Obama’s CHARM WON’T WORK ON Islam-Russia-China!
Obama’s CHARM Offensive WORKED WELL ON Americans,
Because we have religious freedom in a world OF Darkness!
It Won’t Work on Islamic Faith because it’s a Darkness Doctrine,
Mullahs are wiser than the children of light in the way of the Flesh!
We are dealing with men who believe charm is true sign of Weakness,
They are filled with Satan’s spiritual darkness and truly believe It’s Light,
In this Age of the Gentiles Mullahs believe Islamic MIGHT is the ONLY Right!
Obama’s charm will be instrumental in leading to A TRUCE FOLLOWED by War,
Which Seems Most Likely to Begin at Some Point in Time between 2010 & 2015!
March 6, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
The two excerpts which follow give a most accurate description of what America is now facing in ever growing threats from our international enemies. And to lead us against this array of spiritual darkness in high places, we have elected a first term senator as president to lead us to victory militarily on the world stage as he spends our financial reserves to make us prosperous.
Speeches, smiles, charm, and crooked politicians will bring Armageddon. From a prophetic prospective I think it is most exciting, and I look forward to prophetic fulfillment that will reveal just how close we are to a full blown Middle East War.
Mullahs, as children of this world, do not have their eye fixed singly on Christ and, as such, they are filled with the darkness of the evil one, seeing evil as good, and good as evil through evil eyes. They are wise in the ways of the world, but not in the way of Jesus. Obama is dealing with men and women who love darkness rather than light. Because they hate the light they hate us, because their deeds are evil. I assure you this will not change until the Second Advent of Christ.
Ephesians 6:12 – For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Luke 16:8 – And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.
Matthew 6:22,23 – The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light. [23] But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!
John 3:18-21 – He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. [19] And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. [20] For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. [21] But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
The following excerpts are quite descriptive of what America faces lead by a first term Senator President preaching “change” – Nothing is going to change man’s character until the Second Advent.
Begin Excerpt 1 from The Australian
Mullahs can’t be charmed
Iran and Syria are snubbing Obama’s overtures,
Observes Jonathan Spyer
March 04, 2009
Article from: The Australian
BARACK Obama, in his recent speech to Congress, coined a phrase that handily sums up the essence of his administration’s emerging approach to the Middle East region: “In words and deeds,” the President said, “we are showing the world that a new era of engagement has begun.”
This latest declaration joins Obama’s earlier statement that “if countries like Iran are willing to unclench their fist, they will find an extended hand from us”.
The new policy is one of outreach to enemies. Among other things, it involves reduced pressure and attempts at dialogue with Iran, as well as what looks like an extended courtship of the Assad regime in Syria.
In words and deeds, the response of these countries to the Obama approach is also becoming apparent.
In February, Iran carried out two high-profile acts indicating that its drive to achieve a nuclear weapons capability has — so far at least — failed to be swayed by the new era.
On February 2, Tehran announced that it had successfully launched
its first satellite into orbit. The launch was testimony to the advances made by Tehran’s long-range ballistic missile program.
It was also testimony to the importance the Iranian regime attaches to acts of open defiance and demonstrations of strength.
On February 25, Iran revealed that it is to begin a test run of its Russian-built light water reactor at Bushehr.
The plant, which began construction in 1998, is due to begin functioning in the first half of this year.
Russia has resisted international calls to suspend involvement. The test run, which coincides with a visit to Tehran of the head of Russia’s state atomic energy corporation, represents an additional message from the Iranians regarding their position on the relative importance of extended hands and clenched fists.
Below the radar screen, there is concern at the increasing opacity of the Iranian nuclear program. The Iranians have chosen a unique interpretation of their obligations vis-a-vis the International Atomic Energy Agency and its investigations. More and more, Iran simply declines to provide information. The result is that there are now real fears that a secret uranium enrichment site in addition to the site at Natanz may have been constructed. Regarding the not-yet-operating heavy water plant at Arak, again, Iran is simply refusing to answer questions. The Iranians’ impunity derives from a probably correct reading of the present international atmosphere.
The courting of Syria, meanwhile, is showing no signs of being knocked off track by the latest revelations from the IAEA regarding just what it was that the Israeli air force bombed at al-Kibar in September 2007. A recent report from the agency dismissed Syrian attempts to claim that traces of uranium found at the site were residue left by Israeli munitions.
Inspectors have complained that Syria is denying access to parts of the site and has failed to provide requested documentation concerning the site’s use.
Syrian spokesmen have explained the reluctance to grant access as deriving from fears that Israel may try to use information provided to gain knowledge of Syrian military installations. As if on cue, and in the latest evidence of the Syrian regime’s feline sense of humour, a missile facility has now appeared at the site bombed in 2007. The facility, apart from defending Syrian skies from its enemies, will no doubt serve an additional function as a reason why the site cannot be made open to inspectors from the IAEA.
Despite all this, the charm offensive is continuing. In addition to three high-profile congressional delegations to Damascus, a series of quieter gestures are signalling to the Syrians that the sanctions regime put in place by the previous US administration may discreetly be wound down.
The US Treasury Department last week permitted $US500,000 ($780,000) to be transferred to a Syrian charity. The Department of Commerce approved the supplying of spare parts to Syria’s superannuated Boeing 747 aircraft, and so on.
Thus far deeds. In terms of words, the picture does not differ greatly. The Syrians were reputedly angered by a suggestion from congressman Benjamin Cardin during the visit of the first congressional delegation that Damascus might share some responsibility for its international isolation because of its “partnership of terrorism”. An editorial in the al-Watan newspaper described such remarks as “far from the Arab, international and American reality”.
The newspaper succinctly summarised Syria’s position as follows: “The Syrians are looking forward to a change in American policy, not to a change in Syrian policy.”
Iranian spokesmen have struck a similar tone. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Hassan Qashqavi responded to Obama’s earlier declaration by contending that Iran had “never clenched its fists”. Rather, it was the Bush administration that had shown its “clenched fist to Mid-East nations”.
The new era of engagement thus appears so far to be providing the Iranians with valuable leeway for the pursuit of their nuclear ambitions, and the Syrians with similar space to avoid being brought to account for their own, apparently now discontinued program. In addition, the new era is giving the spokesmen of both dictatorships plenty of opportunity for engaging in the scolding and proclamations of moral superiority of which they are fond.
It is unlikely that this is what the new US President had in mind. It is therefore probable that the new era will be an unusually short one.
Jonathan Spyer is a senior research fellow at the Global Research in International Affairs Centre.
Begin Excerpt 2 from Wall Street Journal
Obama’s Iran Crisis
It’ s arriving fa
ster than he thinks.
March 4, 2009
As a Presidential candidate, Barack Obama called a nuclear Iran “a grave threat” and said “the world must prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.” But he also called for direct, high-level talks in the hopes that the mullahs could be persuaded to abandon their nuclear dreams.
We’ve never held out much hope for those talks, which would inevitably be complicated and protracted. Mr. Obama is already trying to lure Russian help on Iran by offering to trade away hard-earned missile defense sites in Eastern Europe. Russia’s President claims to be unimpressed. And now it turns out that the rate at which Iran’s nuclear programs are advancing may render even negotiations moot.
That’s a fair conclusion from the latest report by the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency. Among other disclosures, the IAEA found that Iran has produced more than 1,000 kilograms of low enriched uranium (LEU), enough for a single bomb’ s worth of uranium after further enrichment.
The IAEA also found that Iran had underreported its stock of LEU by about 200 kilograms, which took the agency by surprise partly because it only checks Iran’s stockpile once a year. This is the basis for Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Michael Mullen’s weekend acknowledgment that the U.S. believes Iran has enough fissile material to make a bomb.
Iran now possesses 5,600 centrifuges in which it can enrich uranium — a 34-fold increase from 2006 — and plans to add 45,000 more over five years. That will give Tehran an ability to make atomic bombs on an industrial scale. Iran has also announced that it plans to begin operating its Russian-built reactor at Bushehr sometime this spring. That reactor’s purposes are ostensibly civilian, but it will eventually produce large quantities of spent fuel that can covertly be processed into weapons-usable plutonium.
That’s not all.
The IAEA says its inspectors have been denied access to a heavy water reactor in Arak, and that Iran has put a roof over the site “rendering impossible the continued use of satellite imagery to monitor further construction inside the reactor building.” Most proliferation experts agree that the Arak reactor, scheduled for completion in 2011, can have no purpose other than to produce weapons-grade plutonium.
True to form, Iran continues to deny the IAEA access to other parts of its nuclear programs, including R&D facilities and uranium mines. “Regrettably,” says the report, “as a result of the continued lack of cooperation by Iran in connection with the remaining issues which give rise to concerns about possible military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear programme, the Agency has not made any substantive progress on these issues.”
The report contains much more of this. It is the latest in a long line of reports that should have sounded alarms but instead have accustomed the world to conclude that a nuclear Iran is something we’ll just have to live with. Well, not the entire world: Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned last week that “time is slipping through our fingers” when it comes to stopping Tehran.
“What is needed,” he added, “is a two-pronged course of action which includes ironclad, strenuous sanctions . . . and a readiness to consider options in the event that these sanctions do not succeed.”
Nobody — Mr. Obama least of all — can doubt what Mr. Barak means by “options.” Nor should the Administration doubt that an Israeli strike, however necessary and justified, could put the U.S. in the middle of a broader Middle East war.
If Mr. Obama wants to avoid a security crisis in the first year of his watch, he will have to get serious about Iran now.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.