Look Out World – Here Comes the Future Cairo Islamic Caliphate
After The Greater Syria Antichrist Defeats The Egyptian Army,
Then establishes Cairo as his gigantic Middle East Caliphate
January 13, 2012
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood’s final goal of establishing a “rightly guided Caliphate for the education of the world” in Cairo is beginning and, after the Muslim Brotherhood completes its initial goal of breaking Egypt away from its Western allies toward an Islamist foreign Policy. Then the Greater Syrian Antichrist will drive Israel in to the vast Negev Wilderness, then head west
to the Suez Canal to conquer all of Egypt.
Begin Excerpt by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy via Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs/Daily Alert
January 12, 2012
The Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) is widely expected to dominate the next Egyptian legislature.
The FJP’s political victory promises radical changes for Egypt, including a theocratic domestic program and a confrontational foreign policy. The U.S. should have no illusions about the party’s aims or ability to moderate.
As long as the FJP is in power, Washington should condition future bilateral relations on its behavior regarding key U.S. interests, including the treatment of religious minorities, Egypt’s peace treaty with Israel, and counterterrorism.
The FJP’s overriding aim is to establish an Islamic state in which sharia would be the primary source of legislation. Brotherhood Supreme Guide Muhammad Badie recently declared that, after forming the new government,
the organization would pursue its final goal of establishing a “rightly guided caliphate for the education of the world.” The Brotherhood is already working through the FJP to tilt Egypt away from its Western allies and toward an Islamist foreign policy.
The peace treaty with Israel will likely be the first casualty of an FJP-led government.
It intends to put the Camp David Accords to a national referendum, thereby shielding itself from direct responsibility for the treaty’s demise. It is tempting to believe that the FJP will moderate once in power, but this is highly unlikely. (Washington Institute for Near East Policy)
Begin 2007 Archive Blog
ISLAM IS DETERMINED TO ESTABLISH A CALIPHATE EMPIRE
November 9, 2007
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
I find it very disturbing that a great number of Americans and citizens of many other countries, having only small percentages of Muslims in their native populations, still do not understand the impossibility of true peace in the Middle East. Unfortunately, the governments under the control of Muslims are under the control of the Laws of Allah, and any occupant or visitor in that country who is not a Muslim is classified as an infidel. Please carefully read the following paragraphs, which were extracted from the MEMRI article, which follows our heading.
BEGIN QUOTE
The following are excerpts from an interview with Abu Bakr Ba’shir, spiritual leader of Al-Gama’a Al-Islamiyya in Indonesia, which aired on Al-Arabiya TV on October 26, 2007.
“Democracy Runs Counter to Islam, Because it Emphasizes the Sovereignty of the People, Whereas Islam Emphasizes the Sovereignty of Allah”
Abu Bakr Ba’shir: “The path taken by many political parties in their effort to establish an Islamic regime is not the right path, because these parties adopt democracy. Democracy is not an Islamic means. Democracy runs counter to Islam, because it emphasizes the sovereignty of the people, whereas Islam emphasizes the sovereignty of Allah. Thus, if we are to submit to the law of Allah, Muslims have no choice but to say: ‘We hear and obey.’ In democracy, Allah’s commands may be open to discussion, and if we agree with them, we accept them, but
if we do not agree with them, we reject
them. Herein lies the flaw.
Therefore, as long as the Islamic political parties endeavor to adhere to Islam by means of democracy, they will not achieve their goal.”
We Are Duty-Bound to Establish an Islamic State, and the Muslims Are Duty-Bound to Live in an Islamic Country”
“I do not accept their concept of independent judgment, unless the bombing is carried out in the countries of the infidels who declared war against the Muslims, such as America. America has declared war on the Muslims, and therefore, we are permitted to carry out bombings there, because they are the ones who declared war against the Muslims. Herein lies the problem.”
We are duty-bound to establish an Islamic state, and the Muslims
are duty-bound to live in an Islamic country. Muslims are forbidden to live in an infidel country.
Sheik Fawzan Al-Fawzan issued a fatwa forbidding Muslims to live in the countries of the infidels.
That is why we are committed to establishing an Islamic state. The path that the Prophet Muhammad bid us to take is the path of preaching and Jihad.
Waging Jihad is the proper conduct.
That is why it is essential to establish an Islamic state by means of preaching and Jihad. We have tried to do this in Indonesia, by committing ourselves to Islamic preaching.”
END QUOTE
The principles of Democracy are an abomination to Allah, because the Islamic faith gives all sovereignty to Allah, and any principle practiced under democracy, which conflicts with the Laws of Allah is judged and dwelt with by Islamic religious leaders. The reason a massive caliphate does not now cover most of the globe is because democracy has been the stronger world force, but Islam is growing stronger day by day. There can be no other solution to the conflict short of global war, which just happens to be exactly what the Bible predicts must eventually break out.
Begin 2007 Archive Blog
MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute) Special Dispatch
Series No. 1761
November 8, 2007
Leader of Indonesian Jama’a Islamiyya Abu Bakr Al-Ba’shir: I Support Bombings in America, But Not in the Muslim World
The following are excerpts from an interview with Abu Bakr Ba’shir, spiritual leader of Al-Gama’a Al-Islamiyya in Indonesia, which aired on Al-Arabiya TV on October 26, 2007.
“Democracy Runs Counter to Islam, Because it Emphasizes the Sovereignty of the People, Whereas Islam Emphasizes the Sovereignty of Allah”
Abu Bakr Ba’shir: “The path taken by many political parties in their effort to establish an Islamic regime is not the right path, because these parties adopt democracy. Democracy is not an Islamic means. Democracy runs counter to Islam, because it emphasizes the sovereignty of the people, whereas Islam emphasizes the sovereignty of Allah. Thus, if we are to submit to the law of Allah, Muslims have no choice but to say: ‘We hear and obey.’ In democracy, Allah’s commands may be open to discussion, and if we agree with them, we accept them, but if we do not agree
with them, we reject them. Herein lies the flaw. Therefore, as long as the Islamic political parties endeavor to adhere to Islam by means of democracy, they will not achieve their goal.”
We Are Duty-Bound to Establish an Islamic State, and the Muslims Are Duty-Bound to Live in an Islamic Country”
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.