Israel, turn to Messiah Jesus for Help,
US won’t Save YOU from ISLAMIC JIHAD,
No US troops for Israel AS MUSLIMS ATTACK,
Obama Is The Friend of ISRAEL IN WORD ONLY,
In reality he is a fast talking roll of STICK BALONEY,
And to Israel he will reveal himself as a Classic PHONY,
Leaving her only promises when she stands as the Lonely,
Against hoards of the Sword of Allah and ISLAM THE HOMELY,
But at 2nd Advent of Israel’s Messiah she will be made COMELY,
And Messiah
will rule from Jerusalem as KING OF ALL COMELINESS!
April 7, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Zechariah 13:8 – And it shall come to pass, that in all the land, saith the Lord, two parts therein shall be cut off and die; but the third shall be left therein.
Revelation 12:6 – And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
Zechariah 13:9 – And I will bring the third part through the fire, and will refine them as silver is refined, and will try them as gold is tried: they shall call on my name, and I will hear them: I will say, It is my people: and they shall say, The Lord is my God.
Zechariah 14:8,9 – And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem; half of them toward the former sea, and half of them toward the hinder sea: in summer and in winter shall it be. [9] And the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and his name one.
Isaiah 62:1-5 – For Zion’s sake will I not hold my peace, and for Jerusalem’s sake I will not rest, until the righteousness thereof go forth as brightness, and the salvation thereof as a lamp that burneth. [2] And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name. [3] Thou shalt also be a crown of glory in the hand of the Lord, and a royal diadem in the hand of thy God.
[4] Thou shalt no more be termed Forsaken; neither shall thy land any more be termed Desolate: but thou shalt be called Hephzi-bah, and thy land Beulah (married): for the Lord delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married. [5] For as a young man marrieth a virgin, so shall thy sons marry thee: and as the bridegroom rejoiceth over the bride, so shall thy God rejoice over thee.
Begin Excerpt fromDEBKAfile Exclusive Analyiss
US Awards Iran Role as Military Partner, Sells Israel Short
DEBKAfile Excusive Analysis
April 4, 2009, 1:36 PM (GMT+02:00)
Only two weeks ago, Israel’s chief of staff Lt. Gen. Gaby Ashkenazi, then visiting Washington, was denied interviews with US defense secretary Robert Gates and the chairman of the US chiefs of staff Adm. Mike Mullen. He cut short his visit after seeing national security adviser Gen. James Jones and Iran envoy Dennis Ross, lesser lights in terms of their direct influence on President Barack Obama.
Since then, the US president has decided the snub was ill-judged.
During 2008 and up until his exit from the White House, George W. Bush found Ashkenazi useful for conveying to the former prime minister Ehud Olmert and defense minister Ehud Barak his administration’s strong objections to an Israeli military strike on Iran’s nuclear sites.
The US effort to hold Israel’s hand brought Mullen and an array of top US generals calling at the chief of staff’s Tel Aviv headquarters almost every ten days in the last months of 2008.
Mullen wanted to keep this effort afloat, but president Obama thought otherwise, which is why Ashkenazi was so coolly received in Washington in mid-March.
However, the inception of Binyamin Netanyahu as prime minister with Barak held over at defense occasioned a spate of declarations which worried the new administration: Netanyahu declared at his swearing-in last Tuesday that if American sanctions and diplomacy fail, Israel will be forced to take action against Iran’ s nuclear weapon drive and time wa
s running out.
His words were echoed by Barak.
Obama therefore decided to revive the Ashkenazi track, while he was still abroad at the G20 in London and the NATO summit at Strasbourg, and before visiting Istanbul next week. He feared that Israel might upset his broad strategic applecart which hinges on the co-option of Iran as its primary hinge.
Ashkenazi was therefore invited to Strasbourg to carry some more bad news to his government, i.e. that the Obama administration wants Iran as its key military and intelligence partner for resolving America’s Afghanistan-Pakistan (known now as “Afgpak”) predicament. The shape of this alliance lacks final form; backdoor US-Iranian meetings at various levels are in progress at different venues to determine how far Tehran is willing to go. But the US president has set his course.
The high points of the proposed collaboration were first revealed exclusively by DEBKA-Weekly 390 of March 27 and
391 of April 3.
Its impact was sensed at the NATO summit in Strasbourg.
Aside from UK premier Gordon Brown, NATO leaders by and large refused the US president’s appeal for more troops to fight in Afghanistan.
German chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy told Obama there was no point in sending reinforcements to Afghanistan if US troops were on their way out, especially after Washington had opted for an “Iranian solution” for the conflict without reference to Berlin or Paris.
The Obama administration has a bitter pill for Israel to swallow for the sake of progress toward a strategic collaboration with Tehran on Afghanistan and Pakistan. It cuts close to the bone in terms of Israel’s security and international standing:
1. Washington will not brook any unilateral Israeli military action that might upset US-Iranian moves towards cooperation in the Afg-Pak Arena.
2. Washington will apply all its resources to obstruct such action.
3. It will not be enough for Israel to stand idle as Iran develops a nuclear bomb.
The Obama administration also has fish to fry with Taliban and is bent on an urgent breakthrough in Israel-Arab peacemaking for dividends relevant to this arena too. Israel can therefore expect to be squeezed hard for sweeping concessions to Syria, Lebanon and the Palestinians in order to enhance America’s hand on both these tracks.
4. This will bring Jerusalem’s Arab opponents to the negotiating table with loaded dice and no bar to treating Israel as the weak party.
The tidings Ashkenazi brings back to Jerusalem from Strasbourg will not be news because Israel officials have been aware of the state of play between Obama and Tehran for some weeks. The only question is how Adm. Mullen packaged his briefing: Did he offer the Israeli chief of staff the chance of military coordination with the United States alongside its evolving pact
with Iran? Or simply outline the new situation as a take-it or leave-it proposition?
When this development finally percolates through to the Israeli public, opposition leader Tzipi Livni will no doubt use the opportunity to lay it at the door of the Netanyahu-Lieberman administration as the price for backing away from the Annapolis version of a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict.
Livni’s efforts to discredit the new government will be internationally popular – but chronologically and factually untenable.
The new Obama strategy and its disastrous fallout for Israel took shape while she was still foreign minister and vice premier, for one; and, furthermore, a Palestinian state is clearly defined as the end product of the phased Middle East road map, which the Netanyahu government has formally embraced.
The Annapolis initiative never took off because the ensuing Livni-Olmert talks with Palestinian leaders led nowhere.
Begin Excerpt from Jerusalem Post
‘Israel doesn’t take orders from Obama,’ minister Erdan says
April 6, 2009
elie leshem , THE JERUSALEM POST
“Israel does not take orders from [US President Barack] Obama,” Environmental Protection Minister Gilad Erdan (Likud) said on Monday, responding to the US president’s earlier reaffirmation of his administration’s commitment to all previous understandings between Israel and the Palestinians, including the process launched at Annapolis in 2007.
Erdan, who is in charge of coordinating between the Knesset and the cabinet, also praised Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who only last week said that Israel was not bound by the Annapolis talks.
“In voting for [Prime Minister Binyamin] Netanyahu the citizens of Israel have decided that they will not become the fifty first US state,” said Erdan, who was representing the coalition in a Knesset deliberation of Lieberman’s controversial statements. He added, however, that “Obama is a friend of Israel and the United States is an important ally, and everything between us will be decided through communication.”
Begin Excerpt from DEBKAfile Exclusive Report
Hamas aborts Palestinian unity talks, empowered by US courtship of its Syrian sponsor
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report
April 6, 2009, 10:22 AM (GMT+02:00)
DEBKAfile’s Middle East sources disclose that Hamas has just deliberately driven the Egyptian-brokered Hamas-Fatah reconciliation talks into the ground. The radical group was freshly-empowered to raise the ante by the Obama administration’s active courtship of its Syrian sponsor, without president Bashar Assad giving an inch on his strategic alliance with Tehran. The breakdown of the Palestinian power-sharing talks in Cairo has effectively dashed hopes of securing
the release of Gilead Shalit, the Israeli soldier held by Hamas for nearly three years.
Sunday, April 5, the Hamas delegates to the talks suddenly demanded that Egyptian politicians be attached to the group of intelligence officials chairing the talks, knowing full well that Hosni Mubarak would never agree and an impasse was unavoidable.
The Hamas delegation had swung round to deferring to its pro-Iranian hard-line political chief Khaled Meshaal, who had been restored to the Syrian ruler’s favor. The pro-Egyptian faction, Mussa Abu Marzuk and Mahmoud A-Zahar, correspondingly lost the ground they gained during the months of Meshaal’s absence from the scene.
The Syrians fostered the impression that they had muzzled him to help the Palestinian reconciliation talks go forward in Cairo. But DEBKAfile sources reveal this was a bluff.
Assad had secretly employed Meshaal on his own business to break up the Brussels-based National Deliverance Front, the pro-Western opposition group fighting the Damascus regime.
Meshaal succeeded in drawing the Front’s sting. Over the weekend, the Muslim Brotherhood (Hamas’ parent body and a key member of the Front) was persuaded to call off its resistance operations at home and abroad.
Hamas’ Damascus leader thus shot up as player on the regional Arab and international Muslim scenes, a feather in the cap for his backers in Tehran and their drive for regional expansion. Hence the hardened Hamas line in the Cairo unity talks which Tehran has opposed from the start.
In Damascus, the Syria ruler meanwhile extends one hand to welcome the long procession of American visitors calling on him, while with the other he quietly nurtures he radical Hamas, in conjunction with Tehran.
Sunday, April 5, the day Hamas sabotaged the Palestinian unity track in Cairo, US Democratic congressmen Stephen Lynch and Bob Inglis were on his doorstep. After discussing the situation in Iraq, Gaza and Middle East peacemaking with Assad, the congressmen produced this optimistic statement: “With genuine effort on all sides, were are hopeful that we can work constructively toward our mutual goals.”
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.