Man’s Ideologies CANNOT Equalize wealth Distribution!
Once the Value Added Tax (VAT) Program is Voted In,
There is no turning back from VAT to restore Sanity,
It means “Sock it to the Rich” until they all Vanish,
When new taxes are needed hit US Middle Class,
France was the main instigator of the VAT Plan,
Now the Value Added Tax Engulfs ALL Europe,
It’s Likely to Eventually be PUI IN by Obama,
And AFTER the US Middle Class Disappears,
Only the poor of the US will be left to Tax
And will still be here when Jesus Comes.
Deuteronomy 15:11 – For the poor shall never cease out of the land: therefore I command thee, saying, Thou shalt open thine hand wide unto thy brother, to thy poor, and to thy needy, in thy land.
Mark 14:7 – For ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good: but me ye have not always.
John 6:62,63 – What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before? [63] It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
April 2, 2010
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
The following was extracted from Wikipedia
Value added tax is a type of sales tax.
Maurice Lauré, Joint Director of the French Tax Authority, the Direction générale des impôts, was first to introduce VAT on April 10, 1954, although German industrialist Dr. Wilhelm von Siemens proposed the concept in 1918. Initially directed at large businesses, it was extended over time to include all business sectors. In France, it is the most important source of state finance, accounting for nearly 50% of state revenues.
Personal end-consumers of products and services cannot recover VAT on purchases, but businesses are able to recover VAT (input tax) on the products and services that they buy in order to produce further goods or or services that will be sold to yet another business in the supply chain or directly to a final consumer.
In this way, the total tax levied at each stage in the economic chain of supply is a constant fraction of the value added by a business to its products, and most of the cost of collecting the tax is borne by business, rather than by the state. VAT was invented because very high sales taxes and tariffs encourage cheating and smuggling. Critics point out that it disproportionately raises taxes on middle- and low-income homes.
Begin Excerpt from THE INDEPENDENT via World News
Revolt over Sarkozy’s tax plans puts his future in doubt
Approval ratings hit an all-time low as President accused of pandering to rich
By John Lichfield in Paris
Friday, 2 April 2010
President Nicolas Sarkozy faced a damaging head-on challenge from within his own party yesterday as his standing in opinion polls fell be
low 30 per cent for the first time.
Thirteen parliamentarians from the President’s centre-right party moved to scrap Mr Sarkozy’s first and proudest “reform”: a law which guarantees that no one in France should pay more than 50 per cent in direct taxes.
The Elysée Palace insisted there was no chance of a U-turn on a policy that has come to symbolise his erratic attempts to roll back the state. But the challenge from within his own party is also deeply symbolic. The President’s once seemingly unassailable grip on the centre right has been seriously weakened by a humiliating defeat in mid-term regional elections last month.
The Paris political village is buzzing with reports that Mr Sarkozy may decide not to run for a second term in 2012. According to one source, his closest aides are speculating that frustration, or ill health, or the repeatedly voiced wishes of his wife, Carla Bruni Sarkozy, may persuade him to retire in two years’ time at the relatively early age (for French politics) of 57.
Other centre-right sources – and the President himself – insist that he is determined to fight on.
He hopes to rebuild his domestic standing through hyperactivity on the international stage, starting with his visit to Washington earlier this week and continuing with France’s G8 and G20 presidency next year.
He will be starting from a low base.
A poll to be published in Le Figaro magazine tomorrow, puts his approval rating at 28 per cent – his lowest ever.
Two previous presidents, François Mitterrand and Jacques Chirac, sank even lower but both managed to retain the core support of their own parties. Mr Sarkozy is in danger of losing control of the Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (UMP), which he snatched from Mr Chirac in 2005-06.
“In truth, Sarkozy has never had many true loyalists in the UMP parliamentary party, maybe 30 [out of 315],” one source said yesterday. “He hijacked the party by persuading everyone that he, and he alone, could bring them success.”
On Wednesday night, Mr Sarkozy addressed his parliamentary troops. He begged them to remain loyal to his reform programme and, in particular, not to campaign against his 50 per cent ceiling on direct taxes.
The so-called “bouclier fiscal” was pushed through within weeks of Mr Sarkozy coming to office in May 2007.
The tax ceiling was the emblem of his campaign promises to make France “work harder and earn more”; to “break the French taboo on making money”; and to create a “shock of confidence” which would boost the French economy.
It was dismissed by left-wing opponents as a concession to Mr Sarkozy’s wealthy friends in the media, business and advertising. The loss in revenue hamstrung other policies. The “shock” of growth failed to appear.
Now that France is struggling with a deficit of almost 8 per cent, many of Mr Sarkozy’s allies say that the tax shield must go.
Although it loses the French state only €500m (£443m) to €600m a year, the symbolism of
the shield has become disastrous. Any increase in direct taxes to reduce the deficit would fall on poor and middling earners. The rich would pay no more.
Thirteen parliamentary members of the UMP signed a comment article in Le Monde yesterday saying that they planned to table a draft law to scrap the bouclier fiscal. Only by making the rich share the pain of tax rises and spending cuts, could the government “give a new sense of purpose to a country which is becoming dangerously fragile and divided,” the deputies said.
To lose the government majority in the national assembly it would need around 50 UMP and allied deputies to change sides. On the “tax shield”, such a rebellion is no longer unthinkable.
European leaders: Growing pains
* Angela Merkel’s standing with the German electorate has slumped to a four-year low because of infighting in her coalition.
A poll for the ARD TV yesterday showed the Chancellor’s personal popularity down seven points in the last month to 55 per cent.
* Spain’s José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero has grown increasingly unpopular since he announced austerity plans to contain the deficit, including pension reforms.
The latest poll for El Pais showed 76 per cent of people did not trust the premier, up eight points from the previous month.
* Although Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi escaped total humiliation in last weekend’s regional elections, his personal approval ratings are at an all-time low of 44 per cent.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107
of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.