The Syrian King of the North WILL Conquer Egypt
And Establish CAIRO as CAPITAL of His Caliphate,
AFTER Driving Israel INTO The NEGEV Wilderness!
His Caliphate will Cease at Jesus’ Second Advent,
But It Will Grow Quickly After He Conquers Egypt.
By Second Advent it Will consist of Many Nations.
Muslim Brotherhood
& Al-Qaeda & Other Radicals
Will Internally Clear The Way For The Syrian King
In Egypt Before He Actually Crosses HER Borders.
Internal Terrorist groups inside Moderate Nations
WILL Fight Against Governments When Antichrist
Drives south into Israel to push Israel into Negev
May 8, 2011
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Once the moderate Arab nations see the Antichrist’s initial success, they will rush to join the original 10 horns with him to become a part of his Caliphate Kingdom. It will be a rush to attempt to avoid his wrath for not joining him earlier. The internal attacks within will be invaluable to Antichrist in establishing his Caliphate. Many Arab countries will eventually have new rulers appointed by the King of the North. And among those who have been loyal to him he will divide the land and the spoils of war for gain (profit).
Daniel 11:39 – Thus shall he do in the most strong holds with a strange god, whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them to rule over many, and shall divide the land for gain.
I believe the following listed nations will be part of Antichrist’s Caliphate by the time the 2nd Advent of Christ occurs at the final battle of Armageddon.
At that time Michael will stand up for Israel, which will end the Antichrist’s reign as he comes to his end, and none can help him.
Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Saudi Arabia. Yemen, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, Kuwait, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Iran, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and United Arab Emirates.
Daniel 11:40 to 12:1 – And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the KING OF THE NORTH shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; AND HE SHALL ENTER INTO THE COUNTRIES, AND SHALL OVERFLOW AND PASS OVER. [41] He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon. [42] He shall stretch forth his hand also UPON THE COUNTRIES: and the land of Egypt shall not escape. [43] But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps. [44] But tidings out of the east and out of the north shall trouble him: therefore he shall go forth with great fury to destroy, and utterly to make away many. [45] And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him. [1] And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
Begin Excerpt from BBC News
Egypt revolution groups plan secular election strategy
By Jonathan Head BBC News, Cairo
7 May 2011 Last updated at 16:47 ET
The protests in Cairo’s Tahrir Square spawned new groups of activists
More than 2,000 political activists have met in Egypt to try to create a unified movement to press for deeper democratic reforms.
It was the largest political gathering since the resignation of President Hosni Mubarak in February.
The activists hope to create a new secular political movement for an election scheduled for September.
The organisers of this conference wanted it to represent all the groups that took part in the January uprising.
Among the more than 2,000 attendees were academics, business figures, workers and farmers, and a handful of Muslim clerics.
‘Dictatorship of the minority’
Their goal was to set a clear agenda for the democratic transformation of Egypt – activists complained that they were being excluded by the military council that now rules the country.
But with such a multitude of opinions, agreeing a single agenda was difficult, although they said they would try to present a single slate of candidates to contest September’s general election.
Secular Egyptians fear the poll will be dominated by the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood.
Mamdouh Hamzah, an engineer who initiated and largely funded the conference, said: “We want the next parliament to represent all facets of Egyptian society, not one facet.
“Because if one group has a majority of the parliament we are facing the dictatorship of a minority.”
The mostly young activists acknowledge they lack the experience of the Muslim Brotherhood, and that the election is taking place too soon for them.
The activists hope the 60-member National Council they plan to establish next week can put pressure on the military to take on board their concerns, in particular over the drafting of a new constitution, a task being given to the next parliament.
Begin Excerpt from The Jerusalem Center for Public Afairs/Daily Alert
May 5, 2011
Who Else Is Condemning the U.S. for Killing Bin Laden?
Jonathan D. Halevi
A close ideological link exists between the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda. The two organizations aspire to the similar goal of establishing an Islamic caliphate and imposing Islam over the entire world via jihad. Al-Qaeda sprang from the foundations of the Muslim Brotherhood. Osama bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, started out as Muslim Brotherhood activists.
The Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates in Jordan and the Palestinian territories openly condemn bin Laden’s “assassination,” disproving the claim that the Muslim Brotherhood is a pragmatic movement. The Islamic movement in Israel, headed by Ra’ed Salah, also condemned “the assassination of the Sheikh and martyr Osama bin Laden.” (Jeusalem Center for Public Affairs)
Begin Excerpt from THE JERUSALEM POST
The Region: Egypt pipeline bombing is only the beginning
By BARRY RUBIN
05/01/2011 23:26
A real revolution and full-scale regional war might be the end.
Gas flames 20 meters high signal the birth of a new Middle East. That pillar of fire, unlike the biblical one, indicates that Egyptians are following new, would-be prophets into the desert. A new Pew poll, despite the positive spin by the mass media, is very worr
isome.
Once again the Egyptian pipeline supplying 40 percent of Israel’s natural gas supply has been bombed. It had just reopened after the previous bombing, following a delay so long as to make one suspect it wasn’t just technical. The terrorists simply waited until damage from the prior attack was repaired before launching another one. No doubt, this process will continue. This is a major setback for Israel – a high price for having trusted in trade with an Arab neighbor with whom peace had been concluded – supposedly – more than 30 years ago.
Whether or not Egypt formally renounces or demands changes in the Egypt-Israel peace treaty, that too is finished as a source of stability.
Egyptians support tearing it up by a 54 to 36 percent margin. But many of that 36% would probably support major revisions – a position now advocated by most Egyptian politicians.
Among other developments, the Egyptian government supported Syria in the UN to prevent any condemnation of that country for repression of peaceful demonstrators. Arab solidarity has trumped any consistent stand supporting democracy and human rights. Mubarak had a bad relationship with a terrorist-sponsoring, anti- American Syria. The new regime will reverse that. Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Nabil Elaraby has announced that the Egypt-Gaza Strip border will soon reopen fully, meaning that arms, money and terrorists can flow freely into Gaza.
As if that’s not enough, the Egyptian government helped negotiate a Fatah-Hamas deal that radicalizes the Palestinian Authority and makes negotiations, much less peace, impossible.
As part of this deal, Egyptian troops will enter the Gaza Strip.
And what will they do there
? Help unify the Hamas and Fatah militaries, in theory.
But that’s not what’s going to happen. What is more likely is that the Egyptian officers will become military advisers to Hamas. And what if Hamas attacks Israel and Israel retaliates? Will this trigger a war with Egypt, especially if Egyptians are accidentally killed?
ACCORDING TO this new Pew Poll, Egyptians view the Muslim Brotherhood favorably by a margin of 75% to 20%. Asked directly, 31% say they sympathize with Islamists; 30% don’t. While 62% say laws should strictly follow the Koran, most of the others say all laws should merely adhere to its values and spirit.
What this amounts to is that roughly one-third of Egyptians want an Islamist state and support the Bro
therhood, one-third are open to its propaganda, and one-third are opposed (including, presumably, the country’s 10+% Christians).
Egyptians respect the military – at least for now – and think well of the democratic movements that made the revolution. But when it comes to programmatic sympathy for an organized group, Islamists are clearly the strongest force.
The poll also shows some interesting variations in public opinion. Contrary to Western expectations, sympathy for the Brotherhood is greater among high-income (43%) and middle-income (41%) than among low-income Egyptians (26%).
Remember the conventional wisdom that poverty and ignorance breeds Islamism
? It’s just flat wrong; this finding suggests that revolutionary Islamism might be more a wave of the future than a relic of the past. Moreover, it shows that even the middle and upper classes don’t naturally embrace democratic moderation – another conventional wisdom in the West.
Islamism, like Marxism, is a coherent ideology that fulfills the needs of people looking for systematic answers to their problems. Why are the poorer less Islamist? I would suggest two factors. Poorer Egyptians are likely to be more traditional in religious terms, and loyal to the nationalism of the old regime. In other words, they are relatively passive recipients of what they’ve been taught in religious and political terms.
This explains the seemingly contradictory finding that while 59% with only a primary school education want to annul the treaty with Israel, “only” 40% of those with a college education do. Xenophobia is a simple idea quite consistent with both tradition and the Arab nationalism dominant in Egypt for
the past 60 years.
Here, we see the potential power of anti-Israel and anti-American demagoguery. The most sophisticated, I’ll bet, would prefer some clever maneuver that guts the treaty without making Egypt look bad internationally.
Speaking of attitudes toward the United States, guess what? President Barack Obama’s assistance in wrecking the old regime overnight brought no additional popularity to America. Attitudes toward the United States are negative by a 79 to 20% margin. Hostile views of Obama personally are less overwhelming, but still strong – 64 to 35% – and unchanged from before the revolution.
The conclusion was that the US involvement was negative by a 39 to 22% margin, with 35% saying it was neither, which also represents a defeat for Obama. In other words, Obama’s actions convinced no one.
As for presidential candidates, Amr Moussa scored an amazing 90% positive rating. Readers know I feel he will be Egypt’s next president and follow a radical nationalist policy, opposed to Islamism but willing to make concessions to the Brotherhood that might be the first stage in a longer-term Islamist transformation.
FINALLY, THERE is a new force to be reckoned with: Islamists more radical than the Brotherhood. Suddenly these groups – many comprised of former Brotherhood activists – are getting a lot of media time. Some think they could get 5 to 10% of the parliamentary seats if they run candidates, in addition to the Brotherhood’s likely 30%.
Also, these are going to be the people committing a growing number of terrorist attacks and assaults on Christians.
The natural gas pipeline is only the beginning. A real revolution and fullscale regional war might be the end.
The writer is director of the Global Research in International Affairs Center (www.gloria-center.org) and editor of Middle East Review of International Affairs Journal and Turkish Studies.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.