Obama is Praised by Islam for
Removing Politically Incorrect Term
“Islamic Terrorism” From ALL Documents AND Official Transactions,
Obama goes out of his way to not offend Muslims and illegal Aliens!
I wish he would do the same for the rest of the American Population
Instead
of ramming his radical programs down the majority of Throats
A Christian Has More Reason to Fear Obama Than a Muslim or an Alien!
II Timothy 3:1,12.13 – This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. [12] Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. [13] But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.
May 20, 2010
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Begin Excerpt from MEMRI
Middle East Media Review Institute (MEMRI)
‘Al-Sharq Al-Awsat’ Deputy Editor Praises: “The Obama Administration… [for Taking] the Initiative to Remove the Term ‘Islamic Terrorism’ From Its Documents and Official Transactions”
May 14, 2010
Special Dispatch No. 2958
In a May 12, 2010 op-ed titled “Why Didn’t Obama Mention Islam?” in the London daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, the paper’s deputy editor-in-chief, Osman Mirghani, commented on how U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration is dealing with recent terrorist operations in the U.S., contrasting it with his predecessor George W. Bush’s handling of similar incidents. He notes the Obama administration’s move to “remove the term ‘Islamic terrorism’ from its documents and official transactions,” explained that the U.S. is “no longer responding to extremist voices” calling for targeting the terrorists’ home countries, and enumerates other changes made by the administration.
He concludes by stating that Obama is definitely trying to “confront the negative stereotype of Islam’ as he promised to do in his June 2009 speech at Cairo University.
Following is the article, in the original English.
Obama “Avoided Mentioning Islam in Discussing the Terrorist Operation”
“There is a huge difference between the way the Obama administration dealt with the recent terrorist operations and the way the administration of former president George W.
Bush dealt with similar operations.
Obama’s administration, on all levels, was eager to deal with American-Pakistani Faisal Shahzad’s attempt to blow up a car in Times Square in New York with a lot of deliberation and without hastily issuing statements, also avoiding any suggestions of a link between terrorism and Islam.
“After the failed terrorist attack, Obama said that his country would not be intimidated and that the investigations will seek to determine if the suspect in the case had links to ‘foreign extremist organizations.’ He did not once refer to the religion of Faisal Shahzad and avoided mentioning Islam in discussing the terrorist operation.”
“Obama Spoke About [the Failed Christmas Day Bomber] As a Member of the Al-Qaeda Organization – But [Not] About Him Being a Muslim”
“A few months ago, following the botched attempt of Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmuttalib to blow up a U.S. airliner over America on Christmas Day, Obama spoke about the detained terrorist as a member of the Al-Qaeda organization but he did not speak about him being a Muslim. Even when he spoke about Al-Qaeda, Obama noted that it was not the first time that the network had targeted America, ignoring the links that were made in the past between the organization and Islam or when it was put in the context of ‘Islamic extremism.’
“When Major Nidal Malik Hasan killed 13 people at the Fort Hood military base in Texas last November President Obama ‘cautioned against jumping to conclusions.’ In all of his statements after that crime was committed, President Obama focused on troop morale and the issue of psychological pressure as a result of the war, ignoring the fact that Nidal Malik Hasan is a Muslim and of Arab origin.”
“The Obama Administration Took the Initiative to Remove the Term ‘Islamic Terrorism’ From Its Documents and Official Transactions”
“The Obama administration took the initiative to remove the term ‘Islamic terrorism’ from its documents and official transactions after the US President announced that he wanted to turn a new page with regards to the Islamic world.
There is recognition today of the fact that terrorists are benefiting from the creation of an anti-Islamic and anti-Muslim atmosphere after any terrorist operation, and that issuing statements or taking steps that target Muslims employed by extremist groups further spreads hostility against the U.S., the West, and even moderate Islamic states.
“Moreover, the war on terror is a universal war; it cannot be won without international cooperation.
Terrorism does not target the U.S. alone; the Islamic states were victims of terrorism long before it reached the American borders.”
“The U.S. Is No Longer Responding To Extremist Voices That Call For Targeting the Countries To Which The Terrorists Belong”
“Because the policy of invading countries as a strategy to confront terrorism cannot be followed, as this policy has human, military, financial and moral costs, the U.S. is no longer responding to extremist voices that call for targeting the countries to which the terrorists belong. The identity of the terrorist does not necessarily implicate the country he belongs to, in the same way that other adherents of the religion the terrorist follows should not be condemned.
“The person who attempted the recent explosion in New York was Pakistani, and it is believed that he carried out his attempt with instruction and training from the Pakistani Taliban; this doesn’t mean that Pakistan is involved in the case or that it must be subjected to U.S. strikes, which is what some extremist voices call for. Pakistan is engaged in a war against the Taliban and its cooperation in the war against terror is considered vital and necessary for fighting this disease.”
“The Case Of Faisal Shahzad Destroys the Logic of Extremists… Because the Perpetrator Comes From America Itself”
“The paradox lies in the fact that the case of Faisal Shahzad destroys the logic of extremists from the core because the perpetrator comes from America itself, where he lived and worked and has U.S. citizenship. Moreover, the person who is said to have influenced his thinking is Sheikh Anwar Al-Awlaki, who also has U.S. citizenship. More importantly, it emerged that Major Nidal Malik Hasan and the Nigerian Omar Farouk Abdulmuttalib were also influenced by Al-Awlaki.”
“Despite Numerous Attempts by Moderate Voices, The Bush Administration Remained Captive to the Big Stick Policy and Slogans Of ‘You’re Either With Us Or Against Us,’ Which Caused The Popularity Of The U.S. To Wane”
“The Al-Qaeda organization used youngsters of different nationalities in terrorist operations, and at first it succeeded at having an impact on America’s relations with the various countries that those operatives belonged to.
The organization benefited from the atmosphere of suspicion that prevailed in America’s relations with numerous Islamic countries, just as it exploited the anti-Islamic atmosphere in order to add fuel to the fire of anger and extremism.
“Despite numerous attempts by moderate voices, the Bush administration remained captive to the Big Stick policy and slogans of ‘you’re either with us or against us,’ which caused the popularity of the U.S. to wane, not only in the Islamic world but in numerous countries around the world.”
In His Cairo Speech, Obama “Pledged That He Would Confront the Negative Stereotype Of Islam… There Is No Doubt That He Is Trying To Do That”
“When Obama entered the White House, his election was not a message of hope and inspiration to America alone, but to the entire world, that welcomed the message
of change. Since day one, the new president has extended his hand to the Islamic world; he delivered speeches from Ankara and Cairo and he appointed an envoy from the Organization of the Islamic Conference.
“More importantly, U.S. discourse has changed, and the tendency to link every terrorist operation to the religion of the perpetrator has disappeared. In the speech Obama made to the Islamic world from Cairo last year, he pledged that he would confront the negative stereotype of Islam… there is no doubt that he is trying to do that as demonstrated by the American discourse following the recent terrorist operations.”
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site.
However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.