Terrorist Nations Need More Time To INSURE Israel’s Defeat,
They want a conventional war which is one they can Win!
Obama diplomacy has been a bonanza to their Purpose.
Islam is succeeding in Making Israel SEEM a Monster,
And will continue to do so until they provoke Israel
Into attacking Hizbullah or Iran AS AN Aggressor,
Giving Islam a False counterattack Justification!
Daniel 7 Ten Nation Horns need more Bonding
To make a plan that will insure their Success!
I believe this attack will occur prior to 2015!
June 3, 2010
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
During the last century I became convinced Hizbullah would be used by Iran and Syria to lure Israel into a disastrous counterattack situation, which would lead to Israel being driven into the Negev Wilderness, where she would remain surrounded on all sides by the Islamic forces of Antichrist for some three and one-half years.
I have never believed the final war will begin as a nuclear war. I am certain the war between Israel and Islam that drives Israel into the Negev will be conventional. It is highly advantageous to the Islamic nations involved because of their overwhelming numerical advantage.
When they have consolidated, highly organized, and positioned their forces, then the counterattack trap will be launched and no one will directly help Israel.
It is quite possible that the Israelis may attack the Iranian nuclear sites, and Hizbullah would immediately launch thousands of rockets at northern Israel in response, to which Israel would respond with a rapid push north into Lebanon, where the trap would be sprung by
Hizbullah and troops from Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Iran.
There is no way under heaven to prevent this final war of the Age of the Gentiles. The only question is WHEN it will begin.
Russia, America, France, Great Britain, and China will monitor the war to prevent it becoming nuclear until the final battle of Armageddon, at which time Antichrist will invite the nations to come to assist him in the final destruction of Israel at the final battle of the war, the battle of that great day of God Almighty, the battle of Armageddon.
Revelation 16:12-14 – And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water
thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared. [13] And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. [14] For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth un to the kings of the earth and of the whole world,
to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.
Daniel 11:44 to 12:1 – But tidings out of the east and out of the north shall trouble him: therefore he shall go forth with great fury to destroy, and utterly to make away many. [45] And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him. [1] And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
SPECIAL PROPHECY UPDATE NUMBER 177B
June 23, 2004
Hizbollah Will Eventually Trigger An End Time Jihad!
Daniel 11:40 – And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.
Alexander the Great, the “notable horn” in Daniel 8:5, which was “broken” and replaced by four other horns in Daniel 8:8 that represented the four generals who would divide his kingdom among themselves after his death, was still very much alive when he captured Israel in 332 B.C., only to fall dead nine years later in 323 B.C.
In the division of his kingdom into four parts, Egypt and Israel were given to Ptolemy I, and his descendants ruled over Israel until 212 B.C., when Antiochus III conquered Israel from the north, and the Seleucids ruled over Israel until 167 B.C. The many Seleucid kings that ruled over Syria were individually identified as the “king of the north” by Daniel, and he called the individual Ptolemaic kings that ruled over Israel and Egypt the “king of the south.”
Daniel prophesied Alexander’s death some 268 years before it occurred.
In Daniel’s prophecies from Daniel 11:5 to 11:45 he refers to two types of kings, kings of the north, who would rule as Syrian kings to the north of Israel, and to kings of the south that ruled over the territory that made up the Ptolemaic kingdom to the south of Syria. So the king of the south in Daniel 11:40 is the ruler in Israel “at the time of the end,” while the willful king of the north is the ruler in Syria.
I firmly believe that it will be the terrorist army known as Hizbollah, under the directions of Syria and Iran, that will deliberately perform an act designed to get Israel to push north into Syria and Lebanon as an act of retribution, which will give international justification for 10 Arab nations, led by the Syrian ruler, to rumble south into Israel in a lightening surprise Jihad. I have watched the rise of the Hizbollah terrorist arm for some 22 years, and observed a weaving of its tentacles across many nations in an ever increasing involvement in the amazing recent growth of worldwide terrorism. I think it worthy of giving a brief history of the movement, and an outline of its current activities, because I believe it will be the catalyst used by Islam to lure Israel into the “end time” push into the territories of Syria and Lebanon. Much of the information which follows was taken from a report by Lewis Lipkin, which was listed under the title “HIZBOLLAH INTERNATIONAL.”
Hizbollah was officially inaugurated in June of 1982.
At that time the Sunni Syrian government
allowed the Shi’ite Iranian government to send a specialized group of 1000 into the north-south oriented Bekaa Valley of Lebanon, a long valley that had been occupied by some 60,000 Syrian forces.
The group of 1000 was made up of military and religious teachers, who were members of the Ayatollah Khomeni’s Revolutionary Guards, and whose primary function was to establish a connection with Lebanon’s Shi’ia revolutionists. The first year of activity by this group was directed toward staying out of the limelight, during which time it could grow into a structured operational army of terrorists dedicated to the destruction of Israel and, eventually, when it grew sufficiently, to the destruction of all nations outside the protection and approval of its god Allah.
It grew rapidly from its onset, recruiting the young Lebanese Shi’ites to its mission. Its military wing swelled due to abundant Iranian funding from huge oil revenues and the Syrian permissive attitude, which grew as long as western and Israeli forces stayed in Lebanon to promote a fragile peace. By late 1983, the Hizbollah terrorist army had risen to almost 10,000 in number, and then it came out of the international terrorist closet forever by the truck bombing of the U.S. Marine headquarters in Beirut. The ruthless slaughter of 241 of the 300 sleeping marines, as well as 56 France paratroopers in a separate incident, led to the withdrawal of the multilateral peace keeping force from all of Lebanon, with the exception of Syria, which then, for all practical purposes, took over Lebanon, at times referring to it as “greater” Syria. The loss of American marines was officially denounced by Islamic governments while their people celebrated wildly in their streets. Hizbollah had been so cleverly kept under wraps by Syria and Iran, that the attack was attributed to some vague “Shi’ite militant group.”
The Iranians succeeded in gaining the most control over Syria’s Shi’ite group, the Amal militia. They expanded from the Bekaa valley and became dominant in all of Lebanon’s southern Shi’ite villages, such that now, in reality, this area is both the territory and stronghold of Hizbollah.
The growth of the Hizbollah military wing has been marked by many car-bombings, kidnappings of some West Europeans and Americans, kidnappings and murders of Israelis, many intermittent outbreaks of the shelling of Israeli communities in northern Israel, and, by the close of the twentieth century, more than 4,000 rockets of the Katyusha series had been fired at the single town of Kiryah Shemona. Recent shifts in Syria toward a more militant policy toward the U.S., has caused it to change some of its playing second fiddle to Iran in the control of Hizbollah, and this trend will continue until the aforementioned Jihad against Israel occurs. Syria is currently in control for when, and how, long shelling of Israel attacks will be conducted, but the real control of Hizbollah still lies in the hands of Iran.
Hizbollah has been steadily spreading its terrorist cells across the surface of the earth. It has organized cells in Europe, the United States, and South America. They are named “The Party of God,” and the following quote from Martin Kramer’s book, “Hizbollah’s Vision of the West,” makes plain their future intentions and bonding with Iran.
“We are the sons of the Nation of Hizbollah, whose vanguard God made victorious in Iran, reestablishing the nucleus of a central Islamic state in the world. We abide by the orders of the sole and wise and just command represented by the Supreme Jurisconsult who meets the necessary qualifications, and who is presently incarnate in the Imam and Guide, the great Ayatollah Ruhallah Al-Musawi Al-Khomeini, may his authority be perpetuated, enabler of the revolution of Muslims and harbinger of their glorious Renaissance.”
The Iranian–Hizbollah program for WORLD conquest was set forth by Khomeini while he was still in exile. He stated: “There are two kinds of war in Islam: one is called jihad (holy war), which means the conquest of other countries in accordance with certain conditions. The other type of war is to preserve the independence of the Muslim country and the repulsion of foreigners. Jihad, or holy war, which is for the conquest of other countries and kingdoms, becomes incumbent after the formation of the Islamic state in the presence of the Imam or in accordance with his command. Then Islam makes it incumbent upon all adult males, provided they are not disabled or incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of other countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in EVERY country in the WORLD.”
The planned conquest of Israel by Islam is not the end of Islamic fanaticism generated out of Iran. This is the pure religious zeal that drives men and women to pay the ultimate price of their lives to bring the religion of Allah to all nations of the world through conquest. This religion represents the joy of physical death in Jihad as a rare privilege that gives one a position of eternal joy in the heaven of Allah.
The day after September 11, 2001, President Bush was quick to declare that a war on terror would be directed against ALL terrorist groups of “global reach.” The Party of God is just as much a terrorist group as the Al Queda, but does not arouse the same degree of reaction or concern in the American media and government, most likely because it has not yet struck at America’s heartland. Rest assured that in time it will soon do so at the command of Syria and Iran.
Last week’s article by Haaretz Correspondence Nathan Guttman stated that Hizbollah has been moving many fighters to Iraq to battle American troops and those who favor the new Iraqi government. The transfer has been carried out through Syria, following an Iranian initiative. The transit through Syrian territory is being permitted by Damascus along its lengthy porous border with Iraq. Lebanese Hizbollah fighters are part of a broader force of pro-Iranian militants that operates in Iraq to destabilize the country and undermine the intent of the Americans to formulate an independent country with civil liberties. Both Syria and Iran are anxious to see the Hizbollah establish solid operational units in Iraq before the new government is in place next week. The Congressional bipartisan commission, in its interim report, indicated its inquiry into the 9/11 event showed that cooperation between Hizbollah and Al-Qaida is extensive.
The local Hizbollah “specialty,” the occasional shelling of northern Israeli towns, is now almost certainly under Syrian control. The timing and intensity of such recent shelling has been taken as a barometer of Syria’s choice of Iraq as its bedfellow as it pulls ever further from any meaningful relations with the U.S. and Israel. One of these days Hizbollah will launch a particularly heavy shelling into some of the northern Israeli cities, which will be intended to be the straw that breaks the back of Israel’s patience. The Syrians and Iranians will have a massive force lying concealed in the long, deep NE-SW Palmyra fold valleys of southwestern Syria, poised and waiting for the push north into Lebanese-Syrian territory by Israel, the king of the south, in retaliation for the shelling. Israel will be stunned at the massiveness and effectiveness of the force repulsing them, and the following Scriptures will be fulfilled in quick order. The king of the north will drive south in Israel to Beersheba and conquer all of Egypt.
Daniel 11:40-43 – And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over. [41] He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon. [42] He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape. [43] But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans
and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps.
Zechariah 13:8 – And it shall come to pass, that in all the land, saith the Lord, two parts therein shall be cut off and die; but the third shall be left therein.
Revelation 12:6 – And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
Begin Excerpt from The Daily Star Lebanese News via World News
Flotilla fallout ‘will restrain’ Israel from launching war on Lebanon
Hizbullah seen as benefiting from Freedom Fleet Melee
By Michael Bluhm
Daily Star staff
Thursday, June 03, 2010
BEIRUT: Fallout from Israel’s attack on the Freedom Fleet should keep chances slim for any conflict between Lebanon and Israel in the short term, while the assault and the resulting outcry are also providing a boost for Hizbullah at home and in the region, a number of analysts told The Daily Star on Wednesday.
After a welter of belligerent rhetoric on both sides of the border at the beginning of this year, rumors swirled in Lebanon about Israel plotting a summer war on Lebanon, but the international condemnation raining down on the country after Monday morning’s Freedom Fleet massacre will force it to swear off any military action in the immediate future, said retired General Elias Hanna, who teaches political science at various universities.
“This flotilla incident will restrain Israel from waging a war,” he said.
Israel must secure US approval for any incursion against Lebanon, and the administration of US President Barack Obama will not let Israel move against Hizbullah because of its interests in promoting diplomatic initiatives on Iran’s disputed nuclear program and pushing the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, said Hilal Khashan, who teaches political studies at the American University of Beirut.
“The flotilla incident will not be the spark that ignites an Israeli war on Lebanon,” he said. “Israel cannot attack Lebanon without a US go-ahead.”
The US would only allow Israel to respond militarily if Hizbullah moved against it first, but the Shiite group will not use Monday’s catastrophe as a pretext for violence, Khashan added.
“Hizbullah will not provoke an Israeli war on Lebanon over the flotilla,” he said. “Hizbullah will not attack Israel unless it is ordered to do so by the Iranians for purely Iranian reasons.”
While the aftermath of the flotilla attack could help ensure a quiet summer in Lebanon, the long-term arc of the incident remains unclear, Hanna said.
If tensions continue to rise over Israel’s killings and the country feels pushed into a corner, it could decide to respond by using its military superiority to try to redraw a region that was becoming too hostile, much as it did in invading Lebanon in 1982, Hanna added.
On the other hand, some here say the Freedom Fleet incident does not alter the essential calculus of Lebanon’s situation.
In this view, neither Israel nor Hizbullah wanted a war even prior to the flotilla contretemps, while the long-term security prospects here depend foremost on the outcome of the standoff over Iran’s nuclear program, said Habib Malik, who teaches history at Lebanese American University and is the son of Charles Malik, one of the founders of modern Lebanon and co-author of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Some analysts have long held that, should the US-Iran showdown move toward confrontation, Hizbullah’s status as an Iranian proxy would make Lebanon a clear target for an Israeli preemptive strike in order to limit Iran’s options.
For now, though, Hizbullah stands to gain from Monday’s tragedy; with Israel looking like a pariah, Hizbullah’s declared status as stalwart of the regional anti-Israel resistance puts it on the right side of the issue, Hanna said.
The right of the Shiite group to its formidable arsenal has long divided Lebanese, and many in the March 14 political camp stepped up their calls for the National Dialogue to address the matter after Hizbullah gunmen and their allies seized large swaths of western Beirut in March 2008 after the group felt the former Cabinet had encroached on its privileges. However, Hizbullah’s foes will not be able to call into question Hizbullah’s weapons for some time after the Israelis put on such a display of wanton aggression, Hanna added.
“It will strengthen their hand in Lebanon,” he said.
“Nobody dares now to say something about Hizbullah. This high rhetoric [about Hizbullah’s weapons] is history. It is gone.”
In addition, the Freedom Fleet attack will strengthen Hizbullah’s regional standing because Turkey – a major backer of the flotilla – has moved much closer to the Iran-Syria-Hamas-Hizbullah resistance in the wake of the incident, Hanna said.
“You have a newcomer – a major ally of the United States – backing Hamas and indirectly backing Hizbullah,” Hanna said of Turkey, which is also a NATO member.
Indeed, regional events in the past few years have largely improved the position of Iran and its allies, and the Freedom Fleet melee has only contributed to this trend favoring Hizbullah, Hanna said. “It adds to its political power and image,” he added.
On an ideological level as well, Israel’s attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla provides significant evidence for Hizbullah’s philosophy of armed resistance, Malik said.
“Hizbullah gets a lot of mileage from what happened, because they can repeat their mantra that the only way to get anything done in the Middle East is through resistance,” he added. “They would say the resistance path is vindicated.”
With Egypt deciding to open the Rafah border crossing to ease the blockade of Gaza, Hizbullah can also claim the moral high ground against Cairo over Hizbullah’s history of backing for Hamas in Gaza, Malik said.
Relations between Egypt and Hizbullah collapsed as Egypt recently convicted about 30 people on charges of spying for Hizbullah, aiding Hamas and threatening Egypt’s security. Hizbullah, meanwhile, has long chastised the so-called moderate Arab regimes for accommodating Israel and the US.
“This is one opportunity for Hizbullah to get back at regimes such as Egypt and castigate them for being comatose,” Malik said. “There is a very embarrassing reality that the Turks are shedding blood and the Egyptians are not.”
Back in Lebanon, the Israeli assault could also serve to reignite the traditional anti-Israeli feelings among the country’ s Sunni
s, Malik said. The sentiment had been prominent throughout much of the 20th century, pushed by popular Sunni leaders such as former Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, but in recent years Lebanon’s Sunnis had begun to view Syria as an archenemy after the 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, Malik added. Many here have blamed Damascus in the killing of Hariri, a Sunni, but Syria has always categorically denied any involvement in the assassination.
Sunnis here had been “frustrated” by Egypt’s ties with Israel, and many then held unrealized hopes that Saudi Arabia would lead the anti-Israel camp without any response; Turkey’s recent actions, however, have resuscitated the anti-Israel stream among the Sunnis here and abroad, Malik said.
“This is galvanizing the Sunnis here, to some extent, back to this anti-Israel position that they used to hold before,” he added. “All of a sudden, Turkey in the Sunni Arab street is reviving some of that sentiment.
There’s an audience waiting to be passionately aroused.”
While anger against Israel also brings together Lebanon’s Sunnis and Shiites, the momentary unity will not last; the differing political worldviews that polarized the two communities in the past few years still remain firmly entrenched, Malik said.
“When Israel does something, it’s a very quick rallying point,” he said. “Those [Sunni-Shiite] differences never really go away. It’s an interesting little holiday from them for a while.”
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.