Jovial Joe & Charming Clinton leading the Charge!
Barack is now coming out of his dark closet of Hatred!
Hussein uttered many professions of great love for Israel
Obama has two little Demons that let the cat out of the Bag
I agree with the writers of the two excerpts following our Lead
Barack Hussein Obama’s TRUE Attitude HAS Been Exposed To All!
It’s a Blessing in Disguise to all Israel to Know he can’t be Trusted
All appointees of his Administration are exposing his true Character
King Obama is like the Egyptian ruler from whom God rescued Israel
March 15, 2010
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Romans 8:28 – And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.
Begin Excerpt 1 from YNet News
A blessing in disguise
Moshe Dann pleased that Biden, Clinton emerged from Obama’s closet hatred of Israel
Moshe Dann
March 14, 2010
If delusion is one of the most dangerous pitfalls of diplomacy, then, paradoxically, recent criticism of Israel by Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is a blessing in disguise.
Condemning a routine announcement of Israeli plans to build a new neighborhood in Jerusalem, Biden fired the first shot. Clinton added that “it was not only an insult to Biden, but an insult to the United States.”
Such fiery attacks on Israel are sharp contrasts to pledges of love and loyalty, rhetoric
meant to anesthetize Israelis against the reality of American policy and intentions.
We should all breathe a sigh of relief, not only that these agents of PLO policies – that Jerusalem is negotiable – have left, but that it’s out in the open.
Prime Minister Netanyahu avoided the first salvo by excusing and apologizing for the “untimely” announcement. Actually, the timing was perfect. It exposed the real purpose of Biden’s visit and President Barack Hussein Obama’s direction.
But Netanyahu cannot avoid Clinton’s pot shots, which struck at the spinal nerve of the relationship between Israel and the US. As she put it, this was not a dispute over policy, but a deliberate attempt to humiliate the United States of America.
It was not the planned official dedication of a square and monument in Ramallah – during Biden’s visit – to a terrorist who had murdered Israelis that offended Ms. Clinton, but plans to build apartments for Jews.
Concessions a display of weakness
Supporters of Israel should rejoice that Biden and Clinton have emerged from Obama’s closet hatred of Israel. Their wild attack, as deadly as it seemed initially, however, did little or no damage. It clears the way for a robust Israeli response, one that will set the course of Israeli policy and the guidelines of future discussions.
PM Netanyahu now has the opportunity to defend Israel’s position, not only on Jerusalem, but on other issues of Israeli sovereignty that have been disputed. This includes the right to decide on what Jewish heritage sites include and the right to preserve those historical and archeological sites, the right of Jews to live in Judea and Samaria, and the right of self-defense.
Unfortunately, however, Netanyahu brought this upon himself when he unilaterally declared a building freeze against Jews.
Had this been c onditi
oned on Arab Palestinian compliance, or compromise, it might have been justified.
Instead, it simply escalated Arab demands and postponed negotiations.
Moreover, unilateral Israeli concessions, especially on vital, core issues, are a display of Israeli weakness. That policy must be reconsidered in light of what has resulted.
The author is a writer and journalist in Jerusalem
Begin Excerpt 2 from THE JERUSALEM POST
Oren: Worst crisis with US since ’75
By JPOST.COM STAFF
March 15, 2010
AIPAC urges White House to tone down rhetoric, says situation “very worrying.
Israel’s Ambassador to Washington Michael Oren convened Foreign Ministry consuls for them the crisis between Israel and the US is the worst since 1975, Army Radio reported on Monday.
Oren was referring to a crisis that evolved when Israel refused to sign a treaty to withdraw forces from Sinai after the Yom Kippur War.
In an unusual move, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) m ade
a public call on the White House to tone down the rhetoric. The lobby said statements made by senior officials in US President Barack Obama’s administration were “very worrying.”
The crisis erupted late last week when the Interior Ministry approved the building of 1,600 new housing units in the east Jerusalem neighborhood of Ramat Shlomo, while US Vice President Joe Biden was visiting Israel.
The US administration refused to let go of the issue, even after Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu apologized to Biden and Biden said the apology was accepted. AIPAC said the White House should avoid public demands and unilaterally setting a timetable for Israel to follow.
In his briefing to consuls, Oren said the crisis with the US is of “historic” proportions.
The US reportedly wants Israel to announce that it’s cancelling the Ramat Shlomo project, investigate how the project came to be announced when Biden was here, and make gestures towards the Palestinian Authority. The US also reportedly demands that Israel publicly announce that all core issues will be discussed during the peace negotiations.
On Sunday, Anti Defamation League National Director Abe Foxman said the US criticism of Israel was “especially troubling” because Netanyahu had offered clear explanations of the announcement mishap both publicly and privately.
“US Vice President Joe Biden accepted the prime minister’s apology,” Foxman said. “Therefore, to raise the issue again in this way is a gross overreaction to a point of policy difference among friends.
“We cannot remember an instance when such harsh language was directed at a friend and ally of the United States,” the statement continued. “One can only wonder how far the US is prepared to go in distancing itself from Israel in order to placate the Palestinians in the hope they see it is in their interest to return to the negotiating
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site.
However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.