Obama Softly-Softly DIALOG WON’T WORK NOW!
In the World of Carnal Mankind SOFTIES Finish LAST,
Or in a Worse Case Scenario Seem to End Up Enslaved,
Or in the Supreme Worse Case End Up Dead as a Doornail!
Jesus stated what mankind would be like until his 2nd Advent,
And even after his 2nd Advent Jesus will use a millennial iron Rod,
For a Thousand Years On Carnal Mankind to Keep a Peace On Earth,
But in the final eternal heaven age carnality will no longer exist in Men!
THIS IS THE PEACE STATUS CHARACTER IN TODAY’ S GENTILE AGE!
Matthew 10:34,36 – Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. [35] For I am come to set a man at variance against his fat her, and the daughter against
her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. [36] And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.
THIS IS THE PEACE STATUS CHARACTER IN THE MILLENNIUM!
Zechariah 14:9 – And the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and his name one.
Psalm 2:6-9 – Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion. [7] I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
[8] Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. [9] Thou shalt BREAK THEM WITH A ROD OF IRON; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.
THIS IS THE PEACE STATUS CHARACTER IN THE FINAL HEAVEN AGE!
Revelation 21:1-5 – And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. [2] And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. [3] And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and
God himself shall be with them, and be their God. [4] And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away. [5] And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.
May 27, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Begin Excerpt from THE AUSTRALIAN
Kim shows up Obama’s soft approach
Greg Sheridan, Foreign editor
May 26, 2009
Article from: The Australian
THE new nuclear test carried out by North Korea demonstrates the complete failure, so far, of US President Barack Obama’s softly-softly diplomacy and willingness to start afresh with old enemies.
It may be that Obama’s approach is well worth a try, but so far its yield is zero.
This is in great contrast to North Korea’s nuclear weapons program. It yields a great deal indeed. There is every chance Pyongyang will succeed in all its ambitions with its latest nuclear test.
North Korea’s first nuclear test, in October 2006, brought president George W. Bush back to the negotiating table.
North Korea’s ageing and apparently unwell dictator, Kim Jong-il, has been keen to get Obama’s attention since the new US President took office.
Last month, North Korea test-fired a ballistic missile that travelled across Japan before splashing down in the Pacific Ocean.
Obama reacted coolly. Pyongyang has now gone a step further with its second ever nuclear test, which serves multiple aims for North Korea.
By all reports, Kim suffered a stroke last August. There are very good reports that he is now consolidating the power structure, and the line of succession, around him. The reflex of every North Korean institution in this context will be to demonstrate ultra-loyalty and ultra-nationalism. This means the internal atmosphere in North Korea would contribute directly to the decision to conduct such a test.
However, the technical and military aspects of this test should not be overlooked. Last month’s missile test was far more successful than the North’s previous long-range missile test. Similarly, this nuclear test has, on early reports, produced a far greater yield than the 2006 test did.
That means Pyongyang is getting much better at both missile technology and nuclear weapons technology. It is clear Pyongyang wants to possess a full suite of nuclear weapons and wants to be accepted as a nuclear weapons state.
Analysts believe Pyongyang possesses five to 10 nuclear devices. The latest test appears to have been a plutonium bomb. That means Pyongyang has used a substantial section of its nuclear fuel in this test. However, the record is th at North Korea keeps turning out to have more nuclear weapons and nuclear technology than Western intelligence assesses
at any given moment.
It may be that the highly enriched uranium program, which the North boasted of in talks with American negotiators several years ago, has also yielded fuel for nuclear weapons.
The truth is, we just do not know.
But clearly North Korea is moving steadily up the nuclear weapons food chain.
The greatest danger from the North’ s weapon
s lies in proliferation.
It has shown itself willing to sell weapons and nuclear technology
to all-comers in the past. Israel bombed a nuclear reactor in Syria the North Koreans had sold to the Syrians.
But the idea Pyongyang would never use a nuclear weapon cannot be absolutely guaranteed. Everyone assesses Pyongyang to be a rational actor, but rational actors can make colossal miscalculations. This is partly why everyone in the international system over recent years has been trying to reassure the North Koreans that they will not be subject to any pre-emptive military strike. Indeed, the US and its allies do not even seek regime change in North Korea, merely less destabilising behaviour.
North Korea is rational enough, but its rationality occurs within a framework so distinctive and self-enclosed that it does not allow outsiders to provide any effective incentives and disincentives. It is highly likely that within a few months at the most, Obama will concede to Pyongyang’s most recent dem and – which is for one-on-one negotiations between North Korea
and the US, and the effective sidelining of the Six Party talks process.
Although it is absolutely clear Pyongyang will never give up its nuclear weapons, it is quite likely that process will culminate in another US-North Korea deal, which will provide economic aid in exchange for North Korea agreeing to give up its nuclear activities.
Pyongyang may well be able to sell its Yongbyon reac
tor to the Americans for a third time, only to continue with nuclear activities at other sites and to re-open Yongbyon when the new agreement inevitably collapses. If events follow that pattern, Pyongyang’s actions will not only have been rational, but also remarkably effective as state policy.
In the meantime, the Chinese will prevent the UN from taking any serious action and will not itself prevail upon North Korea to change in fundamentals.
All the time, Obama’s hope – and Kevin Rudd’s hope too – of global nuclear disarmament will grow more distant, and his open hand of friendship will be met with a spit in the face.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.