Obama Magnificent Speeches Initially Mesmerize His Followers!

Magnificent Speeches of Obama Do Initially Mesmerize His Followers

But After Seeing Their Reaction AS IT Affects 2012 Election Chances

He THEN gives a Follow-up Speech Explaining what He ‘Really’ Said.

Obama’s initial speeches as a novice have an experimental Nature

After which he correlates them to favorably fit a Majority Reaction

Without Losing Backing of His Extreme Left Liberal Base Support.

how do antibiotics affect birth control pills

doxycycline cat

Obama Is a Novice in government But a Master in Political Deceit.

He fits perfectly in a prophetic type of an End Time US President

And Scriptures do advise God May use Evil Rulers as it suits Him.

I’m conv inced he has been used

blinklist com levitrai

in Advancing Prophetic Events.

So if He’s re-elected it won’t be a GREAT disappointment to Me

Since I am desirous for the Catching Out of the saved to Occur.

May 27, 2011

http://www.tribulationperiod.com/

Ephesians 6:12 – For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

II Corinthians 11:13,14 – For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. [14] And no marvel; for Sat an himself is tr

0 cialis comment currently reply

ansformed into an angel of light.

Begin Series of Excerpts from Jerusalem

add comment effects levitra side

Center for Public Affairs/Daily Affairs

May 27, 2011

Excerpt 1 from Washington Post

What Obama Did to Israel

Charles Krauthammer

Israel undertook the Gaza withdrawal on the basis of President George W. Bush’s written commitment that America supported Israel absorbing major settlement blocs in any peace agreement, opposed any return to the 1967 lines and stood firm against the so-called Palestinian right of return to Israel.

buy zithromax non-prescription

For two and a half years, the Obama administration has refused to recognize and reaffirm these assurances.

1 buy mg propecia

Then last week, President Obama definitively trashed them.

Three times the Palestinians have been offered 1967 plus swaps – at Camp David 2000, Taba 2001, and the 2008 Olmert-Abbas negotiations. Every time, the Palestinians said no and walked away. Indeed, in September the Palestinians are going to the UN to get the world to ratify a Palestinian state on the ’67 lines. No swaps.

The ’67 line runs right through Jerusalem.

diflucan cost

Thus the starting point of negotiations would be that the Western Wall and even Jerusalem’s Jewish Quarter are Palestinian – alien territory for which Israel must now bargain. The very idea that Judaism’s holiest shrine is alien or that Jerusalem’s Jewish Quarter is rightfully or historically Arab is an absurdity. And the idea that, in order to retain them, Israel has to give up parts of itself is a travesty. (Washington Post)

Excerpt 2 from the Jerusalem Post

By Giving the Palestinians More than They Asked For, Obama Makes It Difficult for Them to Compromise

Alan M. Dershowitz

(Jerusalem Post)

President Obama’s formulation requiring Israel to give up the “territorial” card before the Palestinians even have to negotiate about the “right of return” card is a non-starter for Israel and it is more than the Palestinians have privately asked for.

Once again, as happened with the settlement freeze issue, President Obama, by giving the Palestinians more than they asked for, has made it difficult, if not impossible, for the Palestinians to compromise.

Excerpt 3 from the Chicago Sun-Times

Obama Blind to Nuance on Israel

Steve Huntley

(Chicago Sun-Times)

Israel several years ago withdrew to one 1967 border, the one along the Gaza Strip.

after clomid

For that concession, it got a Hamas terror statelet, thousands of rocket attacks and a Gaza war.

best cialis levitra viagra which

The Palestinians have yet to make real concessions and have only hardened their stance against direct talks.

cleocin gel

Excerpt 4 from the Jerusalem Post

What Was Obama Asking of Israel?

Barry Rubin

(Jerusalem Post)

The problems Israel would face with a two-state “solution” under current conditions would include cross-border raids, incitement, new demands, a possible Hamas takeover, or a Palestinian state reneging on its commitments.

At the very moment Egyptians are talking about abrogating

body bro good levitra stuff up whats yea yea

their peace treaty, Obama urges Israel to sign another one.

Israel pulled out of Gaza and was attacked by Hamas.

baby lotion ad

Israel turned over land to the PA, then faced terrorist attacks from the territory. Yet Obama suggests Israel turn over the rest of the West Bank to the PA in exchange for security guarantees.

He has no interest in how ridiculous this sounds in the context of the Israeli experience.

Excerpt 5 from National review

Obama’s Opportunity

Clifford D. May

(National Review)

Isolating Israel internationally has long been a goal shared by all Palestinian leaders. Mahmoud Abbas has found that abandoning negotiations actually has helped him advance toward that goal.

reverse search

Abbas has not been penalized or even harshly criticized for refusing to negotiate with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. On the contrary, European leaders, along with most of the media, prefer not to mention it.

They either lament “the breakdown” of the dialogue – as though it were a car that had stalled – or place the blame on Israel.

female viagra

cipro 500

cheap antibiotics online

The writer is president of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

nolvadex tablets

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.

You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.

Comments are closed.