Syrian Strategic War Plan FOR Israel
Is for Israel to attack Hizbullah FIRST!
Then Syria and Hizbullah Counterattack
From North & Northeast TO Pincher, AND
Encircle Israel in southern Lebanon, Then
Islam beg
ins pushing IDF south into Negev!
Where it remains until Messiah’s 2nd Advent
October 28, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
All the end time kingdoms where the Islamic kings will arise are now exposed in the great statue of Daniel 2. When the 10 chosen end time kings arise and attack Israel, led by the Antichrist, after Israel has lamented in the Negev wilderness for some 3 and ½ years, the Messiah, the Lord Jesus Christ, will return at his Second Advent to restore Israel to fellowship and begin his Millennial Reign. I believe those kingdoms in place to be Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Sudan, Lebanon, Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and Iran.
The Chief Prince of Meshech and Tubal in Ezekiel 38 will arise in the midst of these Kingdoms.
Daniel 2:44 – And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
Luke 21:25-27 – And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring; [26] Men’s hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken. [27] And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.
Zechariah 14:8,9 – And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem; half of them toward the former sea, and half of them toward the hinder sea: in summer and
in winter shall it be. [9] And the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and his name one.
Begin Excerpt from Middle East Media Review Institute (MEMRI)
October 22, 2009 No. 2612
Hizbullah MP: “Syria Opens Its Borders to Anyone Wishing to Wage Resistance, Including Al-Qaeda Fighters on Their Way to Iraq”
Walid Sukariyya is a Sunni representative of the Hizbullah party in the Lebanese parliament, who served for many years as an officer in the Lebanese army. In an interview with Al-Quds Al-Arabi, he said that Syria has opened its border to anyone who wished to wage resistance, including Al-Qaeda fighters on their way to Iraq.
He said further that Syria’s support of Hizbullah stemmed only from strategic military considerations – if Israel tried to invade Syria through Lebanon, Hizbullah would delay the Israeli forces; without it, Damascus would fall within hours.
Following are excerpts from the interview:
Syria’s Support of the Resistance in Lebanon Is Part of a Crucial Defensive Strategy, While Its Positions on Normalization and Negotiations with Israel, and on the Arab Peace Initiative, Are Merely Tactical Bargaining Chips
The Al-Quds Al-Arabi article states: “Sukariyya is certain that Israel cannot possibly agree to peace, and this is for objective reasons, the most important of which is that peace would prevent it from launching preemptive mil
itary strikes, at which it has excelled for decades, and whose purpose has always been to crush the resistance and generate crises.
Moreover, if Israel enters the peace process as a small state in its present boundaries, it will forever be a hostage in the hands of the U.S. Therefore, the Israelis want peace, but [only] after they [attain their goal of] the ‘greater Israel’ – because in its present dimensions, Israel cannot ensure its safety…
“[As for] Syria, Sukariyya says that it wants peace [too], but as part of [a general] Arab [agreement] and not in a separate framework. He adds that the understandings recently [reached] by Syria and Saudi Arabia will help to prevent normalization between the Arab world and Israel.
[According to him,] Syria’s rallying to the support of the resistance in Lebanon, and [its] occasional [attempts] to direct the activity [of the resistance], [are part of] a defensive strategy which is crucial for Syria, while Syria’s stance on normalization [with Israel], on the [Arab peace] initiative, on the negotiations [with Israel], and even on peace are [only] tactical bargaining chips.
Since, for obvious reasons, Syria cannot [conduct] a confrontation through direct resistance, it has opened [its] border with Iraq to all the resistance fighters of Al-Qaeda, even though it does not share
their ideology. [As for Hizbullah, Syria] supports it because it is the only resistance [force] that is present in Lebanon, in the area closest to Israel…”
Hizbullah Will Delay an Israeli Attack on Syria; Without It, Damascus Will Fall within Hours
“Syria cannot abandon Lebanon, [Sukariyya says.] This option does not exist, for reasons that have to do not with politics but with the security and military [considerations]. Syria’s front [with Israel] stretches from Jabl Al-Sheikh [Mount Hermon] to the Jordanian border, and [all the way] to the Lebanese front and the Mediterranean. This is why Damascus supports the resistance – because it dos not want to confront the enemy itself, [so] supporting the resistance is its only way for it to defend Al-Sham [i.e., Greater Syria].
“From a military standpoint, Damascus has no [other] way to delay the Israeli army and to impede its advance [into the Syrian heartland]. Since the withdrawal of the Syrian army from Lebanon, the entire Beqa’ region has become exposed [to an Israeli attack]. Therefore, the value of the resistance [in Syria’s eyes] is that it can delay an Israeli invasion into Syrian soil. Without the resistance, Israel would be able to enter the Al-Masna’ area [in Syria] within hours. Sukariyya explains that Syria needs a steadfast force on the Israeli border in the Al-Qa’im region – not in order to interfere in Lebanon’s [internal] politics, as the simple folk believe, but for a clear military and strategic reason, namely in order to defend Damascus.
Without the resistance [i.e., Hizbullah], Damascus will be as good as fallen, from a military standpoint. Syria’s direct lines of defense will be exposed, and it will take only a few hours to surround Damascus and take it. The situation [in Lebanon] is different from the one in the Golan, where [Syria’s] military lines are [defensible].”
The Missiles Fired by Hizbullah in the 2006 War Were Syrian
“Sukariyya admits that the resistance in the Lebanese region… may not prevent a forceful ground offensive by Israel aimed at taking Damascus. However, [Hizbullah’s] presence will delay the Israeli army should it decide to attack.
As everyone acknowledges, this is a great advantage in a military campaign, and it will be of considerable value to the Syrians now that they have withdrawn from the Beqa’ region. This, Sukariyya believes, is why… Syria naturally pursues a strategy of directing [the activity of] the resistance in Lebanon and supporting it. Also, according to him, this is why it is no longer a secret that the missiles that destroyed the Israeli tanks during the July [2006] aggression were actually Syrian.”
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site.
However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.