I’ve Been Waiting for It for 35 Years!
My long awaited terror trap is Forming,
A union of conspiracy is coming Toget her,
Terror Nations controlling Terrorist Groups,
Both Masters and Satellites finally Conspiring,
In a master plan to force Israel into a deadly Trap,
Resulting in Israel being driven into the great Negev,
Likely at a point in time lying between 2010 and 2015,
Most likely to occur in the time zone from 2012 to 2015!
August 25, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
SEE AUGUST NOON BLOG OF AUGUST 14
It appears the Islamic foes of Israel have FINALLY realized the only way they can recover Israel from Dan to Beersheba is to lull Israel into a false sense of security. I have wondered for 35 years as to WHEN they would finally come to this conclusion.
It now appears they have reached it, and eventually all terrorist activity will dwindle to a trickle in Israel by terrorist groups which get their orders from Syria and Iran.
Then, after a brief period of internal terrorist activities ceasing by Hamas, Fatah, and Hizbullah, the Hizbullah will launch a few rockets into northern Israel, and the final war of the Age of the Gentiles will begin. Some wildcat terror splinter groups will continue to act intermittently, but most of the splinter groups will follow the lead of Iranian and Syrian Dictates.
ARCHIVE PROPHECY UPDATE NUMBER 3
Issued in January 2001
Each time a new election is held in Israel we get queries from Europe and Africa. Additionally, we get calls from across the United States because of the lecture series I have conducted for 21 years. The queries usually involve which candidate I think will win the election. It was not easy to predict the election when Benjamin Netanyahu won. But it was easy to predict his defeat by Ehud Barak, as well as Barak’s recent defeat by Ariel Sharon. The polls were quite definite as to who would win the last two elections. After an election we get even more queries as to whether or not the new leader can bring peace with the Palestinians. I do not mind answering these queries, in fact, I rather enjoy it when I have time to do it.
But there is something far more important in the peace process than who is the leader of Israel, and who is the leader of the Palestinians. I retired from the USAF/National Security Agency as a synoptic analyst. When one analyzes anything, it is imperative to advance from what controls the conclusion of the problem being examined. Some problems do not have a definite controlling factor, and all the factors, both incidental and insignificant, must be given the appropriate weight in making a forecast of the outcome. However, this is not the case in making a determination of when peace will come between Israel and the Palestinians. The controlling factor which determines when a false peace will come to Israel, rests solely with the many terrorist groups that plague her. There can never be a period of peace, even false peace, without the approval of major terrorist groups. Yassar Arafat cannot control the terrorist groups, nor can any other single Arab leader. The terrorist complex of Osama Bin Laden, the Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Hisbullah, and Fatah are really controlled by leaders in Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Afghanistan, and Iraq. Until these leaders finally come to the conclusion that the only way Israel can be driven into the Negev is by being lulled into a false sense of security, the terrorist groups will continue to operate, and the killing will continue. I believe these terrorist groups will eventually realize that if they really want to slaughter Jews by the hundreds of thousands, and drive the rest into the Negev, they will have to lull Israel into a brief period of false peace. When this happens, an agreement will be reached between Israel and the Palestinians. So my advice to those who want to get a feel of when the false peace will come is this: WATCH the terrorist groups. When their actions drop to zero, and stay there for a while, you may rest assured it has been as a result of meetings behind closed doors between the leaders of the aforementioned nations, and the leaders of the terrorist groups they sponsor. I don’t pay much attention to any leader of Israel or the Palestinians. The terrorist groups are the key to a false peace in the Mid-East. When they grasp that by appearing to cease their activities they will be able, at a later time, to kill many Jews, and drive the rest into the Negev, they will settle down and wait for the surprise attack against Israel from the north. Ariel Sharon may try to put a “forced peace” on the Palestinians before the terrorist groups shut down. This was one of the options considered by his party in the past. But it will not work. Watch for a cessation of terrorism. Then after a brief period of false peace look for a vicious surprise attack from the north out of Syria.
SEE PREVIOUS NOON BLOG OF AUGUST 24, 2009
ARCHIVE PROPHECY UPDATE 12
Issued in March 2001
The Apostle Paul had a deep spiritual burden for his own people, the nation of Israel.
His born again heart longed for them to forsake their unbelief by turning to Jesus as their Messiah. He expresses this desire in Romans 10:1 as he states: “Brethren, my hearts desire and prayer to God for Israel is that they might be saved.” There is no question that Paul saw Israel as being in unbelief. But he knew that some future day they would believe, and consequently be grafted back into God’s olive tree, from which they had been broken off because of their unbelief.
He stated this principle in Romans 11:20, as he wrote: “Well, because of unbelief they were broken off.” But he goes on in verse 23 to indicate they will one day believe, and thereby restored to being part of God’s olive tree. He writes, “And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be grafted in: for God is able to graft them in again.” I said all this to explain the words “they” and “them” in I Thessalonians 5:3, where Paul states: “For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh on them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.” Paul, in his use of “they” and “them,” is referring to the nation of Israel in unbelief. However, it would also in part apply to all unbelievers in the last days. So why have I given this discourse? The word translated as “safety” is “asphaleia,” which means “the security one experiences when standing
on something that is firmly fixed.
It gives the one standing on it a sense of “not falling.” The last four leaders of Israel have worn out the following expression: “We must have a peace with security.” We have heard it used hundreds of times on the media, and it has been printed over and over again in countless articles. Why is this important? God indicates a time will come when Israel actually believes she has “a peace with security.” Why is it so important that we understand this prediction? Because we can know that the final war, involving Israel’s Islamic neighbors, will not occur until it is fulfilled!
Israel must be lulled into a false sense of security before any united Islamic attack against her can be successful. Until this happens, and it will, I merely wait for it to come to pass. Then, when peace and security for Israel does appear to arrive in the Middle East, you can know that
the final war of this age is about to occur. Don’t believe all these terrorist attacks will suddenly cause the final war of this age to begin. It is only when they cease that you can know the last war, which finally produces Armageddon some 3 and ½ years after it begins, is imminent.
Begin Excerpt by Barry Rubin in the Jerusalem Post
The Region: Iran and Syria: So happy together
August 23, 2009
Barry Rubin , THE JERUSALEM POST
One can learn a great deal by analyzing the visit of Syrian President Bashar Assad to Iran last week. Statements made by Assad and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reveal a great deal about the allies’ strategy which seems to escape Western observers.
The first point is that they are indeed close allies.
I would estimate that analyses by Western “experts” that Syria can be pried away from Iran outnumber explanations that this is impossible by about 10 to one.
This mistaken conception is also the official policy of the United States and France, perhaps Britain as well.
There are, of course a huge number of benefits Syria derives from its alliance with Iran including Islamist legitimacy, protection against being attacked or pressured, money, weapons, cooperation in anti-Israel terrorism and spreading both countries’ influence among the Palestinians, Lebanese and Iraqis. Once Iran gets nuclear weapons, which is on the horizon, the alliance’s value for Syria will rise dramatically.
This is why it was silly for US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to suggest recently: “Given what’s been going on in Iran and the instability that appears to be present there, it may not be in Syria’s interest to put their eggs into that basket.” Well, Assad apparently doesn’t agree with her. Perhaps she should listen to what he’s saying and watch what he’s doing in order to draw the opposite conclusion.
Assad said: “I think that what happened in Iran is an important thing and a big lesson to the foreigners, and therefore they are not very satisfied. I believe the Iranian people’s reelection [of Ahmadinejad] is another emphasis on the fact that Iran and Syria must continue the regional policy as in the past.”
In other words, he correctly views Ahmadinejad and the regime as even stronger after the election. Dictators respect repression; they aren’t impressed by an opposition which stages demonstrations and whose leaders get thrown into prison.
That’s especially true when they don’t even receive Western support.
WATCHING THE gradual concessions made by the West to the Iran-Syria block, and its evident fear of confronting them, Assad stated that he was confident the international community would accept Iran and Syria more than it had done in the past.
Note also that the two countries are very consciously coordinating strategy in a war against Western interests and the relatively more moderate Arab regimes, a conflict that Western governments don’t even perceive as existing: “Iran and Syria are on the same front, and any political event is an opportunity which must be used at the best way possible while helping one another,” said Assad.
Iranian Supreme Leader (and the real leader of the country) Ali Khamenei agreed: “The result of this unity is evident in the Palestine, Lebanon and Iraq issues and also in the entire region.” The tide is in favor of the resistance, he added, referring to the combination of Iranian, Syrian, Hamas, Hizbullah, Iraqi insurgents and other members of the radical alliance.
What does this mean?
Palestine: Hamas is entrenching itself further, while European governments seem less willing to isolate it. There is no prospect of bringing down that regime and the West isn’t even trying to do so. Khamenei probably assumes – wrongly – that Hamas is steadily making gains in subverting Fatah’s rule in the West Bank.
Lebanon: While Hizbullah didn’t win the last election, it is clear that the Iran-Syria client increasingly owns the country.
The country’s president is fairly subservient to Iranian and Syrian influence; the tribunal investigating Syrian terrorism in Lebanon seems pretty dead itself. Hizbullah seems on the verge of reestablishing veto power in the government, and the most courageous opponent of Iran-Syria influence, Walid Jumblatt, has changed sides (or at least gone to neutrality).
Iraq: The US forces are withdrawing. Iran’s money, agents and clients seem to be able to operate freely, though Teheran is nowhere near taking over the country.
Khamenei also said something truly shocking. After remarking about Syria’s improved relations with Iraq (a country against which it is daily sponsoring terrorist attacks), he added that unity (the translation probably should say “alliance”) between Iran and Syria, on one h
and,
and their neighbors Iraq and Turkey would benefit the region.
What does this mean? He is showing Iran’s longer-term plan to pull Iraq (under a more friendly faction) and Turkey (currently ruled by an Islamist-oriented regime) into a broad alliance. That statement should send shock waves throughout the West, and cause intelligence analysts to pick up the phone and inform someone who has Obama’s ear.
Iran and Syria, along with their clients, are at war with America, and the US government doesn’t even know it.
That’s why Khamenei remarked, “America’s blade has become blunter in the region.” He’s right. That’s why if anyone is worried about putting all the eggs in one basket, nowadays it is America’s Arab partners. The fact that the US is perceived as weaker and foolish in the region is far more important than the fact that Obama might be more popular in public opinion polls.
WITH A US government so intent on apologizing to everyone, all but ruling out the use of force or power politics and apparently – in Iran’s perception – afraid to confront its enemies, they’re concluding in Teheran and Damascus, as Ahmadinejad put it: “Today the world has realized that Western theories are not working anymore and that is why it needs the help and cooperation of Syria and Iran.”
An increase in economic sanctions, which is the main US plan against Iran at present, is not going to change this perception – or Teheran’s behavior. But, before effective action can be taken there must be the realization that a conflict is going on, one that is far more important than the one between the US and al-Qaida.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by
the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site.
However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.