2010 Looks Like Earliest Date for Iran to have a Deliverable Nuclear Warhead!
December 7, 2006
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Although I do not expect Israel to launch a nuclear weapon aga in
st Iran unless Iran first launches one against them, nor do I expect Iran to use their future nuclear warheads unless Israel first launches against her, I do not believe that Iran will take the chance of initiating a conventional war against Israel without a nuclear deterrent. If the following estimate by experts in the Jerusalem Post of a 2010 date, turns out to be a good estimate plus or minus two years for Iran having a deliverable nuclear warhead, then my guesstimate of a conventional war Middle East war breaking out at some point in time between 2008 to 2012 seems to be reasonable.
Begin Jerusalem Post Article by Yaakov Katz
Iran hitting Obstacles to Enrichment
Yaakov Katz, THE JERUSALEM POST
December 7, 2006
While predicting Iran will still obtain nuclear power by the end of the decade, Western sources have told The Jerusalem Post that the Islamic Republic has recently encountered major technological complications in its attempts to enrich uranium.
According to these sources, Iran’s nuclear program has encountered “serious” obstacles on its way to crossing the nuclear technological threshold and obtaining independent research and development capabilities. The obstacles have pushed off predictions regarding the point Iran would obtain these capabilities, with Western sources now claiming Iran will cross the technological threshold only in late 2007.
Despite the setbacks in the enrichment of uranium – a critical step in the development of a nuclear bomb – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced plans last month to build 60,000 additional centrifuges, leading Western sources to believe that it was only a matter of time before Iran overcame the technological obstacle. Pakistan encountered similar difficulties in its nuclear program but eventually overcame them.
Experts speculated that the enrichment difficulties Iran was encountering at its plant at Natanz could be behind Iran’s gaining interest in constructing a heavy-water nuclear plant near the town of Arak to produce plutonium, which can also be used to build a bomb.
According to nuclear experts, Iran would need 3,000 working centrifuges to successfully enrich uranium. At the moment, Iran has two working cascades – each consisting of 164 centrifuges – at Natanz with which it claimed in April to have enriched uranium to 3.5 percent. For a bomb, uranium needs to be enriched to 90% or SQ, a nuclear technical term for Significant Quantity.
Once Iran completes the construction of the centrifuges and masters the technology it will still take a year to reach SQ and then another two years to assemble a nuclear device, or in 2010.
Teheran has said it intends to activate 3,000 centrifuges by late 2006 and then increase the program to 54,000 centrifuges.
Iranian officials say that would produce enough enriched uranium to fuel a 1,000-megawatt reactor, such as that being built by Russia and nearing completion at Bushehr.
Meanwhile Wednesday, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said that sanctions would not force his country to abandon its nuclear program.
United Nations sanctions “would only complicate the situation” and could make it worse, Mottaki told diplomats and reporte
rs during a visit to the Hague. He said sanctions were “not acceptable. And definitely it will bring some changes in our approach.”
On Tuesday, the UN Security Council and diplomats from other key nations met in Paris to discuss possible sanctions against Iran, which is suspected of seeking to build a nuclear arsenal. Teheran insists it only wants civilian nuclear energy.
“We hope the other parties come back to talks or negotiations,” Mottaki said at the Clingendael Institute, an international relations think tank.
But he repeated that even if Iran was subjected to sanctions, it would not seek nuclear arms.
“The time for nuclear weapons is over,” he said.
He said that, as a signatory to various international arms treaties, Iran would never use or make weapons of mass destruction.
During the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s, Iranian generals “returned to Ayatollah Khomeini, and said ‘please, let us prepare a little bit of chemical weapons to prevent Saddam'” Hussein from using them, Mottaki said.
But Khomeini refused. “Iran was committed (to international restrictions) even during a time of war,” Mottaki said.
“Any sanction on Iran will only strengthen our resolve to advance our independence,” he said, repeating that Iran had the right under international law to pursue nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.
AP contributed to the report.
End Jerusalem Post Report
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. You may use material originated by this site.
However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner
from which we extracted it.