Who is the Legitimate “Occupier” in the West Bank and Gaza Strip
?
March 26, 2006
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
The answer to this question,
for someone who believes the Bible is the inspired word of God, was settled long ago.
For the rest of the world it is a complicated question. But for the believer it is a simple one. The answer to the question is found in the answer to this question – Does man or God have the right to decide the legitimate occupier of the West Bank and Gaza Strip? For those who do not believe the Bible is God’s inspired word, they settle it by their own conclusions, but for those who believe it is God’s inspired word, it has already been settled for them by God’ word.
Genesis 15:18 – In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:
The land grant to Abraham did not pass to the male descendants of his seeds from Hagar and Keturah, but was passed down through the seed descendants of Isaac and Jacob.
The following event occurred in the center of what we now call the West Bank.
Genesis 28:10-14 – And Jacob went out from Beer-sheba, and went toward Haran.
[11] And he lighted upon a certain place, and tarried there all night, because the sun was set; and he took of the stones of that place, and put them for his pillows, and lay down in that place to sleep. [12] And he dreamed, and behold a ladder set up on the earth, and the top of it reached to heaven: and behold the angels of God ascending and descending on it. [13] And, behold, the Lord stood above it, and said, I am the Lord God of Abraham thy father, and the God of Isaac: the land whereon thou liest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed; [14] And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed.
The article by Arthur Cohn in the Jerusalem Post is accurate as to how
the two major viewpoints have caused a wide diversity of opinion. In the final analysis, much of what one believes is dependent on whether he or she believes the Old Testament is inspired – Does God or man have the right to decide who is the true “occupier” of the West Bank and Gaza Strip? And does God consider the Palestinian homicide bombers as “freedom fighters” or “terrorists” of a false God represented by a false prophet? Does Hollywood or God decide the answer to the question?
BEGIN JERUSALEM POST ARTICLE
The ‘Occupation’ is the Problem
Arthur Cohn, THE JERUSALEM POST
March 22, 2006
The Palestinian film “Paradise Now,” which sympathetically depicts the lives of two Palestinian terrorists, won the Golden Globe and was nominated by the Academy of Motion Pictures in Hollywood for the best foreign film Oscar.
How is it possible, I ask myself, that such a film is acclaimed by people of culture? The main reason is that terrorists active against Israel are regarded by many as freedom fighters whose motives should be understood.
One word has transformed Palestinian terrorists into sympathetic figures in certain quarters and has tainted all political discussion surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: That word is “occupation.”
All land not part of Israel until 1967 is deemed “occupied territory.” And in dealing with supposedly stolen land all means are justified.
By these criteria there can be no negotiations about Gush Etzion or other settlement blocs, no discussion about a united Jerusalem. These areas are illegally occupied and have to be given back.
The term “occupation” also reminds people of the German occupation of Europe during WWII.
This allusion to Nazism makes Israel’s transgression even worse. It is only a small step from the “occupation” to a full-scale comparison of Israel to Nazi Germany. In this context, who can deny the Palestinians the right to fight the “occupation”?
Calling the West Bank “occupied” is irresponsible and unjustified. Let’s remember that Israel didn’t initiate the war in order to conquer land.
Israel was attacked in 1967.
Israel didn’t take any land from a sovereign state. The West Bank and Gaza were illegally in the hands of Jordan and Egypt respectively.
The disputed areas were promised for Jewish settlements by the League of Nations in 1922, and all the resolutions of this body were transferred to the UN under Article 80 of the UN charter.
THERE IS no parallel case in history that treats territories captured in a defensive war as occupied. Moreover, for most Arabs all the land of the state of Israel is stolen (“the occupation started in 1948”) and those who speak now about “occupation” of the areas beyond the Green Line play into the hands
of the Palestinians and their anti-Israel propaganda.
The soft treatment by many in the international community we are now seeing of the soon-to-be Hamas-led PA – which declares that all Israel has to be “liberated” by terrorism from “occupation” – is the proof for that. All use of the misleading term “occupied territories” encourages the double standard whereby many nations treat the various terror groups such al-Qaida one way and the Palestinian terror groups another way.
IF THERE will come a time for a peace agreement between Israel and a reliable Palestinian partner, many concessions will have to be made. But to declare in advance that all these areas don’t belong to Israel, that they are part of an illegal occupation, makes no sense. Does the Old City of Jerusalem, which was attacked in 1948, not belong to Israel? Are areas like Gush Etzion not part of the Zionist enterprise? Have the survivors of the Jews brutally killed in the Hebron pogroms no right to return to their historical Jewish center
?
Those who declare that great parts of Israel are occupied territories also indirectly support the Arabs’ claim that the Jews really don’t have any true roots in the Holy Land at all.
One sixth-grade Palestinian school book put it this way: “The argument that the Jews have historical rights in Palestine is the greatest lie in human history.”
The ugly efforts of the Arab propaganda to rewrite Jewish history, by saying for instance that the Temple never existed, are indirectly supported by those who speak flippantly about “occupied territories.”
By declaring that the West Bank is “occupied” we are also supporting the peculiar idea that they must become judenrein – free of Jews. If more than one million Palestinian Arabs live in Israel, why is it unthinkable that Jews would live under the Palestinian Authority?
AS FOR the ownership of the land, almost all Jews who settled beyond the Green Line built their homes on public land and not on privately owned Arab property.
If Israel’s demand for security lacks a basis in law, justice and morality, if Israel does not stress its rights in the Land of Israel, if it basically justifies the Arab position that large parts of Israel belong only to them and are forcibly stolen, the Jewish state and its supporters cannot wonder when we see so many students on American university campuses embracing the Palestinian propaganda narrative. We cannot be surprised that so many writers and media people speak out against Israeli policies; we cannot wonder when major churches tell their congregants they are divesting from Israel; and we cannot wonder when a prestigious award is given to a film that shows understanding, even a certain admiration, for anti-Israel terrorists.
The writer is the Academy Award-winning producer of numerous films, including The Garden of the Finzi-Continis and One Day in September.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more detailed information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.