The Iranian Plan Is NOT JUST To Destroy Israel,
It also is paving the way to replace the Presidents
Of Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Iraq, and OTHERS!
Infrastructure to do this is now being implanted by Hamas,
Hizbullah, & Iranian Agents Sprinkled Across the Middle East!
When Iran, Syria, and their terrorist satellites finally attack Israel,
Revolutions in many moderate Arab nations will cause leaders to Fall,
When the dust has settled a gigantic Caliphate Will Have Been Created!
But the Caliphate Islamic Kingdom will not be able to hold together for Long,
And will be replaced by the Kingdom of Christ at his 2nd Advent at Armageddon!
April 14, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Daniel 2:42,44 – And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.
[43] And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay. [44] And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
Begin Excerpt from World News
The Iranian plan
Hizbullah terror cells uncovered in Egypt masterminded by Iranians
Smadar Peri
The hands that were sent to establish the terror cells in Egypt and run the smuggling network bringing arms and money into Gaza indeed belong to senior Hizbullah activists, yet the brain that came up with the plan to arm Hamas and undermine President Mubarak’s regime is in Tehran.
And so, for example, two of the suspects arrested in Egypt in connection with the Hizbullah terror cells work for an Iranian TV channel that broadcasted from Cairo and whose offices were used as a site for secret meetings and the transfer of funds and orders to the members of the Hizbullah cell in Egypt.
Cairo and Tehran have experienced plenty of friction ever since the Shah’s regime was toppled in 1979, marking the rise of the Ayatollahs’ “proper Islam.” Egypt’s embassy in Cairo was closed down, and meanwhile the Iranians named a major street and a square on the outskirts of Tehran after Khalid Islambouli, President Sadat’s killer.
Over the years, terror cells dispatched by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards in order to kill Egyptian leaders were detained by Cairo. Four years ago, the Egyptian ambassador to Baghdad was killed, and his body had not been returned to this day.
Egyptian officials also warn that Qatar has fallen into the Iranian trap, and that al-Jazeera has become the axis of evil’s mouthpiece.
If Iran’s nuclear race is Israel’s nightmare, the Arab world’s nightmare is the “great plan” being formulated by the Iranians: A plan that is meant to “creep” into the territory of Arab states, deploy a network of sleeper terror cells within them, recruit terror activists, shower opposition movements with money, and then carry out a series of attacks, assassinations, artificial protests, and violent clashes with security forces and police.
Jordan’s King Abdullah openly shared his fears of “the Iranian crescent” when he warned against the Iranian plan to send its long arms into Lebanon, take over focal points of power in Iraq, and use Sudan as a base for deploying thousands of terrorists in Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
Unanswered question
It was no coincidence that Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit announced: “We knew about the Israeli Air Force’s bombings in Sudan in real time.” We can guess that Egyptian intelligence services monitor Sudan because of the Iranian arms that settled there uninterruptedly and established training bases there.
In one moment, Iranian intelligence agents can block the Nile’s water sources, Egypt’s lifeblood, send in al-Qaeda-style murderers, and smuggle weapons and explosives not only to Gaza’s tunnels but also to Cairo and to the Alexandria Port.
In his late-night speech the other night, Hizbullah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah did not even try to deny the depth of the ties and commitment to Tehran. I wish that our excellent ties with Iran were appreciated by the leaders of states cooperating with the Zionist enemy, he said.
Nasrallah also did not try to shirk responsibility for the arms smuggling. He just didn’t provide the answer for the obvious question: Who is sending, via Hizbullah, hundreds of millions of dollars to finance terror, and where did the attack plans and arms received by the network activists in Egypt come from?
Begin Excerpt from Jerusalem Post
Analysis: Hizbullah shows its true colors to the Arab world
April 13, 2009
Zvi mazel , THE JERUSALEM POST
Many Egyptians can’t bring themselves to believe that Hizbullah was running agents and planning terror attacks in their country. Most Arab countries couldn’t believe it, either, though they have offered no reaction. They are still trying to come to terms with the new situation.
But last week’s news should not have surprised them. Iran never made a secret of its plans to export its brand of Islamic revolution to the whole of the Middle East, bringing about the destruction of Israel in the process. Hamas and Hizbullah are the Teheran regime’s tools in working toward this goal.
Yet the very thought of having an Arab group set up terrorist network in the heart of Egypt is perceived by most of the Arab world as a violation of all that’s holy.
Commentators can pontificate all they want about the weakening of Egypt, but the land of the pharaohs is still the most important country in the Arab world. It is the largest in population and boasts an impressive history and an impressive culture. Its strategic position is matchless since it commands the Suez Canal and is located at the crossroads of Asia and Africa.
And last, but not least, it has the strongest Arab army in the Middle East.
Had Hizbullah’s subversive activities succeeded, that army might have been called in to take over. What would have happened to the region and to the peace process is anybody’s guess.
We are not talking this time of a few Beduin being bribed to launch terror attacks against Israeli tourists: the target was Egypt itself.
According to official Egyptian declarations, a Hizbullah agent named Mohamed Yousuf Sami Shehab recruited around 50 young men – Lebanese, Syrian, Sudanese and Palestinians, and 12 Egyptian Shi’ites.
The foreigners entered Egypt with fake passports. When they were arrested $2 million were found in their possession, along with several cars, and explosives ready to be detonated.
They were busy setting up a terror infrastructure throughout the country, including in Upper Egypt, purchasing an apartment building in Aguza, one of the choicest locations in Cairo, and renting dozens of villas and shops in Sinai – in Dahab, Nueiba and Rafah.
In the city of Suez, they rented villas overlooking the canal in order to monitor the shipping traffic – apparently plotting to attack American and Israeli vessels.
US warships bringing supplies and reinforcements to Kuwait, Qatar, Iraq and Afghanistan go through the canal on their way to the Persian Gulf.
Hizbullah may even have considered sinking a ship to close down the Suez Canal, which would have forced all maritime traffic from the West to the Persian Gulf and Asia to sail thousands of additional kilometers, via the Cape of Good Hope.
According to official sources in Egypt, Hizbullah intended to launch a massive series of terror attacks. Though American and Israeli targets were to be hit first, the aim was
to destabilize the country and provoke huge demonstrations that could bring down the regime and lead to a military coup.
Hizbullah chief Hassan Nasrallah gave himself away when he admitted in his speech on Friday that Sami Shehab was a member of his organization and that he had been sent to Egypt to deliver “logistic assistance” to Hamas in Gaza.
At the same time he launched a virulent attack on Egypt, lambasting it for blockading Gaza and dismantling the smuggling tunnels. His words were tantamount to a declaration of war against Egypt.
Prime Minister Ahmed Nazif declared that there could be no compromise on the safety of his country; President Hosni Mubarak and Foreign Minister Ahmed Abul Gheit have so far refrained from comment, leaving the field to a number of unnamed sources who attacked Nasrallah vigorously.
One has to keep in mind that Egypt is at the forefront of pragmatic Arab countries fighting against Iranian subversive activities in the region.
During the Second Lebanon War in the summer of 2006, Cairo was virulently attacked by Syrian, Iranian and Hizbullah media on the grounds of its alleged support for Israel, much as it was this year, during Operation Cast Lead.
It is well known that the peace treaty between Egypt and Israel is to Iran as a red flag to a bull. The treaty is seen as a major stumbling block in the path of the Islamic revolution launched by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979 – and Teheran cut off diplomatic ties with Egypt after the
treaty was signed.
Recent efforts by Iran to renew these ties failed, because Teheran refused to remove the name of Anwar Sadat’s assassin from a major street in the Iranian capital.
But it has been suggested that this demand was nothing but a pretext: Mubarak, who is well aware of Iran’s intentions, is in no hurry to renew relations.
Iran’s reaction was to step up its subversive activities in the region and especially against Egypt.
Another, dangerous aspect of that battle is the determination of more and more Arab countries to have nuclear programs of their own to counterbalance Teheran’s efforts. Egypt is in the final planning stage of four nuclear plants to produce electricity.
A year ago Mubarak spoke publicly against efforts being made to promote Shi’ite Islam and accused Shi’ites of being more faithful to Iran than to their own country.
In this fight Egypt finds itself allied with Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Morocco against Iran and its allies – Syria, Sudan, Hizbullah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad and lesser organizations.
It is through Hizbullah that Iran is most active. Agents and instructors from that organization are at work in Iraq, where they train pro-Iranian militias; in Yemen, where they support the Houthiin, a Shi’ite extremist movement, in rebellion against the government; and in Bahrain, where they help Shi’ite opposition forces.
It is quite likely that we are now seeing only part of their vast subversive endeavor.
In the past few weeks, the confrontation between the pragmatic Arab camp and Iran and its proxies surfaced openly. An Iranian official declared that Bahrain was an Iranian province, angering all Arab countries.
Mubarak flew immediately to Bahrain’s capital, Manana, to affirm that Bahrain was and will remain Arab.
A few days later, Sunni Morocco off broke diplomatic relation with Iran because of the activities of Shi’ite preachers on Iran’s payroll.
To show his displeasure with the situation, Mubarak did not attend the yearly Arab summit that took place in Doha, Qatar’s capital, at end of March.
His representative launched a scathing attack on Iran without expressly naming it and said that Arabs should not let non-Arab elements interfere in their internal affairs; he went on to accuse Al-Jazeera of inciting the Arab masses to revolt against their governments – a dig at the emir of Qatar, who owns the popular station and who has lately joined the Iranian camp.
Setting up the Hizbullah network is the Iranian answer.
It comes at a crucial time for Egypt, where nobody knows what will happen when Mubarak departs the scene, and where the Muslim Brotherhood is gaining strength.
Some people suggest that the feud between Egypt and Iran will benefit Israel, but this is far from the truth. Israel needs a strong and stable Egypt.
Meanwhile, there is a new player on the scene.
US President Barack Obama has started a dialogue with Syria and is about to begin one with Iran.
Egypt and the pragmatic camp are not too happy about that development, though they will not admit it publicly; they would rather see Israel and the US bomb Iran and do away with the Iranian threat, since they know very well it will not be removed by diplomacy.
The raison d’etre of the ayatollahs’ regime is to promote an Islamic revolution, and the only way to stop it by using force.
The writer, a former ambassador to Egypt, is a fellow at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.
Begin Excerpt from Jerusalem Post
Peres: Iran aspires to ‘control Mideast’
April 13, 2009
JPost.com Staff , THE JERUSALEM POST
President Shimon Peres responded to the developing row between Egypt and Hizbullah on Monday morning, saying, “Sooner or later the world will realize that Iran has aspirations to control the Middle East, and that it’s Teheran which has colonialist ambitions.”
Speaking after meeting with the country’s top rabbis in honor of the Pessah holiday, Peres told Army Radio, “They fight even without us being involved, and that’s good.”
The president’s comments came as the first official Israeli response after Cairo announced that a Hizbullah-linked cell was plotting to attack Egyptian institutions and Israeli tourists on the Sinai Peninsula.
Peres went on to call Hizbullah “an Iranian agent,” and called its chief, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, “a man who wraps himself in sheikh’s robes, yet is willing to kill.”
“Soon, the world will realize,” he repeated.
Throughout Monday morning, Peres, accompanied by Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin, met with Shas spiritual leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, Sephardi Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar, and Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger.
The president traditionally visits the religious leaders twice a year, on Pessah and Succot.
Also Monday, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas telephoned Peres to wish him a happy Passover, and to express his willingness to continue with the peace process, Israel Radio reported.
Peres reportedly told the PA president not to “give up hope.”
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.