The Essence of Timing for a Jihad Attack
December 14, 2005
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Being a child of the atomic age it would have been easy for me to agree that the tribulation war would be a nuclear holocaust, and I can readily understand why many believe it will be the case.
But I am just as sure it will not be a nuclear conflict as they are it
will be one of atomic terror.
My reasons for believing this are found in Archive Prophecy Updates 187A and 129C. Once our troops are pulled out of Iraq the likelihood of the U.S. getting them back into the Middle East in time to help Israel is next to none because of he quickness of the Jihad attack, as well as the U.S. population being in no mood to send them back.
For some time I have made the statement I expected the Jihad attack against Israel could come as early as 2007, and was likely to occur prior to 2012. The following article from the Jerusalem Post indicates the Head of the Israel Defense Forces believes Iran could have a nuclear bomb as early as 2008, or as late as 2015.
My proofs behind my belief we will not see an international nuclear war are fully exposited in our Archive Prophecy Updates 187A and 129C. And there will not be a Jihad launched against Israel by the Arabs while a significant number of American troops are still in Iraq.
I do believe that the majority of our troops will have been pulled out by mid 2007.
BEGIN EXTRACTS FROM JERUSALEM POST ARTICLE
Halutz: Iran Could Have Bomb by 2008
By JPost.com Staff and AP, THE JERUSALEM POST
December 13, 2005
IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Dan Halutz said Tuesday that Iran was approaching the point where it would have the technological know-how to build nuclear weapons.
According to Halutz, it is possible that Iran would be able to complete building a bomb as early as 2008 or as far as 2015.
Halutz spoke at the Knesset’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee.
Meanwhile, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Tuesday reiterated his doubt about the Holocaust and called on Muslim nations to take a proactive stand on the Palestinian issue.
The president’ s comment
s, published Tuesday on Iranian state television’s Web site, were the second time in a week that he has expressed doubt about the Nazi destruction of European Jewry during the World War II. Ahmadinejad provoked an international outcry in October when he called Israel a “disgraceful blot” that should be “wiped off the map.”
“If the killing of Jews in Europe is true,” the Web site
quoted Ahmadinejad as saying, “and the Zionists are being supported because of this excuse, why should the Palestinian nation pay the price?”
The television did not broadcast Ahmadinejad’s comments, and the Web site offered no reason.
In Israel, Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said: “The real problem with the repeated statements of the Iranian president is that they correctly represent the mind-set of the Iranian leadership, and they accurately articulate the policies of that extremist regime.”
The president made the remarks Monday at an Islamic conference in Teheran that was attended by Khaled Mashaal, Hamas’s political leader.
Later Monday, Ahmadinejad discussed the Palestinian issue with Mashaal, the Web site reported.
“The Islamic world should give up its policy of passivity and deal with the Palestinian issue more actively,” Ahmadinejad said, according to the Web site.
He did not elaborate.
He said the West could not play a neutral role in
the Palestinian-Israeli issue.
“The West’s policy has always been in favor of the Zionist regime and to the detriment of the Islamic world. It can’t be a judge or mediator now,” Ahmadinejad said.
Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has ultimate say on all matters, has backed Ahmadinejad’s calls for Israel’s elimination.
END EXTRACTS FROM JERUSALEM POST ARTICLE