Obama PUSH Turns To SHOVE Against Israel!
on:absolute;top:-200px;left:-200px;’>doxycycline cat
Obama Push turns to Shove against Israel!
He is pushing Israel FROM LAND God gave Them!
God gave IT TO ISRAEL as a heritage for his People!
What Obama is doing is wrong and a price will be Paid!
In Excerpt 1 from the Jerusalem Post Psalm 137 is Quoted,
Please consider the verses before and after the quoted Verse,
And then Consider all Three Excerpts from June 7 Jerusalem Post!
June 10, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Psalm 136:21 to 137:6 – And gave their land for an heritage: for his mercy endureth for ever:
[22] Even an heritage unto Israel his servant: for his mercy endureth for ever. [23] Who remembered us in our low estate: for his mercy endureth for ever: [24] And hath redeemed us from our enemies: for his mercy endureth for ever. [25] Who giveth food to all flesh: for his mercy endureth for ever. [26] O give thanks unto the God of heaven: for his mercy endureth for ever. [1] By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion. [2] We hanged our harps upon the willows in the midst thereof. [3] For there they that carried us away captive required of us a song; and they that wasted us required of us mirth, saying, Sing us one of the songs of Zion. [4] How shall we sing the Lord’s song in a strange land
? [5] If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning. [6] If I do not remember thee, let my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth; if I prefer not Jerusalem above my chief joy.
I believe God used the Pharaoh of Egypt to accomplish his purposes, but Pharaoh and his people paid a price for shoving the nation of Israel.
I believe God is using Obama to accomplish his purposes, but I believe Obama and the U.S. will also pay a price for shoving Israel, as will all the nations of the world. The verses preceding those above tell of his actions against the rulers and nations that shoved Israel as the Lord led them out of bondage.
Psalm 136:10-22 – To him that smote Egypt in their firstborn: for his mercy endureth for ever: [11] And brought out Israel from among them: for his mercy endureth for ever: [12] With a strong hand, and with a stretched out arm: for his mercy endureth for ever. [13] To him which divided the Red sea into parts: for his mercy endureth for ever: [14] And made Israel to pass through the midst of it: for his mercy endureth for ever: [15] But overthrew Pharaoh and his host in the Red sea: for his mercy endureth for ever. [16] To him which led his people through the wilderness: for his mercy endureth for ever. [17] To him which smote great kings: for his mercy endureth for ever: [18] And slew famous kings: for his mercy endureth for ever: [19] Sihon king of the Amorites: for his mercy endureth for ever: [20] And Og the king of Bashan: for his mercy endureth for ever: [21] And gave their land for an heritage: for his mercy endureth for ever: [22] Even an heritage unto Israel his servant: for his mercy endureth for ever.
“TO HIM THAT SMOTE EGYPT”
“TO HIM WHICH LED HS PEOPLE”
“TO HIM WHICH SMOTE GREAT KINGS”
“TO HIM WHICH DIVIDED THE RED SEA”
“AND GAVE THEIR LAND FOR A HERITAGE”
“AN HERITAGE UNTO ISRAEL HIS SERVANT”
AFTER SOME THREE AND ONE-HALF YEARS IN THE NEGEV THE GOD OF ISRAEL WILL PERSONALLY GIVE ISRAEL THEIR PROMISE LAND GRANT
Zechariah 13:9 – And I will bring the third part through the fire, and will refine them as silver is refined, and will try them as gold is tried: they shall call on my name, and I will hear them: I will say, It is my people: and they shall say, The Lord is my God.
Zechariah 14:3-5 – Then shall the Lord go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in
the day of battle.
[4] And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north,
and half of it toward the south. [5] And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the Lord my God shall come, and all the saints with thee.
Zechariah 14:9 – And the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and his name one.
Begin Excerpt 1 from Jerusalem Post
Why Obama is wrong on Israel and the Shoah
June 7, 2009
, THE JERUSALEM POST
At Buchenwald, he said: “The nation of Israel [arose] out of the destruction of the Holocaust.”
That rationale, standing alone, set the stage for Obama to assert: “On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Palestinians… have suffered in pursuit of a homeland.”
BARACK OBAMA has been terribly misinformed if he thinks Israel’s legitimacy hinges on the Shoah. Of course, had the Jews achieved a national homeland in Palestine before the outbreak of WWII – as Britain promised in the 1917 Balfour Declaration and as the League of Nations affirmed in 1920 – the doors to this country would not have been barred to Jewish refugees seeking to escape from the Nazi killing machine. History would have turned out very differently indeed.
What the Holocaust proved is that the world is too dangerous a place for Jews to be stateless and defenseless. But we Zionists were making that argument long before Hitler came to power.
Granted, modern political Zionism developed in the late 1800s and early 1900s. But the president needs to better appreciate that Israel’s legitimacy is not dependent on the consequences of the war waged against the Jews between 1933 and 1945. It is, first and foremost, rooted in the historic connection of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel.
The Zionist movement rejected Uganda as a safe haven in 1903, the need to save Jews from violent anti-Semitism notwithstanding, because Uganda did not belong to the Jews.
However one chooses to understand Jewish civilization – as sacred history, or through the modern lenses of secular history and archeology – the ancient bond between the Jews and their land is indisputable.
By 1000 BCE, the Twelve Tribes had formed a united monarchy. Then, when in 586 BCE the Jews were defeated and exiled, “By the rivers of Babylon… we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.” We returned and rebuilt our commonwealth – only to be defeated and exiled again, in 70 CE. As early as the 9th century, Jews had reestablished communities in Tiberias; and, in the 11th century, in Gaza.
SO YOU see, Mr. President, long before Christianity and Islam appeared on the world stage, the covenant between the people of Israel and the Land of Israel was entrenched and unwavering. Every day we prayed in our ancient tongue for our return to Zion. Every day, Mr. President. For 2,000 years.
At every Jewish wedding down through the centuries, the bridegroom has crushed a glass beneath his foot while declaring: “If I forget thee, O Jerusalem…”
Perhaps it’s because Palestine was never sovereign under the Arabs that even moderate Palestinians cannot find it in their hearts to acknowledge the depth of the Jews’ connection to Zion. Instead, they insist we are interlopers.
When Obama implies that Jewish rights are essentially predicated on the Holocaust – not once asserting they are far, far deeper and more ancient – he is dooming the prospects for peace.
For why should the Arabs reconcile themselves to the presence of a Jewish state, organic to the region, when the US president keeps insinuating that Israel was established to atone for Europe’s crimes?
Begin Excerpt 2 from Jerusalem Post
US envoy: Talks must begin ‘immediately’
June 7, 2009
khaled abu toameh and jpost.com staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
US President Barack Obama wants “immediate” talks between the Palestinians and Israel to forge a comprehensive Middle East peace agreement, US envoy George Mitchell was quoted by Reuters as saying on Monday.
Mitchell, who is en route to the Middle East, said such talks are aimed at reaching “a comprehensive peace and normalisation of relations” between Israel and its neighbours, which would also serve “the security interests of the United States”.
“The president has told me to exert all efforts to create the circumstance when the parties can begin immediate discussions,” Mitchell told reporters at the start of a Palestinian donors’ conference in the Norwegian capital.
Mitchell said the purpose of the donors’ meeting was to “provide support for the Palestinian authority” and pave the way for a two-state solution with Israel.
“It’s important that there is a building of institutions and governmental capacity so that at an early time there can be an independent and viable Palestinian state,” Mitchell said.
Norway’s Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere said at the conference that recent political uncertainty regarding any Middle East peace deal had hurt fund-raising efforts for the Palestinians.
“We, the donor community, are not into this as a humanitarian project but a political project,” said Stoere, who chairs the donors’ group for Norway.
A World Bank report on the Palestinian economy issued at the donors’ meeting said foreign support remained “indispensable” to allow the Palestinian Authority to “provide basic services” and praised “good” budget management by Abbas and his team.
But on Sunday, PA officials said the Palestinian Authority won’t return to the negotiating table with Israel unless Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu endorses the two-state solution and freezes construction in the West Bank settlements.
The officials said PA President Abbas had relayed this position to the US during his recent visit to Washington, where he held talks with Obama.
One of the officials expressed hope that the looming crisis between the Obama administration and Netanyahu over the future of the peace process would lead to the collapse of the Israeli government.
“Netanyahu’s government is bad for the peace process,” the official told The Jerusalem Post.
“This is a radical government that does not accept the two-state solution and insists on building settlements.”
Another official said that “Netanyahu was mistaken if he thinks he would find any Palestinian who would accept anything less than a sovereign Palestinian state on all the territories that were occupied by Israel in 1967.”
The PA official added, “We’re not in a rush. Let’s see if Obama is serious and whether he’s going to force Netanyahu to accept the two-state solution and halt settlement construction. If Obama succeeds, we will resume the peace talks tomorrow morning.”
Commenting on the announcement by Netanyahu that he intends to spell out his government’s peace strategy soon, Abbas spokesman Nabil Abu Rudaineh said that as far as the Palestinians were concerned, the principles of peace are very clear.
If Netanyahu wants peace, then he must abide by the two-state solution, stop settlement construction and honor the road map plan for peace in the Middle East, Abu Rudaineh said.
“These are the principles of a just peace,” Abu Rudaineh added.
“Peace must be based on international resolutions pertaining to the conflict. This requires immediate steps on the ground so as to create the proper atmosphere for the resumption of the peace talks.”
Tayeb Abdel Rahim, a senior aide to Abbas, said that in any case the talks with Israel should be resumed from the point where they ended and not from zero.
Abdel Rahim said that there would never be real peace in the region unless Israel released all the Palestinian prisoners.
He said that during his talks with Obama, Abbas had stressed that all the prisoners should be released unconditionally as a prerequisite for peace.
Begin Excerpt 3 from Jerusalem
Poll: Obama’s policies bad for Israel
June 8, 2009
Gil Hoffman , THE JERUSALEM POST
A majority of Israelis believe that the Middle East policies of US President Barack Obama are not good for the Jewish state, according to a Dahaf Institute poll taken ahead of Obama’s speech to the Muslim world.
The poll of 501 Israelis, sponsored by Yediot Aharonot and representing a statistical sample of the population, found that 53 percent believed Obama’s policies were not good for Israel and just 26% said they were good. The rest did not respond.
Fifty-one percent said Obama cared more about the Palestinian desire for a state than about Israeli security, and just 22% said he put Israel’s security needs first.
Asked whether they were disappointed with Obama’s policies, 51% said yes, 41% said no and the rest declined to answer. Half the respondents said they blamed both Obama and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu for the perceived crisis between Israel and the US, 28% solely blamed Obama and 16% just Netanyahu.
Forty-seven percent approved of Netanyahu’s performance thus far as prime minister, while 45% disapproved. But when asked specifically about his handling of relations with the US, 47% were dissatisfied and only 34% approved.
A majority (56% vs. 40%) said Netanyahu should give into Obama’s demands. However, most respondents (50% vs. 44%) said they did not believe Netanyahu would allow the formation of a Palestinian state.
On the settlement issue, Israelis, unlike the Obama government, differentiate between established
settlements and unauthorized outposts. Seventy percent called for removing outposts, and just 25% supported keeping them. However, regarding freezing current settlements, the gap was much smaller, with 52% in favor and 43% opposed. Regarding natural growth in settlements, 54% said it should be considered and 42% said it should not.
The first poll taken after Obama’s speech will be published in The Jerusalem Post later this week.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.