19 Days of Fighting To Stop The Hamas
From sending rockets into Israeli Masses,
Including some of schoolchildren’s Classes,
Is IDF goal to end rockets shot by Jackasses,
Plus ending along the fence future PA Clashes,
So IDF The Hamas Infrastructure Now Smashes,
To hasten a prophesied period of Peace & Safety,
But it Will End When the Antichrist Becomes Hasty,
Then 1260 Days Thereafter Christ’ s Victory i
s Tasty!
January 15, 200
9
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Begin Excerpt 1 from Haaretz
ANALYSIS / Egypt’s Gaza truce plan is mostly bad for Hamas
By Amos Harel and Avi Issacharoff, Haaretz Correspondents
January 15, 2009
After 19 days of fighting and more than 1,000 Palestinian fatalities, the first significant signs that Hamas is breaking could be seen Wednesday night.
Hamas representatives to talks with Egypt announced an agreement in principle on Wednesday to the Egyptian cease-fire proposal. They also demanded several clarifications, primarily from Israel.
The war in Gaza isn’t over yet. The final days of the Second Lebanon War show that it’s best to be wary of agreements that come too early. But the way things looked on Wednesday, Hamas seems to be willing to accept the Egyptian initiative, which is almost a kind of surrender agreement for it.
The Egyptian proposal is mostly bad for Hamas. It doesn’t let the organization bring the Palestinian public any political achievement that would justify the blood that has been spilled, and even forces on it the return of the Palestinian Authority to Gaza, in the form of its renewed presence at the Rafah crossing (as a condition for its reopening).
Once the cease-fire is reached, the IDF will withdraw from the positions it captured in Gaza, and only then will the two sides begin to discuss the opening of border crossings and removal of the blockade, which was the reason Hamas gave for waging war. The most that Cairo is offering is a timetable for the opening of the crossing points, and even that depends on negotiations due to begin after the cease-fire is reached, and it’s tough to know how or when they will end.
Hamas representatives did say on Wednesday night they had not yet accepted the Egyptian proposal, but in the same breath they said it was the only proposal on the table. In other words, they have to accept it if they want to maintain their rule in Gaza. It was no coincidence that two representatives of the Hamas leadership in Gaza who traveled to the Cairo talks are the ones who held the official press conference, while the Hamas political leadership was already on their way home to Damascus.
When concessions are necessary, Hamas prefers to show the public the face of their true representatives rather than the ones living elsewhere, who are not living in Gaza during the Israeli offensive.
The tremendous destruction Israel caused in Gaza significantly increases the level of hatred directed at Israel, but Gazans are also angry at Hamas leaders for dragging the Strip into an unnecessary and poorly considered war. Hamas is already working on its narrative. There’s no doubt that when the war does end, it will claim victory. But the destruction in Gaza, which looks like the victim of a massive earthquake, will tell a different story. Perhaps that is why Hamas wanted to make it clear yesterday that it wants to make certain Gaza will be rebuilt and its residents will be compensated for suffering and property damage.
The Hamas statement came as Israeli defense officials were gradually reaching similar conclusions regarding the need for a quick cease-fire.
Defense Ministry and top generals have expressed reservations about expanding the ground incursion in Gaza and support bringing the war to a quick end. Some say Israel has already done all it could with all possible goals of the Gaza operation and has proven that it is no longer deterred by a serious conflict with Hamas or by sending in ground forces and reservists.
Several said it would be best to end the operation now, when Israeli deterrence has improved – and before U.S. President George W. Bush makes way for his successor, Barack Obama, on January 20. And some of the participants in Israeli discussions about the issue have expressed support for a quick withdrawal under a cease-fire declaration, even before an agreement is reached on weapons-smuggling.
The Israel Defense Force’s Southern Command is in the minority, interested as it is in deepening the operation – but conditioning this on putting a cap of several months on the time limit for soldiers in the field and Shin Bet security service agents.
Some in the IDF think the army succeeded in reaching its military goal, and that now the rest depends on the diplomats. This morning Defense Ministry official Amos Gilad goes to Cairo, and he is eagerly expected back this evening to report on where things stand.
Alongside the degree of optimism, one must remember that having thousands of soldiers in hostile territory is a recipe for continued friction, and maybe some mishaps.
The IDF has always had a problem with maintaining operational discipline over a long period, especially when reserve forces are involved. On Wednesday, with the active assistance of bloggers, false rumors were spread saying that Gilad Shalit had been rescued from captivity. That didn’t happen, but if noth ing goes wrong with the plans
in the next few days, Israel has a decent chance of ending this conflict while maintaining the upper hand.
Begin Excerpt 2 from YNet News
Israeli official: Keeping all options open
Senior diplomatic official tells Ynet that if Egyptian truce proposal fails to meet Israeli objectives, other options remain open, hinting military op could expand.
Decision of whether to accept ceasefire plan or deepen offensive to be made by Friday, he adds
Roni Sofer
Israel will give the Egyptian-brokered negotiations on a Gaza ceasefire a chance, but is keeping other options open as well, a senior Jerusalem official told Ynet Wednesday night, hinting that the military operation in the Strip could still expand further.
“The military move in Gaza continues in full strength with strikes from the air, sea and ground, in a bid to further wear out Hamas,” he explained. “The decision on whether to declare a truce or expand the operation in Gaza will likely be made by Friday,” he added.
Defense Ministry representative Amos Gilad will depart for Cairo Thursday o discuss the Egyptian ceasefire proposal and Hamas’ stance as it was conveyed to the Egyptians.
Gilad will seek to establish whether the initiative meets Israel’s demands, namely a halt to the rocket fire and terror emanating from Gaza and a stop to Hamas’ military buildup. Gilad will also try to find out whether Egypt is willing to incorporate technologies that will be provided by the US and Germany to curb the smuggling of weapons into Gaza.
Shalit’s release a possible bonus
Meanwhile, Israel is also operating in another channel and has sent Foreign Ministry Director-general Aharon Abramovitch to Washington to determine what guarantees can be provided by the US, NATO, Germany, the Netherlands, Turkey and other elements against the transfer of arms from Iran and Hizbullah to Hamas.
The issue of Gilad Shalit’s release has not been defined by the cabinet as one of the objectives of the Gaza operation, and is considered a possible “bonus” in any truce agreement.
Following Gilad and Abramovitch’s return, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and Defense Minister
Ehud Barak will meet with the heads of the defense establishment to decide on whether to advance towards a ceasefire or carry on
with the offensive.
A senior diplomatic official stressed Wednesday that the government would continue to operate on both the diplomatic and military channels, until either one can realize the goals of the operation.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to advance underst anding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.