Jordan WILL SWING to Syria-Hamas Axis,
When Ten Islamic Jihad toes attack Israel,
And The Antichrist WILL BY-PASS All Jordan,
Moab, Ammon, And Esau OFFSPRING Escape,
But Israel to Jordan CERTAINLY will NOT Race!
Idea of Israeli escape to Petra is OUT OF Place,
A WOMAN going TO Negev Wilderness WE Face,
I’ve WARNED for 34 years that will be THE Case!
January 21, 2009
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Revelation 12:6 – And the woman fled into the wilderness, w here she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed
her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
Daniel 11:41 – He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon.
The initial attack into the glorious land of Israel will be from the north, from Syria and Lebanon, and the first of many countries that will fall before the antichrist will be Israel. There will be a lightning surprise Jihad blitzkrieg launched by Lebanon, Syria, Iran, and Iraq, with logistical support from Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Libya, Turkey, and Sudan, as well as a direct internal attack by the Palestinians inside Israel.
These are the ten toes of a Daniel 2 great statue, the ten horns of his fourth beast, and the ten horns on both of John’s beasts.
Daniel 2:42 – And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.
Daniel 7:7 – After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns.
Revelation 13:1 – And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
Revelation 17:3 – So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
Daniel 11:41 – He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon.
Many of the countries of Daniel’s day were named for their first descendants as they related to Abraham. Edom was associated with the descendants of his grandson Esau, with Ammon and Moab being associated with the two sons of his nephew Lot. In Daniel’s day these three countries were to the immediate east, northeast, and southeast of Israel. If you will check all maps from B.C. 500 to 700, you will discover that all three of these countries would be entirely engulfed by modern day Jordan. So why would Jordan escape Antichrist’s wrath?
First of all, its geographical position would have no military, political, or financial value to him, and the occupants of Jordan will certainly not attack him, so he will bypass Jordan on his way to conquer the Suez Canal, which will have all three of these values abundantly. Jordan will not be a part of the initial Jihad, but after Israel is driven into the Negev it will be 100% in the antichrist’s camp. Because Egypt and Jordan made peace with Israel they are out of favor with Syria, Iran, and the radical Islamic Jihad proponents across the Middle East.
Secondly, it is well known that a huge bulk of the Palestinians fled into Jordan in the 1967 War, and they hate Israel with a passion. A growing shift in public sentiment in Jordan is causing the terrorist factions to gain the upper hand. So when Israel is attacked, the Jordanians themselves will not attack Israel, but the terrorist groups in Jordan will, such that the Antichrist will by-pass Jordan.
Quite frankly, the idea that Israel will flee to Petra in Jordan for 1260 days of safety has always been in the category of ridiculous. But like all prophetic interpretations, time will tell!
Another reason Israel would not flee to Petra is brought to light by Zechariah 13:8.
Zechariah 13:8 – And it shall come to pass, that in all the land, saith the Lord, two parts therein shall be cut off and die; but the third shall be left therein.
In the first century the Petra area only received about six inches of rain per year. And this, along with springs in the area, could not support a population of 20,000 in and around the city.
But the Nabataeans developed a sophisticated system of public waterworks fed by three large springs several miles from Petra. Petra’s aqueduct system carried about 12 million gallons of fresh spring water per day, which would be enough to sustain a modern day American population of more than 100,000. The system was destroyed by a major earthquake in the Jordan Valley Rift, but even if it existed today, there is no way it could meet the needs of two million Israelis, which would require 240 million gallons of fresh spring water per day.
Because Saudi Arabia plays footsies with the United States, it also falls into the non-favored category. The Arab world simply doesn’t trust Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia enough to include them in the secret planning that will go into the Jihad, and they will be as surprised as Israel when it is launched. Jordan and Saudi Arabia will support the antichrist after he conquers Egypt, and will to do so for the remainder of the tribulation period
Once the Antichrist begins his attack against Israel, the rulers of Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia will be toast if they can’t flee their countries in time.
Daniel 11:42 – He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape.
Begin Excerpt from Haaretz
ANALYSIS / Jordan’s king is torn between U.S.-Egypt and Syria-Hamas axes
By Zvi Bar’el
January 21, 2009
“I swear in the name of Allah that I will not use that American merchandise, I will not bring it into the house and I will not permit the members of my family to use it.”
That was the vow made in recent weeks by members of Jordan’s committee against normalization with Israel. The burning of U.S.-made goods, a call for a boycott on companies that cooperate with Israel, and even a demand to sever Jordan’s diplomatic relations with Israel are nothing new, but the burning of the Israeli flag by Jordanian MPs inside the parliament building – that has never happened before.
Even the demonstrations that flooded the streets of the capital Amman, and particularly the confrontation between thousands of demonstrators and the security forces in the Al-Rabia neighborhood are things Jordan has not seen for many years.
If we add to that the fact that Jordan has not yet allowed its ambassador to return to Tel Aviv and remember that the relationship between the Israeli embassy and Jordanian government institutions has been unofficially frozen, can we conclude that Jordan has changed direction
?
In the past year Jordan has held contacts with Hamas representatives, mainly via its chief of intelligence, Gen. Mohammad Al Dhabi, the prime minister’s brother. At the same time, relations between Jordan and the Palestinian Authority have been damaged.
Jordanian commentators explained that King Abdullah suspected that a “conspiracy” was being hatched between the former chief of the Royal Hashemite Court, Bassem Awadallah, and Saeb Erekat, the Palestinian representative in the peace talks with Israel. The purpose of this suspected conspiracy was to turn Jordan into the Palestinians’ alternative homeland.
Some people claim that even a document was written on the subject. A person close to the royal court told Haaretz that these accusations are “nonsense that is being cooked up by those who want to harm Jordan.”
Nonsense or not, the king fired the head of his court and did not reject the meetings with Hamas members. That was supposed to be a clear message to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) and his people: Although they are distancing Jordan from the diplomatic negotiations, the kingdom knows very well how to conduct the political game inside Palestine.
And now, about three months after Awadallah’s dismissal, the king has dismissed
the man who laid the infrastructure for the renewed relationship with Hamas. Al Dhabi has been replaced by Mohammad Rakkad. Has the king now changed his mind and does he want to send Hamas a message that it does not have a Jordanian guarantee either?
The answer is complex and not based only on the Jordan-Hamas or Jordan-PA axes. One of the explanations is that the king wanted to create a “balance” in his court between Awadallah, considered the representative of Jordanian citizens of Palestinian origin, and Al Dhabi, considered the representative of Jordanians of Jordanian origin. Both were very close to the king, but when one “representative” is dismissed, the other should go as well.
But that is only part of the answer to the question of why Al Dhabi was dismissed. In the past year he was responsible for the warming of relations between Jordan and Syria, which became close to Qatar after the Qatari ruler’s role in solving the crisis in Lebanon. Al Dhabi believed that the time had come for Jordan and Qatar to improve relations after almost a decade of tension.
The paradox is that Jordan’s anger at Qatar was aroused in 1999, when
Qatar agreed to serve as a refuge for the Hamas leaders expelled from Jordan.
Now, however, it is Jordan that is pursuing contacts with Hamas. In 2006, Qatar voted for Ban Ki-moon as United Nations secretary general over the Jordanian candidate.
However, last November, a Jordanian delegation headed by the prime minister went to Qatar and signed an agreement on economic cooperation. The anger dissipated and Jordan believed that it had stabilized its relations with its neighbors. Relations with Egypt are close, those with Syria are warming up, and now Qatar has joined the circle of friendship.
And then came the war in Gaza and Jordan once again faces a problem.
Should it back Abbas’ PA? Should it harshly criticize Hamas, as did Egypt and Saudi Arabia, or should it condemn Israel
and back the Hamas leadership? In other words, should it follow the Syrian-Qatari-Turkish route, or the Egyptian-Saudi one, alongside Israel and the Un
ited States?
Jordan twisted uncomfortably. The climax came before the Arab summit conference convened by the ruler of Qatar. Tremendous pressure was put on Jordan and the PA. The prime minister of Qatar said, for example, that Abbas had told him that if he appeared at the Doha conference “his throat would be slit from ear to ear.” The Jordanian king also hesitated. He explained to the ruler of Qatar that “at this time he cannot appear at a conference that is seen as supporting Hamas, especially when Abu Mazen is not participating in it.”
But the real explanation apparently lies in
the heavy American pressure on the king. According to Jordanian sources, the king was ordered to decide whether he belongs to the “moderate” or “extremist” axis. The king opted for Sharm al-Sheikh over Doha, and the tension was apparent on his face at the Egyptian summit.
The Jordanian newspapers came out with a series of explanations and excuses for the king’s decision, but the end result remains: Syria and Qatar are angry at the king, while Washington and Cairo are pleased. And Israel? The sight of the burned flag still stings, but the removal of the chief of Jordanian intelligence, who wanted to renew the connection between Jordan and Hamas, is soothing to some extent.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included in formation
for research and educational purposes.
For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.