A Great Deceiver of Jew and the West Speaks Eloquently by a Double Mind
Worst of ALL, He is a Novice Who Pictures Himself a Master and Believes It
In Governing he’s like a Bear Cub trying to get
Tree Honey in Boxing Gloves
Hell hath no Fury like a Novice who blames others for his own Inadequacies
October 8, 2011
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
James 1:8 – A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.
Most novices picture themselves as masters – and are content with the Picture.
This is why there are so few masters – Jean Toomer
Begin Excerpt from Haaretz
Obama’s resurrection of the Elders of Zion
The itching that started when President Obama began to speak only got worse.
By Sayed Kashua
Published 11:58 07.10.11
I had to get to a doctor.
It started with a tingling sensation in my right arm a few minutes after President Obama began to speak at the United Nations. The feeling in my arm grew constantly worse the deeper Obama got into his speech. There were remarks that seemed to be laced with anti-Semitism, conjuring up unfounded tales from dark periods, libels about how the Jews supposedly controlled the world economy and ran the world according to their interests. I could hardly believe it: the president of the United States himself takes the stage in front of the world’s leaders and presents a conspiracy theory better suited to the peoples of the Orient, holding that Zionism is dictating an old-new world order.
“Disgraceful,” I muttered occasionally during the speech, as I scratched my painful arm. A pinkish stain emerged on my skin, and aloe vera gel didn’t help quell the raging fire.
By the morning after the speech, the pink stain had turned deep red and the pain in my arm was getting worse all the time. “You have to see a doctor,” my wife said. “It might be contagious, that thing.”
“It’s probably an insect bite,” I said, shrugging off her diagnosis before leaving for work. “I’ll put a little Fenistil on it and it’ll go away fast.”
During the whole drive to work I heard journalists, commentators and the prime minister’s people celebrating the U.S. president’s speech as though it were a national victory and a diplomatic achievement for the Jewish people. I couldn’t believe my ears. How could such smart people forgive the president’s inflammatory remarks so easily? Didn’t they understand that the man had resuscitated the Elders of Zion? Was their command of English so poor that they could interpret his speech as a declaration of support?
If so, we are in a bad way: Concrete danger lurks and the Jews all around are once more acting as usual, thinking it will all blow over. How could they forget the power of words, the power of strong leaders whose oratory enflames the masses? The blood boiled in my veins – and the skin on my right arm started to burn so fiercely that tears welled up. The Jews are in mortal danger; someone has to open the eyes of the complacent masses.
“Sabah alhir,” the guard at the entrance greeted me on the wrong morning of the year, even though I had never exchanged a word with him before. “Sabah alhir,” he repeated in a terrible accent, which for some reason
infuriated me.
“Never,” I retorted, “but never, ever, speak to me in Arabic.
Got it?”
I don’t know what came over me that morning. Usually I am polite to colleagues at work and to strangers generally. But on that morning of the day after the speech, I could not tolerate a word in Arabic. Here they come, rising against us to destroy us, and the world’s strongest leader takes their side and declares unabashedly that he, like the Arabs, is afraid of the Jews.
On that Thursday evening the pains wouldn’t let me fall asleep – pains in my arm and pains over the future of the Jewish people. That’s how it is: so many years of life amid this people have made me almost one of their sons. Jewish history has become an integral part of my history. So how can I fall asleep when the Palestinian president is scheduled to speak the next day and hurl mud at the country I live in and
at the nation within which I breathe?
Which is exactly what the Palestinian archenemy did. He stood on the platform, puffed with pride, and with Obama’s speech as a tailwind he demanded shamelessly to establish a national home for the Arabs and talked about his right and the right of those like him to self-determination.
True, it was expected, but it still hurt like sharp knives plunged into the flesh, especially the flesh of my arm, which broke out in blisters as the world’s leaders applauded, ostensibly in favor of the Palestinians, but obviously aiming their applause mainly against the Jews.
That’s it, it’s lost. Nothing will be able to help us against the whole world. The fix was in.
No one will believe the truth now, no one will believe our prime minister even if he cries authentic tears when he tells about our treatment of the Palestinians. No one in this stubborn, uncaring world will believe it when we describe the full equality, the upholding of rights, the fair and equitable distribution of resources that this country grants the Palestinians.
If he had any self-respect, the Palestinian president, he would hand the keys back to the Israeli prime minister on the UN dais. If he had an iota of honesty, he would call for dismantling the Palestinian Authority and forgo the aspiration to establish a state. If so, Israel and the Jewish people would take leadership and responsibility and would get the opportunity to prove what lessons they have learned from the past, to prove that everyone is equal before the law and before the authorities. The world would see how for every Jewish settlement that is established, two Palestinian settlements are established; and how for every liter of water that a Jewish household gets, a Palestinian household gets twice as much.
But who will believe now that the Jew can be egalitarian? Who will believe, after these two speeches, that the Palestinians are living a free and tranquil life? Who will believe that the Jews here do not differentiate between one human being and another, between blood and blood?
“It’s a blood libel!” I cried out to the applauding world and scratched my arm until it bled.
This story is by:
Sayed Kashua
Begin Excerpt from Newsmax
GOP: Obama, Biden Incite Wall Street Protests
Friday, 07 Oct 2011 01:02 PM
By Martin Gould and Michelle Lopata
President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden are under increasing attack for egging on the burgeoning Occupy Wall Street protest that has spread to cities across the country.
Senior Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah said he believes comments Obama made about “running Republicans out of town” could end up turning the protests ugly.
“We are going to have riots in this country because of what these people are doing,” he warned.
Hatch said Obama’s words coupled with by Teamsters leader Jimmy Hoffa’s Labor Day speech in which he called tea party members “sons of bitches” who should be “taken out” could incite violence.
“They are going to get people very angry and sooner or later people who basically are dependent upon the federal government and are about to be cut back, yeah, you are going to have lots of problems,” Hatch told reporters in Salt Lake City, one of many places that have seen protests.
Fellow Republican Sen. Rand Paul joined in the attack on the White House, calling Obama’s comments “inflammatory,” and saying the protesters reminded him of the Paris mob during the French Revolution.
“I see the president’s rhetoric of envy inflaming the public,” the Kentucky senator told Fox News’ Judge Andrew Napolitano.”
“I hope ultimately it doesn’t result in lawlessness where they say, ‘Gosh those nice iPads through the window should be mine and why don’t I throw a brick through the window to get them because rich people don’t deserve to have them when I can’t have one.’”
Obama said during his Thursday press conference that voters will “run Republicans out of town” if they refuse to pass his jobs bill. He then expressed sympathy for the Occupy Wall Street movement which started in lower Manhattan three weeks ago. He said it “expresses the frustrations that the American people feel.”
“We had the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression, huge collateral damage all throughout the country, all across Main Street, and yet you’re still seeing some of the same folks who acted irresponsibly trying to fight efforts to crack down on abusive practices that got us into this problem in the first place,” Obama said.
“People are frustrated and the protesters are giving voice to a more broad-based frustration about how our financial system works.”
Biden likened the protests to the birth of the tea party. “What is the core of that protest?” he asked. “The core is: The bargain has been breached. The core is the American people do not think the system is fair, or on the level. That is the core is what you’re seeing with Wall Street.
“There’s a lot in common with the tea party,” he said at the Washington Ideas Forum. “The tea party started, why? TARP. They thought it was unfair.”
Biden is not the only one likening the movement to the tea party. The Los Angeles Times asked whether the movement is “a tea party for Democrats.”
The idea was shot down by Tea Party Express chairwoman Amy Kremer. She told Britain’s Guardian newspaper the protesters were like “a kid having a temper tantrum because their parents won’t buy them the whole ice-cream store.
“Their demands are ridiculous, absurd.” Kremer added. “This isn’t Wall Street’s fault. It’s Washington’s fault – and that’s where they should focus their efforts.”
But David Webb of Manhattan-based Tea Party 365 believed there are similarities.
“The transport unions are getting behind it, rabble rousing and agitating, moveon.org is imposing its progressive agenda on it,” he told the Guardian.
“I accept that there will always be institutions or individuals who want to take advantage of any grass-roots movement,” added Webb. “They tried to take advantage of us, but by and large we said no. We don’t yet know whether Occupy Wall Street will do the same.”
The Occupy Wall Street protests have spread to cities including Washington DC, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver and Tampa in the past week. Although ostensibly an anti-big business demonstration, it has attracted groups concerned with a wide range of left wing issues.
Jonathan Collegio who works for Karl Rove’s American Crossroads office in Washington told Newsmax that protesters near his 14th Street office had signs ranging from “Voting is a Hoax – Wake Up” to “Jail Obama” to “The military budget is KILLING Washington State!” and even “Stop Cheating Movie Goers.”
“It’s just your generic left wing protest,” said Collegio. “It reminded me of those World Bank/IMF protests from about 10 years ago, where the exact cause was nebulous, and the protests were instead a cornucopia of disparate left wing causes from veganism to anarchy.”
Tea party aligned Rep. Paul Broun of Georgia agreed. “They don’t know why they’re there. They’re just mad,” he told ABC’s Top Line.
“Now the unions seem to be weighing in and trying to subvert that anger into a political power to try to re-elect a president whose policies are just totally ignorant and incompetent about the economy and how to create jobs and how to create freedom in this country.”
Radio host Rush Limbaugh described the protesters as Obama’s base. “He expressed his solidarity because those are his campaign foot soldiers down there. He can’t turn his back on them this close to the elections,” Limbaugh said.
Leading Republicans have also bashed the movement. Presidential candidate Herman Cain said he believed the whole protest movement has been “planned and orchestrated to distract from the failed policies of the Obama Administration.
“Don’t blame Wall Street, don’t blame the big banks, if you don’t have a job and you’re not rich, blame yourself. It is not someone’s fault if they succeeded, it is someone’s fault if they failed.”
And Majority House leader Eric Cantor called the protesters “a mob” saying he was becoming “increasingly concerned” about the growing movement.
Read more on Newsmax.com: Obama, Biden egging on Wall Street Protests
Important:
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.