Obama’s words building up Arabs,
Speeches destroy Islamic fear of U.S.
Islamic RADICALS fear Great U.S. Satan,
Much MORE THAN the LITTLE Satan Israel!
So If radicals come to believe U.S. President
Is Neutral in his policy toward Israel and Islam,
Guess who is more likely to attack nation of Israel,
Since they believe U.S. will not come to their Rescue?
The excerpt comes from http://www.actforamerica.org/
June 7, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
The United States protective nuclear umbrella over Israel has created, in the minds of Israel’s enemies, the belief that America might use them if they attacked Israel. It seems apparent to me, at this point in time, that the speeches of Obama during his campaign, and since he took office, give the enemies of Israel a reason to believe he would not use American nuclear weapons to defend Israel, nor will he commit any American air or ground forces to defend her, unless non-Islamic forces, such as Russia and China, should attack her. I have believed for some 40 years that the last war of this age would be a vicious knock down, drag out, conventional war between Israel and the forces of Islam, with America, Russia, China, and the rest of the non-Islamic nations monitoring it, but not actively participating in it, that is, until the final battle in it, which is the battle of Armageddon.
Begin Excerpt from “Act for America” via Ron Whittlemore
Dear Ronald,
Our friend Frank Gaffney, President of the Center for Security Policy, recently penned an insightful column regarding the implications of the messages
President Obama is sending Israel and the Muslim world.
For those tempted to think Israel’s security is solely Israel’s problem, let us remember that Islamists in the Middle East frequently refer to America as “the Great Satan.” In other words, a greater “Satan” than Israel!
Anything we do that emboldens Islamists in their hatred of and actions toward Israel will ultimately embolden them in their hatred of and actions toward us.
Obama sows a Mideast whirlwind
Center for Security Policy | Jun 01, 2009
By Frank Gaffney, Jr.
(Jerusalem): From this vantage point, two events this week appear to be ominous straws in the wind, warnings of a “man-caused” maelstrom that may inexorably plunge the Middle East into another, potentially cataclysmic war.
The first is the fact that Israel feels obliged to undertake an unprecedented, country-wide civil defense exercise this week.
At one point in its course, every man, woman and child in the Jewish State is supposed to seek shelter from a simulated attack of the kind Iran may shortly be able to execute against it.
The second is President Obama’s latest effort to reach out to the Muslim world, this time on June 4 from one of its most important capitals, Cairo. There, he is expected to make an address that will reiterate his previous statements on the subject – pronouncements that, unfortunately, can only have been interpreted by his intended audience as acts of submission.
If past is prelude, the President of the United States will: apologize yet again for purported offenses against Muslims by his country; promise to be respectful of Islam, including those who adhere to its authoritative, if virulent, theo-political-legal program known as Shariah; and enunciate diplomatic priorities and initiatives designed to reach out to America’s enemies in the region, while putting excruciating pressure on its most reliable ally there, Israel.
This pressure has become more palpable by the day.
It has taken various forms, including: U.S. stances adopted at the United Nations that will serve to isolate Israel; blank political and even financial checks for Palestinian thugs like Mahmoud Abbas; diminishing U.S.-Israeli cooperation on intelligence and military matters; and the withholding from Israel of helicopters (and perhaps other weaponry) being provided to Arab states.
Perhaps the most chilling example of this coercive pressure so far, however, was originally reported in the Israeli paper Yediot Aharonot and given international prominence by my esteemed colleague and Jerusalem Post columnist, Caroline Glick.
According to these accounts, in a recent lecture in Washington, U.S. Army Lieutenant General Keith Dayton, the American officer charged with training Palestinian military forces in Jordan, made a shocking declaration.
In Ms. Glick’s words, “[Gen. Dayton] indicated that if Israel does not surrender Judea and Samaria within two years, the Palestinian forces he and his fellow American officers are now training at a cost of more than 300 million could begin killing Israelis.” She went on to note that neither the general nor the Obama administration seemed to find this prospect grounds for rethinking the wisdom of such a training-and-arming program.
In fact, her column observed that Defense Secretary Gates “just extended Dayton’s tour of duty for an additional two years and gave him the added responsibility of serving as Obama’s Middle East mediator George Mitchell’s deputy.”
Taken together with the U.S. administration’s refusal to come to grips with what truly is the most serious threat to peace in the Middle East – Iran’s rising power and growing aggressiveness, reflecting in part its incipient nuclear weapons capabilities – the stage is being inexorably set for the next, and perhaps most devastating, regional conflict.
Whether the signals Mr.
Obama is sending are intended to communicate such a message or not, they are going to be read by Israel’s enemies as evidence of a profound rift between the United States and the Jewish State. In this part of the world, that amounts to an invitation to an open season on Israel.
It is hard to believe that the Obama Middle East agenda enjoys the support of the American people or their elected representatives in Congress.
Historically, the public and strong bipartisan majorities on Capitol Hill have appreciated that an Israel that shares our values, that is governed democratically and that is in the cross-hairs of the same people who seek our destruction is an important ally. Quite apart from a sense of moral and religious affinity for the Jewish people’s struggle to survive in their ancient homeland, most of us recognize that it is in the United States’ strategic interest to stand with Israel.
It is worrisome in the extreme that Mr. Obama does not appear to share this appreciation. To those who worried about his affinity for the Saudi king and Islam more generally and his longstanding ties to virulent critics of Israel like Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi and former Harvard professor-turned-National Security Council staffer Samantha Power, the President’s attitude is not exactly a surprise. His administration’s posture may have been further reinforced by Arab-American pollster John Zogby’s recent Forbes Magazine article arguing that friends of Israel made up John McCain’s constituency, not Obama’s. (This raises an interesting question about the sentiments towards Israel of the 78% of American Jews who voted for the latter in 2008.)
My guess, however, is that, as the implications of President Obama’s Mideast policies – for the United States as well as Israel – become clearer, he is going to find himself facing the sort of popular and congressional revolt that has confronted him in recent weeks on Guantanamo Bay. The question is: Will such a reaffirmation of American solidarity with and support for Israel come in time to prevent the winds of war being whipped up by Mr. Obama’s posturing and rhetoric – and driving Israelis into bomb shelters – from wreaking havoc in the Middle East, and perhaps far beyond
?
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.