Nothing will stop the fulfillment of Zechariah,
But if Israel gives back the West Bank and Golon
Heights to Syria
and the Palestinians, She is Signing
Away the lives of some four million Jews in the last War
Of the Age of the Gentiles, As a contributor to a Holocaust!
November 9, 2008
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
There is no question in my mind as to the valid ity
of the conclusions advanced in the summary of the presentation by Giora Eiland at the Tel Aviv Workshop for Science Technology and Security. To give up these two tracks of land given to Israel by God, would go down as one of the great military blunders in history.
Zechariah 13:8 – And it shall come to pass, that in all the land, saith the Lord, two parts therein shall be cut off and die; but the third shall be left therein.
Revelation 12:6 – And the woman (Israel) fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
Begin Excerpt from Independent Media Review Anaysis (IMRA)
Giora Eiland explains why Israel can’t leave the Golan and must control West Bank
Dr.
Aaron Lerner
Date: 8 November 2008
The following is IMRA’s translation of an excerpt of a summary of a
presentation by Giora Eiland, former head of the National Security Council at the 4 November 2008 session on military superiority at the Tel Aviv Workshop for Science Technology and Security.
The summary was prepared by Uri Reychav, former Chief Systems Engineer at Rafael.
Syria: There is a debate over the continuation of negotiations with Syria.
A more important topic is if there is a regurgitation of past understandings or if the conditions have changed. Let us consider the military concept and
the security arrangements that evolve from them.
There were negotiations with Syria with maps and numbers and arrangements. We said then, that if we leave the Golan there must be other arrangements that will insure our security. Namely, the ability to defend ourselves in the case of attack.
Can we defend ourselves without the Golan
? The answer was – no. Thus the agreement had to cerate a situation in which in the case of war we would be able to grab the Golan.
It was thought then that such a situation would be if:
A. The Golan is demilitarized.
B. The Syrian divisions are beyond Damascus
C. Our forces are in the Hulah Valley
Today we see two problems with these conditions:
1) Such an arrangement is based on five assumptions:
A. The arrangement will be honored and not collapse.
B. When they Syrians move we will correctly interpret their intentions. This is also not certain. They can build cities and villages next to the new border and riots could break out along with a substantial military movement.
C. The Government of Israel would quickly call up the army.
D. The timetable is correct and we aren’t making a mistake
E. That there is a decision by the Government of Israel that this is war and it acts.
2) The assumption is that the threat
is a Syrian division. But maybe the threat is irregular forces, as is the case in Lebanon? That something like Hezbollah sets itself up in cities and villages on the Jordan? And that deep in their heartland they have advance missiles? And that the equipment they have is advanced – even more advanced than ours?
Thus, the concept nine years ago was in error.
If we carry out negotiations with Syria now based on the old records – the question remains: can we defend ourselves without the Golan?
Palestinians: The concept during the Clinton era was that the military threat from the east – Jordan and its partners, is from armored forces and the terror threat was seen in terms of terrorist penetrations. The solution was to retain intelligence warning stations in the field against the tanks and a security fence against terror.
But today other threats also exist. The Palestinians can arm themselves with rockets and missiles and it is impossible to verify that they are demilitarized. In the scenario of general war it would be impossible to use the main north south toll road – Route 6.
Therefore, because of Hezbollah it is impossible to return to the ’67 lines. It might be enough against a conventional army, maybe there is a solution for handling an individual suicide bomber, but the overall threat “requires more control of the territory”.
Dr. Aaron Lerner, Director IMRA (Independent Media Review & Analysis)
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site.
However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.