Do Not Be Surprised
If Obama brings Troops
Home Ahead Of Schedule!
July 26, 2010
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
The two best Islamic friends I studied with in USAFIHL’S in the sixties were two Pakistani Captains, Omar and Nazier. The Pakistan government and politics have changed drastically since that time, and a lot of CIA actions and programs in both Pakistan and Afghanistan are far better buried than exposed.
Began Excerpt from THE LEBANESE STAR via Reuters and World News
Leaked U.S. archive fuels doubts on Afghan war
By Susan Cornwell and Phil Stewart
July 26, 2010
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Obama administration scrambled on Monday to manage the explosive leak of secret military records which paint a grim picture of the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan and raise new doubts about key ally Pakistan.
The unprecedented release of some 91,000 classified military documents was likely to fuel mounting uncertainty in the U.S. Congress about the unpopular war as President Barack Obama sends 30,000 more soldiers into the faltering drive to break the Taliban insurgency.
The documents detail allegations that U.S. forces sought to cover up civilian deaths in the conflict as well as U.S. concern that Pakistan secretly aided the Taliban even as it took billions of dollars in U.S. aid.
The White House condemned the leak, saying it could threaten national security and endanger American lives, while the Pentagon called the release a “criminal act” and said
it was reviewing the documents to determine the potential damage to both U.S. and coalition troops.
The leaked documents, a collection of field intelligence and threat reports from before Obama ordered the troop surge in December, graphically illustrate the Pentagon’s own bleak assessment of the war amid deteriorating security and a strengthening Taliban.
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, the whistle-blowing website behind the release, told a London news conference on Monday his group had held back 15,000 of the documents as it decides whether their publication
had security implications.
The archive leak came as the Taliban said they were holding captive one of two U.S. servicemen who strayed into insurgent territory, and that the other had been killed.
The reported capture could further erode domestic U.S. support for the war ahead of pivotal congressional elections in November.
FOCUS ON PAKISTAN
Pakistan, which came in for particular scrutiny in the archive, said leaking unprocessed reports from the battlefield was irresponsible, while a spokesman for Afghan President Hamid Karzai said the documents underscored longstanding concern about both Pakistan’ s involvement in the country and the civilian death toll.
The documents suggest that representatives from Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) met directly with the Taliban in secret strategy sessions to organize militant networks fighting U.S. soldiers.
Senator Jeff Sessions, a conservative Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said suggestions that even rogue elements of the ISI were seeking to confound the U.S. war effort were troubling.
“That would be very disturbing if they were participating in strategies to fight U.S. soldiers. It would be unacceptable,” Sessions told reporters.
Pakistan Foreign Ministry spokesman Abdul Basit dismissed the reports as “far-fetched and skewed.”
“If anything these betray the lack of understanding of the complexities involved,” Basit said. “Pakistan’s constructive and positive role in Afghanistan cannot be blighted by such self-serving and baseless reports.”
Colonel Dave Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman, on Monday declined to discuss the relationship with Pakistan or any of the specific documents, saying that despite their release on the Internet the reports remain classified. [
Along with doubts about Pakistan, the documents also said that the coalition troops have killed hundreds of Afghan civilians in unreported incidents, and that they often sought to cover up the mistakes which have shaken confidence in the war effort among many Afghans.
At least 45 civilians, many of them women and children, were killed in a rocket attack by the NATO-led foreign force last week during fighting with Taliban insurgents in the southern province of Helmand, an Afghan government spokesman said.
“Over the years, we have raised the issue of civilian casualties and how harmful civilian casualties or collateral damage could be to achieving our joint objective of defeating terrorism in Afghanistan,” spokesman Waheed Omer said.
He said there have been reductions in civilian deaths over the past year and a half and that there was a common understand
ing about the negative impact such incidents have caused and the role of the ISI in supporting the militants.
U.S. national security adviser Jim Jones said the leak would not affect “our ongoing commitment to deepen our partnerships with Afghanistan and Pakistan.”
Violence in Afghanistan is at its highest since the war began as thousands of extra U.S. troops crank up a campaign to oust insurgents from their traditional heartland in
the south.
“WAR DIARY”
The United States has repeatedly urged Pakistan to hunt down militant groups, including some believed to have been nurtured by the ISI as strategic assets in Afghanistan and against arch-rival India.
Islamabad says it is doing all
it can to fight the militancy, adding that it was a victim of terrorism itself.
Under the heading “Afghan War Diary,” the 91,000 documents collected from across the U.S. military in Afghanistan cover the war from 2004 to 2010, WikiLeaks said in a summary.
The documents were provided first to The New York Times, Britain’s The Guardian newspaper and German weekly Der Spiegel.
Last month was the deadliest for foreign troops since 2001, with more than 100 killed, and civilian deaths have also risen as ordinary Afghans are increasingly caught in the cross-fire.
(Additional reporting by Alister Bull in WASHINGTON and Chris Allbritton in ISLAMABAD; Writing by David Fox and Andrew Quinn; Editing by Mark Heinrich and Eric Beech)
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.