The Nation Of Israel Is About To Commit
Spiritual Fornication With A Profane Action!
Israel is now Creeping to “Peace and Safety”
By Bargaining Away A Home God Gave To Her!
Israel now duplicating Esau’s inheritance Distain
When he cared less for it than a pot of Jacob Stew!
Any “Peace and Safety” they obtain will be Temporary,
And certainly not worth the time of travail that follows It!
God gave the land to Israel as his wife for a home to live In,
But she has lost it repeatedly for acts of spiritual Fornication!
Now she profanes the home God gave her by giving it to Islam,
But God Himself Marries Her to His Land Grant After A Tribulation,
And then the meaning of the song “Beulah Land” will be a Reality!
October 20, 2008
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Hebrews 12:16,17 – Lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright. [17] For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for he found no place of repentance, though he sought it carefully with tears.
I Thessalonians 5:3,4 – For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. [4] But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief.
Zechariah 13:9 – And I will bring the third part through the fire, and will refine them as silver is refined, and will try them as gold is tried: they shall call on my name, and I will hear them: I will say, It is my people: and they shall say, The Lord is my God.
Isaiah 62:1-5 – For Zion’s sake will I not hold my peace, and for Jerusalem’s sake I will not rest, until the righteousness thereof go forth as brightness, and the salvation thereof as a lamp that burneth. [2] And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name.
[3] Thou shalt also be a crown of glory in the hand of
the Lord, and a royal diadem in the hand of thy God. [4] Thou shalt no more be termed Forsaken; neither shall thy land any more be termed Desolate: but thou shalt be called Hephzi-bah, and thy land Beulah: for the Lord delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married. [5] For as a young man marrieth a virgin, so shall thy sons marry thee: and as the bridegroom rejoiceth over the bride, so shall thy God rejoice over thee.
Beulah means “married”
Begin Excerpt from The Daily Star via World News
Time to prepare for an Israeli about-face on comprehensive peace
By The Daily Star
Monday, October 20, 2008
It has been more than six years since the Arab League unanimously endorsed a historic peace initiative aimed at ending the decades-old conflict with Israel, but it seems that the leaders of the Jewish state are only beginning to understand the significance of the offer. On Sunday, Defense Minister Ehud Barak said that Israeli leaders are now seriously considering a response to the initiative that would allow for the negotiation of a comprehensive Middle East peace settlement. In an interview with Israel’s Army Radio, Barak also emphasized that he was in full agreement with President Shimon Peres, as well as Prime Minister-designate Tzipi Livni, who is working to form a new coalition government. This alignment of Arab and Israeli leaders marks an unprecedented opportunity for Middle East peacemaking that should be immediately seized upon by Arab leaders, as well as the next president of the United States.
For their part, Arab leaders need to prepare themselves for what seems to be an impending Israeli about-face on the Saudi-penned peace initiative. Barak hinted that the Israelis are likely to use the Arab initiative as a starting point to put forth a comprehensive peace proposal of their own. Leaders in the Arab world need to be ready to respond to such a proposal and they can begin to do that by outlining detailed proposals.
The next US president will need to be ready on his first day in office to shepherd the Middle East peace process. Too many American leaders have put peace on the back burner, and those who did make peacemaking a priority did so well into their second terms in office. The costs of doing so have been enormous, not only in terms of the senseless loss of lives on both sides of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Israeli wars, along with the oppression and/or dispossession of millions of Palestinians, have fanned the flames of extremism across the region and have severely damaged America’s credibility in the Middle East. Moreover, the failure to act on an opportunity to cement Israel’s place among the nations of the region is a dangerous wager that has put the entire future of the Jewish state at risk. Time is not on the side of Israel: Talks as a means of ending the occupation are losing credibility, especially among younger Palestinians and Arabs, and this trend will only accelerate in the absence of any real progress.
The next US president will need to convince a good many Americans and Israelis alike that things need to change.
Begin Excerpt from Associated Press via The Jerusalem Post
Barak: Israel mulling Saudi peace plan
October 19, 2008
Associated Press , THE JERUSALEM POST
Israeli leaders are giving serious consideration to a dormant Saudi plan offering a comprehensive peace between Israel and the Arab world, Defense Minister Ehud Barak said Sunday.
Barak said that with individual negotiations with Syria and the Palestinians making little headway, it may be time to pursue an overall peace deal for the region. He said he had discussed the Saudi plan with Prime Minister-designate Tzipi Livni and that Israel was considering a response.
Saudi Arabia first proposed its peace initiative in 2002, offering pan-Arab recognition of Israel in exchange for Israel’s withdrawal from lands captured in 1967 – the West Bank, Gaza Strip, east Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. The 22-member Arab League endorsed the plan last year.
Israel has said the plan is a good basis for discussion, but has also expressed some reservations.
“Therefore, there is definitely room to introduce a comprehensive Israeli plan to counter the Saudi plan that would be the basis for a discussion on overall regional peace,” Barak told Army Radio.
He noted the “deep, joint interest” with moderate Arab leaders in containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions and limiting the influence of Hizbullah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza.
While outgoing prime minister, Ehud Olmert, has welcomed the Saudi plan, he and other leaders want to keep small parts of the territories captured in 1967. Israel also objects to language in the Saudi plan that appears to endorse a large-scale return of Palestinian refugees to lands inside Israel. Israel says a massive influx of Palestinians would destroy the country’s Jewish character.
President Shimon Peres proposed merging Israel’s various peace talks into one track last month at the United Nations. In a speech to the General Assembly, he called on Saudi King Abdullah to “further his initiative.” He has since been pushing the idea in meeting with Israeli, Arab and Western officials, his office said.
While Peres has no formal role in Israeli foreign policy, he is a Nobel peace laureate and well respected in the international community.
In Sunday’s interview, Barak said he was in full agreement with Peres, and had discussed the peace plan with Livni as well.
“I had the impression that there is indeed an openness to explore any path, including this one,” he said of his talks with Livni.
Barak said Israel had to tread lightly, though, so as not to appear to be “coming from a position of patronage to the entire Arab world.”
“We are one of the players and it is proper that we introduce an initiative,” he said.
Livni’s office refused to comment on her talks with Barak.
Jpost.com contributed to this report.
Begin Excerpt from DEBKAfile Special Report
Barak urges kiss of life for moribund Saudi 2002 peace plan
DEBKAfile Special Report
October 19, 2008, 9:42 PM (GMT+02:00)
Defense minister Ehud Barak has proposed in coalition talks with Kadima leader, foreign minister Tzipi Livni, that serious consideration be given to the 2002 Saudi plan which offered pan-Arab recognition of Israel in exchange for full Israeli withdrawal from all lands captured during the 1967 war: the West Bank, Gaza, Jerusalem and the Golan.
“There is definitely room to introduce a comprehensive Israeli plan to counter the Saudi plan,” after individual negotiations with Syria and the Palestinians proved unproductive, said Barak, who heads the Labor party, to Israel Army radio Sunday.
Livni refuses to comment on her talks with Barak.
After failing to form a government in her first round of coalition talks, the Kadima leader must ask the president for another 14 days’ grace from Monday or face the prospect of a snap election.
The Labor leader said in his interview that “moderate Arab leaders” shared an interest in containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions, limiting Hizballah’s influence in Lebanon and bringing the Palestinian Hamas under control in the Gaza Strip. He also reproved the demonstrators protesting the government’s failure to secure the release of Gilead Shalit in two-and-a-half years, saying their protest only raised Hamas’ price for the captive soldier’s freedom.
These comments, DEBKAfile’s Middle East sources stress, show how completely the defense minister is out of touch with the emerging dynamic of the contemporary Middle East. The Saudi peace plan is a dead letter for the Arab world, overtaken by tempestuous change. Gone are the days when the Saudis and Egypt, the so-called moderate Arab nations, set the pace in the Middle East, although Israelis in power still cling to them as key trendsetters.
Today, the Saudis are fighting to dislodge Lebanon’s takeover by Iran and Syria and Shiite expansion through the Sunni Arab world.
Many observers view the Syrian troop concentrations poised on the Lebanese border, backed by Iran and Hizballah, against the Saudi-backed and armed Islamic militias led by Lebanese majority leader Saad Hariri in North Lebanon, as the first round in an epic Saudi-Iranian confrontation. Some observers see the coming of Lebanon War No.
2 two years after Israel failed to defeat the Hizballah in 2006. This one, pitting Sunni Muslims against Shiite powers, already dominates the region’s political and military dynamic, relegating the Saudi peace pl
an to an irrelevant past.
Much water has run under Middle East bridges since 2000 when Barak as prime minister engineered Israel’s pullout from its south Lebanese security zone, and 2005, when his successor Ariel Sharon ordered Israel’s unilateral disengagement from the Gaza Strip, making way for Hamas to move in.
This move was actively supported by Livni. Summer 2006 saw Ehud Olmert’s botched management of the Lebanon War followed by his failure to arrest Iran’ s progre
ss toward a nuclear bomb.
The forces dominating regional affairs today are no longer “moderates” but a radical coalition of Iran, Syria, Hizballah and the Palestinian Hamas and Jihad Islami. Their pre-eminence makes it pointless for the defense minister to try to administer the kiss of death to the Saudi peace plan as a strategic guideline for a potential government he may share with Tzipi Livni.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.