The Sinister Internal Intrigue of Control,
Practiced repeatedly in Syria and Lebanon,
By politically planned internal Assassinations,
Planned and programmed behind closed Doors,
At the highest level of Syrian and Iranian Offices,
Is All Part of a very Routine Jihad Scenario Culture!
What the world sees on the outside veils evil Inside!
August 5, 2008
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
Begin DEBKAfile Excerpt
Syrian sources confirm death of Assad confidential aide and his nuclear link
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report
August 4, 2008, 11:41 PM (GMT+02:00)
Damascus Sunday broke its silence about the mysterious assassination of Gen. Muhammad Suleiman in Tartus early Saturday, Aug.
2 and confirmed DEBKAfile’s disclosure that the general played an important role in administering the al Kibar plutonium reactor. Officials in Damascus leaked to Middle East media that Suleiman was a member of the Syrian Research Commission, the government body in charge of missile, chemical and biological weapons and nuclear development.
They said he had met the team of nuclear watchdog monitors, headed by Olli Heinonen, which visited Syria in late June to check out US and Israeli charges that Syria had been building a plutonium reactor at al Kibar.
Those sources also stressed his murder was unrelated to the 2005 assassination of Lebanese ex-prime minister Rafiq Hariri in Beirut, or any internal rivalries in the ruling regime in Damascus.
DEBKAfile reported earlier:
Gen. Muhammad Suleiman was a shadowy figure who acted for Bashar Assad in the regime’s four most sensitive and confidential spheres:
1. He was the president’s liaison man with the North Korean government. On his frequent trips to Pyongyang, Gen. Suleiman organized the consignment of components for the plutonium reactor in northern Syria, which Israeli demolished last September, and the security of the North Korean scientists and technicians who accompanied them.
2. Muhammad Suleiman was also the president’s private channel of communication with Iranian military and intelligence chiefs; in this capacity, he most probably facilitated the Syrian-Iranian-North Korean connection. The Syrian reactor was designed to produce nuclear fuel for the Iranian program and radioactive weapons for Syria.
3. The late general also acted as the president’s contact man with Hizballah’s leaders. He worked directly with Imad Mughniyeh, head of Hizballah’s security apparatus, who was killed in Damascus last February.
4. His key function was the management of Assad’s personal interaction with the Syrian chief of staff, generals and heads of military intelligence. There was no state secret from the powerful general. He was to have accompanied the Syrian president on his state visit to Tehran Saturday; instead he was laid to rest in his home village of Driekesh in t
he north.
Damascus has done its utmost to keep the general’s death under wraps, but word has spread and theories abound: Speculation ranges from an outside hand, or a jealous rival to an internal element who felt the concentration of so much power in one hand was a threat to the regime.
Begin Jerusalem Post Excerpt
‘Murdered Syrian officer knew too much’
August 4, 2008
brenda gazzar and herb keinon , THE JERUSALEM POST
Amid increasing speculation, some Arab media and Syrian dissidents suggested Monday that the reported assassination of a senior Syrian intelligence officer over the weekend may be a case of one man knowing too much for his own good.
As of Monday, the tightly-controlled Syrian press had yet to comment on the reported death of Brig.-Gen. Muhammad Suleiman, said to be a close adviser to Syrian President Bashar Assad, who was reportedly killed by a sniper from a yacht.
“There is no doubt that General Muhammad Suleiman is the closest person to Bashar al-Assad and is his right hand in the armed forces and he knows everything,” an unidentified Syrian official was quoted as saying in Monday’s London-based Asharq al-Awsat,
which is owned by Saudi Arabia and is critical of Assad’s government. “He has all the files; security, financial and [army] reform” files.
Suleiman, 49, was responsible for “sensitive security files” in the Syrian president’s office and in charge of the financing and reform of the Syrian army, the source said. But he added that it was too early to know whether the assassination had to do with particular files Suleiman handled.
“It’s better to wait three or four days until the indications appear in this or that direction, particularly because the assassination took place in a very precise way,” he was quoted as saying by Asharq al-Awsat.
Other Syrian sources, quoted in the Al Bawaba news site, have said he was the liaison officer to Hizbullah, in addition to other assignments.
Asharq al-Awsat also said Suleiman had been among the Syrian officials requested by the former president of the international tribunal to investigate the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri.
Dissidents were quick to point the finger at the regime.
“As [with] everybody else, it seems, I cannot help but connect [Suleiman’s assassination] to an ongoing attempt at eliminating people who have sensitive information on the Lebanese file and Syria’s involvement there, perhaps even the assassination of Hariri, et al,” the Maryland-based Syrian dissident and novelist Ammar Abdulhamid wrote in an e-mail interview.
“It seems that the indictment issued against [President] Omar Bashir of Sudan [by the International Criminal Court for genocide, crimes against humanity and murder] might have had a psychological impact here. After all, the Tribunal is still the main threat against the regime.”
But Syrian expert Joshua Landis, the co-director of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Oklahoma, said he doubts the veracity of many such claims, often circulated by the regime’s opponents to show Western countries that Syria is unstable and not worth engaging.
“We don’t know anything about this Muhammad Suleiman,” he told The Jerusalem Post. “It’s really all wild speculation. There is a big propaganda machine that would use something like this to imply that the regime is falling apart… I think there will be a lot of speculation about this, [and] all of it will be uninformed or misleading.”
Landis said that Suleiman had played an important role the first two years of Bashar Assad’s regime, serving “as a sort of chief of staff” but had played a less prominent role since then.
The assassination, he added, is “embarrassing to the regime,” since it is doing its best to depict itself as “a sea of tranquility in the Middle East fraught with extremism, factionalism and al-Qaida type elements.”
Israeli diplomatic sources said it was difficult to tell what kind of significance the killing of Suleiman would have on Syria domestically, or on the possible ramifications for Israel, since no one had any definitive idea who was responsible.
“There is a complete Syrian blackout,” the sources said, adding that there were a number of theories about who might have had an interest in killing him.
The first theory is that it had to do with internal fighting inside Hizbullah, and a possible “settling of accounts.” The second theory is that Assad himself may have wanted to see him killed, concerned he may have known too much about the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Min
ister Rafik Hariri three years ago.
The UN-established Special Tribunal for Lebanon is expected early next year to begin trying those suspected of killing Hariri in 2005.
And the third theory is that Israel was responsible for the killing, to stop the arms smuggling from Syria to Hizbullah. Suleiman was reportedly responsible for the transfer of arms to Hizbullah.
The officials said that unlike Israel’s attack in September on an alleged nuclear facility in Syria, or the killing of Hizbullah commander Imad Mughniyeh in Damascus, Israel did not feel it had to prepare for a possible revenge attack, partly because the Syrians have not blamed Israel.
Though Syria did blame Israel for the September attack, and Hizbullah blamed Israel for the killing of Mughniyeh, Damascus has not pointed a finger at Israel for the killing of Suleiman.
Suleiman’s assassination, along with that of Hizbullah operations chief Imad Mughniyeh’s, demonstrates that Syria’s security apparatus is not fool-proof, says Moshe Maoz, a professor emeritus of Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
“This is a blow to the regime,” he told the Post. “This is a police state and security is above everything. In this sense, it’s not going good for the regime.” Maoz said he “doubts very much” that Israel was involved in Suleiman’s death.
Suleiman “was at the heart of the regime and Israel is in negotiations with Syria and this is not the time to do it,” he said. “Normally, Israel would exhaust all possibilities to damage the regime, but not now.”
He added: “But it’s very, very hard to say.”
Channel Two journalist Ehud Ya’ari said Monday that Syrian sources indicated the assassination had to do with Suleiman’s involvement with Syrian’s alleged nuclear program.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner
from which we extracted it.