Hassan Nasrallah: Leader of Iran should appoint all Islamic Rulers
Lebanon should become part of the Greater Islamic Republic
To be Ruled by the Leader of an Islamic Iranian Republic
Shiite Goals have not changed since Hizbullah’s Birth
And the goals are finishing as planned in Lebanon!
The goals are the basic functions of a Caliphate!
Initially stretching east from Morocco to Java!
October 14, 2010
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
The goal of the Shiite Dictatorship known as the Islamic Republic of Iran has never been secret.
It is to first form a great Caliphate across all of North Africa, all of the Middle East, and most of Southeastern Asia, and then to gradually expand it across the face of the entire earth.
I believe they will be able to get their Caliphate, but it will be destroyed by the Second Advent before it starts to gradually expand.
Begin Archive Excerpt 1 from MEMRI
Middle East Media Research Institute
ARCHIVAL – Hassan Nasrallah in the Late 1980s: Lebanon Should Become Part of the Greater Islamic Republic Ruled by Leader of Iran, Who Should Appoint all Islamic Rulers
Clip No. 2636
December 31, 1989
Following are excerpts from a video clip of Hassan Nasrallah before assuming office as Hizbullah secretary-general.
The video was posted on the Internet.
Hassan Nasrallah: What is the nature of the regime that Hizbullah wants for Lebanon at present, in light of the state of the country and the numerous sects? The preceding lectures have answered this question. Right now, we do not have a plan for a regime in Lebanon.
We believe that we should remove the colonialism and the Israeli [occupation], and only then can a plan be implemented.
Our plan, to which we, as faithful believers, have no alternative, is to establish an Islamic state under the rule of Islam.
Lebanon should not be an Islamic republic on its own, but rather, part of the Greater Islamic Republic, governed by the Master of Time [the Mahdi], and his rightful deputy, the Jurisprudent Ruler, Imam Khomeini.
[…]
[I was asked] about Hizbullah’s relations with Iran and with the leadership of
the Islamic Revolution in Iran. As far as we are concerned, these relations… I am one of the people working for Hizbullah and its active apparatuses. I would not have rema ined for a s
ingle moment in any apparatus of Hizbullah if I were not absolutely convinced that these apparatuses are connected, through a certain hierarchy, to the Jurisprudent Ruler and Leader, whose decisions are binding.
As far as we are concerned, this is axiomatic.
Diplomatic and political statements are not what is important in this case.
Ayatollah Karroubi cannot simply admit: Yes, Hizbullah are our people in Lebanon. This is inconceivable, both politically and media-wise. Our essential and organic relation with the leadership of the Islamic Revolution in Iran and the Rule of the Jurisprudent is axiomatic, as far as we are concerned.
We belong to this path, we make sacrifices for its sake, and we expose ourselves to dangers, because we are convinced that the blood we shed flows for the sake of the Rule of the Jurisprudent.
[…]
Should the Jurisprudent Ruler be the one to appoint the leaders, and bestow legitimacy upon them, in all Muslim countries? Yes, because his jurisprudence is not limited by geographical boundaries.
It extends to wherever Muslims may be.
[…]
Begin Excerpt from DEBKAfile Special Report
High military alerts as Ahmadinejad, Nasrallah call for Israel’s destruction
DEBKAfile Special Report
October 13, 2010, 8:27 PM (GMT+2:00)
DEBKAfile’s military and Iranian sources report: Towards the end of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad first day in Lebanon Wednesday Oct. 13, a high alert was declared in the Israeli, Syrian, Lebanese armies, the Hizballah militia and the UN peacekeeping force. The visitor was expected to further sharpen his tone and fire seriously belligerent rhetoric at Israel from the sites he is touring Thursday along the Lebanese-Israeli border.
A sign of this came in the harsh tone of the speech he delivered Wednesday night from the Al-Raya Stadium in the Shiite district Dahya district of Beirut: Ahmadinejad and Hizballah leader Hassan Nasrallah declared their common goal was Israel’s destruction. The IDF, the Lebanese army and UNIFIL raised their war alert further when it was discovered that Nasrallah was not standing beside the Iranian president but had relayed his speech by videotape.
Although Ahmadinejad spent t he day meeting Lebanese leaders,
he was not seen to have met Nasrallah. However, our sources report that they did get together secretly in the early afternoon and coordinated their movements and actions for the next part of the Iranian leader’s visit. They talked again without publicity Wednesday evening shortly before their speeches at the stadium.
The Hizballah leaders physical absence from the platform alongside the Iranian president, as though his life is in greater danger than that of his guest, is interpreted by Western intelligence circles in Beirut as pointing to Nasrallah reserving a piece of high drama up his sleeve, alarming enough to justify a demonstration of strength by Hizballah in Beirut or in South Lebanon. That is why he preferred to keep his head down Wednesday. The maneuver was almost certainly approved or even cooked up with the Iranian president.
Ahmadinejad went on to denigrate “the Zionist entity as the embodiment of the deception of the capitalist world order and the materialistic ideas.”
He spoke of major change awaiting the world starting from “our region” and explained: “A resistance front has been formed by the peoples of Lebanon, Palestine, Syria, Turkey, Iran, Iraq and all the region.”
Israel’s only response to the vicious attacks showered on its head from Lebanon came from an official in the bureau of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who said: The President of Iran’s Lebanon visit is like that of a commander reviewing his troops – the terrorists of Hizballah who act as Iran’s military arm in the region. Anyone who cares about peace and freedom must be filled with alarm by the Iranian provocation. Lebanon deserves calm and prosperity instead of which it has become the servant of Iranian aggression spearheaded by Hizballah.”
The official gave no indication of any Israeli plans to combat Iran’s domination of Lebanon.
Washington’s response was still milder. The White House commented that the Ahmadinejad visit to Lebanon marked his provocative behavior, while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said it would lead to greater regional instability.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site
is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.