Imprisoned Followers of Frankenstein, the Wolf Man, and Count Dracula, do not Break Ranks with their Individual Leader’s Particular Brand of Terror!

Imprisoned Followers of Frankenstein, the Wolf Man, and Count Dracula, do not Break Ranks with their Individual Leader’s Particular Brand of Terror!

June 12, 2006

http://www.tribulationperiod.com/

Once the Hamas and Islamic Jihad leaders not in Israeli prisons turned down the Prisoners Peace Plan put forward by Fatah, the imprisoned Hamas and Islamic Jihad followers removed their names from the plan they put forward as a Fatah-Hamas-Islamic Jihad Prisoner Peace Plan, leaving only the Fatah prisoners in favor of it. Their “party whips” remind me of our own congressional parties willingness to stick to a party line they don’t like, rather than vote their own conscience.

Two Authors of the Prisoners’ Document Pull Out

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Arutz Sheva – IsraelNationalNews.com

Two members of the team who wrote the much-touted Prisoners’ Document plan for peace between Israel and the Hamas-led Palestinian Authority on Sunday withdrew

female viagra

their signatures from the document.

Abdel Khaled Natche, a top Hamas member incarcerated in Israel, has withdrawn his name from the document, as has fellow prisoner, Bassem al-Saadi, a top Islamic Jihad member.

buy minocin

buy zithromax non-prescription

Both men said in a statement read by Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri

10 mg prednisone

that Fatah Chairman and PA President Mahmoud Abbas had used the document for political gain, rather than the solution to a deadlock that it was meant to be.

blinklist com levitrai

The statement by Natche read in Gaza by a spokesman said he had withdrawn his signature on behalf of all Hamas prisoners, accord

how do antibiotics affect birth control pills

ing to media sources.

cipro 500

Natche and al-Saadi accused Abbas of “unacceptable abuse” in their statement. “

The document is now a completely Fatah document,” announced Abu Zuhri. The two were angered by Abbas’ call for a referendum on the document should Hamas refuse to accept the plan.

Abbas was the first to embrace the plan, which was authored by prisoners from the Hamas, Fatah and Islamic Jihad parties and called for a two-state solution with a PA state drawn on the pre-1967 boundaries, as well as a total right of return to Israel for Arabs who left Israel following the modern Jewish state’ s founding in 1948.

after clomid

In addition, it calls for PA Arabs to “focus their resistance on the lands occupied in 1967.”

The plan does not call for formal recognition of Israel, nor does it call upon terror group Hamas to renounce violence or disarm, all of which are the preconditions set by the Quartet of Nations (United States, United Nations, European Union and Russia) for restoring international funding for the PA government.

Natche, a leader of the local Hamas militia in Hebron, helped formulate the document last month together with Marwan Barghouti, a senior leader of the Fatah party and Bassem al-Saadi of Islamic Jihad. Hamas and Fatah were engaged in a bloody power struggle in the streets of Gaza at

cheap antibiotics online

the time, one which has continued despite a number of ceasefires which did not hold.

map 2 of reverse search

add comment effects levitra side

nolvadex tablets

The two parties continued their battles on Sunday while leaders from both parties were scheduled to meet again in another effort to work out their differences.

Abbas has pushed for acceptance of the document by Hamas as a way of softening the terrorist organization’s stance on peace talks with Israel. Hamas has steadfastly refused to budge on the issue, prompting Abbas to issue an ultimatum to Hamas: approve the plan or face a general referendum on the document.

End Arutz Sheva Article

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by

10mg effect prednisone side

the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107

body bro good levitra stuff up whats yea yea

of the US Copyright Law.

0 cialis comment currently reply

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

diflucan cost

For more detailed information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. You may use material originated by this site.

best cialis levitra viagra which

doxycycline cat

However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.

Comments are closed.