Iran RUSHES To Get A Deliverable DEFENSIVE Long Range ICMB
And a Defensive Nuclear Warhead She Can Mount on Her Missiles!
Hizbullah Rushes to Prepare a Trap for the NEXT TIME Israel Attacks!
Israel is Developing & Positioning Three TYPES of ANTI-Missile Systems,
And establishing a pattern of its warships and subs going to Persian Gulf
To Either Bluff or Actually carry Out an Aerial Assault on Iran NUKE Facilities!
One might tend to suggest the world is headed toward final Middle East War!
July 17, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
I have contended for 35 years that the Middle East war is inevitable and that it will be conventional, not nuclear.
The primary purpose of having nuclear weapons is to prevent nations having them not to launch theirs against you. If a nation does not have them they are at the mercy of all who do. The fear of Iran developing nuclear weapons has never been of any concern to me, nor has the outbreak of an inevitable conventional war in the Middle East. I look forward with great anticipation of the fulfillment of prophecy by its beginning, and of the coming of Messiah’s Second Advent, which ends it at Armageddon.
The mad rush for both Syria and Iran to obtain nuclear warheads to act as a deterrent to cause Israel not to launch a pre-emptive strike at them, continues on a day to day basis in the Middle East. In spite of being in a definite minority, I do not believe either Syri
a or Iran is developing the nuclear weapons to launch against Israel in a pre-emptive strike. They are acutely aware Israel has an abundant number of nuclear warheads on many Jericho missiles in the Negev, many more than enough to end Syria and Iran as nations on this planet.
Syria, Iran, and all their allies do not want a nuclear war. They all want a conventional war, in which they have a fantastic numerical advantage.
Their development of an arsenal of nuclear warheads is strictly for deterrence of an Israeli strike against them, while they attack Israel in a conventional war.
Almost one-quarter of the population in Israel is non-Jewish, and four-fifths of the non-Jewish are of the Islamic faith, so it is unlikely Iran and Syria have a desire to inflame members of their own religion or the huge international community, by nuking the non-Jewish gro up.
The populations of the world need to be concerned about a destruction coming on the earth by a tectonic chaos produced by God on an ungodly world. It will be far worse than a nuclear holocaust.
Isaiah 29:6 – Thou shalt be visited of the Lord of hosts with thunder, and with earthquake, and great noise, with storm and tempest, and the flame of devouring fire.
Begin Excerpt from Stern-Germany via Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs/Daily Alert
German Intelligence: “Iran Can Set Off a Bomb within Six Months”
(Stern-Germany)
Iran will soon be able to produce atomic bombs and perform underground nuclear testing, just as North Korea has done, experts in the German Foreign Intelligence Service (BND) have told Stern.
“If they want to, they will be able to set off a uranium bomb within six months,” a BND expert said.
Iran is focusing on building missiles capable of transporting nuclear bombs to targets as far as Europe. According to a senior BND official, these efforts are pursued “with massive intensity.”
The German Foreign Intelligence Service has “no doubt” that the missile program in Iran is “exclusively” aimed at the production of
atomic warheads.
The necessary missile components are being obtained through a massive network of dummy companies headed by the Iranian Said Mohammad Hosseinian. Several German companies are also involved.
While Reuters on Wednesday reported falsely that the BND had denied the Stern report, the BND did not deny the report.
Begin Excerpt from Haaretz
Defense official: Israel readying for attack on Iran
By Amos Harel, Anshel Pfeffer and Jack Khoury,
Haaretz Correspondents and Haaretz
July 16, 2009
Israel’s recent deployment of warships across the Red Sea should be seen as serious preparation for an attack on Iran, an Israeli defense official told the Times of London on Thursday.
“This is preparation that should be taken seriously. Israel is investing time in preparing itself for the complexity of an attack on Iran. These maneuvers are a message to Iran that Israel will follow up on its threats,” the official was quoted as saying.
Earlier this week, two Israel Navy gunboats openly sailed through the Suez Canal into the Red Sea.
The ships that passed through the Suez Canal on Tuesday were two Sa’ar 5 gunboats, the Hanit and the Eilat.
This follows a similar incident in late June, when an Israeli Dolphin-class submarine passed through the canal, later returning the same way.
The move, apparently coordinated with Egypt, is seen as a warning message to Middle Eastern radicals, first and foremost Iran.
Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit confirmed the crossings and said that Cairo’s agreements with Jerusalem permit Israeli military ships to transit the canal. He declined to speculate on whether the voyage was meant as a warning to Iran or anyone else.
While Israeli naval ships have gone through Suez before, the last such occurrence was at least a year ago.
An Israeli diplomat told the Times that Israel’s has been bolstering its ties with certain Arab nations just as wary of the Iranian nuclear threat. In particular, the diplomat cited a “shared mutual distrust of Iran” between Israel and Egypt.
Though neither side says so publicly, there is ongoing security coordination between Israel and Egypt, which could be expanded if necessary in the future.
Israel has an interest in a naval presence in the Red Sea for two reasons: the effort to halt arms smuggling from Iran to the Gaza Strip – which, according to international media reports, mainly takes place by sea from Iran to Sudan, and then overland via Egypt, and the effort to bolster its deterrence against Iran in the event of a direct conflict breaking out.
Related articles:
Did Israel coordinate warships in Suez with Egypt?
Israel won’t base submarines in Red Sea, says defense official
Begin Excerpt from DEBKAfile Special Report
Israel-Lebanese border nowhere near secure three years after Lebanon War
DEBKAfile Special Report
July 16, 2009, 9:06 PM (GMT+02:00)
The mysterious explosion at the Hirbet Salim village in South Lebanon, heard on both sides of the border, occurred, DEBKAfile’s military sources report, at one of the 35 large weapons dumps the Hizballah has built illegally as near as 20 kilometers from the Israel border.
Its men failed to adhere to the handling procedures for the dozens of rockets stored there and suffered casualties, dead, wounded and missing, when they blew up.
Hizballah forces cordoned the disaster area against outside access.
Each of the Hizballah depots, containing surface-to-surface and anti-aircraft missiles, mortar shells, and large quantities of ammunition and explosives, is heavily fortified, fenced in by barbed wire and guarded by Hizballah checkpoints around the clock. At least five of these Hizballah guards were killed in the blast.
In the event of war with Israel, these arsenals are able to arm some 7,500 Hizballah militiamen who live in hiding wearing civilian clothes among the Lebanese-Israeli border villagers.
This perilous state of affairs is carefully concealed three years after the Lebanese war by Israel’s war leaders, its armed forces chiefs, the UN peacekeeping force and the Lebanese president.
They are all conspiring now to mask the facts that the Lebanese border region is swamped with vast amounts of rockets and weapons – triple the quantity Hizballah commanded on the eve of the 2006
war – and Hizballah’s return in full force in South Lebanon.
The same policy of concealment enabled Hizballah to launch its surprise attack in 2006.
This week, neither the present chief of staff Gabi Ashkenazi nor the OC Northern Command Gabi Eisencott referred to Hizballah’s blatant violations of UN Security Council resolution 1701, which cut short that war with a ceasefire and a ban on Hizballah’s rearming and return to South Lebanon.
The UN peacekeeping force, deployed to prevent these violations, let them happen under its noses, together with the massive smuggling of arms to Hizballah from Iran and Syria.
After the explosion on July 15, UNIFIL headquarters was forced to admit to the presence of the arms depot as a gross violation of 1701.
Lebanese president Michel Suleiman, like UNIFIL, was caught in flagrant negligence of Hizballah’s illicit activities, and tamely offered to form a joint Lebanese-UN inquiry committee to probe the incident.
Finally, Israel’s Lebanon war leaders – most of all the former Chief of Staff Dan Halutz – whose mismanagement was widely criticized at the time – tried to cover up their failings by holding up the three-year calm on the border as proof of its success.
The prime minister at the time, Ehud Olmert, ex-foreign minister Tzipi Livni, and ex-defense minister Yehoshua Peretz, tried taking this tack, only three days later the Hirbat Salim explosion restored a sense of reality.
The truth is that the “calm” was ordered by Tehran to enable its surrogate, the Hizballah, to regroup close to the Israeli border and rearm undisturbed, so as to be ready to hit Israel on a signal when it suits Iran’s book.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.