created it. [21] Produce your cause, saith the Lord; bring forth your strong reasons, saith the King of Jacob. [22] Let them bring them forth, and shew us what shall happen: let them shew the former things, what they be, that we may consider them, and know the latter end of them; or declare us things for to come. [23] Shew the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that ye are gods: yea, do good, or do evil, that we may be dismayed, and behold it together.
BLOG 6 ENDED WITH AN EXPOSITION OF DANIEL 11:42
Rebellion is preparing the way for the rise of an Islamic Antichrist
To the North of Israel in What was once called ‘Greater Syria’
It is likely to start a Middle East War twixt 2014 and 2016
I have long been an admirer of the articles written by Daniel Pipes. I have long believed the bulk of the major forces involved in the Daniel 11:40 counterattack against Israel, would be Syria, Turkey, and Lebanon. I believe Jordan will support these three AFTER the counterattack begins, which is one of the reasons Jordan is bypassed by Antichrist on his way to attack Egypt AFTER he drives Israel into the Negev Wilderness. Many other African and Middle East Islamic countries will very quickly announce their full support of his action when they see the success of his counterattack against an Israeli intrusion into Lebanon against Hizbullah.
THIS IS THE CONTINUATION OF THE ATTACK BY THE KING OF THE NORTH WITH THE MAJORITY OF HIS ATTACKING FORCE INITIALLY COMING FROM SYRIA, TURKEY, AND LEBANON. ONCE JORDAN SEES THE ANTICHRIST (KING OF THE NORTH) IS SUCCESSFUL IN PUSHING ISRAEL (KING OF THE SOUTH) TOWARD THE NEGEV, THE MAJORITY PALESTINIAN POPULATION WILL DEPOSE THEIR KING, AND SUPPORT THIS LEADER FROM GREATER SYRIA. IT IS ONE OF THE REASONS HE WILL BYPASS JORDAN, LEAVE ISRAEL CUT OFF IN THE NEGEV, AND HEAD STRAIGHT FOR CAIRO AND EGYPT TO GAIN CONTROL OF THE SUEZ CANAL. EGYPT WILL REMAIN NEUTRAL WHEN THE ANTICHRIST KING FROM GREATER SYRIA ATTACKS ISRAEL AND WILL BE SHOCKED WHEN HE HEADS ACROSS THE NORTHERN SINAI TO CONQUER SUEZ.
Daniel 11:40-42 – And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over. [41] He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon. [42] He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape.
Daniel 11:43 – But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps.
The shortest, most compact, and comprehensive definition of the term “Greater Syria” I have encountered, follows in an advertisement by Google eBook for Daniel Pipes’ Book, which immediately follows:
Begin Advertisement
Greater Syria:
The History of an Ambition (Google eBook)
Daniel Pipes
Oxford University Press US, 1992 – History – 256 pages
“[While for many years scholars and journalists have focused on the more obvious manifestations of political life in the Middle East, one major theme has been consistently neglected. This is Pan-Syrian nationalism–the dream of creating a Greater Syria out of an area now governed by SYRIA, LEBANON, ISRAEL, JORDAN, AND TURKEY. Though not nearly as well known as Arab or Palestinian nationalism and hardly studied in depth, Pan-Syrianism has had a profound effect on Middle Eastern politics since the end of World War I. In Greater Syria, the noted Middle East scholar Daniel Pipes provides the first comprehensive account of this intriguing, important, and little understood ideology.]”
Begin Excerpt from REUTERS via THE JERUSALEM POST
Hundreds of thousands protest in Syria, 11 killed
By REUTERS
07/22/2011 17:48
Tanks deployed in Homs where five are killed overnight; six shot in Damascus suburb of Mleeha; police, militia beat Kurdish protesters in northeast.
AMMAN – Syrian forces shot dead at least 11 people and hundreds of thousands demanded an end to Syrian President Bashar Assad’s autocratic rule in widening protests on Friday, rights activists and witnesses said.
Five civilians were killed overnight in Homs, 165 km (100 miles) north of the capital Damascus, when tanks were deployed to halt protests in the besieged city, residents said.
RELATED:
Gunfire echos in Homs as Syria cracks down
Syria: Assad loyalists kill 10 in attacks in Homs
A further six were later shot dead in protests in the Damascus suburb of Mleeha, in Homs, and in the Idlib area in the northwest, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights and the National Organization for Human Rights said.
The four-month-old uprising is the biggest challenge to Assad’s authority since he succeeded his father 11 years ago and it is spreading.
Rights activists reported protests after Friday prayers in several places — the Medan district of Damascus, Latakia on the coast, Deraa in the south and Deir al-Zor in the east — as well as Homs, the latest focus of the armed crackdown on protesters.
“Tanks and armored vehicles have deployed in Homs thoroughfares, but in every street adjacent to them there are people in the streets,” a resident of Homs, who gave his name as Osama, said by telephone.
Once confined to outlying towns and rural regions, the uprising has now taken a firm hold in cities such as Homs and Hama, scene of a 1982 massacre by the military.
In the first such crackdown on Kurds since the uprising began, dozens of people were wounded when police and militia used batons and teargas against protesters in the mainly Kurdish northeastern city of Qamishli, witnesses said.
The protesters demanded political freedoms and an end to state-endorsed discrimination against Syria’s 1 million Kurds, as well as voicing solidarity with the protesters elsewhere.
Begin Excerpt from MEMRI
Middle East Media Research Institute
May 20, 2012
Clip No. 3342
Egyptian Philosopher Murad Wahba: “The Muslim Brotherhood Is Ideologically Required to Start Wars”
Following are excerpts from an interview with Egyptian philosopher Murad Wahba, which aired on Sada Al-Balad TV on April 20, 2012:
Murad Wahba: Democracy has four components.
Interviewer: Where does Egypt stand with regard to these four components?
Murad Wahba: We’re not even in the ballpark. This is not an exaggeration. There are four components: Secularism and relative thinking do not exist. They are considered heresy. As for a social covenant, the religious authorities interfere in everything. Enlightenment is forbidden – from the days of Sheik Abd Al-Razeq, through Taha Hussein, and all the way to Naguib Mahfouz.
Interviewer: And others too.
Murad Wahba: Enlightenment is thwarted all the time. They eradicate any sign of rational thinking. As for liberalism – there is no room for individualism. Everybody moves like a herd of sheep.
[…]
Today, there is a bloc of Gulf states against the Muslim Brotherhood. This is a new phenomenon.
Interviewer: What do you mean?
Murad Wahba: Some declarations have been issued on this.
Interviewer: I think that the Dubai police [chief] was very clear on that.
Murad Wahba: Right. The Gulf states, along with the Asian countries, may be able to “besiege” the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood. Under these circumstances, I believe that the Muslim Brotherhood ideology will face a crisis – how will they cooperate, when they are in power, with neighboring countries – the Gulf states – and with Asia, given its current relations with the Gulf states, in light of the present problems, in which the US and Europe are also involved? Today, the US and Europe are closer to the Gulf states and to Asia than they are to Egypt.
Interviewer: At present?
Murad Wahba: Yes. That’s how I see things. There is a crisis. The Muslim Brotherhood is, of course, exploiting the issue of Israel, and is trying to generate threats from Sinai, in an attempt to drag the Egyptian army into starting another war with Israel. But I think that the military leadership is aware of what is happening in the Sinai, and of the goals underlying these incidents. Therefore, in my view, there will be a crisis between the leadership of the Egyptian army and the Muslim Brotherhood.
[…]
For the Egyptian military leadership, the notion of war pertains to national security: Our army’s mission is to defend us against an attacking enemy, but it is not part of its mission to artificially initiate a war. For the Muslim Brotherhood, war is something one initiates, in an effort to convert the region and the entire world to Islam. Therefore, the Muslim Brotherhood is ideologically required to start wars.
Interviewer: But on the tactical level, they talk about honoring the Camp David Accords, and about honoring international agreements. Moreover, there is a strange and worrying flirtation going on between the Muslim Brotherhood and the American administration regarding the implications on Israel. When John McCain, for example, was in Egypt, he received their assurance that the [Israel-Egypt] treaty would be maintained, that the QIZ treaty would be maintained, and even that they have no problem with the gas exportation [to Israel] – unless the courts decide otherwise, and it’s a different story.
Murad Wahba: But let me tell you something. I always pay attention to the expressions they use when they talk about their commitment to the international agreements. They always add the qualifier: “But it’s subject to change and to discussion.” That is their tactic. I’ve noticed that they always conclude with a “but” – “we honor the international agreements, but the people will have its say.” “If circumstances change, it may become necessary to reexamine [the treaty].” It is these expressions that will enable them to send the Egyptian army to initiate war against Israel in the future.
[…]
If the army returns to the military bases, and the Muslim Brotherhood takes over the state institutions, it will mean the Islamization of the country and of society. When that happens, the army, which is a state institution, will undergo Islamization willy-nilly. Under such circumstance, it will not be able to remain out of it.
[…]
If the Muslim Brotherhood takes over the presidency, it will herald the beginning of a comprehensive process of Islamization, from top to bottom.
[…]
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.