A Lesson in Persian Cunning from the NIE 2003 Assessment!
December 9, 2003
http://www.tribulationperiod.com/
A few years ago I ran articles on Persian Cunning, which is not a fairy tale myth.
Persians are noted for it. The halt, which many say did not happen, was the stoppage of devices to contain the nuclear weapon, once they actually produced enough enriched uranium to make a sufficient number of
nuclear bombs to place in the missile warhead casement. It certainly doesn’t mean they are not hades bent to made the bomb to put in the warhead casement. I have always contented they want to develop am arsenal of sufficient size to be used as a deterrent to keep Israel
from launching their massive nuclear arsenal against them, when they finally feel strong enough to start a “conventional” war with Israel. Several months ago I chose 2010 as the earliest possible date Iran could develop an “arsenal” great enough to feel safe in starting a conventional war.
I believe that is the correct assessment, but I am certainly aware it could occur earlier. In reality, I rather expect it is more likely to occur at some point in time between 2012 and the end of 2015.
I believe the fanatical Arab nations and terrorist groups are going to follow the leadership of Iran, and that Persian Cunning will cause them to wait for a full scale war only when they believe they can win it. The two big power nations, China and Russian, will wait until the Arabs and Persians have defeated Israel, and Israel has remained in the Negev for more then three years, then they will come down to join the Arabs and Persians, in what Islam will believe is the elimination of all Jews from the land God gave to Jacob through Abraham and Isaac.
PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE BY TERENCE P.
JEFFERY.
BEGIN WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE
Is Iran irrational
?
December 8, 2007
By Terence P. Jeffrey – The most interesting point in the new National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), which reports Iran halted its nuclear weapons program four years ago, is not about what Iran did or did not do in developing
nuclear weapons. It is about how Iran decides such things.
The U.S. intelligence community does not believe Iran is a madman. “Our assessment that Iran halted the program in 2003 primarily in response to international pressure indicates Tehran’s decisions are guided by a cost-benefit approach rather than a rush to a weapon irrespective of the political economic and military costs,” says the NIE. “This, in turn, suggests that some combination of threats of intensified international scrutiny and pressures, along with opportunities for Iran to achieve its security, prestige and goals for regional influence in other ways, might — if perceived by Iran’s leaders as credible — prompt Tehran to extend the current halt to its nuclear weapons program.”
Whether American politicians accept or reject the assumption that Iran acts rationally will have tremendous consequences for the fate of the Middle East and for our security.
The case for believing Iran is an irrational actor largely rests on the shoulders of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, because he routinely makes irrational statements, especially about Israel.
In 2005, Mr.
Ahmadinejad convened a conference called “The World Without Zionism.” There he laid out an Apocalyptic vision in which Israel — or the “Zionist regime,” as he invariably calls it — becomes the final battleground in a long struggle between Islam and the West. “The establishment of the Zionist regime was a move by the world oppressor against the Islamic world The skirmishes in the occupied land are part of the war of destiny. The outcomes of hundreds of years of war will be defined in Palestinian land,” he said. “Israel must be wiped off the map.”
A Congressional Research Service report published in August referenced reports that contend “Ahmadinejad believes his mission is to prepare for the return of the 12th ‘Hidden’ Imam, whose return from occultation would, according to Twelver Shi’ite doctrine, be accompanied by the establishment of Islam as the global religion.”
“I have a connection to God,” Mr. Ahmadinejad said at a Tehran mosque last October. He added that President Bush “also receives inspiration — but from Satan.” All this inevitably suggests a chain of thought: A leader who believes it is his job to usher in an Apocalyptic age, where Israel is destroyed and Islam becomes the global religion, cannot be deterred from constructing, or using, a nuclear weapon.
Therefore, an Ahmadinejad-led Iran must be pre-empted from obtaining one.
This chain of thought draws us toward another pre-emptive Middle Eastern war and counsels that we risk all the horrendous unintended consequences that could flow from such a war.
But is Mr.
Ahmadinejad really Iran’s decider? If he had personally driven Iran’s nuclear-weapons policy, the NIE released this week would make no sense. Mr. Admadinejad was elected president of Iran on June 24, 2005. The NIE says Iran halted its nuclear-weapons program in autumn 2003 and had not restarted it by the middle of this year. During the whole time Mr. Ahmadinejad has been president, in other words, Iran’s nuclear-weapons program has been halted.
Apparently, the madman did not call the shots.
His predecessor, Mohammad Khatami, could have warned him of that. The Ayatollah Khatami, a moderate “reformer” (by Iranian standards) was elected and re-elected Iran’s president by popular vote supermajorities.
For four of his eight years in office, Khatami supporters controlled a supermajority in parliament. They never enacted their reform agenda, however, because it was vetoed by the Council of Guardians, six clergymen appointed by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei and six secular lawyers appointed by the Iranian judiciary.
“In January 2007,” the Congressional Research Service reported, “an Iranian newspaper owned by Khamenei admonished Ahmadinejad to remove himself from the nuclear issue.”
The intelligence community assumes a certain long-term stability among Iran’s real deciders. “This Estimate does assume that the strategic goals and basic structure of Iran’s senior leadership and government will remain similar to those that have endured since the death of Ayatollah Khomeini in 1989,” says the NIE.
President Bush seems to agree. “The NIE talks about how a carrot-and-stick approach can work,” Mr. Bush told his Tuesday press conference.
“And it was working until Ahmadinejad came in. And our hope is that the Iranians will get diplomacy back on track.”
Mr. Bush’s bet is simply this: The ayatollahs may be immoderate, but they are not irrational.
Terence P. Jeffrey is a nationally syndicated columnist.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more detailed information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
You may use material originated by this site. However, if you wish to use any quoted copyrighted material from this site, which did not originate at this site, for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner from which we extracted it.