The IMPOSSIBILITY of ANY LASTING TSS
Is the reason a TP cannot come to Israel
Until Israel’s MESSIAH comes to bring it In
Linkage Obama seeks between TSS and TP
Is a Mistake that Will ONLY Produce Short FP
TSS (Two State Solution) and FP (False Peace)
TP (True Peace) – CHRIST brings at 2nd Advent!
The prophecy spoken by the Angel of the Lord concerning the descendants of the first son of Abraham, Ishmael, birthed from the womb of Hagar the Egyptian by a plan devised by Sarah and Abraham, has certainly been true for centuries, and will continue to be so until Messiah comes to straighten out the situation this humanly devised plan generated.
Genesis 16:1-12 – Now Sarai Abram’s wife bare him no children: and she had an handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar. [2] And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the Lord hath restrained me from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her.
And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai. [3] And Sarai Abram’s wife took Hagar her maid the Egyptian, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife. [4] And he went in unto Hagar, and she conceived: and when she saw that she had conceived, her mistress was despised in her eyes.
[5] And Sarai said unto Abram, My wrong be upon thee: I have given my maid into thy bosom; and when she saw that she had conceived, I was despised in her eyes: the Lord judge between me and
thee. [6] But Abram said unto Sarai, Behold, thy maid is in thy hand; do to her as it pleaseth thee. And when Sarai dealt hardly with her, she fled from her face. [7] And the angel of
the Lord found her by a fountain of water in the wilderness, by the fountain in the way to Shur. [8] And he said, Hagar, Sarai’s maid, whence camest thou? and whither wilt thou go? And she said, I flee from the face of my mistress Sarai. [9] And the angel of the Lord said unto her, Return to thy mistress, and submit thyself under her hands.
[10] And the angel of the Lord said unto her, I will multiply thy seed exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude. [11] And the angel of the Lord said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the Lord hath heard thy affliction.
[12] And he will be a WILD MAN; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.
Verse 12 has truly been the case for his descendants as well as the descendents of the six sons born to Abraham after Sarah’s death. To believe that diplomatic dialog (by Obama’s thrilling speaking ability and the chatter of his talking heads in the Middle East) will produce a LASTING Two-State Solution (TSS) is sheer madness.
The introduction of the Islamic religion into the ancient world by Muhammad was responsible for inflaming the Middle East, which has led to the formation of a fanatical assembly of Islamic Jihad WILD MEN, the descendants of Ishmael and Keturah, who are possessed by the spirit of Antichrist, professing that Jesus was a great prophet, but NOT the son of God. It is the strong religious delusion predicted by Paul in II Thessalonians 2:10-12.
I John 2:21-23 – I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth. [22] Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Fa
ther and
the Son. [23] Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath
the Father also.
I John 5:5 – Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?
II Thessalonians 2:10-12 – And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. [11] And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: [12] That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
May 11, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Begin Excerpt 1 from Jerusalem Post
Monday May 11, 2009
Rosner’s Domain: So, what’s Obama’s position on linkage?
Posted by SHMUEL ROSNER
A week ago – when AIPAC supporters were shocked to report that they were told by Rahm Emanuel that “the efforts to stop Iran hinged on peace talks with the Palestinians” – Emanuel denied, sort of. Using the good services of his Atlantic friend, Jeffrey Goldberg, Emanuel (or someone wanting to help him) could make sure that the record straightened out:
Rahm apparently did no such thing. I have it on good authority that Rahm told the audience that Obama believes that it will be easier to enlist Arab allies in the confrontation with Iran if visible progress is made on the Palestinian front. This is inescapably true. But he did not suggest a quid pro quo. That would be blackmail.
The case of James Jones will be harder to deal with:
“We understand Israel’s preoccupation with Iran as an existential threat. We agree with that,” the senior official was quoted as saying by AFP. However, Jones went on to stress that the Iranian threat only reinforces
the need for peace in the region. “By the same token, there are a lot of things that you can do to diminish that existential threat by working hard towards achieving a two-state solution,” he reportedly said.
This is troubling for three reasons:
1. It’s rubbish. A TSS isn’t going to “diminish that existential threat”.
2. It makes Israel a hostage: get a TSS or face existential threat.
The problem is that for a TSS to m ateri
alize a Palestinian partner is also needed – a party that doesn’t exist.
3. Even more troubling: Israel faces the “threat” – Palestinians don’t (the Iranians do not threaten them). This presumabely means that Israel is the one who should worry about the TSS more than the Palestinian leadership. This also means that Palestinians might not feel as pressured to compromize, and might think that they are in a position to demand more concessions from Israel.
4. And what if a TSS isn’t within reach
? (as most experts believe is the case) Would Jones still work to “diminish” the threat?
EXCERPT 2 REFERRING TO JAMES JONES IN EXCERPT 1 FOLLOWS
Begin Excerpt 2 from Jerusalem Post
US: Iran boosts need for two states
May. 10, 2009
JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
US President Barack Obama’s National Security Adviser, retired general James Jones, on Sunday reiterated remarks recently made by other senior US officials linking the resolution of the Iranian nuclear standoff to progress in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.
In an interview with ABC television, Jones said that the US government agrees with Jerusalem that Teheran’s nuclear ambitions pose an “existential threat” to Israel.
“We understand Israel’s preoccupation with Iran as an existential threat. We agree with that,” the senior official said.
However, Jones went on to stress that the Iranian threat only reinforces the need for peace in the region.
“By the same token, there are a lot of things that you can do to diminish that existential threat by working hard towards achieving a two-state solution,” he said.
“This is a very strategic issue. It’s extremely important. And we’re looking forward to having a good, constructive dialogue with our Israeli friends when they visit Washington in the next seven or eight days,” Jones said in response to a question about Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s upcoming visit to Washington on May 18.
In a closed meeting with AIPAC’s major donors last week, Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emmanuel, reportedly said that America’s ability to face Iran depended on Israel’s ability to make progress with the Palestinians.
He told them that solving the conflict would enable progress in dealing with the main threat of Iran.
However, senior Israeli officials have rejected linking the Iranian nuclear issue with the Middle East peace process.
“We have to stop the Iranian threat as if there were no conflict with the Palestinians and we have to progress with the Palestinians as if there were no [nuclear] threat from Iran,” Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon said on Thursday.
“The Iranian threat is a threat to everyone. The issue has nothing to do with the Palestinians,” he explained.
In a press conference in Washington on Tuesday, President Shimon Peres also rejected the idea of “linkage” between the Palestinian and Iranian issues.
However, Peres emphasized that Israel accepted the road map peace plan, which calls for the eventual formation of a Palestinian state, and that the new government intended to adhere to previous governments’ decisions.
Netanyahu has so far refused to publicly endorse the two-state solution and has focused on the importance of strengthening the West Bank economy.
But the prime minister noted on Sunday that economic growth and the improved welfare of the West Bank population were not a substitute for peace talks.
Hilary Leila Krieger contributed to this report.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.