Part 1 – THE RUPTURE BEFORE THE RAPTURE!
AN OB
AMA FAR LEFT LIBERAL Democratic Diplomacy,
Will eventually be instrumental in creating A False Peace,
Only a false peace is prophetically possible with Islamic Nations!
This is Part 1 of what will probably Finish Up as a 3 Part Rupture Series!
May 8, 2008
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Watching the election last November was like dining on sweet and sour pork.
I hoped the Republicans would win, which was a sweet taste to my palate, but I knew if the Democrat’s Obama won, even though it would produce a very sour taste in my tummy, it was much more likely to bring in the false peace. Oddly enough, having waited since 1967 in hopes for the false peace to come in, and not knowing for sure HOW it would do so, as I listened to Obama’s silver tongue campaign dialogue, I believed he would try to use it to charm the international community into the false peace, if he was elected. He has exceeded my expectations. Even if he were to drop dead, his policies are in place, and Joe Biden and the Democratic Congress would continue them. We are headed down a road to a brief false peace, which will then be followed by a vicious breaking of it by an Islamic Jihad attack against Israel that will drive her into the Negev Wilderness for three and one-half years, during which time I believe the rapture will occur, after which the Second Advent will occur at Armageddon.
Begin Excerpt from Rosner’s Domain via Jerusalem Post
Rosner’s Domain: More from “Does the Democratic Majority have a problem with Israel
?
”
Posted by SHMUEL ROSNER
May 8, 2009
Here are a couple of paragraphs from my presentation at the BESA-ADL conference earlier this week:
These are the specific reasons I listed for which the Democratic majority might have a problem with Israel – or maybe it’s Israel that might have a problem with the Democratic majority:
Substantive reasons:
Because Democrats want to make peace with the Arab world, and Israel is standing in their way.
Because Democrats want to make peace with the rest of the world and Israel stands in their way.
Because Democrats tend to adopt risk-averse policies on foreign policy matters, not wanting to risk “another Iraq” or “another blunder”
Because Democrats – and Americans in general – think more about domestic, economic issues, and just want the world to go away.
Because Democrats have turned “dialogue” and “engagement” into new religion, and Israel seems to be skeptical of their new gods.
Because experts with liberal tendencies recommend more “balance”, believing that such balance can provide for new openings in the peace process.
Because the tied has turned and America now abandons Jacksonian, aggressive, policies – and finds it hard to sympathies with countries pursuing military means on a daily basis.
Political reasons:
Because this Democratic majority is committed to the success of the Obama administration – and if confrontation between Obama
and Israel occurs the legislators might find it difficult to side with Israel.
Because Democratic voters, as I’ve shown earlier, support Israel less than Republican voters.
Because Jewish Americans – an important sub-group in the Democratic establishment – are less supportive of Israel than they once were (again, I will not bore you with numbers, but the proof is overwhelming).
Because as I’ve demonstrated, one can now have it both ways: claiming to be supportive of Israel while pursuing policies traditionally considered un-supportive, relying on so-called pro-Israel groups.
Because in recent years the cause of Israel was conquered by Republicans, making it much less appealing for Democratic legislators.
Because Bush was considered very supportive of Israel – But everything Bush was doing is anathema for Democrats.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.