Arab and Jew have dialog Confusion
Because Cry for truce is to pass Ammunition
Such that both sides will be ready for a war in 2010
And The War Is Likely To Be Islamic Initiated Prior To 2015!
July 24, 2008
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
This is what I call the calm before the storm. It is, and will continue to be,
a time of dialog,
dialog, dialog, with short bursts of diplomacy, then threats, threats, threats, then dialog, dialog, dialog. I expect this cycle to keep on repeating itself until Syria, Hizbullah, Iran, and Hamas feel a high level of confidence they are fully prepared in manpower, training, and military hardware, to defeat Israel in a major conventional Middle East war with the forces of Islam.
Islam forces were embarrassed in bitter defeats in 1948, 1956, 1967 and 1973.
They definitely want to be ready for the coming war.
So, when will they consider themselves to be ready to initiate a major conventional war in the Middle East? As you have heard so often, my guesstimate is that it will begin at some point in time between 2010 and 2015. In my opinion, if they start it before 2010, they stand a very good chance of losing it, and will have to start all over again. Time is on the side of Islam and, if they want to win the next war, they need to take as much time as is needed to be fully prepared for it.
Begin Excerpt from DEBKAfile
Olmert to Obama: By late 2009, early 2010 Iran will be able to assemble nuclear bomb
DEBKAfile Special Report
July 23, 2008, 11:23 PM (GMT+02:00)
Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert told visiting US Senator Barack Obama Wednesday night, July 23 that within little more than a year, Iran would be able to assemble all the components for a nuclear bomb. He said the international penalties to force Iran
to give up its nuclear plans must be speeded
up without removing the military option from the table.
Earlier, senior Israeli defense sources reported that Iran is set to receive Russian S-300 anti-air missiles for fighting off strikes against its nuclear facilities by early September, seriously complicating any air attack.
DEBKAfile’s military sources note that this was the second statement in four days by Israeli security sources, stressing the need for expeditious action to preempt Iran’s military nuclear progress.
It is not by chance that this latest statement coincided with the visit by the Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama.
He spoke in general about his commitments on Iran if he wins the race to the White House. This second Israeli statement indicated a specific time frame for action.
The Israeli sources, who refused to be named, said the first delivery of S-300 missile batteries was expected as soon as early September, weeks away, and could take six-to 12 months to be deployed and made operable.
“There is no doubt,” he said, “that the S-300s would make an air attack more difficult.
This assessment clashed with a statement by US defense secretary Robert Gates who said on July 9 ”… it’s highly unlikely that those air defense missiles would be in Iranian hands any time soon.” Gates is known to be a firm objector to a US or Israeli military operation against Iran’s nuclear sites.
Israel’s chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi, who is spending a week in Washington will no doubt update American officials on Israel’s latest intelligence on Iran’s plans.
Saturday night, July 20, an Israeli “security-political official” estimated that if diplomatic efforts to bring Iran to give up uranium enrichment failed, President George W.
Bush would order Iran attacked between the November 4 presidential election and his exit from the White House in January. The quote was aired shortly after the six-power talks with Iran in Geneva – with US official participation for the first time – ended without an answer from Tehran.
One of the purposes of the Israeli air force drill over the Mediterranean last month, widely seen as a dress rehearsal for a possible raid on Iran, was to practice passes against the S-300 batteries which Greece acquired from Russia via Cyprus.
Begin Haaretz Excerpt from Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs – Daily alert
July 24, 2008
Shin Bet: Gaza Lull Is Lifeline to Hamas
Amos Harel
Shin Bet chief Yuval Diskin believes the cease-fire agreement in Gaza serves the interests of Hamas, not Israel.
“The cease-fire gave Hamas a lifeline. We are not attacking them.
We eased the blockade on them at a time when they are not committed to stopping their rearmament,” Diskin told the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Tuesday. He said the temporary lull “is essentially an illusion.
In our assessment the rocket attacks will resume at some point in the future.”
Diskin noted that “Israel’s situation is very problematic in its struggle against radical Islam. Palestinian daring against Israel has increased since Hamas took over [in Gaza] while Israel’s deterrence has suffered a very substantive blow.” He argued that Israel’s deterrent has “suffered substantially” in the past three years, with the disengagement from Gaza, the Hamas takeover there, and the Second Lebanon War.
(Ha’aretz)
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.