The Gulf News excerpt points to an Iraq Coalition!
Mark these three men and their end time Coalition!
Goodbye to Secular Iraq – Hello to Islamic Republic!
Goodby to American Troops – Hello to Iran and Syria
WATCH Ammar Al Hakim, Nouri Al Maliki, and the Al Sadr
I have taught since 1976 that Iraq would be a Toe & Horn
In Daniel 2 and 7 – The final steps in prophecy now Appear
The Variable has Always Been WHEN the “TEN” Would Attack
But since 2007 I have been settled on it occurring before 2015
June 15, 2010
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
1976 Quote from Page 78 of “Tectonic Chaos”
Revelation 13:1 – And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having SEVEN HEADS and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
The seven heads of the Beast in Revelation 13:1 represent six great world governments that of the past in which Satan has been actively involved. The seventh world government is now rising again at the present time around Israel and will soon produce the Antichrist.
Prior to God separating from His wife, the nation of Israel, six great world Kingdoms that existed before, and at, the time of the cross are, in chronological order, as follows:
(1) The Egyptian
(2) The Assyrian
(3) The Babylonian
(4) The Medo-Persian
(5) The Grecian
(6) The Roman
The rising seventh Kingdom will incorporate all the cunning and skill in the arts and sciences that have been handed down from the previous six kingdoms
. Man has come a long way since the days of the cruel Pharaoh of the Exodus, but all that modern man has learned is based on the root contributions of these six kingdoms – and soon all the knowledge and expertise of sinful mankind will be centered in the final kingdom.
The ten horns of Revelation 13:1 are ten Arab nations who will form the nucleus of the final kingdom, and the ten crowns are the power of the kings that will rile them.
For ye ars we h
ave pictured the typical Arab as a scrawny little fellow on a camel in the desert with a comic expression on his face. This viewpoint is quickly changing. Oil is replacing the U.S. dollar in international importance – and soon ten Arab nations will have gained economic control of much of the earth’s wealth. We will not try to stop them because of the Soviet Union – and the Soviet Union will not try to stop them because of us and Red China. The world power block will block itself as the Arab nations prosper in our midst.
End 1976 Quote from “Tectonic Chaos”
Begin Special Prophecy Update Number 176B
June 16, 2004
Ten Toes Are Beginning to Wiggle
Daniel 2:42-44 – And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and
partly broken. [43] And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay. [44] And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
This Kingdom and its Lamb King, who Daniel’s people rejected at his First Appearance, will soon return for his Second Appearance to bring in his Kingdom as its Lion King of Judah. I have always believed these ten toes would indeed arise out the territory once controlled by the two legs to which they were attached, namely, the southern flank of the old Roman Empire. The two legs of Daniel’s statue, during the time of their existence as an empire, stretched their long toes into the nations now identified as Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Sudan, Lebanon, Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and Iran.
I believe these 10 nations will be directly involved in the coming Jihad against Israel.
I believe the 10 toes found in chapter 2 of Daniel are the 10 horns found in chapter 7 of Daniel, and that the “little horn” of Daniel 7 comes out of Syria or its immediate surrounding area.
Daniel 7:24-27 – And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings. [25] And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. [26] But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and
to destroy it unto the end.
[27] And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him.
I believe the three kings that he initially plucks up, and replaces with his subordinates who will do his bidding, will probably be implanted as rulers of Lebanon, Libya, and Sudan. He will first bypass Jordan, then conquer Egypt, and leave Saudi Arabia alone, but it is inferred that the three he subdues are part of the original 10 toes, and I do not believe that Egypt, Jordan, or Saudi Arabia will be part of the original 10.
Turkey is now pulling away from very friendly relations established with Israel over the past several years. Iraq will be as anti-Israel as ever after American troops pull out.
END ARCHIVE PROPHECY UPDATE 176B
BEGIN 2005 SUPPLEMENT TO ARCHIVE
PROPHECY UPDATE 176B
May 18, 2005
The article which follows from the New York Times by John F. Burnes was extracted from the DEBEKA Files. In Archive Update 176B I gave the expectation that Iraq would indeed turn against Israel and the U.S. with renewed hatred. There is no question in my mind that Iraq will be one of the 10 toes that attack Israel in the not too distant future.
IRAQ WILL BE ONE OF THE 10 TOES OF DANIEL’S PROPHECY!
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
BEGIN NEW YORK TIMES ARTICLE
Registering New Influence, Iranian Foreign Minister Visits Iraq
John F. Burns (New York Times)
Iran sent its foreign minister, Kamal Kharrazi, to Baghdad on Tuesday. Almost 25 years after Iraq and Iran started an eight-year war that left a million people dead, the government in Baghdad is now led by officials with close personal, religious, and political ties to Iran’s ruling Shiite ayatollahs. Kharrazi appeared eager to put the U.S. on notice that Iran expects to wield influence in Iraq, especially in the long term: “The party that will leave Iraq is the United States, because it will eventually withdraw, but the party that will live with the Iraqis is Iran, because it is a neighbor to Iraq.”
END SUPPLEMENT TO ARCHIVE PROPHECY UPDATE 176B
BEGIN EXCERPT FROM JUNE 15, 2010 GULF NEWS
Ghosts of the past threaten Iraq’s emerging alliance
Al Hakim and Al Maliki have made a deal that should secure them the premiership, but nagging problems remain
By Sami Moubayed, Special to Gulf News
Published: 00:00 June 15, 2010
When the 38-year old Ammar Al Hakim succeeded his father as head of the Supreme Iraqi Islamic Council (SIIC) in August, many thought that he would easily be manipulated and abused by many of his father’s friends and allies, men who were far older and experienced than him.
Al Hakim, however, has done a very good job at building bridges both within Iraq and with its neighbours, and has recently visited Damascus, Tehran and Riyadh to market himself as a reliable political heavyweight in Iraqi politics.
During the March elections his coalition, the Iraqi National Alliance (INA), put in a solid performance.
It did not sweep parliament — as was the case in 2005 — but did enough to be the third-largest bloc, with 70 seats.
Al Hakim would have been satisfied with this, knowing that, even with 91 seats, Eyad Allawi did not have a majority and could not form a Cabinet on his own — this would require 163 seats. None of the aspirants could become prime minister without the full backing of Al Hakim and the SIIC.
This week, Al Hakim and Prime Minister Nouri Al Maliki announced they would merge their two blocs, the INA and Al Maliki’s State of Law coalition, which has 89 seats, into one bloc, giving them a total of 159 seats. The remaining four seats required for a majority are relatively easy to obtain.
The writing had been on the wall for weeks, as the two sides openly debated a merger. But only last week, apparently fed up with the prime minister’s arrogance, Al Hakim had snapped: “I speak to the politicians and tell them: Come down from your ivory tower and [do away] with your personal ambitions!” Al Hakim was visibly angry with Al Maliki’s insistence that no one but he was entitled to the Iraqi premiership. The two men seemed to agree that it was v
ital to prevent the rise of the secular Allawi, but little else besides.
Al Hakim does not trust Al Maliki, and nor does his ally, Moqtada Al Sadr.
Al Maliki came to power in 2006 thanks to the unwavering support of Abdul Aziz Al Hakim (Ammar’s father) and Al Sadr, but subsequently turned his back on both of them. Al Sadr supported Al Maliki in 2006-2007, legitimising him among grassroots Iraqis, while the prime minister protected him from the government dragnet, allowing his men to bear arms and create a mini-state in the slums of Baghdad.
Once firmly in power, however, Al Maliki abandoned Al Sadr, prompting the young cleric to tell La Republica: “Between myself and Abu Israa [Al Maliki] there has never been much feeling. I never trusted him. At our last meeting he first told me: ‘You are the country’s backbone,’ and then he confessed that he was ‘obliged’ to combat us. Obliged, you hear me?”
Al Sadr sees Al Maliki as an American stooge who will renege on all promises made to the INA once he is firmly back in power, as he did in 2007. Al Hakim, meanwhile, views the prime minister as a very unreliable ally because of his decision in January 2009 to contest the provincial elections on his own.
This, and his decision to run independently again last March, means that Al Maliki will forever be seen as an opportunist in the eyes of his Shiite allies. Al Hakim, however, is obliged to ally with Al Maliki — at the behest of Iran — to ensure the Shiites are not overwhelmed by secular figures such as Allawi or Sunnis.
The merger does not necessarily mean that everything is resolved. Unless real pressure is applied on Al Maliki by Tehran, he will refuse to accept a compromise candidate for prime minister — certainly not anyone from the INA. Al Hakim himself has no ambition to become prime minister, much like his father and uncle who were “prime minister makers”. . The SIIC has long wanted one of its own to become prime minister, such as Adel Abdul Mahdi.
Rivalry
Once this matter is resolved, Al Hakim and Al Sadr need to resolve their differences. For years, Al Sadr had accused Al Hakim’s father of being an Iranian stooge, because he fought alongside the Iranians during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s.
Al Sadr has always boasted that he never fled Iraq — not for a single day during the heyday of the Saddam regime — while the Al Hakim family spent years in Tehran, and were bankrolled and protected by the Iranians.
When Al Hakim toyed with the idea of creating an au
tonomous Shiite district in southern Iraq, similar to the Kurdish one in the north, Al Sadr was the first to challenge the idea, arguing that pan-Arabism rather than pan-Shiitism should prevail, and that Iraq should remain united.
Now that Abdul Aziz Al Hakim is gone, the rivalry between the two turbaned young men is stronger than ever. They come from heavyweight families that have competed for leadership of the Shiite community for decades, are both sons of legendary figures, and happen to be only two years apart in terms of age.
The longer it takes to find solutions, the more these old rivalries will bubble to the surface, if not between the leaders themselves then between their followers. Al Maliki, Al Hakim and Al Sadr seem to realise that time is not on their side, as Allawi speeds up his PR campaign to promote himself as the only real prime minister.
He met with Al Maliki to score points on Saturday, then surprisingly wrote an article for The New York Times, addressing the US public directly. In Iraq, the ghosts of the past have a way of causing very real problems. Unless genuine solutions are hammered out in Baghdad, the Al Hakim-Al Maliki merger will amount to nothing.
Sami Moubayed is editor-in-chief of Forward Magazine in Syria.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.