King of North planning Delusion
Bashar Assad’s Definite Conclusion
On getting back the Golan is no Illusion
The Idea may seen lost in all this Confusion
But into Golan Syria will surely make Intrusion
Bible Prophecies of long ago stated such a Decision
June 15, 2008
KING OF THE SOUTH (Israel) AND THE KING OF THE NORTH (Syria) COLLIDE, AND SYRIA MOVES SOUTH INTO ISRAEL, THE GLORIOUS LAND! I THINK IT QUITE LIKELY A JIHAD ATTACK, INTO THE GLORIOUS LAND, WILL INITIALLY BE LAUNCHED AT SOME POINT IN TIME BETWEEN 2010 AND 2015.
Daniel 11:40,41a – And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries,
and shall overflow and pass
over. [41] He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown:
Begin Haaretz Article
Syria: We’ll get the Golan back with or without peace
By Yoav Stern, Haaretz Correspondent, and Haaretz Service
June 14, 2008
Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Fayssal Mekdad said on Saturday that Syria has the “non-peaceful” means to retrieve the Golan Heights – which Israel captured from Syria during the 1967 Six-Day War – should peace talks with Israel
fail to achieve that goal.
Mekdad, a former Syrian ambassador to the United Nations, told the Jordanian newspaper Ad-Dustour that Israelis living in the Golan Heights, whom he termed “settlers,” must know that Syria would “defend its land within minutes.”
Mekdad also reiterated to Israelis living in the area that the Golan is Syrian territory and that they are “forbidden from raising children there, because it is not their place and they will not be able to reside there.”
He then asked rhetorically, “What is preferable – liberating the Golan through peace and without bloodshed or liberating the land through war? We are not afraid of launching a peace process with Israel.
“Mekdad’s comments come one day after Syrian President Bashar Assad said in an interview published Friday by The Hindu that Damascus suspects Israel decided to return to negotiations after an eight-year hiatus as a result its failings in the Second Lebanon War and the realization that it could not live securely among its neighbors without peace.
“The Israelis used to think that with time they were going to be stronger and any opposition to their policies would be weaker, but actually what happened was the opposite,” Assad told the Indian newspaper. “Now, the Israelis learned that without peace they cannot live safely and Israel cannot be safe.”
“I think this is true especially after the war on Lebanon and because of the result of that war inside the Israeli society; this is the main incentive for the Israelis to move toward peace,” he added.
Assad also said that Israel never asked Syria to cuts its relations with Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran as a pre-condition for peace negotiations.
When asked by The Hindu what the Syrian response was to such a request, Assad said: “Nobody asked us to do this. The Israelis have been talking about negotiations without pre-conditions. So, they cannot ask for conditions for the negotiations, and they have not asked either.”
“Iran does not interfere in Syrian issues,” Assad told The Hindu.
“They support the Syrian cause whether we are happy or they are happy, and that’s why the relations between Syria and Iran are very strong.”
Israel and Syria announced last month that they had agreed to hold indirect peace talks through Turkish mediation.
At the heart of the negotiations is the return by Israel to Syria of the Golan Heights, a strategic plateau captured by Israel in the 1967 Six-Day War.
In the interview with The Hindu, Assad reiterated the Syrian demand that Israel return the Golan Heights in exchange for peace.
When asked what Syria could give Israel in return, Assad said: “We [Syria] don’t have something to give but we have something to achieve together, which is peace… It is something we achieve together, but Israel has the land and should give it back.”
In the interview, Assad refuted claims that a Syrian facility bombed by Israel in September was allegedly being used for nuclear development under the guidance of North Korea.
Assad said the story “was fabricated 100 percent,” adding: “How could it be nuclear, where are the radiations, where are the protections of this facility? How can you build such a facility under the daily watch of satellites?”
The Syrian president responded affirmatively to the question of whether the U.S. was trying to create an atmosphere of suspicion against Damascus.
“This is the image of this [U.S.] administration; everybody in the world still remembers what happened in Iraq when they had all that evidence, but then it was proved that everything was fabricated; even Colin Powel confessed in an interview that he was not truthful, and we all know the same, and most of the countries know about the problem between Syria and the U.S., and they always try to find traps for Syria. This is reality.”
French FM Kouchner says ‘not amused’ by Assad visit to Paris
Meanwhile, France’s foreign minister said Friday he is uncomfortable the president of Syria has been invited to Paris’s Bastille Day parade, even though such visits are necessary to keep dialogue open.
“I’m not especially amused by Syrian President Bashar Assad’s visit,” Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said on Europe-1 radio. But he said Syria has made progress by resuming peace talks with Israel.
“The visit doesn’t leave me totally at ease, but this is what we have to do or else we’ll maintain a state of tensions, difficulties and probably
confrontations,” Kouchner said.
Assad has been invited to France in July along with other leaders of Europe, North Africa and the Middle East, including Israel, to discuss President Nicolas Sarkozy’s plan for a union of Mediterranean countries.
While they are in France,
they have also been invited to attend the July 14 Bastille Day parade.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site.
However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.